Correlation of Algorithmic and Visual Assessment of Lesion Detection in Clinical Images

Dual-energy CT for differentiation of hypodense liver lesions in pancreatic adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To assess the accuracy of CT spectral HU curve assessment of hypodense liver lesions.

METHODS

In this retrospective HIPAA-compliant study (January 2016 through May 2023), patients with biopsy-proven pancreatic adenocarcinoma and a biopsied indeterminate liver lesion underwent a DECT abdominal CT scan. Spectral HU curves were provided for each hypodense liver lesion, and slopes were calculated. Lesion Hounsfield units, iodine concentration and virtual enhancement were recorded. The Wilcoxon rank sum test was used to compare malignant and benign lesions. Optimal cutoff points were estimated using ROC curves and Youden's Index.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients (19 men, 17 women) with a mean age of 63 years ± 9 (standard deviation), a mean height of 170.9 cm ± 9.5, a mean weight of 69.8 kg ± 14.5, and a body mass index of 23.9 kg/m2 ± 3.5. Reference standard assessment identified 92 liver lesions (50 metastases, 24 cysts, 13 abscesses, 3 regions of inflammation, 2 hemangiomas) with a mean size of 1.1 cm ± 0.5. The mean interval between the CT and liver lesion biopsy was 24 days. A diagnosis of benign versus malignant was determined based on optimal cutoffs: spectral curve slope of 1.36, iodine concentration of 6.47 (100 µg/cm3), and enhancement of 10.25. The receiver operating curves (ROC) for diagnosis using spectral curve slope, iodine concentration, and virtual enhancement resulted in an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.948, 0.946, and 0.937, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spectral HU curves and iodine concentration of well-defined hypodense liver lesions are highly accurate in the diagnosis of benign versus malignant lesions.

KEY POINTS

Question Limited evidence exists for spectral imaging diagnosis of liver lesions-can DECT accurately differentiate between benign and metastatic hypodense liver lesions? Findings Ninety-two hypodense liver lesions evaluated using HU keV curve slope, iodine concentration, and virtual enhancement resulted in accurate benign versus metastatic differentiation. Clinical relevance Hypodense liver lesions are a challenging issue at staging, often requiring further imaging, follow-up, and/or biopsy. The additional information from multi-energy CT can be useful to differentiate between benign and malignant lesions, thereby reducing the need for costly additional evaluation.

Optimization of abdominal CT based on a model of total risk minimization by putting radiation risk in perspective with imaging benefit

BACKGROUND

Risk-versus-benefit optimization required a quantitative comparison of the two. The latter, directly related to effective diagnosis, can be associated to clinical risk. While many strategies have been developed to ascertain radiation risk, there has been a paucity of studies assessing clinical risk, thus limiting the optimization reach to achieve a minimum total risk to patients undergoing imaging examinations. In this study, we developed a mathematical framework for an imaging procedure total risk index considering both radiation and clinical risks based on specific tasks and investigated diseases.

METHODS

The proposed model characterized total risk as the sum of radiation and clinical risks defined as functions of radiation burden, disease prevalence, false-positive rate, expected life-expectancy loss for misdiagnosis, and radiologist interpretative performance (i.e., AUC). The proposed total risk model was applied to a population of one million cases simulating a liver cancer scenario.

RESULTS

For all demographics, the clinical risk outweighs radiation risk by at least 400%. The optimization application indicates that optimizing typical abdominal CT exams should involve a radiation dose increase in over 90% of the cases, with the highest risk optimization potential in Asian population (24% total risk reduction; 306%C T D I v o l increase) and lowest in Hispanic population (5% total risk reduction; 89%C T D I v o l increase).

CONCLUSIONS

Framing risk-to-benefit assessment as a risk-versus-risk question, calculating both clinical and radiation risk using comparable units, allows a quantitative optimization of total risks in CT. The results highlight the dominance of clinical risk at typical CT examination dose levels, and that exaggerated dose reductions can even harm patients.

