Template-driven computed tomography radiation dose reporting: implementation of a radiology housestaff quality improvement project

A Discharge Time-Out: A Case Study on Physician–Nurse Discharge Communication and the Challenge of Sustainability in Resident-Led Quality Improvement

Resident-led quality improvement (QI) is an important component of resident education yet sustainability of improvement and impact on resident education have rarely been explored. This study describes a resident-led intervention to improve nursing (RN)–provider (MD) communication at discharge—the Discharge Time-Out (DTO)— and explores its uptake and sustainability. One year later, residents were surveyed regarding QI self-efficacy and planned QI involvement. Baseline verbal RN–MD communication at discharge was rare. During DTO implementation, rates of structured communication averaged 56% (341/608) with several months >70%. During the monitoring phase, this fell to 45% and did not recover (833/1852). Participating residents reported increased QI self-efficacy ( P < .05) and increased likelihood of participating in future QI ( P < .05). The DTO increased RN–MD communication but was not sustained. Resident-led QI should explicitly address sustainability to achieve improvement and educational objectives. To foster resident education and avoid short-lived, low-impact projects, increased attention should be given to sustainability of resident-led QI.

Use of Iterative Cycles in Quality Improvement Projects in Imaging: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

Studies suggest that quality improvement (QI) projects in health care lack scientific rigor, but the actual frequency of use of proven scientific QI methodology is unknown. The purposes of this study are to (1) conduct a systematic review of QI projects in radiology journals on the frequency of use of iterative cycles, a marker of proven QI methodology, and (2) assess association of the use of iterative cycles with characteristics of these projects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched English-language radiology journals on MEDLINE between 2008 and 2015 for published QI studies. Three reviewers appraised studies and extracted data. Use of iterative cycles was identified, and results were summarized qualitatively. χ² Analysis evaluated associations of iterative cycles with other data elements.

RESULTS

Of 3,134 potentially eligible citations, 44 studies met inclusion criteria. Only 46% of these used iterative cycles to refine intervention. Use of iterative cycles were associated with projects designed to improve process, QI expert support, reporting of unintended effect of intervention, and explicitly stated use of iterative cycles. General lack of scientific rigor was represented by failure to report baseline data (9%), describe unintended effects (66%), and discuss limitations (36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our systematic review found fewer than half of the QI projects in radiology journals used iterative cycles to refine intervention, a scientific strategy central to many proven improvement methodologies. Use of iterative approach was associated with projects designed to improve processes, QI expert support, report of unintended effect, and explicitly stated use of iterative cycles.

A Resident-led Initiative Improves Screening and Treatment for Vitamin D Deficiency in Patients with Hip Fractures

BACKGROUND

Acute hip fractures carry a high risk of morbidity and are associated with low vitamin D levels. Improvements in screening and treating low vitamin D levels may lead to lower fall rates and a lower likelihood of additional fragility fractures. However, patients with low vitamin D levels often remain unassessed and untreated, even after they experience these fractures.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

We wished to determine whether a resident-led initiative can improve (1) screening for and (2) treatment of vitamin D deficiency in patients with acute hip fractures.

METHODS

Our department initiated a housestaff-led, quality improvement project focused on screening and treating vitamin D deficiency in patients with acute hip fractures. Screening encompassed checking serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level during the acute hospitalization, and treating was defined as starting supplementation before discharge when the serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D level was less than 30 ng/mL. To evaluate the efficacy of this program, an administrative database identified 283 patients treated surgically for an acute hip fracture between July 2010 and June 2014. This period included 2 years before program initiation (Year 1, n = 65 patients; Year 2, n = 61 patients), the initial program year (Year 3, n = 66 patients), and the subsequent program year (Year 4, n = 91 patients). Followup was extended to 6 weeks after treatment with 9.2% (26/282) of patients lost to followup. Eight patients were excluded owing to documented intolerance of vitamin D supplementation. There were no differences regarding patient demographics, fracture type, or treatment rendered across these 4 years. The primary endpoints were the proportion of patients screened and treated for vitamin D deficiency. The secondary endpoint was the continuation of vitamin D supplementation at the patient's 6 week followup, according to the patient's medication list at that visit. This analysis included all patients, assuming those lost to followup had not continued supplementation. ANOVA and chi-square tests were used to evaluate the differences in demographic data and in screening and treating rates.

