Paradoxical relationship between distress and functional network topology in phantom sound perception

Topological features of limbic dysfunction in chronicity of tinnitus with intact hearing: New hypothesis for 'noise-cancellation' mechanism

PURPOSE

The reorganization of the limbic regions extend to general cognitive network is believed to exist in the chronicity of tinnitus with particular 'hubs' contributing to a 'noise-cancellation' mechanism. To test this hypothesis, we investigated the topological brain network of tinnitus in different periods.

METHODS

Resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging were obtained from 32 patients with acute tinnitus, 41 patients with chronic tinnitus and 60 age- and gender- matched healthy controls (HC). The topological features of their brain networks were explored using graph theory analysis.

RESULTS

Common small-world attributes were compared between the three groups, all showed a significantly increased values in Cp, Lp, λ (all p < 0.05). Significantly increased nodal centralities in the left superior frontal gyrus and the right precuneus, significantly decreased nodal centralities in the right inferior temporal gyrus were observed for acute tinnitus patients compared to HC. While for chronic tinnitus patients, there were significant increased nodal centralities in the left hippocampus, amygdala, and temporal pole, but decreased nodal centralities in the right inferior temporal gyrus. Additionally, significant higher nodal centralities were found in bilateral medial superior frontal gyrus for acute tinnitus patients compared to chronic tinnitus patients. Besides, alterations in rich-club organization were found in acute tinnitus patients and chronic tinnitus patients compared with HC, with increased functional connections among rich-club nodes and peripheral nodes in patients with tinnitus.

CONCLUSIONS

Brain network topological properties altered across prefrontal-limbic-subcortical regions in tinnitus. The existed hubs in tinnitus might indicate an emotional and cognitive burden in 'noise-cancellation' mechanism.

Symptom dimensions to address heterogeneity in tinnitus

Tinnitus, the auditory phantom percept, is a well-known heterogenous disorder with multiple subtypes. Researchers and clinicians have tried to classify these subtypes according to clinical profiles, aetiologies, and response to treatment with little success. The occurrence of overlapping tinnitus subtypes suggests that the disorder exists along a continuum of severity, with no clear distinct boundaries. In this perspective, we propose a neuro-mechanical framework, viewing tinnitus as a dimensional disorder which is a complex interplay of its behavioural, biological and neurophysiological phenotypes. Moreover, we explore the potential of these dimensions as interacting networks without a common existing cause, giving rise to tinnitus. Considering tinnitus as partially overlapping, dynamically changing, interacting networks, each representing a different aspect of the unified tinnitus percept, suggests that the interaction of these networks determines the phenomenology of the tinnitus, ultimately leading to a dimensional spectrum, rather than a categorical subtyping. A combination of a robust theoretical framework and strong empirical evidence can advance our understanding of the functional mechanisms underlying tinnitus and ultimately, improve treatment strategies.

Too Blind to See the Elephant? Why Neuroscientists Ought to Be Interested in Tinnitus

A curative therapy for tinnitus currently does not exist. One may actually exist but cannot currently be causally linked to tinnitus due to the lack of consistency of concepts about the neural correlate of tinnitus. Depending on predictions, these concepts would require either a suppression or enhancement of brain activity or an increase in inhibition or disinhibition. Although procedures with a potential to silence tinnitus may exist, the lack of rationale for their curative success hampers an optimization of therapeutic protocols. We discuss here six candidate contributors to tinnitus that have been suggested by a variety of scientific experts in the field and that were addressed in a virtual panel discussion at the ARO round table in February 2021. In this discussion, several potential tinnitus contributors were considered: (i) inhibitory circuits, (ii) attention, (iii) stress, (iv) unidentified sub-entities, (v) maladaptive information transmission, and (vi) minor cochlear deafferentation. Finally, (vii) some potential therapeutic approaches were discussed. The results of this discussion is reflected here in view of potential blind spots that may still remain and that have been ignored in most tinnitus literature. We strongly suggest to consider the high impact of connecting the controversial findings to unravel the whole complexity of the tinnitus phenomenon; an essential prerequisite for establishing suitable therapeutic approaches.