Central Neuroepigenetic Regulation of the Hypothalamic–Pituitary–Adrenal Axis

Distinct saliva DNA methylation profiles in relation to treatment outcome in youth with posttraumatic stress disorder

In youth with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) non-response rates after treatment are often high. Epigenetic mechanisms such as DNA methylation (DNAm) have previously been linked to PTSD pathogenesis, additionally DNAm may affect response to (psychological) therapies. Besides investigating the direct link between DNAm and treatment response, it might be helpful to investigate the link between DNAm and previously associated biological mechanisms with treatment outcome. Thereby gaining a deeper molecular understanding of how psychotherapy (reflecting a change in the environment) relates to epigenetic changes and the adaptability of individuals. To date, limited research is done in clinical samples and no studies have been conducted in youth. Therefore we conducted a study in a Dutch cohort of youth with and without PTSD (n = 87, age 8-18 years). We examined the cross-sectional and longitudinal changes of saliva-based genome-wide DNA methylation (DNAm) levels, and salivary cortisol secretion. The last might reflect possible abbreviations on the hypothalamic-pituitary- adrenal (HPA) axis. The HPA-axis is previously linked to DNAm and the development and recovery of PTSD. Youth were treated with 8 sessions of either Eye Movement Reprocessing Therapy (EMDR) or Trauma Focused Cognitive behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT). Our epigenome wide approach showed distinct methylation between treatment responders and non-responders on C18orf63 gene post-treatment. This genomic region is related to the PAX5 gene, involved in neurodevelopment and inflammation response. Additionally, our targeted approach indicated that there were longitudinal DNAm changes in successfully treated youth at the CRHR2 gene. Methylation at this gene was further correlated with cortisol secretion pre- and post-treatment. Awaiting replication, findings of this first study in youth point to molecular pathways involved in stress response and neuroplasticity to be associated with treatment response.

Exploring transcriptional and post-transcriptional epigenetic regulation of crf and 11βhsd2 in rainbow trout brain during chronic social stress

Using dominance hierarchies in juvenile rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss) as a model of chronic social stress in fish, we explored whether epigenetic transcriptional and post-transcriptional mechanisms are involved in the gene expression of corticotropin-releasing factor (crf) and 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase (11βhsd2), key factors involved in the regulation of the endocrine stress axis response. In juvenile rainbow trout pairs, subordinate individuals display sustained elevation of circulating cortisol concentrations. Cortisol production is controlled by the hypothalamic-pituitary-interrenal (HPI) axis in fish and initiated by CRF release from the preoptic area (POA). Given that crf is modulated during chronic social stress, and that such stress has been implicated in the epigenetic regulation of crf in other taxa, we probed a role for epigenetic regulation of crf transcript abundance in chronically stressed rainbow trout. We also investigated the regulation of the cortisol-metabolising enzyme 11βhsd2 in the POA, which is upregulated in subordinates. The potential involvement of DNA methylation and microRNAs (miRNAs) in the regulation of crf transcript abundance was investigated during social stress in the POA of fish, as was the potential involvement of miRNAs in 11βhsd2 regulation. Although transcript abundances of crf were elevated in subordinate fish after 4 days, DNA methylation profiles within putative promoter sequences upstream of the crf gene were not significantly affected by chronic stress. An inverse relationship between crf and its predicted posttranscriptional regulator miR-103a-3p in the POA suggests that miRNAs may be involved in mediating the effects of chronic social stress on key components of the endocrine stress axis.

