Assessment of language impairment and function

Neuropsychological evaluation of phenoconversion risk in REM sleep behaviour disorder: A scoping review

The objective of this study was to assess the role of cognitive evaluation in the prediction of phenoconversion in polysomnography-confirmed idiopathic or isolated rapid eye movement sleep behaviour disorder, through a scoping review focussing on a longitudinal comprehensive neuropsychological assessment of patients with idiopathic REM sleep behaviour disorder. A literature search (2006-2022) yielded 1034 records, and 20 were selected for analysis. The sample included 899 patients from eight different cohorts and five countries. We extracted data on clinical evolution, mild cognitive impairment diagnosis, neuropsychological tests used, and classification of cognitive domains. Tests, cognitive domains, and mild cognitive impairment definitions were heterogeneous across the studies, precluding a meta-analysis. Ten studies (50%) evaluated the presence of mild cognitive impairment; 14 studies (70%) grouped neuropsychological tests into between three (6 studies, 21.4%) and seven (1 study, 7.1%) cognitive domains. The most frequently used tests were semantic fluency, Stroop colour word test, trail making test A and B, digit span, Rey auditory verbal learning test, and Rey-Osterrieth figure. All except digit span showed a role in predicting phenoconversion. The authors did not consistently assign tests to specific cognitive domains. In conclusion, we discuss methodological differences between the studies and highlight the need for a standardised framework for neuropsychological data acquisition and presentation, based on a multilevel approach covering test selection, domain assignment, and mild cognitive impairment diagnostic criteria.

Determining levels of linguistic deficit by applying cluster analysis to the aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery in post-stroke aphasia

The aphasia quotient of Western Aphasia Battery (WAB-AQ) has been used as an inclusion criterion and as an outcome measure in clinical, research, or community settings. The WAB-AQ is also commonly used to measure recovery. This study aimed to quantitatively determine levels of the linguistic deficit by using a cluster analysis of the WAB-AQ in post-stroke aphasia (PSA). 308 patients were extracted from the database. Cutoff scores are defined by mean overlap WAB-AQ scores of clusters by systematic cluster analysis, the method of which is the farthest neighbor element, and the metrics are square Euclidean distance and Pearson correlation, performed on the full sample of WAB-AQ individual subitem scores. A 1-way analysis of variance, with post hoc comparisons conducted, was used to determine whether clusters had significant differences. Three clusters were identified. The scores for severe, moderate, and mild linguistic deficit levels ranged from 0 to 30, 30.1 to 50.3, and 50.4 to 93.7, respectively. For PSA, the cluster analysis of WAB-AQ supports a 3-impairment level classification scheme.

Feasibility of Remotely Supervised Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (RS-tDCS) for People with Stroke-Induced and Progressive Aphasia

Background

Remotely-supervised transcranial direct current stimulation (RS-tDCS) is a telerehabilitation protocol that provides access to tDCS treatment to participants with aphasia in their homes using real-time monitoring via videoconference and overcomes barriers associated with in-person tDCS treatment of neurological disease.

Aims

Two feasibility studies for participants with aphasia are presented herein that investigate (1) RS-tDCS procedural implementation, acceptability, and demand, and (2) acceptability of ten repeated consecutive RS-tDCS sessions.

Methods & Procedures

Thirteen participants with aphasia were enrolled in Study 1: (1) seven participants with stroke-induced latent aphasia, (2) four participants with stroke-induced clinically diagnosed aphasia, and (3) two participants with logopenic variant primary progressive aphasia (lvPPA). Four supervisors (1 certified speech-language pathologist [SLP], 3 graduate SLPs-in-training) were trained to supervise RS-tDCS and also provided survey responses. All participants participated in RS-tDCS training and a virtual simulation of home delivery. Two participants with stroke-induced aphasia (1 latent aphasia, 1 clinically diagnosed aphasia) were enrolled in 10 consecutive sessions of RS-tDCS alongside computerized treatment in their home for Study 2.

Outcomes & Results

This work provides preliminary evidence for the feasibility of RS-tDCS for people with stable and progressive aphasia of varying severity and typology and includes both participant and clinician perspectives. Importantly, no major barriers to use of RS-tDCS were revealed for people with aphasia, though eHelpers were required for two participants.

Conclusions

This work confirms that remotely supervised at-home tDCS studies can be used to enable much-needed efficacy trials, with sufficient sample size, power, and dosing considerations, that will determine the clinical efficacy of tDCS as a treatment adjuvant to aphasia treatment.