Targeting G protein-coupled receptors in cancer therapy

Smart Delivery Systems Responsive to Cathepsin B Activity for Cancer Treatment

Cathepsin B is a lysosomal cysteine protease, contributing to vital cellular homeostatic processes including protein turnover, macroautophagy of damaged organelles, antigen presentation, and in the extracellular space, it takes part in tissue remodeling, prohormone processing, and activation. However, aberrant overexpression of cathepsin B and its enzymatic activity is associated with different pathological conditions, including cancer. Cathepsin B overexpression in tumor tissues makes this enzyme an important target for smart delivery systems, responsive to the activity of this enzyme. The generation of technologies which therapeutic effect is activated as a result of cathepsin B cleavage provides an opportunity for tumor-targeted therapy and controlled drug release. In this review, we summarized different technologies designed to improve current cancer treatments responsive to the activity of this enzyme that were shown to play a key role in disease progression and response to the treatment.

GPR35 antagonist CID-2745687 attenuates anchorage-independent cell growth by inhibiting YAP/TAZ activity in colorectal cancer cells

Background and purpose: GPR35, a member of the orphan G-protein-coupled receptor, was recently implicated in colorectal cancer (CRC). However, whether targeting GPR35 by antagonists can inhibit its pro-cancer role has yet to be answered. Experimental approach: We applied antagonist CID-2745687 (CID) in established GPR35 overexpressing and knock-down CRC cell lines to understand its anti-cell proliferation property and the underlying mechanism. Key results: Although GPR35 did not promote cell proliferation in 2D conditions, it promoted anchorage-independent growth in soft-agar, which was reduced by GPR35 knock-down and CID treatment. Furthermore, YAP/TAZ target genes were expressed relatively higher in GPR35 overexpressed cells and lower in GPR35 knock-down cells. YAP/TAZ activity is required for anchorage-independent growth of CRC cells. By detecting YAP/TAZ target genes, performing TEAD4 luciferase reporter assay, and examining YAP phosphorylation and TAZ protein expression level, we found YAP/TAZ activity is positively correlated to GPR35 expression level, which CID disrupted in GPR35 overexpressed cells, but not in GPR35 knock-down cells. Intriguingly, GPR35 agonists did not promote YAP/TAZ activity but ameliorated CID's inhibitory effect; GPR35-promoted YAP/TAZ activity was only partly attenuated by ROCK1/2 inhibitor. Conclusion and implications: GPR35 promoted YAP/TAZ activity partly through Rho-GTPase with its agonist-independent constitutive activity, and CID exhibited its inhibitory effect. GPR35 antagonists are promising anti-cancer agents that target hyperactivation and overexpression of YAP/TAZ in CRC.

Genome wide DNA methylation analysis identifies novel molecular subgroups and predicts survival in neuroblastoma

BACKGROUND

Neuroblastoma is the most common malignancy in infancy, accounting for 15% of childhood cancer deaths. Outcome for the high-risk disease remains poor. DNA-methylation patterns are significantly altered in all cancer types and can be utilised for disease stratification.

METHODS

Genome-wide DNA methylation (n = 223), gene expression (n = 130), genetic/clinical data (n = 213), whole-exome sequencing (n = 130) was derived from the TARGET study. Methylation data were derived from HumanMethylation450 BeadChip arrays. t-SNE was used for the segregation of molecular subgroups. A separate validation cohort of 105 cases was studied.

RESULTS

Five distinct neuroblastoma molecular subgroups were identified, based on genome-wide DNA-methylation patterns, with unique features in each, including three subgroups associated with known prognostic features and two novel subgroups. As expected, Cluster-4 (infant diagnosis) had significantly better 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) than the four other clusters. However, in addition, the molecular subgrouping identified multiple patient subsets with highly increased risk, most notably infant patients that do not map to Cluster-4 (PFS 50% vs 80% for Cluster-4 infants, P = 0.005), and allowed identification of subgroup-specific methylation differences that may reflect important biological differences within neuroblastoma.

CONCLUSIONS

Methylation-based clustering of neuroblastoma reveals novel molecular subgroups, with distinct molecular/clinical characteristics and identifies a subgroup of higher-risk infant patients.

G Protein-Coupled Receptor Kinase 4 Is a Novel Prognostic Factor in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Purpose

We previously reported that G protein-coupled receptor kinase (GRK) 4 halts cell cycle progression and induces cellular senescence in HEK293 cells. The present study was aimed at assessing the prognostic value of GRK4 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

Methods

GRK4 expression was detected by immunohistochemistry in paired tumoral and peritumoral tissues of 325 HCC patients. One hundred and twenty-six patients from Western China were utilized as a training cohort to develop a nomogram, while 86 patients from Eastern China were used as a validation cohort. The proliferation and migration of lentiviral-GRK4 expressing HepG2 cells were determined by MTT and wound healing assays.

