Fludarabine as a modulator of cisplatin activity in human tumour primary cultures and established cell lines

The Role of STATs in Ovarian Cancer: Exploring Their Potential for Therapy

Ovarian cancer (OvCa) is a deadly gynecologic malignancy that presents many clinical challenges due to late-stage diagnoses and the development of acquired resistance to standard-of-care treatment protocols. There is an increasing body of evidence suggesting that STATs may play a critical role in OvCa progression, resistance, and disease recurrence, and thus we sought to compile a comprehensive review to summarize the current state of knowledge on the topic. We have examined peer reviewed literature to delineate the role of STATs in both cancer cells and cells within the tumor microenvironment. In addition to summarizing the current knowledge of STAT biology in OvCa, we have also examined the capacity of small molecule inhibitor development to target specific STATs and progress toward clinical applications. From our research, the best studied and targeted factors are STAT3 and STAT5, which has resulted in the development of several inhibitors that are under current evaluation in clinical trials. There remain gaps in understanding the role of STAT1, STAT2, STAT4, and STAT6, due to limited reports in the current literature; as such, further studies to establish their implications in OvCa are necessitated. Moreover, due to the deficiency in our understanding of these STATs, selective inhibitors also remain elusive, and therefore present opportunities for discovery.

Targeting purine metabolism in ovarian cancer

Purine, an abundant substrate in organisms, is a critical raw material for cell proliferation and an important factor for immune regulation. The purine de novo pathway and salvage pathway are tightly regulated by multiple enzymes, and dysfunction in these enzymes leads to excessive cell proliferation and immune imbalance that result in tumor progression. Maintaining the homeostasis of purine pools is an effective way to control cell growth and tumor evolution, and exploiting purine metabolism to suppress tumors suggests interesting directions for future research. In this review, we describe the process of purine metabolism and summarize the role and potential therapeutic effects of the major purine-metabolizing enzymes in ovarian cancer, including CD39, CD73, adenosine deaminase, adenylate kinase, hypoxanthine guanine phosphoribosyltransferase, inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase, purine nucleoside phosphorylase, dihydrofolate reductase and 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase. Purinergic signaling is also described. We then provide an overview of the application of purine antimetabolites, comprising 6-thioguanine, 6-mercaptopurine, methotrexate, fludarabine and clopidogrel. Finally, we discuss the current challenges and future opportunities for targeting purine metabolism in the treatment-relevant cellular mechanisms of ovarian cancer.

Fludarabine in the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a review

Fludarabine (FAMP) is the most effective and most extensively studied purine analog in indolent B-cell malignancies. Its use is indicated for first-and second-line treatment of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia (B-CLL). FAMP as a single agent has produced superior response rates and progression-free survival than standard therapy with chlorambucil and alkylator-based regimen. Efficacy of FAMP may be increased by combining this purine analog with other chemotherapeutic and non-chemotherapeutic agents. FAMP and cyclophosphamide combination (FC) has shown promising results with higher overall response and complete response rates than FAMP in monotherapy, although no difference has been detected in survival. Quality of response and eradication of minimal residual disease (MRD) have been reported to be associated with prolonged survival. Eradication of MRD has been achieved by combining FC with mitoxantrone or monoclonal antibody including alemtuzumab or rituximab or both. FAMP has been widely used in non-myeloablative conditioning regimens, often combined with a variety of other cytotoxic agents, with the aim of inducing enough immunosuppression to allow successful engraftment and to exert some pretransplant anti-tumor activity. The current paper provides an overview of use of FAMP as a single agent or as a cornerstone of different therapeutic strategies for treatment of B-CLL patients.

