The experiences of 585 people when they tried to withdraw from antipsychotic drugs

Patient Voices: Lived Experiences of Decision-Making Process in Long-Term Antipsychotic Medication Treatment

This research explores patients' perspectives on the decision-making process for long-term antipsychotic treatment. Twenty individuals on non-compulsory antipsychotic medications were interviewed, and their responses were analyzed using grounded theory. The analysis revealed three interconnected themes that suggest a cyclical process potentially eroding patient autonomy: According to participants' accounts, they often received limited information about dependence, withdrawal symptoms, or expected treatment duration before starting medication. Subsequently, many reported developing desires to stop or reduce their antipsychotic treatment. Participants then described experiencing dismissal of their reported side effects or treatment ineffectiveness, lack of alternatives, and opposition to reduction attempts from their psychiatrists. These experiences formed a cycle where initial information gaps contributed to later challenges when attempting treatment modifications. The findings emphasize the value of comprehensive information delivery, serious consideration of patients' reported experiences, and treatment processes that enhance patients' sense of autonomy in their psychiatric care.

How important are informed consent, informed choice, and patient-doctor relationships, when prescribing antipsychotic medication?

BACKGROUND

Antipsychotic medications (APs) are used for people with psychosis diagnoses and, increasingly for other problems and groups.

AIMS

This study examines how APs are prescribed, from the perspective of recipients.

METHODS

757 people, from 30 countries, responded to questions about their experiences with APs, in an online survey.

RESULTS

Most (70%) were told nothing about adverse effects. Fewer than 2% recalled being told about the risks of diabetes, suicidality, sexual dysfunction, or reduced life span. None recalled being told about reduced brain volume or withdrawal effects. Only 28% recalled being offered other treatments; with only 14% offered talking therapies. 46% were not told how long to take the APs; and, of those who were told something, 48% were told to take them forever. Most respondents (76%) were not told how APs work. Only 19% were satisfied with the prescribing process, and only 25% reported a good, or very good, relationship with the prescriber. Information, satisfaction with the process, and the prescriber relationship were all positively related to three self-reported outcomes: reduction of problems the drugs were prescribed for, general helpfulness, and quality of life.

CONCLUSIONS

Steps need to be taken to ensure people prescribed antipsychotics are fully informed, especially about adverse effects and alternatives.

What is helpful and unhelpful when people try to withdraw from antipsychotics: An international survey

OBJECTIVE

Antipsychotics remain the first-line treatment for people diagnosed with psychotic disorders despite adverse effects which lead many people to stop their medication. Many stop without the support of the prescriber, who may fear relapse. The objective of this study is to better understand the process of withdrawal from antipsychotics, from the perspective of people taking antipsychotics.

DESIGN

Online survey.

METHODS

An international online survey elicited quantitative responses about pre-withdrawal planning (560) and qualitative responses about what was helpful and unhelpful when withdrawing from antipsychotics (443). Responses came from users of antipsychotics in 29 countries.

RESULTS

Forty-seven per cent did not consult their psychiatrist before discontinuing. Only 40% made preparations, most commonly making a plan, gathering information and informing family. The most frequently reported helpful factors were focussing on the benefits of getting off the drugs (including ending adverse effects and feeling more alive), information about withdrawal symptoms and how to withdraw safely, withdrawing slowly, and support from psychologists, counsellors and psychotherapists. The most common unhelpful factor was the psychiatrist/doctor, largely because of their lack of knowledge, refusal to support the patient's wishes and the threat or use of coercion.

CONCLUSIONS

Evidence-based, respectful, collaborative responses to patients' concerns about adverse effects and desires to withdraw would probably reduce relapse rates and improve long-term outcomes. It would definitely help end pervasive breaching of the principle of informed consent and human rights legislation.