Beyond monoamines: I. Novel targets and radiotracers for Positron emission tomography imaging in psychiatric disorders

With the emergence of positron emission tomography (PET) in the late 1970s, psychiatry had access to a tool capable of non-invasive assessment of human brain function. Early applications in psychiatry focused on identifying characteristic brain blood flow and metabolic derangements using radiotracers such as [¹⁵ O]H₂ O and [¹⁸ F]FDG. Despite the success of these techniques, it became apparent that more specific probes were needed to understand the neurochemical bases of psychiatric disorders. The first neurochemical PET imaging probes targeted sites of action of neuroleptic (dopamine D₂ receptors) and psychoactive (serotonin receptors) drugs. Based on the centrality of monoamine dysfunction in psychiatric disorders and the measured success of monoamine-enhancing drugs in treating them, the next 30 years witnessed the development of an armamentarium of PET radiopharmaceuticals and imaging methodologies for studying monoamines. Continued development of monoamine-enhancing drugs over this time however was less successful, realizing only modest gains in efficacy and tolerability. As patent protection for many widely prescribed and profitable psychiatric drugs lapsed, drug development pipelines shifted away from monoamines in search of novel targets with the promises of improved efficacy, or abandoned altogether. Over this period, PET radiopharmaceutical development activities closely paralleled drug development priorities resulting in the development of new PET imaging agents for non-monoamine targets. Part one of this review will briefly survey novel PET imaging targets with relevance to the field of psychiatry, which include the metabotropic glutamate receptor type 5 (mGluR5), purinergic P₂ X₇ receptor, type 1 cannabinoid receptor (CB₁ ), phosphodiesterase 10A (PDE10A), and describe radiotracers developed for these and other targets that have matured to human subject investigations. Current limitations of the targets and techniques will also be discussed.

The translational genetics of ADHD and related phenotypes in model organisms

Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a highly prevalent neurodevelopmental disorder resulting from the interaction between genetic and environmental risk factors. It is well known that ADHD co-occurs frequently with other psychiatric disorders due, in part, to shared genetics factors. Although many studies have contributed to delineate the genetic landscape of psychiatric disorders, their specific molecular underpinnings are still not fully understood. The use of animal models can help us to understand the role of specific genes and environmental stimuli-induced epigenetic modifications in the pathogenesis of ADHD and its comorbidities. The aim of this review is to provide an overview on the functional work performed in rodents, zebrafish and fruit fly and highlight the generated insights into the biology of ADHD, with a special focus on genetics and epigenetics. We also describe the behavioral tests that are available to study ADHD-relevant phenotypes and comorbid traits in these models. Furthermore, we have searched for new models to study ADHD and its comorbidities, which can be useful to test potential pharmacological treatments.

Pattern recognition receptors in health and diseases

Pattern recognition receptors (PRRs) are a class of receptors that can directly recognize the specific molecular structures on the surface of pathogens, apoptotic host cells, and damaged senescent cells. PRRs bridge nonspecific immunity and specific immunity. Through the recognition and binding of ligands, PRRs can produce nonspecific anti-infection, antitumor, and other immunoprotective effects. Most PRRs in the innate immune system of vertebrates can be classified into the following five types based on protein domain homology: Toll-like receptors (TLRs), nucleotide oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptors (NLRs), retinoic acid-inducible gene-I (RIG-I)-like receptors (RLRs), C-type lectin receptors (CLRs), and absent in melanoma-2 (AIM2)-like receptors (ALRs). PRRs are basically composed of ligand recognition domains, intermediate domains, and effector domains. PRRs recognize and bind their respective ligands and recruit adaptor molecules with the same structure through their effector domains, initiating downstream signaling pathways to exert effects. In recent years, the increased researches on the recognition and binding of PRRs and their ligands have greatly promoted the understanding of different PRRs signaling pathways and provided ideas for the treatment of immune-related diseases and even tumors. This review describes in detail the history, the structural characteristics, ligand recognition mechanism, the signaling pathway, the related disease, new drugs in clinical trials and clinical therapy of different types of PRRs, and discusses the significance of the research on pattern recognition mechanism for the treatment of PRR-related diseases.

