Effects of completion angiography on the outcome of carotid endarterectomy

Intraoperative Computed Tomography Angiography: A Novel Completion Imaging Modality for Carotid Endarterectomy

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative computed tomography angiography (ICTA) is a novel completion imaging modality for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). No studies exist in the literature describing ICTA use in CEA.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of ICTA as a method of immediately evaluating the technical results of CEA.

METHODS

Twenty-three consecutive CEAs were performed by a single neurosurgeon over an 8-month period. Of this series, 12 utilized ICTA for completion imaging, 10 utilized duplex ultrasonography (US), and 1 utilized no intraoperative completion imaging. Electronic medical records were reviewed to assess demographics, CTA results, US results, and need for revisions.

RESULTS

Patients included 13 men (62%) and 8 women (38%). All patients had symptomatic internal carotid artery stenosis. Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) patch angioplasty was used in 16 cases (70%). Average operative times were comparable between cases that utilized CTA and US, 180 and 175 min, respectively. Major technical defects were identified in one of the 12 cases utilizing ICTA and none of the 10 cases utilizing intraoperative US. The technical defect was revised without subsequent neurological complication. One patient had a postoperative intracerebral hemorrhage requiring surgical evacuation. Fifteen patients were followed for up to 3 months with no postoperative stroke or transient ischemic attacks.

CONCLUSION

ICTA is a potentially safe and effective completion imaging modality compared to traditional alternatives, enabling the identification of technical deficits intraoperatively. While no statistically significant difference in operative times were noted between intraoperative CTA and US use, numerous steps must be taken to maximize the efficiency of ICTA.

Completion imaging after carotid endarterectomy in the Vascular Study Group of New England

OBJECTIVES

We studied surgeons' practice patterns in the use of completion imaging (duplex or arteriography), and their association with 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

METHODS

Using a retrospective analysis of 6115 CEAs, we categorized surgeons based on use of completion imaging as rarely (<5% of CEAs), selective (5% to 90%), or routine (≥90%). Crude and risk-adjusted 30-day stroke/death and 1-year restenosis rates were examined across surgeon practice patterns. Finally, we audited 90 operative reports of patients who underwent re-exploration and characterized findings and interventions. We analyzed the effect of re-exploration on outcomes.

RESULTS

Practice patterns in completion imaging varied: 51% of surgeons performed completion imaging rarely, 22% selectively, and 27% routinely. Crude 30-day stroke/death rates were highest among surgeons who routinely used completion imaging (rarely: 1.7%; selectively: 1.2%, routinely: 2.4%; P = .05). However, after adjusting for patient characteristics predictive of stroke/death, the effect of surgeon practice pattern was not statistically significant (odds ratio [OR] for routine-use surgeons, 1.42; 95% CI, 0.93-2.17; P = .10; selective-use surgeons, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.40-1.41; P = .366). Stenosis >70% at 1 year showed a trend toward lowest rates for surgeons who performed completion imaging (rarely: 2.8%, selectively: 1.1%, and routinely: 1.1%; P = .09). This effect became statistically significant for selective-use surgeons after adjustment (hazard risk [HR] for selective-use surgeons, 0.52; 95% CI, 0.29-0.92; P = .02). Overall, 178 patients (2.9%) underwent operative re-exploration. Routine-use surgeons were most likely to perform re-exploration (7.6% routine, 0.8% selective, 0.9% rare; P < .001). An audit of 90 re-explored patients demonstrated technical problems, the most common being flap, debris, and plaque. Rates of stroke/death were higher among patients who underwent re-exploration (3.9% vs 1.7%; P = .03); however, this affect was attenuated after adjustment (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 0.9-5.0; P = .08).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of completion imaging during CEA varies widely across our region. There is little evidence that surgeons who use completion imaging have lower rates of 30-day stroke/death, although selective use of completion imaging is associated with a small but a significant reduction in stenosis 1 year after surgery. We also demonstrate an association between re-exploration and higher risk of 30-day stroke/death, although this effect was attenuated after adjustment for patient-level predictors of stroke/death. Future work is needed to direct the selective use of completion imaging to prevent stroke, rather than cause unnecessary re-exploration.

Routine Completion Angiography during Carotid Endarterectomy is not Mandatory

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative quality control after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) has been advocated to improve the results of surgical treatment of extracranial carotid artery disease. The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of completion angiography (CA) in prevention of stroke and restenosis after CEA in a single center experience.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data concerning 914 consecutive CEAs performed in 3 years (2000-2002) were prospectively collected in a dedicated database. Patients were divided into two groups: in the first group (mandatory-CA group; 430 cases) CA was routinely carried out, except in presence of contraindications to iodinate contrast agents; in the second group (selective-CA group, 484 cases) CA was performed only in selected cases, at surgeon's discretion.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of neurological complications at awakening (0.5% in mandatory-CA group and 0.4% in selective-CA group; p=n.s.) and in 30-day stroke and death rate (1.9% and 1.4%, respectively; p=n.s.). A surgical revision on the basis of CA findings was performed in 5 cases in mandatory-CA group and in 2 cases in selective-CA group (1.2% and 0.4%, respectively; p=n.s.). In the second group, the conditions significantly associated with the need for CA examination were internal carotid near-occlusion, preoperative symptoms, shunt insertion, kind of surgical reconstruction, redo surgery. Estimated absence of ipsilateral stroke and absence of restenosis at 18 months was 98.9% and 89.7% in mandatory-CA group and 99.3% and 93.4% in selective-CA group (p=n.s.) respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on our experience, routine CA following CEA is not suggested. A policy of selected CA at the surgeon's discretion seems to make the intervention safe and durable as well.

