Sleep disturbances and related disordered breathing after hip replacement surgery: A randomised controlled trial

Increased Risk of Postoperative Complications in Patients Who Have Obstructive Sleep Apnea Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) has been linked to multiple adverse health outcomes and postoperative complications. Despite the high prevalence of OSA in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), few studies have evaluated the postoperative course of OSA patients after joint arthroplasty surgery.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus (EMBASE, MEDLINE, and COMPENDEX) were used to conduct a systematic review of articles from inception to July 2023. Primary studies comparing postoperative outcomes following TJA between patients who had and did not have OSA were included. Postoperative medical complications, utilization of critical care, hospital stay, and mortality data were extracted. Descriptive statistics and random-effects meta-analysis models were used to analyze the available data. Included studies were evaluated for methodological risks of bias using the risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions. This review was registered on the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: CRD42023447610).

RESULTS

There were 7 studies with a total of 20,977 patients (9,425 hip; 11,137 knee; 415 hip or knee) that were included. Pulmonary complications were most frequently studied, followed by thromboembolic events. Cardiac, gastrointestinal, hematologic, genitourinary, and delirium events were also reported across studies. Meta-analysis revealed that OSA patients had 4-fold increased odds of overall medical complications (OR [odds ratio], 4.23; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.97 to 6.04; P < .001; I2 = 0%), 4-fold increased odds of pulmonary complications (OR, 4.31; 95% CI, 2.82 to 6.60; P < .001; I2 = 0%), 2-fold increased odds of thromboembolic complications (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.22 to 3.03; P = .005; I2 = 9%), and 4-fold increased odds of delirium (OR, 3.94; 95% CI, 1.72 to 9.04; P = .001; I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant association was found between OSA and overall medical, pulmonary, and thromboembolic complications. These patients also had a higher incidence of postoperative delirium. The present findings underscore the need for comprehensive perioperative strategies to mitigate these risks in OSA patients who elect to undergo TJA.

Advances in the use of dexmedetomidine during the perioperative period to improve postoperative sleep quality in patients undergoing surgery

There is a high incidence of postoperative sleep and sleep architecture disorders in patients undergoing surgery, and dexmedetomidine (DEX) is commonly used to improve postoperative sleep quality and ameliorate the adverse effects of poor sleep on various organ systems. The continuous intraoperative intravenous infusion of DEX, the addition of DEX to postoperative intravenous analgesia pumps, and the continuous infusion of DEX after admission to the intensive care unit are often used clinically to improve postoperative sleep quality at doses of 0.1 to 0.7 μg/kg/hour, but the effects of DEX on sleep quality and structure identified in these studies have been inconsistent. Thus, it is unclear whether DEX improves postoperative sleep quality. The various methods of administering DEX to improve postoperative sleep quality have differing effects, the route used modifies the effect of DEX on sleep structure, and the intrinsic mechanism whereby DEX improves sleep quality remains to be fully investigated. In the present review, we describe new directions for future research into the effects of DEX on postoperative sleep quality and the mechanisms involved, which should help guide the design of further studies. This narrative review was completed according to the Scale for the Assessment of Narrative Review Articles (SANRA).

Intraoperative dexmedetomidine on postoperative sleep disturbance in older patients undergoing major abdominal surgery: A randomized controlled trial protocol

Background

Postoperative sleep disturbance (PSD) occurs frequently in patients who undergo major abdominal surgical procedures. Dexmedetomidine is a promising agent to improve the quality of sleep for surgical patients. We designed this trial to investigate the effects of two different doses of intraoperative dexmedetomidine on the occurrence of PSD in elderly patients who have major abdominal surgery.