Role of fludarabine in hematological malignancies

Fludarabine is a prodrug that is converted to the free nucleoside 9-beta-D-arabinosyl-2-fluoroadenine (F-ara-A), which enters cells and accumulates mainly as the 5'-triphosphate, F-ara-ATP. F-ara-ATP has multiple mechanisms of action, which are mostly directed toward DNA. Collectively, these actions affect DNA synthesis, which is the major mechanism of F-ara-A-induced cytotoxicity. Secondarily, incorporation into RNA and inhibition of transcription has been shown in cell lines. As a single agent, fludarabine has been effective for indolent leukemia. Biochemical modulation strategies resulted in enhanced accumulation of cytarabine triphosphate and led to the use of fludarabine for the treatment of acute leukemia. The combination of fludarabine with DNA-damaging agents to inhibit DNA repair processes has been highly effective for indolent leukemia and lymphomas. Other strategies have incorporated fludarabine into preparative regimens for nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation.

DNA-based drug interactions of cisplatin

The interactions of cisplatin with other anti-cancer agents on the DNA level have been studied extensively in pre-clinical experiments. In general, combination of cisplatin with an antimetabolite, taxane, or topoisomerase inhibitor, can result in a modulation of platinum pharmacology on the DNA, for example, enhanced retention of the platinum-DNA adducts. These interactions are mostly sequence and cell type dependent. In cell line models, antimetabolites can enhance the number of platinum-DNA adducts, probably by inhibition of DNA repair pathways. However, in clinical trials, the opposite effect has been observed, with a reduction of these adducts upon combined treatment. For the taxanes it has been shown that they can inhibit the formation of platinum-DNA adducts, whereas topoisomerase I inhibitors increase the number of adducts, resulting in strong synergistic cytotoxicity. For this last interaction a mechanistic model has recently been proposed, in which the topoisomerase I enzyme directly binds to the platinum-DNA adduct. Thereafter, the topoisomerase I inhibitor binds to this complex, which yields large stabilised lesions to the DNA that are probably difficult to repair. Ongoing studies will proceed to elucidate the exact mechanism underlying the interactions between cisplatin and other anti-neoplastic agents on the DNA level. Such increased understanding might help in designing new and more effective treatment regimens for cancer. In this paper, we review the pre-clinical and clinical studies investigating the observed interactions between cisplatin, the antimetabolites, taxanes, and topoisomerase inhibitors on the DNA level.

A phase I study of fludarabine combined with radiotherapy in patients with intermediate to locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Fludarabine, 9-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-2-fluoroadenine, is an adenine nucleoside analogue that has significant activity in hematological malignancies and has shown promising activity in combination with radiation in preclinical solid tumor models. In this framework, we designed two phase I trials (one conducted at M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, and the other conducted in two Belgian hospitals) exploring concurrent fludarabine and radiotherapy in patients with intermediate to locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fludarabine was administered i.v. daily 3-4 h before the last 10 fractions of a standard radiation fractionation regimen (70 Gy in 7 weeks). The main objective of the trials was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of fludarabine in this particular setting. Twenty-eight patients with stage T2-T4, any N, M0 were included in the study. Fludarabine doses started at 7.5 mg/m(2) per day (3 mg/m(2) per day in Houston) and increased by steps of 2.5 mg/m(2) per day (3 mg/m(2) per day in Houston).

RESULTS

The addition of fludarabine at increasing doses to radiation did not result in increased intensity or duration of skin (18% grade 3 dermatitis) or mucosal (60% grade 3 mucositis) radiotoxicity compared to what was expected for radiation alone. At a daily dose of 17.5 mg/m(2), two patients out of five (40%) developed a grade 4 neutropenia, of whom one developed a neutropenic fever. This dose was set as the MTD. All patients developed a fludarabine dose-dependant lymphocytopenia. The plasma F-ara-A concentration peaked after the 30-min infusion in a dose-dependent fashion and reached an average peak concentration of approximately 2 microM for doses of 15 mg/m(2) and higher.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that fludarabine can be safely administered concurrently with radiation at a daily dose of 15 mg/m(2) during the final 2 weeks of radiotherapy. A phase II trial will be required to establish the potential role of concurrent fludarabine and radiotherapy in the treatment of moderately to locally advanced HNSCC.