Pancreas

Cytological study of 44 cases with solid papillary carcinoma and a systemic review of solid papillary carcinoma and neuroendocrine tumor of the breast

BACKGROUND

Solid-papillary carcinoma (SPC) of the breast is a rare variant of low-grade in situ and invasive carcinoma but there are only a few of the cytologic studies.

METHODS

We examined 44 cases of SPC of the breast to define the cytologic features. We also made a systemic review of reported cases of SPC and neuroendocrine tumor (NET) of the breast.

RESULTS

Both of our and the reviewed cases with SPC were very similar in the cytologic finding. It included hypercellularity, highly discohesive clusters, numerous isolated cells, small nuclei, finely granular chromatin of salt-and-pepper appearance, inconspicuous nucleoli, low nuclear-cytoplasmic ratio, and a plasmacytoid appearance. Moreover, SPC and NET had frequently all of these features in common. Capillary vessels structures and mucinous substance were not frequently seen in our and the reviewed cases with SPC. Rosette and pseudorosette were very rare in the cytologic specimen. The immunocytochemistry with our 9 cases with SPC indicated diffuse positivity for chromogranin A and/or synaptophysin.

CONCLUSION

Many cytologic features are frequently shared by SPC and NET of the breast. However, the vascular structure may not be a precise criterion for SPC. Rosette and pseudorosette are rarely helpful for the cytologic diagnosis.

Utility of intraoperative cytology of resection margins in biliary tract and pancreas tumors

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative diagnosis of resection margins in the biliary tract and pancreas tumors is important in deciding extent of resection; however, diagnosis based solely on frozen sections is sometimes difficult. Therefore, we investigated the usefulness of intraoperative cytology (IC) combined with frozen section (FS) histology. We present the results with a discussion of the value of this combination and its associated problems.

METHODS

We examined 80 bile duct resection margin specimens from 42 patients, and 34 pancreatic resection margin specimens from 29 patients, who underwent intraoperative diagnosis of resection margins during surgery for biliary tract or pancreatic tumors between October 2012 and January 2014. IC was performed on imprint specimens prepared from surfaces of margins being examined. The results were compared with FS and final histology of operative materials.

RESULTS

In IC, excluding cases with insufficient material, the results for bile duct margins; sensitivity was 96.7%, specificity 100% and accuracy 98.7%. The results for pancreatic margins; sensitivity was 100%, specificity 92.9%, and accuracy 93.3%. In FS, the results for bile duct margins; sensitivity was 96.8%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 98.8%. The results for pancreatic margins; sensitivity was 66.7%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 97.1%.

CONCLUSION

IC is quick, highly accurate and very easy to perform. This study even included a specimen for which only IC led to an accurate diagnosis. IC used in combination with FS can achieve intraoperative diagnosis with high overall accuracy.

Utilization of ancillary studies in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions: The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Guidelines

The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology has developed a set of guidelines for pancreatobiliary cytology including indications for endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle aspiration, terminology and nomenclature of pancreatobiliary disease, ancillary testing and post-biopsy management. All documents are based on the expertise of the authors, a review of the literature, discussion of the draft document at several national and international meetings and synthesis of selected online comments of the draft document. This document presents the results of these discussions regarding the use of ancillary testing in the cytologic diagnosis of biliary and pancreatic lesions. Currently, fluorescence in-situ hybridization (FISH) appears to be the most clinically relevant ancillary technique for cytology of bile duct strictures. The addition of FISH analysis to routine cytologic evaluation appears to yield the highest sensitivity without loss in specificity. Loss of immunohistochemical staining for the protein product of the SMAD4 gene and positive staining for mesothelin support a diagnosis of ductal adenocarcinoma. Immunohistochemical markers for endocrine and exocrine differentiation are sufficient for a diagnosis of endocrine and acinar tumors. Nuclear staining for beta-catenin supports a diagnosis of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm. Cyst fluid analysis for amylase and carcinoembryonic antigen aids in the pre-operative classification of pancreatic cysts. A number of gene mutations (KRAS, GNAS, von Hippel-Lindau, RNF43 and CTNNB1) may be of aid in the diagnosis of cystic neoplasms. Other ancillary techniques do not appear to improve diagnostic sensitivity sufficiently to justify their increased costs.

High-grade atypical epithelial cells in pancreatic mucinous cysts are a more accurate predictor of malignancy than "positive" cytology

BACKGROUND

The Sendai guidelines for risk assessment of malignancy in patients with mucinous cysts lists "positive" cytology as a high-risk feature. In the current study, the authors hypothesized that a cytological threshold of high-grade atypical epithelial cells (AEC) is a more accurate predictor of malignancy.

METHODS

The clinical, radiological, and cytological data of 112 patients with histologically confirmed mucinous cysts of the pancreas were reviewed. Cytology slides were blindly reviewed and cells were classified as benign, AEC, or malignant. On histology, neoplasms were grouped as benign (low-grade and moderate dysplasia) and malignant (high-grade dysplasia/carcinoma in situ and invasive carcinoma).

RESULTS

There were 92 patients with an intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN) and 20 with a mucinous cystic neoplasm; 39 were malignant and 73 were benign (42 with low-grade dysplasia and 31 with moderate dysplasia). Only 28% (11 of 39) of the malignant cysts were cytologically malignant with a sensitivity of 29%, a specificity of 100%, and an accuracy of 75%. AEC detected 17 additional cancers (44% of all malignant cysts; 16% more than detected on the basis of "positive" cytology). By using AEC as a surgical triage threshold, the sensitivity was 72%, the specificity was 85%, and the accuracy was 80%, with similar values for small (≤ 3 cm) branch duct IPMN. Nine of 73 (12%) benign cysts were identified with AEC, 4 of which had moderate dysplasia. AEC had a positive predictive value of 87% for the detection of a mucinous cyst with moderate dysplasia or worse.

CONCLUSIONS

AEC are a more accurate predictor of malignancy than "positive" cytology in aspirates of pancreatic mucinous cysts, including small branch duct IPMN. AEC warrant a "suspicious" interpretation for appropriate surgical triage.