1
|
Li D, Shi Y, Ouyang Z, Teng Y, Chen B, Chen Y, Luo Y, Zhang N, Kumar N, Li Y, Li B, Zhu X. Pea-Protein-Stabilized Emulsion as a High-Performance Cryoprotectant in Frozen Dough: Effects on the Storage Stability and Baking Performance. Foods 2024; 13:3840. [PMID: 39682911 DOI: 10.3390/foods13233840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2024] [Revised: 11/20/2024] [Accepted: 11/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/18/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of oil-in-water (O/W) emulsion has drawn increasing attention in the baking industry. Compared with some of the well-recognized functionalities, such as textural improvers and flavor carriers, its cryoprotective behavior in frozen dough has not been extensively investigated. Herein, this study reported a pea-protein (PP)-stabilized O/W emulsion with good freeze-thaw stability and evaluated its effectiveness as a high-performance dough cryoprotectant. Specifically, the emulsions were stabilized by 2, 3, and 4 wt% of PP (PP-2, -3, and -4, respectively) and incorporated into frozen doughs, whose cryoprotective effects were systematically evaluated in terms of dough storage stability and baking performance after 4 weeks of storage. Results showed that the frozen dough with PP-3 emulsion exhibited the most uniform water distribution and reduced content of freezable water as reflected by the results from differential scanning calorimetry and low-field nuclear magnetic resonance analyses. Moreover, the PP emulsion helped to maintain the integrity of the gluten network, thus enhancing the dough elasticity. Accordingly, the emulsion-added bread samples exhibited significantly improved loaf volume and textural properties (e.g., softness) and less baking loss. Our findings highlighted the potential of PP emulsion as a viable and high-performance dough cryoprotectant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diming Li
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
| | - Youqing Shi
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| | - Zhihan Ouyang
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| | - Yongxin Teng
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
| | - Boru Chen
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Intelligent Food Manufacturing, Foshan University, Foshan 528225, China
| | - Yingying Chen
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| | - Yufan Luo
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| | - Nandan Kumar
- Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
| | - Yonghui Li
- Department of Grain Science and Industry, Kansas State University, Manhattan, KS 66506, USA
| | - Bin Li
- College of Food Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan 430070, China
| | - Xiangwei Zhu
- Key Laboratory of Fermentation Engineering (Ministry of Education), Hubei Key Laboratory of Industrial Microbiology, Cooperative Innovation Center of Industrial Fermentation (Ministry of Education & Hubei Province), National "111" Center for Cellular Regulation and Molecular Pharmaceutics, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan 430068, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Boukid F, Baune MC, Gagaoua M, Castellari M. Seafood alternatives: assessing the nutritional profile of products sold in the global market. Eur Food Res Technol 2022; 248:1777-1786. [PMID: 35317084 PMCID: PMC8931775 DOI: 10.1007/s00217-022-04004-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The global market for seafood alternatives is witnessing an exponential growth. Nevertheless, the nutritional quality of such products is scarcely studied. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate, for the first time, the nutritional quality of seafood alternatives launched in the global market from 2002 to 2021 and to compare them with the conventional seafood products. Using the Mintel Global New Products Database, the nutritional information of seafood alternatives (i.e., tuna, shrimps, calamari, fish fingers, fish sticks, salmon, caviar, and fillet) was retrieved, and compared with conventional products. A total of 149 seafood alternatives were identified, of which 83 items had complete mandatory nutritional labeling. Conventional products (n = 973) were also collected, from which 130 products have a complete nutritional labeling. Results revealed that tuna, shrimps, caviar and fillet alternatives contained significantly less protein than conventional products, while calamari, fish fingers, fish sticks and salmon alternatives had similar amounts to their conventional counterparts. Salt content was significantly higher in tuna, fish fingers and sticks substitutes, but lower in shrimps, calamari and caviar alternatives compared to conventional products. Overall, the commercially available seafood alternatives have nutritional strengths and some shortcomings to be further addressed in future research such as low protein content. Additionally, fortification of seafood alternatives with micronutrients, such as omega-3 fatty acids and vitamins (A, B, and D), should be considered to ensure a nutritional equivalence with the conventional products.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fatma Boukid
- Food Safety and Functionality Programme, Food Industry Area, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Catalonia, Spain
- Present Address: ClonBio Group LTD, 6 Fitzwilliam Pl, Dublin, D02 XE61 Ireland
| | - Marie-Christin Baune
- DIL German Institute of Food Technologies e.V., Prof.-von-Klitzing-Str. 7, 49610 Quakenbrück, Germany
| | - Mohammed Gagaoua
- Food Quality and Sensory Science Department, Teagasc Food Research Centre, Ashtown, Dublin, D15 KN3K Ireland
| | - Massimo Castellari
- Food Safety and Functionality Programme, Food Industry Area, Institute of Agriculture and Food Research and Technology (IRTA), Finca Camps i Armet s/n, Monells, 17121 Catalonia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|