Early and late survival of repaired type A aortic dissection

Preoperative neurological dysfunctions: what is their meaning in patients presenting with acute type A aortic dissection?

INTRODUCTION

Type A aortic dissection (AAD) is a life-threatening disease with very high mortality. The gold standard treatment is surgical, as medical treatment has been proven to be ineffective. It is still unclear the role of preoperative neurological dysfunction in the prognosis of the patient. Therefore, the choice of performing surgery in patients with neurological symptoms is still left to the surgeon at the time of the diagnosis. The aim of this study is to make a narrative review of the current literature about the management of patients with neurological symptoms in AAD patients.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

A bibliographical research was performed on PubMed, looking for papers containing the words: "((preoperative neurological symptoms in type a aortic dissection) OR brain injury type A aortic dissection) AND ("2010"[Date - Publication]: "3000"[Date - Publication])". A total of 35 papers were found.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

A total of 6 papers were chosen to be reviewed. All of them concluded that even patients with severe neurological symptoms (up to comatose state) had a good chance to recover neurological functions after surgery if treated in the first hours from the onset of symptoms. Interestingly, a hemorrhagic stroke was rarely found.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative neurological dysfunction have been long considered a contraindication to surgery. Nevertheless, several authors show neurological and survival good results in patients with preoperative neurological dysfunction. They also stress the importance of surgical timing finding in 5 to 10 hours the surgical time limit to improve neurological dysfunction. A preoperative neurological dysfunction could be considered a strong advice towards surgical intervention. It is time to change and consider prompt surgery not only for survival but also for cerebral protection.

Acute aortic dissection complicated by fistula from aorta to right ventricle through ventricular septum

A case report of aortic dissection (AoD) complicated by a shunt to the right ventricle is presented. Complications, treatment options, and survival of patients with Type A and Type B AoD are reviewed.

Acute aortic syndrome: pathology and therapeutic strategies

Acute aortic syndrome (AAS) describes the acute presentation of patients with characteristic "aortic pain" caused by one of several life threatening thoracic aortic pathologies. These include aortic dissection, intramural haematoma, penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer, aneurysmal leak, and traumatic transection. AAS heralds imminent aortic rupture. Highlighting acute aortic pathology as an AAS is therefore important to encourage prompt recognition of this condition and avoid diagnostic delays. The management of AAS remains a therapeutic challenge. The traditional surgical approach to acute "type B" (descending thoracic) aortic pathology is unsatisfactory with high morbidity and mortality. Endovascular aortic stent grafts now represent an alternative minimally invasive approach in these patients who are often poor surgical candidates. Studies show endovascular repair to be technically feasible with fewer complications. This review discusses AAS pathology and in particular assesses the current role for endovascular aortic repair in its treatment.

Nonsurgical reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection by stent-graft placement

BACKGROUND

The treatment of thoracic aortic dissection is guided by prognostic and anatomical information. Proximal dissection requires surgery, but the appropriate treatment of distal thoracic aortic dissection has not been determined, because surgery has failed to improve the prognosis.

METHODS

We prospectively evaluated the safety and efficacy of elective transluminal endovascular stent-graft insertion in 12 consecutive patients with descending (type B) aortic dissection and compared the results with surgery in 12 matched controls. In all 24 patients, aortic dissection was diagnosed by magnetic resonance angiography. In each group, the dissection involved the aortic arch in 3 patients and the descending thoracic aorta in all 12 patients. With the patient under general anesthesia, either surgical resection was undertaken or a custom-designed endovascular stent-graft was placed by unilateral arteriotomy.

RESULTS

Stent-graft placement resulted in no morbidity or mortality, whereas surgery for type B dissection was associated with four deaths (33 percent, P=0.09) and five serious adverse events (42 percent, P=0.04) within 12 months. Transluminal placement of the stent-graft prosthesis was successful in all patients, with no leakage; full expansion of the stents was ensured by balloon inflation at 2 to 3 atm. Sealing of the entry tear was monitored during the procedure by transesophageal ultrasonography and angiography, and thrombosis of the false lumen was confirmed in all 12 patients after a mean of three months by magnetic resonance imaging. There were no deaths or instances of paraplegia, stroke, embolization, side-branch occlusion, or infection in the stent-graft group; nine patients had postimplantation syndrome, with transient elevation of C-reactive protein levels and body temperature plus mild leukocytosis. All the patients who received stent-grafts recovered, as did seven patients who underwent surgery for type B dissection (58 percent) (P=0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary observations suggest that elective, nonsurgical insertion of an endovascular stent-graft is safe and efficacious in selected patients who have thoracic aortic dissection and for whom surgery is indicated. Endoluminal repair may be useful for interventional reconstruction of thoracic aortic dissection.