RESULTS

Screening for vitamin D deficiency improved after initiation of the resident-led quality improvement program, with screening performed for 31% of patients in Year 1 (20/65; odds ratio [OR], 0.44; 95% CI, 0.26-0.75), 20% of patients in Year 2 (12/61; OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.13-0.46), 46% of patients in Year 3 (30/66; OR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.51-1.35), and 88% of patients in Year 4 (80/91; OR, 7.27; 95% CI, 3.87-13.7) (p < 0.001). Vitamin D supplementation was initiated for 33% of patients in Year 1 (21/63; OR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.30-0.84), 28% in Year 2 (17/61; OR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.22-0.68), 50% in Year 3 (32/64; OR,1.00; 95% CI, 0.61-1.63), and 76% in Year 4 (65/86; OR, 3.10; 95% CI, 1.89-5.06) (p < 0.001). At early postoperative followup, we saw substantial improvement in the proportion of patients who continued receiving vitamin D supplementation: Year 1, 12% (8/64; OR, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.07-0.30); Year 2, 15% (9/61; OR, 0.17; 95% CI, 0.09-0.35); Year 3, 26% (16/64; OR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.19-0.59); and Year 4, 46% (40/86; OR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.57-1.33) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of a resident-led quality improvement program resulted in higher rates of screening and treating vitamin D deficiency for patients with acute hip fractures. Housestaff-based initiatives may be an effective way to improve care processes that target improvements in bone health.

Satisfaction of imaging report rendered in emergency setting: a survey of radiology and referring physicians

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To determine physicians' preference toward three types of structured imaging reports (basic structured report [BSR], itemized report [IR], and point-and-click report [PCR]) used in emergency radiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Survey questions were created and considered valid and reliable based on index of item objective congruence from three specialists (>0.75) and a pilot of 25 subjects (Cronbach alpha, 0.83-1.00). Respondents included trainees and attendings in radiology and referring physicians working in the academic emergency department at the time of survey rollout. They were provided report examples of each type and asked to complete a questionnaire consisting of the following five parts: demographics, necessity of imaging report, report quality (content, format and organization, and language), process of reporting, and components of imaging report. For rating scores, the higher value means the higher preference and agreement.

RESULTS

The survey received 79.5% response rate. Respondents included 101 physicians (mean age, 29.4 years; 61 radiology physicians and 40 referring physicians; 81 trainees and 20 attending). Overall, IR was preferred over PCR and BSR by all physicians with scores (out of 10) as follows: IR, 7.62-8.83; PCR, 6.62-8.55; BSR, 5.23-6.65; P < .001. IR received scores (out of 5) of 4.03-4.37, PCR 3.32-4.52, and BSR 2.59-3.86 for report quality. For process of reporting, IR had scores (out of 5) of 3.80-4.56, PCR 2.79-4.09, and BSR 2.32-3.56.

CONCLUSIONS

In emergency setting, physicians preferred IR over PCR and BSR. IR and PCR were equal in report quality metrics, but IR was most preferred in the process of reporting. BSR ranked last in both quality and process.

Radiologist compliance with California CT dose reporting requirements: a single-center review of pediatric chest CT

OBJECTIVE

Effective July 1, 2012, CT dose reporting became mandatory in California. We sought to assess radiologist compliance with this legislation and to determine areas for improvement.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed reports from all chest CT examinations performed at our institution from July 1, 2012, through June 30, 2013, for errors in documentation of volume CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and phantom size. Reports were considered as legally compliant if both CTDIvol and DLP were documented accurately and as institutionally compliant if phantom size was also documented accurately. Additionally, we tracked reports that did not document dose in our standard format (phantom size, CTDIvol for each series, and total DLP).

RESULTS

Radiologists omitted CTDIvol, DLP, or both in nine of 664 examinations (1.4%) and inaccurately reported one or both of them in 56 of the remaining 655 examinations (8.5%). Radiologists omitted phantom size in 11 of 664 examinations (1.7%) and inaccurately documented it in 20 of the remaining 653 examinations (3.1%). Of 664 examinations, 599 (90.2%) met legal reporting requirements, and 583 (87.8%) met institutional requirements. In reporting dose, radiologists variably used less decimal precision than available, summed CTDIvol, included only series-level DLP, and specified dose information from the scout topogram or a nonchest series for combination examinations.

CONCLUSION

Our institutional processes, which primarily rely on correct human performance, do not ensure accurate dose reporting and are prone to variation in dose reporting format. In view of this finding, we are exploring higher-reliability processes, including better-defined standards and automated dose reporting systems, to improve compliance.