On the role of spectral and spatial antenna inhomogeneity in the process of excitation energy trapping in photosynthesis

Energy transfer in a single self-aggregated photosynthetic unit

The primary events of bacterial photosynthesis rely on the interplay of various specialized protein complexes organized in a supramolecular structure commonly termed the photosynthetic unit (PSU), which consists of the photochemical reaction center and of an associated antenna network. Employing single-molecule spectroscopic techniques we have been able to observe the excitation-energy transfer within a single PSU. From these findings we conclude that the building blocks of the PSU spontaneously form stable, functional aggregates in a non-membrane environment.

Spectroscopy on individual light-harvesting 1 complexes of Rhodopseudomonas acidophila

In this paper the fluorescence-excitation spectra of individual LH1-RC complexes (Rhodopseudomonas acidophila) at 1.2 K are presented. All spectra show a limited number of broad bands with a characteristic polarization behavior, indicating that the excitations are delocalized over a large number of pigments. A significant variation in the number of bands, their bandwidths, and polarization behavior is observed. Only 30% of the spectra carry a clear signature of delocalized excited states of a circular structure of the pigments. The large spectral variety suggests that besides site heterogeneity also structural heterogeneity determines the optical spectrum of the individual LH1-RC complexes. Further research should reveal if such heterogeneity is a native property of the complex or induced during the experimental procedures.

Singlet-singlet annihilation kinetics in aggregates and trimers of LHCII

Singlet-singlet annihilation experiments have been performed on trimeric and aggregated light-harvesting complex II (LHCII) using picosecond spectroscopy to study spatial equilibration times in LHCII preparations, complementing the large amount of data on spectral equilibration available in literature. The annihilation kinetics for trimers can well be described by a statistical approach, and an annihilation rate of (24 ps)(-1) is obtained. In contrast, the annihilation kinetics for aggregates can well be described by a kinetic approach over many hundreds of picoseconds, and it is shown that there is no clear distinction between inter- and intratrimer transfer of excitation energy. With this approach, an annihilation rate of (16 ps)(-1) is obtained after normalization of the annihilation rate per trimer. It is shown that the spatial equilibration in trimeric LHCII between chlorophyll a molecules occurs on a time scale that is an order of magnitude longer than in Photosystem I-core, after correcting for the different number of chlorophyll a molecules in both systems. The slow transfer in LHCII is possibly an important factor in determining excitation trapping in Photosystem II, because it contributes significantly to the overall trapping time.

Energy trapping and detrapping by wild type and mutant reaction centers of purple non-sulfur bacteria

Time-correlated single photon counting was used to study energy trapping and detrapping kinetics at 295 K in Rhodobacter sphaeroides chromatophore membranes containing mutant reaction centers. The mutant reaction centers were expressed in a background strain of Rb. sphaeroides which contained only B880 antenna complexes and no B800-850 antenna complexes. The excited state decay times in the isolated reaction centers from these strains were previously shown to vary by roughly 15-fold, from 3.4 to 52 ps, due to differences in the charge separation rates in the different mutants (Allen and Williams (1995) J Bioenerg Biomembr 27: 275-283). In this study, measurements were also performed on wild type Rhodospirillum rubrum and Rb. sphaeroides B880 antenna-only mutant chromatophores for comparison. The emission kinetics in membranes containing mutant reaction centers was complex. The experimental data were analyzed in terms of a kinetic model that involved fast excitation migration between antenna complexes followed by reversible energy transfer to the reaction center and charge separation. Three emission time constants were identified by fitting the data to a sum of exponential decay components. They were assigned to trapping/quenching of antenna excitations by the reaction center, recombination of the P(+)H(-) charge-separated state of the reaction center reforming an emitting state, and emission from uncoupled antenna pigment-protein complexes. The first varied from 60 to 160 ps, depending on the reaction center mutation; the second was 200-300 ps, and the third was about 700 ps. The observed weak linear dependence of the trapping time on the primary charge separation time, together with the known sub-picosecond exciton migration time within the antenna, supports the concept that it is energy transfer from the antenna to the reaction center, rather than charge separation, that limits the overall energy trapping time in wild type chromatophores. The component due to charge recombination reforming the excited state is minor in wild type membranes, but increases substantially in mutants due to the decreasing free energy gap between the states P(*) and P(+)H(-).

Description of energy migration and trapping in photosystem I by a model with two distance scaling parameters

The energy transfer and trapping kinetics in the core antenna of Photosystem I are described in a new model in which the distance between the core antenna chlorophylls and P700 is proposed to be considerably longer than the distance between the chlorophylls within the antenna. Structurally, the model describes the Photosystem I core antenna as a regular sphere around P700, while energetically it consists of three levels representing the bulk antenna, P700 and the red-shifted antenna pigments absorbing at longer wavelength than P700, respectively. It is shown that the model explains experimental results obtained from the Photosystem I complex of the cyanobacterium Synechococcus sp. (A.R. Holzwarth, G. Schatz, H Brock, and E. Bittersman (1993) Biophys. J. 64: 1813-1826) quite well, and that no unrealistic charge separation rate and organization of the long-wavelength pigments has to be assumed. We suggest that excitation energy transfer and trapping in Photosystem I should be described as a 'transfer-to-the-trap'-limited process.