Medical-Legal-Psychology Partnerships - Innovation in Addressing Social Determinants of Health in Pediatric Primary Care

Clinical Pathways for the Identification and Referral for Social Needs: A Systematic Review

CONTEXT

Recognition of the importance of the social determinants of child health has prompted increased interest in clinical pathways that identify and refer for social needs.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this systematic review was to determine the effectiveness of interventions that identify and refer for social needs for families with children aged 0 to 18 years attending outpatient community and ambulatory healthcare services.

DATA SOURCES

We searched the following databases: Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, CINAHL, Emcare, EBMR.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were included if children and their families underwent a process of identification and referral for social needs in outpatient community and ambulatory healthcare services.

DATA EXTRACTION

Initial searches identified 5490 titles, from which 18 studies (73 707 families and children) were finally retained.

RESULTS

Intervention pathways were grouped into 3 categories based on whether identification and referral for social needs was conducted with only targeted community resources, a navigator, or with clinician training. The majority of studies reported positive outcomes; with an increase in social needs identification, an increase in referrals following identification, or a reduction in social needs. Child health outcome results were inconsistent.

LIMITATIONS

The search terms used may have provided bias toward countries in which these terms are in use. The heterogeneity of outcome measures between included studies meant a meta-analysis was not possible.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite evidence that clinical pathways for children and families help reduce social needs, evidence for improvements in child health is insufficient. Further studies from diverse settings are needed to inform clinical practice to optimize child health outcomes.

The Impact of a Pediatric Medical-Legal Partnership on Pediatric Providers: A Qualitative Study

OBJECTIVE

Medical-Legal Partnerships (MLPs) integrate medical and legal care to address prevalent health-harming legal needs (HHLN) among socioeconomically marginalized populations. MLPs address a diverse array of social determinants of health (SDOH) and have been shown to positively impact children's health. Less is known, however, about how MLPs affect health care providers. MLPs may affect child health by changing clinical practice and provider behavior, and transforming providers' relationships with their patients and patients' families. Examining and understanding how MLPs affect providers is thus critical to elucidating how MLPs may ultimately impact child health.

METHODS

We examined one pediatric MLP at an academic medical center in New Haven, Connecticut. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 20 pediatric providers who had engaged with the MLP and 20 parents/guardians who had interacted with the MLP. We analyzed the qualitative data using inductive coding, primarily drawing upon provider interviews.

RESULTS

The MLP affected providers in five major ways. The MLP 1) improved provider awareness of SDOH and HHLN, 2) expanded provider perceptions of their role and responsibilities as clinicians, 3) improved provider efficacy in addressing SDOH and HHLN, 4) empowered providers to engage in systemic advocacy, and 5) improved providers' relationships with patients' families.

CONCLUSION

Our study identifies multiple ways that a pediatric MLP affects providers. Our findings suggest that MLPs can improve patient and population health by equipping providers with the knowledge and tools needed to assist patients with HHLN and SDOH, improving provider-family relationships, and encouraging providers to engage in systemic and institutional advocacy.

Pediatricians Contributing to Poverty Reduction Through Clinical-Community Partnership and Collective Action: A Narrative Review

Poverty affects child health and well-being in short- and long-term ways, directly and indirectly influencing a range of health outcomes through linked social and environmental challenges. Given these links, pediatricians have long advocated for poverty reduction in both clinical settings and society. Pediatricians and others who work in pediatric settings are well-suited to address poverty given frequent touchpoints with children and families and the trust that develops over repeated encounters. Many pediatricians also recognize the need for cross-sector engagement, mobilization, and innovation in building larger collaborative efforts to combat the harmful effects of poverty. A range of methods, like co-design, community organizing, and community-engaged quality improvement, are necessary to achieve measurable progress. Moreover, advancing meaningful representation and inclusion of those from underrepresented racial and ethnic minority groups will augment efforts to address poverty within and equity across communities. Such methods promote and strengthen key clinical-community partnerships poised to address poverty's upstream root causes and its harmful consequences downstream. This article focuses on those clinical-community intersections and cross-sector, multi-disciplinary programs like Medical-Legal Partnerships, Medical-Financial Partnerships, clinic-based food pantries, and embedded behavioral health services. Such programs and partnerships increase access to services difficult for children living in poverty to obtain. Partnerships can also broaden to include community-wide learning networks and asset-building coalitions, poised to accelerate meaningful change. Pediatricians and allied professionals can play an active role; they can convene, catalyze, partner, and mobilize to create solutions designed to mitigate the harmful effects of poverty on child health.

Primary care-based interventions to address the financial needs of patients experiencing poverty: a scoping review of the literature

BACKGROUND

It is broadly accepted that poverty is associated with poor health, and the health impact of poverty has been explored in numerous high-income country settings. There is a large and growing body of evidence of the role that primary care practitioners can play in identifying poverty as a health determinant, and in interventions to address it.

PURPOSE OF STUDY

This study maps the published peer-reviewed and grey literature on primary care setting interventions to address poverty in high-income countries in order to identify key concepts and gaps in the research. This scoping review seeks to map the tools in use to identify and address patients' economic needs; describe the key types of primary care-based interventions; and examine barriers and facilitators to successful implementation.

METHODS

Using a scoping review methodology, we searched five databases, the grey literature and the reference lists of relevant studies to identify studies on interventions to address the economic needs-related social determinants of health that occur in primary health care delivery settings, in high-income countries. Findings were synthesized narratively, and examined using thematic analysis, according to iteratively identified themes.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen papers were included in the review and fell into two broad categories of description and evaluation: screening tools, and economic needs-specific interventions. Primary care-based interventions that aim to address patients' financial needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection upon patient registration, through referral to external services, to direct intervention in addressing patients' income needs.

CONCLUSION

Tools and processes to identify and address patients' economic social needs range from those tailored to individual health practices, or addressing one specific dimension of need, to wide-ranging protocols. Primary care-based interventions to address income needs operate at all levels, from passive sociodemographic data collection, through referral to external services, to direct intervention. Measuring success has proven challenging. The decision to undertake this work requires courage on the part of health care providers because it can be difficult, time-consuming and complex. However, it is often appreciated by patients, even when the scope of action available to health care providers is quite narrow.

Optimizing Medical-Legal Partnerships in Pediatric Psychology to Reduce Health Disparities

OBJECTIVE

To provide a topical review of the literature on the use of medical-legal partnerships (MLPs) to address social determinants of health (SDH) needs as a means to reduce health disparities, and to make recommendations for the implementation of MLPs within pediatric psychologists' clinical work, research, and training.

METHODS

We conducted a topical review of the research on the intersection of MLPs, SDH needs, and health disparities among pediatric populations. Given the scarcity of literature available, both empirical and theoretical articles were included in the review.

RESULTS

Though limited, the extant literature suggests that use of MLPs may help address the SDH needs that perpetuate disparities among pediatric populations. To date, MLPs are not as frequently incorporated in the training and work of pediatric psychologists as they may be in other related fields (e.g., medicine).

CONCLUSIONS

MLPs provide an opportunity for psychologists to broaden their interdisciplinary collaborations, to more aptly meet the social and legal needs of their patients to assist in reducing inequities among underserved pediatric populations. The systematic incorporation of MLPs into pediatric psychology training may help to increase the utilization of these services moving forward.