The Structured Oral Examination: A Method to Improve Formative Assessment of Fellows in Pediatric Endocrinology

Pediatric Endocrinology Education Among Trainees: A Scoping Review

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric endocrinology education is a fundamental part of all pediatric endocrinology training. Hence, understanding the current methods used for training learners on skills required and understanding methods or topics that may be underexplored could help improve the quality of training.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore training and assessment strategies used in pediatric endocrinology training across medical education programs through a scoping review.

METHODS

Search strategy was developed with a librarian, and bibliographic databases (e.g., MEDLINE and EMBASE) were searched from January 2005 to July 2024. Pilot screenings ensured consistent inclusion/exclusion decisions among reviewers. Full-text articles were included if they were related to pediatric endocrinology education and focused on medical learners.

RESULTS

We included 45 of 5814 sources of evidence for data extraction. Majority focused on knowledge of Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes and diabetes ketoacidosis (N = 18), followed by differences in sex development and pubertal assessment (N = 12). The most frequently used training method was through didactics. Additionally, the most frequently used assessment measures included knowledge tests (N = 25). Also, a limited number of studies targeted obesity (N = 2), gender care (N = 3), thyroid (N = 1) and hypoglycaemia (N = 1), and no studies targeted common topics such as bone health and adrenal insufficiency.

CONCLUSION

This review reveals the current emphasis on diabetes-related topics and traditional teaching in pediatric endocrinology education. It suggests a need for more innovative methods, like simulation-based learning and varied assessment techniques, to better equip trainees. Addressing these gaps can improve trainee confidence, patient care, and health outcomes for children with endocrine disorders.

Improving process aspect of oral examination as assessment tool in undergraduate biochemistry by introducing structured oral examination: an observational study in India based on a survey among stakeholders

PURPOSE

The traditional method of oral examination, though a good tool for assessing the depth and breadth of student's knowledge, has its shortcomings. A variable number of questions with variable difficulty levels by different examiners with different expectations can introduce bias in scores. The process aspect of oral examinations of first-year undergraduate medical students was improved by structuring them and by creating uniformity in the number, time, and difficulty level of questions for assessment, and feedback was taken regarding its acceptance as an improved tool of assessment.

METHODS

After finalizing the topics, questions from a viva viewpoint were structured and categorized into three difficulty levels covering all aspects of chosen topics validated by subject experts. The number of questions asked per difficulty level, time, and marks given to each question was pre-decided. After briefing the students, the structured viva was conducted, and feedback was taken from students and examiners.

RESULTS

The majority (87%) of first-year undergraduate students undertook the structured viva and filled in the feedback form. Nearly all students felt that the structured oral examination was a fair and unbiased assessment tool with less subjectivity compared to traditional viva. Most students (83.9%) felt that the topics were comprehensively covered, and 96.4% of students felt less stressed. Among examiners, there was 100% agreement on the uniformity of questions asked, topics covered, less subjectivity, and no carryover effect.

CONCLUSION

The examiners have accepted it as one of the formative assessment tools for future batches of students and are ready to explore its utility as a summative assessment tool.

Enhancing competency-based assessment: Implementing oral boards in nursing education

ABSTRACT

Competency-based education, pivotal in nursing programs, emphasizes learning methods over knowledge accumulation, integrating ongoing assessments for performance and outcomes. The American Association College of Nursing introduced competency-based education, urging educators to explore diverse assessment methods. This article explores the implementation of mock oral boards as an assessment method to synchronize performance standards with competencies in nursing education, specifically in preparing nurse practitioner students for clinical rotations.