Results

GRK4 was differentially expressed in HCC tissues. Tumoral GRK4 intensity, tumor type, and T stage were independent prognostic factors and used to form a nomogram for predicting overall survival (OS), which obtained a good concordance index of 0.82 and 0.77 in training and validation cohort, respectively. The positive and negative prediction values with nomogram were, respectively, 83% and 75% in training cohort and 100% and 52% in validation cohort. Patients with nomogram scores > 32 and 78 showed high risk for OS. Proliferation and motility capabilities were significantly restrained in GRK4-overexpressing HCC cells. Discussion. Low GRK4 expression in HCC tumor tissues indicates poor clinical outcomes. A prognostic nomogram including tumoral GRK4 expression would improve the predictive accuracy of OS in HCC patients. We also demonstrated that GRK4 overexpression inhibits proliferation and migration of HCC cells. The molecular mechanism underlying is worth further study.

The Orexin-A/OX1R System Induces Cell Death in Pancreatic Cancer Cells Resistant to Gemcitabine and Nab-Paclitaxel Treatment

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) represents the fourth cause of cancer-associated death in the West. This type of cancer has a very poor prognosis notably due to the development of chemoresistance when treatments including gemcitabine and Abraxane (Nab-paclitaxel) were prescribed. The identification of new treatment circumventing this chemoresistance represents a key challenge. Previous studies demonstrated that the activation of orexin receptor type 1 (OX1R), which was ectopically expressed in PDAC, by its natural ligand named orexin-A (OxA), led to anti-tumoral effect resulting in the activation of mitochondrial pro-apoptotic mechanism. Here, we demonstrated that OxA inhibited the pancreatic cancer cell (AsPC-1) growth and inhibited the tumor volume in preclinical models as effectively as gemcitabine and Nab-paclitaxel. Moreover, the combination therapy including OxA plus gemcitabine or OxA plus Nab-paclitaxel was additive on the inhibition of cancer cell growth and tumor development. More importantly, the treatment by OxA of chemoresistant tumors to gemcitabine or Nab-paclitaxel obtained by successive xenografts in mice revealed that OxA was able to induce a strong inhibition of tumor development, whereas no OxA resistance was identified in tumors. The OX1R/OxA system might be an innovative and powerful alternative treatment of chemoresistant PDAC.

Decreased CXCR2 expression on circulating monocytes of colorectal cancer impairs recruitment and induces Re-education of tumor-associated macrophages

Though circulating monocytes are the main source of tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs), the regulatory mechanisms of their recruitment to tumours and further differentiation remain unclear. In the present study, we observed a significant decrease in CXCR2 expression in classical circulating monocytes of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly those in the late TNM stage. The percentage of CXCR2⁺ monocytes was negatively associated with systemic inflammatory markers and positively associated with intratumoural immunocyte infiltration. The pro-inflammatory cytokine IFN-γ, which was overexpressed in patients with CRC, down-regulated CXCR2 expression of monocytes/TAMs by promoting GRK-2 expression. In vitro, inhibition of CXCR2 signalling in monocytes led to impaired chemotaxis to the tumour cell line supernatant and lower responsiveness to lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulation. Finally, monocytes from patients with CRC with decreased CXCR2 expression showed distinct phenotypes and functions after differentiating into CRC cell line-educated TAMs, including expression of co-stimulatory factors and secretion profile, than those from healthy controls. GRK-2 inhibitor altered the functional characteristics of TAMs. In summary, our findings suggest that CXCR2 expression on circulating monocytes reflects CRC stages and is an important factor determining TAM composition in the tumour microenvironment.

An Insight into GPCR and G-Proteins as Cancer Drivers

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are the largest family of cell surface signaling receptors known to play a crucial role in various physiological functions, including tumor growth and metastasis. Various molecules such as hormones, lipids, peptides, and neurotransmitters activate GPCRs that enable the coupling of these receptors to highly specialized transducer proteins, called G-proteins, and initiate multiple signaling pathways. Integration of these intricate networks of signaling cascades leads to numerous biochemical responses involved in diverse pathophysiological activities, including cancer development. While several studies indicate the role of GPCRs in controlling various aspects of cancer progression such as tumor growth, invasion, migration, survival, and metastasis through its aberrant overexpression, mutations, or increased release of agonists, the explicit mechanisms of the involvement of GPCRs in cancer progression is still puzzling. This review provides an insight into the various responses mediated by GPCRs in the development of cancers, the molecular mechanisms involved and the novel pharmacological approaches currently preferred for the treatment of cancer. Thus, these findings extend the knowledge of GPCRs in cancer cells and help in the identification of therapeutics for cancer patients.

