Evolutionary origins of chemical synapses

The axes of biology: a novel axes-based network embedding paradigm to decipher the functional mechanisms of the cell

Summary

Common approaches for deciphering biological networks involve network embedding algorithms. These approaches strictly focus on clustering the genes' embedding vectors and interpreting such clusters to reveal the hidden information of the networks. However, the difficulty in interpreting the genes' clusters and the limitations of the functional annotations' resources hinder the identification of the currently unknown cell's functioning mechanisms. We propose a new approach that shifts this functional exploration from the embedding vectors of genes in space to the axes of the space itself. Our methodology better disentangles biological information from the embedding space than the classic gene-centric approach. Moreover, it uncovers new data-driven functional interactions that are unregistered in the functional ontologies, but biologically coherent. Furthermore, we exploit these interactions to define new higher-level annotations that we term Axes-Specific Functional Annotations and validate them through literature curation. Finally, we leverage our methodology to discover evolutionary connections between cellular functions and the evolution of species.

Availability and implementation

Data and source code can be accessed at https://gitlab.bsc.es/sdoria/axes-of-biology.git.

Alternative neural systems: What is a neuron? (Ctenophores, sponges and placozoans)

How to make a neuron, a synapse, and a neural circuit? Is there only one 'design' for a neural architecture with a universally shared genomic blueprint across species? The brief answer is "No." Four early divergent lineages from the nerveless common ancestor of all animals independently evolved distinct neuroid-type integrative systems. One of these is a subset of neural nets in comb jellies with unique synapses; the second lineage is the well-known Cnidaria + Bilateria; the two others are non-synaptic neuroid systems in sponges and placozoans. By integrating scRNA-seq and microscopy data, we revise the definition of neurons as synaptically-coupled polarized and highly heterogenous secretory cells at the top of behavioral hierarchies with learning capabilities. This physiological (not phylogenetic) definition separates 'true' neurons from non-synaptically and gap junction-coupled integrative systems executing more stereotyped behaviors. Growing evidence supports the hypothesis of multiple origins of neurons and synapses. Thus, many non-bilaterian and bilaterian neuronal classes, circuits or systems are considered functional rather than genetic categories, composed of non-homologous cell types. In summary, little-explored examples of convergent neuronal evolution in representatives of early branching metazoans provide conceptually novel microanatomical and physiological architectures of behavioral controls in animals with prospects of neuro-engineering and synthetic biology.

Mechanisms Underlying Influence of Bioelectricity in Development

To execute the intricate process of development, cells coordinate across tissues and organs to determine where each cell divides and differentiates. This coordination requires complex communication between cells. Growing evidence suggests that bioelectrical signals controlled via ion channels contribute to cell communication during development. Ion channels collectively regulate the transmembrane potential of cells, and their function plays a conserved role in the development of organisms from flies to humans. Spontaneous calcium oscillations can be found in nearly every cell type and tissue, and disruption of these oscillations leads to defects in development. However, the mechanism by which bioelectricity regulates development is still unclear. Ion channels play essential roles in the processes of cell death, proliferation, migration, and in each of the major canonical developmental signaling pathways. Previous reviews focus on evidence for one potential mechanism by which bioelectricity affects morphogenesis, but there is evidence that supports multiple different mechanisms which are not mutually exclusive. Evidence supports bioelectricity contributing to development through multiple different mechanisms. Here, we review evidence for the importance of bioelectricity in morphogenesis and provide a comprehensive review of the evidence for several potential mechanisms by which ion channels may act in developmental processes.