Therapy for small cell lung cancer using carboplatin, ifosfamide, etoposide (without dose reduction), mid-cycle vincristine with thoracic and cranial irradiation

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, and etoposide with midcycle vincristine versus standard chemotherapy in patients with small-cell lung cancer and good performance status: clinical and quality-of-life results of the British Medical Research Council multicenter randomized LU21 trial

PURPOSE

Ifosfamide, carboplatin, etoposide, and vincristine, alone and in combination, are highly active against small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This trial was designed to investigate whether survival could be improved by a regimen of all four drugs (ICE-V) compared with standard chemotherapy in patients with SCLC and good performance status, and to assess the patients' quality of life (QL).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to receive six cycles of either ICE-V at 4-week intervals without dose reduction or standard chemotherapy administered according to local practice. The recommended standard control regimens were cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and etoposide; and cisplatin and etoposide.

RESULTS

A total of 402 patients were randomly assigned, and 350 (87%) patients have died. Overall survival was longer in the ICE-V group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.60 to 0.91; P = .0049), median survival was 15.6 months in the ICE-V group and 11.6 months in the control group, and 2-year survival rates were 20% and 11%, respectively. There was no evidence that the relative survival benefit for ICE-V was less in extensive-stage than in limited-stage patients. An increased rate of septicemia was reported in the ICE-V group (15% v 7% in the control group), but this did not result in an increase in reported treatment-related deaths (four patients [2%] in both groups). The findings on QL were broadly similar in both groups, with some benefit in favor of ICE-V.

CONCLUSION

Compared with standard chemotherapy, the ICE-V regimen improves overall survival without QL penalties, despite an increased but manageable level of toxicity.

Chemotherapy of small cell lung cancer: state of the art

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Small cell lung cancer was termed chemosensitive with the introduction of combination chemotherapy in the 1970s. However, two decades of trials have seen little significant progress in achieving its "curable" potential. This paper presents an update of data recently published from phase 2 and phase 3 trials.

RECENT FINDINGS

Platinum and etoposide combination chemotherapy remains the standard of care in small cell lung cancer. New agents, including irinotecan, may improve outcomes, but confirmatory trials are awaited. Triplet therapy, dose intensification, and maintenance therapy have not demonstrated meaningful survival improvements given the increased associated toxicity. Outcomes in limited-stage disease are optimized with the use of concurrent and early chemoradiation. New agents offering an improved toxicity profile for second-line therapy are emerging.

SUMMARY

Small cell lung cancer remains an aggressive disease. Recent advances have yielded, at best, only modest gains. New strategies are required, including incorporation of novel targeted agents.

Outpatient intensive chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer: five years experience of modified 'ICE' ifosfamide carboplatin and etoposide

INTRODUCTION

Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) is increasingly being treated in the district general hospital setting. The search for an active regimen which can be given with the least toxicity and best outcomes led us to use a modified ICE (Ifosfamide, Carboplatin and Etoposide) regimen and modify it further by using oral mesna instead of intravenous mesna.

METHOD

All patients selected to receive the modified ICE regime over a 5-year period were included in our study. All patients were assessed for performance status and prognostic factors. Only those with WHO performance status 0-1 and Manchester prognostic score 0-3 were considered for ICE chemotherapy. All patients were followed up for 1 year after recruitment was completed.

RESULTS

Median survival for all 32 patients was 18.4 months (CI 12.2-24.6) and for the 28 patients with limited disease the median survival was 19.9 months (CI 8.2-31.6). Toxicity levels were low with no neutropenic deaths. One patient died three days after treatment was started due to disease progression. A total of 6 patients remained alive one year after recruitment was completed. Five out of the 6 were followed up for at least 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Using this out-patient modified ICE regime we have achieved a median survival comparable to other active chemotherapy regimes for SCLC with no significant increase in toxicity.

A randomized trial of amifostine as a cytoprotective agent in patients receiving chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer

A randomized trial was conducted to determine whether administration of Amifostine with chemotherapy for small cell lung cancer could decrease the toxicity. 84 patients with small cell lung cancer of favourable prognosis (limited disease, performance status 0-1; limited disease with performance status 2 but normal sodium and alkaline phosphatase, or extensive disease with performance status 0-1, normal sodium and alkaline phosphatase) received treatment with Ifosfamide 3 g/m(2)intravenously, Carboplatin (Glomerular filtration rate + 25) x6 mg intravenously, Etoposide 50 mg orally, twice daily, for 7 days, every 3 weeks. Patients were randomized to receive amifostine 740 mg/m(2)immediately prior to the intravenous drugs (n = 42) or to receive chemotherapy alone (n = 42). The two groups were similar with respect to baseline prognostic factors. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of grade III or IV neutropenia or thrombocytopenia between the two groups, nor in the response rate or overall survival, for which the median was 11 months in the chemotherapy only group and 14 months in the group treated with amifostine. This study has not shown a protective effect from the use of amifostine with this regimen and there does not appear to be any effect upon the efficacy of treatment.

Modified ice study: a phase II study of an intensive, modified ICE regimen (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) in patients with better prognosis, small cell lung cancer

A total of 30 with good prognosis small cell lung cancer were treated with a modified 'ICE' (ifosfamide, carboplatin and etoposide) chemotherapy regimen in an attempt to achieve a high response rate with less toxicity than is seen with the full 'ICE' regimen. This was given every 4 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. In total 25 patients (83%, 95% CI (70-97%)) experienced a partial or complete response at some stage of their treatment. Of these patients, 12 (40%, 95% CI (22-58%)) showed a complete response. A total of 19 patients (63%) had to have their dose reduced and/or delayed at some point due to toxicity. Nadir blood counts showed that 19 patients (63%, 95% CI (46-81%)) had WHO grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia, and 24 (86%, 95% CI (73-99%)) had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia. A total of 17 patients (53%) completed six cycles of chemotherapy. In total 3 patients died during treatment all due to treatment-related complications. Median survival was 12.6 months (95% CI (11.6, 14.7 months)). Nausea, vomiting, dysphagia, activity, mood and overall condition, as recorded using daily diary cards, were worse at the beginning of each chemotherapy cycle. Both response rates and survival were clinically acceptable. However, neutropenia and thrombocytopenia, although reduced from rates reported with the full ICE regimen, were still high. A prospective randomised controlled trial is now needed to assess this regimen in more detail.