Gender Beneath the Skull: Agency, Trauma and Persisting Stereotypes in Neuroepigenetics

Epigenetics stands in a complex relationship to issues of sex and gender. As a scientific field, it has been heavily criticized for disproportionately targeting the maternal body and reproducing deterministic views of biological sex (Kenney and Müller, 2017; Lappé, 2018; Richardson et al., 2014). And yet, it also represents the culmination of a long tradition of engaging with developmental biology as a feminist cause, because of the dispersal of the supposed 'master code' of DNA among wider cellular, organismic and ecological contexts (Keller, 1988). In this paper, we explore a number of tensions at the intersection of sex, gender and trauma that are playing out in the emerging area of neuroepigenetics - a relatively new subfield of epigenetics specifically interested in environment-brain relations through epigenetic modifications in neurons. Using qualitative interviews with leading scientists, we explore how trauma is conceptualized in neuroepigenetics, paying attention to its gendered dimensions. We address a number of concerns raised by feminist STS researchers in regard to epigenetics, and illustrate why we believe close engagement with neuroepigenetic claims, and neuroepigenetic researchers themselves, is a crucial step for social scientists interested in questions of embodiment and trauma. We argue this for three reasons: (1) Neuroepigenetic studies are recognizing the agential capacities of biological materials such as genes, neurotransmitters and methyl groups, and how they influence memory formation; (2) Neuroepigenetic conceptions of trauma are yet to be robustly coupled with social and anthropological theories of violence (Eliot, 2021; Nelson, 2021; Walby, 2013); (3) In spite of the gendered assumptions we find in neuroepigenetics, there are fruitful spaces - through collaboration - to be conceptualizing gender beyond culture-biology and nature-nurture binaries (Lock and Nguyen, 2010). To borrow Gravlee's (2009: 51) phrase, we find reason for social scientists to consider how gender is not only constructed, but how it may "become biology" via epigenetic and other biological pathways. Ultimately, we argue that a robust epigenetic methodology is one which values the integrity of expertise outside its own field, and can have an open, not empty mind to cross-disciplinary dialogue.

Down-regulation of MST1 in hippocampus protects against stress-induced depression-like behaviours and synaptic plasticity impairments

Depression is a common mental disorder, and its main environmental risk factor is chronic stress. The activation of mammalian STE20-like kinase 1 (MST1), a key factor involved in the underlying pathophysiology of stress, can trigger synaptic plasticity impairment, neuronal dysfunction and neuroinflammation. However, it is unclear whether down-regulation of MST1 in the hippocampus protects against stress-induced behavioural dysfunctions. In this study, three mouse models were used to assess the role of MST1 in stress. Various behavioural tests, in vivo electrophysiological recordings, Western blotting, Golgi staining and immunofluorescence assay were used. The data showed that the level of phospho-MST1 (T183) was significantly increased in the hippocampus of mice subjected to chronic unpredictable mild stress (CUMS) and that mice with MST1 overexpression showed depression-like behaviours. Importantly, the impairment of cognitive functions and the hippocampal synaptic plasticity induced by CUMS were significantly improved by MST1 knockdown, suggesting that MST1 down-regulation effectively protected against stress-induced behavioural dysfunctions. Moreover, MST1 knockdown suppressed CUMS-induced microglial activation, reduced the abnormal expression of inflammatory cytokines and impeded the activation of p38, implying that the antidepressant-like effects of MST1 knockdown were associated with inhibiting the p38 pathway. These findings suggest that hippocampal MST1 is an essential regulator of stress, which can be an ideal target for the development of antidepressants in the future.

The neuroendocrine modulation of global DNA methylation in neuropsychiatric disorders

There is an increasing body of knowledge on the influence of differential DNA methylation of specific genomic regions in psychiatric disorders. However, fewer studies have addressed global DNA methylation (GMe) levels. GMe is an estimative of biological functioning that is regulated by pervasive mechanisms able to capture the big picture of metabolic and environmental influences upon gene expression. In the present perspective article, we highlighted evidence for the relationships between cortisol and sex hormones and GMe in psychiatric disorders. We argue that the far-reaching effects of cortisol and sexual hormones on GMe may lie on the pathways linking stress and mental health. Further research on these endocrine-epigenetic links may help to explain the role of environmental stress as well as sex differences in the prevalence of psychiatric disorders.