Methods

In this randomized, double-blind, controlled trial, 210 elderly patients aged ≥65 years will be randomized, with an allocation ratio of 1:1:1, to two dexmedetomidine groups (intraoperative infusion of 0.3 or 0.6 μg/kg/h) and a normal saline placebo group. The primary endpoint is the occurrence of PSD on the first night after surgery, assessed using the Athens Insomnia Scale. The secondary endpoints are (1) the incidence of PSD during the 2nd, 3rd, 5th, 7th, and 30th nights postoperatively; (2) pain at rest and on movement at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, assessed using the Numerical Rating Scale; (3) the incidence of postoperative delirium during 0-7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge, assessed using the 3-min Confusion Assessment Method; (4) depressive symptoms during 0-7 days postoperatively or until hospital discharge, assessed using the 15-items Geriatric Depression Scale; and (5) quality of recovery on postoperative days 1, 2, and 3, assessed using the 15-items Quality of Recovery Scale. Patients' sleep data will also be collected by Xiaomi Mi Band 7 for further analysis.

Discussion

The findings of this trial will provide clinical evidence for improving the quality of sleep among elderly patients undergoing major abdominal surgery.

Ethics and dissemination

This trial was approved by the Ethics Committee of the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (No. 2023-160). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

Trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073163).

Effect of dexmedetomidine infusion on postoperative sleep disturbances in women with breast cancer: A monocentric randomized-controlled double-blind trial

BACKGROUND

Most women with breast cancer are prone to postoperative sleep disturbances (POSD). Little is known about the differences between sevoflurane and propofol combined with dexmedetomidine on POSD in the same context. We investigated the effect of intra-operative sevoflurane or propofol combined with intravenous dexmedetomidine on the incidence of POSD and postoperative sleep structures.

METHODS

A monocentric, randomized-controlled, double-blind trial. Female patients undergoing radical surgery for breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive sevoflurane and placebo, sevoflurane and dexmedetomidine, propofol and placebo, or propofol and dexmedetomidine. Dexmedetomidine was administered at 1.0 μg kg-1 infusion 15 min before induction, then infused at 0.4 μg kg-1 h-1 until the surgical drain started to be placed. The primary outcome was the incidence of POSD within the postoperative first three days (defined as an Athens Insomnia Scale score ≥ 6 points on at least one day of postoperative first three days). The secondary outcome was the duration of sleep structures, collected from the Fitbit Charge 2® smart bracelet (Fitbit, Inc., San Francisco, CA, USA).

RESULTS

There were 188 women analyzed with the modified intention-to-treat method. The incidences of POSD in the dexmedetomidine and placebo groups were similar (p = 0.649). In the sevoflurane sedation strategy, dexmedetomidine decreased nocturnal wakefulness on postoperative first day (p = 0.001). In the propofol sedation strategy, dexmedetomidine increased nocturnal deep sleep on postoperative first (p < 0.001) and third (p < 0.001) days.

CONCLUSION

Intra-operative infusion of dexmedetomidine had no significant effect on POSD but decreased nocturnal wakefulness in the sevoflurane group and increased nocturnal deep sleep in the propofol group.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered at www.chictr.org.cn (ChiCTR2300070136).

The effects of ergonomic sleep mask use on sleep quality and comfort in intensive care patients

This study was conducted to determine the effects of the use of ergonomic sleep mask on sleep quality and comfort in intensive care patients. This randomised controlled experimental study was completed with 128 surgical intensive care patients (control = 64, experimental = 64). During the second night of their stay in the unit, ergonomic sleep masks were given to the patients in the experimental group, and earplugs and eye masks were given to the patients in the control group. A Patient information form, Visual analogue scale for discomfort, and the Richard-Campbell sleep questionnaire were used to collect data. While 51.6% of the patients were female, the mean age of the patients was 63.87 ± 14.94 years. The highest rates of patients had undergone cardiovascular surgery (28.9%) and general anaesthesia (57.8%). It was determined that the sleep quality of the patients in the experimental group was statistically and clinically significantly higher after the intervention (50.86 ± 21.46 vs 37.64 ± 14.97, t = -5.355, Cohen's d = 0.450, p < 0.001). Likewise, the patients who used ergonomic sleep masks had a statistically significantly lower mean VAS for Discomfort score, and their comfort level was higher (p < 0.001), but the difference was not clinically significant (Cohen's d = 0.208). The results of this study showed that the use of ergonomic sleep masks in surgical intensive care patients had a more positive effect on both the sleep quality and comfort levels of patients compared with earplugs and eye masks. The use of an ergonomic sleep mask is recommended in the early period to facilitate sleep and rest in surgical intensive care patients.