Coronary artery disease in patients with type A aortic dissection

The usefulness of preoperative coronary arteriography in patients with type A dissection of the aorta is controversial. To determine the prevalence of arteriosclerotic coronary artery disease in patients with type A dissection of the aorta, we reviewed our experience in 62 patients (42 with acute dissection and 20 with chronic dissection) who underwent operation between January 1, 1986, and December 31, 1993. Among 23 patients with acute dissection who underwent coronary arteriography, 8 (34.8%) had one or more coronary artery lesions causing a greater than 50% narrowing. Among 14 patients with chronic dissection who underwent coronary arteriography, 6 (42.9%) had one or more coronary artery lesions causing a greater than 50% narrowing. There were no fatal complications associated with coronary arteriography. Four patients with acute dissection and 6 patients with chronic dissection underwent coronary artery bypass grafting at the time of operative repair of the aortic dissection, with no operative deaths. On the basis of these findings and the success of combined coronary artery bypass grafting and aortic repair, we recommend that patients with an acute type A dissection who are in stable condition and all patients with a chronic type A dissection of the aorta should undergo preoperative coronary arteriography.

Preservation of the aortic valve in acute aortic dissection: long-term echocardiographic assessment and clinical outcome

The aim of the present study was to determine the long-term status of the native aortic valve after surgical treatment of acute aortic dissection involving the ascending aorta. From 1972 to 1991, 93 patients underwent operation for type I or II aortic dissection. There were 76 men and 17 women. Mean age was 54 +/- 13 years. Eighty patients (86%) had a conservative procedure regarding the aortic root and aortic cusps: 74 had prosthetic replacement of the ascending aorta and 6, complete replacement of the aortic arch. Thirteen patients (14%) had simultaneous replacement of the aortic valve and the ascending aorta. The overall hospital mortality rate was 29% (27/93). The overall actuarial survival rate was 60.2% +/- 5.2%, 49.7% +/- 6.1%, and 35.9% +/- 8.1% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively. The survival rates for patients who had an ascending aortic procedure only were 63% +/- 5.5%, 54% +/- 6.5%, and 39% +/- 8.5% at 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, and for patients who required aortic valve replacement, 45% +/- 14% and 22% +/- 17.5% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Fifty long-term survivors (94% follow-up) with preservation of the aortic valve and aortic root were studied. Among them, 9 (18%) died within a mean interval of 97 +/- 46 months after operation. Causes of death were ischemic cardiac failure (2), aortic rupture or extension of dissection (4), renal disease (1), stroke (1), and sudden death (1). Forty-one patients had long-term clinical and echocardiographic evaluation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Effect of medical and surgical therapy on aortic dissection evaluated by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for prognosis and therapy. The European Cooperative Study Group on Echocardiography

BACKGROUND

Aortic dissection still has a poor prognosis despite progress in therapy. Therefore, this prospective follow-up study was designed to determine whether the degree of communication between true and false lumen in relation to the type of dissection, analyzed by transesophageal echocardiography, influences the risk after initiation of medical or surgical therapy.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In eight centers, 168 patients (124 men and 44 women) of age range of 23-84 years with proven aortic dissection were examined by transesophageal echocardiography in the acute phase, after start of medical and/or surgical therapy, and during follow-up (0-65 months; mean, 10 months). Analyses were performed prospectively according to a detailed study protocol. Patients were subdivided by transesophageal echocardiography according to a modified DeBakey classification. Type I aortic dissection was found in 35%, type II aortic dissection in 17%, and type III aortic dissection in 48%. Preoperative mortality was 3%, 7%, and 2%, and survival rates were 52%, 69%, and 70%, respectively. Type III aortic dissection could be subdivided into those with communication and antegrade dissection (ca) (50%), with communication and retrograde dissection limited to the descending aorta (cr desc) (10%), with dissection extended to the aortic arch and ascending aorta (cr asc) (27%), and with noncommunicating (nc) aortic dissection (13%). An open false lumen with no thrombus formation was present in types I, II, III ca and III cr asc aortic dissection in 17%, 21%, 39%, and 27% respectively, although it was most pronounced in types III nc and III cr desc (75% and 78%). During follow-up in patients who survived, thrombus was demonstrated in the false lumen in 80% of type I aortic dissection and 81% of types III ca and III cr asc. Open false lumen was seen in type II aortic dissection in 18%. Spontaneous healing was found in 4% with type II and 4% with type III aortic dissection (mainly in patients with type III nc aortic dissection). Patients with fluid extravasation, pleural effusion, pericardial tamponade, and periaortic effusion as well as mediastinal hematoma had a mortality of 52%. Reoperations were necessary in 12-29%, with the highest rate in patients with type III ca aortic dissection. Survival for patients with types III nc and III cr desc aortic dissection was higher than those with types I, II, III ca, and III cr asc.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative mortality appears to be reduced by transesophageal echocardiography, allowing rapid initiation of treatment. Intraoperative and postoperative mortality in aortic dissection remains high. Risk factors are fluid extravasation and an open false lumen with high communication. Thrombus formation in the false lumen can be regarded as a good prognostic sign. Surgery appears to be only a first step in the treatment of aortic dissection. Second surgery or closure of entry sites based on intraoperative echocardiography may be considered to induce thrombus formation and reduce aortic wall stress.