Cost-effectiveness of Intraoperative Imaging in Carotid Endarterectomy

OBJECTIVE:

There has never been a large, randomized controlled trial to assess the impact of intraoperative imaging on the success of carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This comparison involves cost-effectiveness analysis.

METHODS:

We constructed a decision-analytic model to compare effectiveness and costs of intraoperative ultrasound (IUS) and completion angiography as adjuncts to CEA. Data on procedural mortality, morbidity, and costs were obtained from the English-language literature. The review included a total of 52 reports, encompassing more than 22,000 patients. The main components of costs were those of the monitoring interventions and the care of perioperative stroke.

RESULTS:

Mean perioperative outcome without completion imaging is approximately 96.7% of what it would be in the absence of perioperative stroke or death. IUS and completion angiography each result in approximately 2% improvement in expected outcome. Mean perioperative costs are $396.50 for IUS, $721.30 for no monitoring, and $840.90 for completion angiography. Because IUS is significantly more effective at detecting technical errors that would likely result in perioperative stroke than no imaging and is significantly less costly than angiography, this strategy dominates the other two (i.e., it provides greater effectiveness at lower cost).

CONCLUSION:

Although surgical complications are uncommon, IUS substantially lowers the rate of perioperative stroke and mortality and thus is significantly more cost-effective than either completion angiography or no operative imaging.

Carotid artery patch angioplasty: impact and outcome

Our study objective was to determine if patch angioplasty after carotid endarterectomy decreases the incidence of post-reconstruction technical defects and recurrent stenosis. This was a retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database from February 1980 to February 2000. Main outcome measures included incidence of intraoperative technical defects, residual disease within 3 months of endarterectomy, and early/late carotid restenosis >50%. During the study period, 71% (1053) of patients had primary closure and 29% (435) had patch closure. Immediate post-reconstruction intraoperative imaging with angiography or duplex ultrasound was accomplished in all cases. Technical defects prompted the reopening of 136 (13%) carotid arteries closed primarily but only 9 (2%) of those that were patched (p < 0.0001). There were no instances of residual disease in either group. Overall rate of recurrent stenosis was 2%, 3%, and 3.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively by life-table analysis. Early and late restenosis was significantly reduced by patch angioplasty (p = 0.024 and 0.006, respectively). This study demonstrates that carotid artery patch angioplasty significantly reduces the incidence of detectable technical defects and the early/late recurrent stenosis rate.

Intraoperative assessment of technical perfection in carotid endarterectomy: a prospective analysis of 1305 completion procedures. Collaborators of the EVEREST study group. Eversion versus standard carotid endartectomy

OBJECTIVE

to define the incidence of technical defects and the impact of technical errors on ipsilateral carotid occlusion, ipsilateral stroke, and early restenosis rates, we analysed 1305 patients undergoing carotid completion procedures.

DESIGN

prospective multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

adequacy of CEA was assessed intraoperatively by angiography in 1004 (77%), by angioscopy in 299 (22%), and by duplex scan in two patients (1%). Arteriograms and angioscopic findings were interpreted at the time of the procedure by the operating surgeon, who also established the need for immediate surgical revision.

RESULTS

perioperatively, 13 major strokes (0.9%, all ipsilateral) and six deaths (0.4%) were recorded. Overall, 112 defects (9%) were identified intraoperatively: 81 (72%) were located in the common carotid artery (CCA) or internal carotid artery (ICA), and 31 (28%) in the external carotid artery. In 48 patients (4%) the defects were revised. Logistic regression analysis revealed that carotid plaque extension >2 cm on the ICA was a positive independent predictor of CEA defects (odds ratio (OR) 1.5p=0.03). A significant association was found between the incidence of revised defects of the CCA and ICA and perioperative ipsilateral stroke (OR 11.5p=0.0002). In contrast, patients with minor non-revised defects had an ipsilateral stroke rate comparable to that of patients with no defects (p=0.4). No significant association was found between revised or non-revised defects and occurrence of restenosis/occlusion at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

the incidence of major technical defects during CEA is low, yet the perioperative neurological prognosis of patients with major defects warranting revision is poor. Completion angiography or angioscopy and possible correction of defects did not protect per se from an unfavourable early outcome after CEA. Therefore, surgical excellence is mandatory to achieve satisfactory results after CEA.

Computerized tomographic angiography scan following carotid endarterectomy

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the role of computed tomographic angiography (CTA) for postoperative assessment of carotid endarterectomy (CE). Twenty carotid endarterectomies were performed and controlled by using (1) intraoperative angiography, (2) postoperative duplex scanning and CTA with multiprojection volume reconstruction (MPVR). Intraoperative angiographic controls were deemed satisfactory for all patients. In 12 patients, the postoperative morphological aspect was satisfactory with CTA and duplex scanning. In the eight remaining patients, CTA and/or duplex scanning revealed 12 abnormalities: 3 were equally visualized on CTA and duplex scanning, 6 only on CTA and 3 only on duplex scanning. CTA is a rapid and noninvasive technique allowing the surgeon to get informative and comparative data. It might be an interesting alternative to postoperative angiography.