Correlation between hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis gene polymorphisms and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms

BACKGROUND

The hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis is the main neuroendocrine system that controls stress responses, including fear learning. To further understand the correlation between the HPA axis and stress- and fear-related symptoms in humans, the current study investigated the relationship between HPA axis gene polymorphisms and a stress- and fear-related disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD). This is the first study that systematically investigates the correlations between HPA axis genes and distinct PTSD symptom clusters.

METHODS

Participants included 1132 Chinese earthquake survivors (772 women and 360 men). PTSD symptoms were measured by the PTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5), and the severity (total symptoms) and symptom clusters were calculated according to the hybrid seven-factor model of DSM-5 PTSD. We genotyped eight single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) of three HPA axis genes, including FKBP5, CRHR1 and CRHR2.

RESULTS

The main effects of the CRHR2 SNP rs2267715 were associated with PTSD severity (P = 0.0035) and all PTSD symptom clusters except dysphoric arousal (P ranging from 0.0011 to 0.048). In women, a gene-environment interaction (G × E) effect of FKBP5 (rs3800373 × trauma exposure) was correlated with PTSD severity (P = 0.038), externalizing behaviors, anxious arousal and dysphoric arousal symptoms (P ranging from 0.014 to 0.028); the G × E effect of CRHR1 (rs4458044 × trauma exposure) was associated with anxious arousal symptoms (P = 0.016). In men, a gene-gene interaction (G × G) effect of FKBP5-CRHR1 (rs9470080 × rs4458044) was associated with PTSD severity (P = 0.0091), intrusion, negative affect, externalizing behaviors and anxious arousal (P ranging 0.012-0.049).

CONCLUSION

Our results systematically revealed that the main effects and G × E and G × G effects of some genetic polymorphisms of HPA axis genes are involved in the severity and distinct symptom clusters of PTSD.

Untangling PTSD and TBI: Challenges and Strategies in Clinical Care and Research

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) can result from similar injuries and can result in similar symptoms, such as problems with sleep, concentration, memory, and mood. Although PTSD and persistent sequelae due to a TBI (PST) have generally been viewed as pragmatically confounded but conceptually separable entities, we examine emerging evidence emphasizing the breadth of overlap in both clinical presentation and underlying pathophysiology between PST and PTSD.

RECENT FINDINGS

New evidence underscores the poor specificity of symptoms to etiology and emphasizes the potential, after both physical brain injury and traumatic stress, for changes in each of the three interacting systems that coordinate the body's response to the experience or expectation of major injury-the immune, endocrine, and neuromodulatory neurotransmitter systems. A view of PTSD and PST sharing common pathophysiologic elements related to the CNS response to acute injury or threat carries important implications for research and clinical care.

Neuroepigenetics of Mental Illness: The Inside Outs of the Outside Within

Epigenetics refers to environmentally sensitive modifications to DNA and chromatin that regulate gene transcription without altering the genetic sequence itself. Because of the brain's central role in a person's adaptation to dynamic changes in the environment, the field of epigenetic research is particularly pertinent for the neurosciences and mental health and illness. "Neuroepigenetics" refers to the field of epigenetics, as applied to research of the nervous system and related functional abilities. The onset and course of mental disorders revolve around person-environment interactions, i.e., the interplay between environmental factors with people (and their brain) throughout life and on the background of an individual's inherited genomic make-up. With respect to the nervous system and its functional abilities, neuroepigenetic research aims to turn the inside outs by explicating the epigenetic profiles that regulate gene expression within cells while epigenetic profiles themselves may reflect the imprints of external factors (the outside of the organism). Neuroepigenetic research is of prime importance for elucidating the molecular underpinnings of gene-environment interplay in relation to functional abilities of the brain and mental health throughout life, and thus for identifying the mechanisms underlying onset and course of mental disorders. However, neuroepigenetic research is still in its infancy and many conceptual and methodological challenges are apparent. In addition, there are considerable complexities and major challenges in conceptualizing the nature and diagnosis of mental disorders, and these need to be taken into account in studying neuroepigenetics of mental disorders. The current manuscript provides an overview and conceptual framework for neuroepigenetic research in mental disorders.