1
|
Peritoneal metastases in elderly patients with colorectal cancer. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY 2022; 48:2558-2564. [PMID: 35662530 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 05/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the introduction of cytoreductive surgery with intraperitoneal chemotherapy and the development of new systemic anti-cancer agents, the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients with peritoneal metastases has changed. Real-world data on the treatment of elderly patients and their clinical outcomes is lacking. METHODS All CRC patients diagnosed with synchronous peritoneal metastases (SPM) during 2008-2019 (n = 7,748) were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Trends in treatment and postoperative mortality were described by age category (<70, 70-74, 75-79, ≥80 years) and period of diagnosis (2008-2013, 2014-2019). Kaplan-Meier curves were constructed, and log-rank tests were performed to evaluate differences in overall survival (OS). RESULTS With increasing age, less patients received multimodality treatment and systemic treatment. Of the patients aged <70 years, 38% underwent multimodality treatment and 35% palliative systemic therapy, declining to 4% and 12% in patients ≥80 years. A large and increasing proportion of elderly patients did not receive cancer-directed treatment, this increased from 32% in 2008-2013 to 41% in 2014-2019 in 75-79 years old patients and from 52% to 65% in ≥80 years old. Postoperative mortality decreased in all age categories over time, OS remained stable. The median OS of elderly patients ranged from 8 months in 70-74 years old to 3 months in patients aged ≥80 years. DISCUSSION Age strongly affects treatment of patients with SPM, with a large and increasing proportion of elderly patients not receiving cancer-directed treatment. Their prognosis remains very poor. There is a need for therapeutic options that are well tolerable for elderly patients.
Collapse
|
4
|
Kowa CY, Jin Z, Gan TJ. Framework, component, and implementation of enhanced recovery pathways. J Anesth 2022; 36:648-660. [PMID: 35789291 PMCID: PMC9255474 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-022-03088-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of enhanced recovery pathways (ERPs) has led to a considerable paradigm shift towards evidence-based, multidisciplinary perioperative care. Such pathways are now widely implemented in a variety of surgical specialties, with largely positive results. In this narrative review, we summarize the principles, components and implementation of ERPs, focusing on recent developments in the field. We also discuss ‘special cases’ in ERPs, including: surgery in frail patients; emergency procedures; and patients with Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2/COVID-19).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao-Ying Kowa
- Department of Anaesthesia, Whittington Hospital, Magdala Ave, London, N19 5NF, UK
| | - Zhaosheng Jin
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA
| | - Tong J Gan
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook University Health Science Center, Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8480, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Dagorno C, Sommacale D, Laurent A, Attias A, Mongardon N, Levesque E, Langeron O, Rhaiem R, Leroy V, Amaddeo G, Brustia R. Prehabilitation in hepato-pancreato-biliary surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. A necessary step forward evidence-based sample size calculation for future trials. J Visc Surg 2021; 159:362-372. [PMID: 34489200 DOI: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2021.07.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Prehabilitation is defined as preoperative conditioning of patients in order to improve post-operative outcomes. Some studies showed an increase in functional recovery following colorectal surgery, but its effect in hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) surgery is unclear. The aim of this study was to realize a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on the current available evidence on prehabilitation in HPB surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review and a metanalysis were carried out on prehabilitation (physical, nutritional and psychological interventions) in HPB surgery (2009-2019). Assessed outcomes were postoperative complications, length of stay (LOS), 30-day readmission, and mortality. MAIN RESULTS Four studies among the 191 screened were included in this systematic review (3 randomized controlled trials, 1 case-control propensity score study), involving 419 patients (prehabilitation group, n=139; control group, n=280). After pooling, no difference was observed on LOS ((-4.37 days [95% CI: -8.86; 0.13]) or postoperative complications (RR 0.83 [95%CI: 0.62; 1.10]), reported by all the included studies. Two trials reported on readmission rate, but given the high heterogeneity, a meta-analysis was not realized. No deaths were reported among the included studies. CONCLUSION No effect of prehabilitation programs in HPB surgery was observed on LOS or postoperative complications rate. Future trials with standardized outcomes of measure, and adequately powered samples calculations are thus required. PROSPERO REGISTRATION CRD42020165218.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dagorno
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - D Sommacale
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955, Team "Pathophysiology and Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Related Cancers", France-Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France
| | - A Laurent
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - A Attias
- Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N Mongardon
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France; U955-IMRB, Equipe 03 "Pharmacologie et Technologies pour les Maladies Cardiovasculaires (PROTECT)", Inserm, University Paris Est Creteil (UPEC), Ecole Nationale Vétérinaire d'Alfort (EnVA), 94700 Maisons-Alfort, France
| | - E Levesque
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - O Langeron
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Service d'anesthésie-réanimation chirurgicale, DMU CARE, DHU A-TVB, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - R Rhaiem
- Department of General, Digestive and Endocrine Surgery, Robert-Debré University Hospital, University of Champagne-Ardennes, Reims, France
| | - V Leroy
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955, Team "Pathophysiology and Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Related Cancers", France-Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Amaddeo
- Université Paris Est Creteil, Faculté de Santé, 94010 Créteil, France; Inserm U955, Team "Pathophysiology and Therapy of Chronic Viral Hepatitis and Related Cancers", France-Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - R Brustia
- Department of Digestive and Hepato-pancreatic-biliary Surgery, DMU CARE, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpitaux Universitaires Henri Mondor, 51, avenue du Maréchal de Lattre de Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|