Roles of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) in Gastrointestinal Cancers: Focus on Sphingosine 1-Shosphate Receptors, Angiotensin II Receptors, and Estrogen-Related GPCRs

It is well established that gastrointestinal (GI) cancers are common and devastating diseases around the world. Despite the significant progress that has been made in the treatment of GI cancers, the mortality rates remain high, indicating a real need to explore the complex pathogenesis and develop more effective therapeutics for GI cancers. G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are critical signaling molecules involved in various biological processes including cell growth, proliferation, and death, as well as immune responses and inflammation regulation. Substantial evidence has demonstrated crucial roles of GPCRs in the development of GI cancers, which provided an impetus for further research regarding the pathophysiological mechanisms and drug discovery of GI cancers. In this review, we mainly discuss the roles of sphingosine 1-phosphate receptors (S1PRs), angiotensin II receptors, estrogen-related GPCRs, and some other important GPCRs in the development of colorectal, gastric, and esophageal cancer, and explore the potential of GPCRs as therapeutic targets.

Lysophosphatidic Acid Signaling in Cancer Cells: What Makes LPA So Special?

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) refers to a family of simple phospholipids that act as ligands for G protein-coupled receptors. While LPA exerts effects throughout the body in normal physiological circumstances, its pathological role in cancer is of great interest from a therapeutic viewpoint. The numerous LPA receptors (LPARs) are coupled to a variety of G proteins, and more than one LPAR is typically expressed on any given cell. While the individual receptors signal through conventional GPCR pathways, LPA is particularly efficacious in stimulating cancer cell proliferation and migration. This review addresses the mechanistic aspects underlying these pro-tumorigenic effects. We provide examples of LPA signaling responses in various types of cancers, with an emphasis on those where roles have been identified for specific LPARs. While providing an overview of LPAR signaling, these examples also reveal gaps in our knowledge regarding the mechanisms of LPA action at the receptor level. The current understanding of the LPAR structure and the roles of LPAR interactions with other receptors are discussed. Overall, LPARs provide insight into the potential molecular mechanisms that underlie the ability of individual GPCRs (or combinations of GPCRs) to elicit a unique spectrum of responses from their agonist ligands. Further knowledge of these mechanisms will inform drug discovery, since GPCRs are promising therapeutic targets for cancer.

YAP and endothelin-1 signaling: an emerging alliance in cancer

The rational making the G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR) the centerpiece of targeted therapies is fueled by the awareness that GPCR-initiated signaling acts as pivotal driver of the early stages of progression in a broad landscape of human malignancies. The endothelin-1 (ET-1) receptors (ET-1R), known as ET_A receptor (ET_AR) and ET_B receptor (ET_BR) that belong to the GPCR superfamily, affect both cancer initiation and progression in a variety of cancer types. By the cross-talking with multiple signaling pathways mainly through the scaffold protein β-arrestin1 (β-arr1), ET-1R axis cooperates with an array of molecular determinants, including transcription factors and co-factors, strongly affecting tumor cell fate and behavior. In this scenario, recent findings shed light on the interplay between ET-1 and the Hippo pathway. In ET_AR highly expressing tumors ET-1 axis induces the de-phosphorylation and nuclear accumulation of the Hippo pathway downstream effectors, the paralogous transcriptional cofactors Yes-associated protein (YAP) and Transcriptional coactivator with PDZ-binding motif (TAZ). Recent evidence have discovered that ET-1R/β-arr1 axis instigates a transcriptional interplay involving YAP and mutant p53 proteins, which share a common gene signature and cooperate in a oncogenic signaling network. Mechanistically, YAP and mutp53 are enrolled in nuclear complexes that turn on a highly selective YAP/mutp53-dependent transcriptional response. Notably, ET-1R blockade by the FDA approved dual ET-1 receptor antagonist macitentan interferes with ET-1R/YAP/mutp53 signaling interplay, through the simultaneous suppression of YAP and mutp53 functions, hampering metastasis and therapy resistance. Based on these evidences, we aim to review the recent findings linking the GPCR signaling, as for ET-1R, to YAP/TAZ signaling, underlining the clinical relevance of the blockade of such signaling network in the tumor and microenvironmental contexts. In particular, we debate the clinical implications regarding the use of dual ET-1R antagonists to blunt gain of function activity of mutant p53 proteins and thereby considering them as a potential therapeutic option for mutant p53 cancers. The identification of ET-1R/β-arr1-intertwined and bi-directional signaling pathways as targetable vulnerabilities, may open new therapeutic approaches able to disable the ET-1R-orchestrated YAP/mutp53 signaling network in both tumor and stromal cells and concurrently sensitizes to high-efficacy combined therapeutics.