Oncology-specific radiation dose and image noise reference levels in adult abdominal-pelvic CT

OBJECTIVES

To provide our oncology-specific adult abdominal-pelvic CT reference levels for image noise and radiation dose from a high-volume, oncologic, tertiary referral center.

METHODS

The portal venous phase abdomen-pelvis acquisition was assessed for image noise and radiation dose in 13,320 contrast-enhanced CT examinations. Patient size (effective diameter) and radiation dose (CTDIvol) were recorded using a commercial software system, and image noise (Global Noise metric) was quantified using a custom processing system. The reference level and range for dose and noise were calculated for the full dataset, and for examinations grouped by CT scanner model. Dose and noise reference levels were also calculated for exams grouped by five different patient size categories.

RESULTS

The noise reference level was 11.25 HU with a reference range of 10.25-12.25 HU. The dose reference level at a median effective diameter of 30.7 cm was 26.7 mGy with a reference range of 19.6-37.0 mGy. Dose increased with patient size; however, image noise remained approximately constant within the noise reference range. The doses were 2.1-2.5 times than the doses in the ACR DIR registry for corresponding patient sizes. The image noise was 0.63-0.75 times the previously published reference level in abdominal-pelvic CT examinations.

CONCLUSIONS

Our oncology-specific abdominal-pelvic CT dose reference levels are higher than in the ACR dose index registry and our oncology-specific image noise reference levels are lower than previously proposed image noise reference levels.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study reports reference image noise and radiation dose levels appropriate for the indication of abdomen-pelvis CT examination for cancer diagnosis and staging. The difference in these reference levels from non-oncology-specific CT examinations highlight a need for indication-specific, dose index and image quality reference registries.

Automatic head computed tomography image noise quantification with deep learning

PURPOSE

Computed tomography (CT) image noise is usually determined by standard deviation (SD) of pixel values from uniform image regions. This study investigates how deep learning (DL) could be applied in head CT image noise estimation.

METHODS

Two approaches were investigated for noise image estimation of a single acquisition image: direct noise image estimation using supervised DnCNN convolutional neural network (CNN) architecture, and subtraction of a denoised image estimated with denoising UNet-CNN experimented with supervised and unsupervised noise2noise training approaches. Noise was assessed with local SD maps using 3D- and 2D-CNN architectures. Anthropomorphic phantom CT image dataset (N = 9 scans, 3 repetitions) was used for DL-model comparisons. Mean square error (MSE) and mean absolute percentage errors (MAPE) of SD values were determined using the SD values of subtraction images as ground truth. Open-source clinical head CT low-dose dataset (N_train = 37, N_test = 10 subjects) were used to demonstrate DL applicability in noise estimation from manually labeled uniform regions and in automated noise and contrast assessment.

RESULTS

The direct SD estimation using 3D-CNN was the most accurate assessment method when comparing in phantom dataset (MAPE = 15.5%, MSE = 6.3HU). Unsupervised noise2noise approach provided only slightly inferior results (MAPE = 20.2%, MSE = 13.7HU). 2DCNN and unsupervised UNet models provided the smallest MSE on clinical labeled uniform regions.

CONCLUSIONS

DL-based clinical image assessment is feasible and provides acceptable accuracy as compared to true image noise. Noise2noise approach may be feasible in clinical use where no ground truth data is available. Noise estimation combined with tissue segmentation may enable more comprehensive image quality characterization.

Reduced-Dose Deep Learning Reconstruction for Abdominal CT of Liver Metastases

Background Assessment of liver lesions is constrained as CT radiation doses are lowered; evidence suggests deep learning reconstructions mitigate such effects. Purpose To evaluate liver metastases and image quality between reduced-dose deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-dose filtered back projection (FBP) contrast-enhanced abdominal CT. Materials and Methods In this prospective Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant study (September 2019 through April 2021), participants with biopsy-proven colorectal cancer and liver metastases at baseline CT underwent standard-dose and reduced-dose portal venous abdominal CT in the same breath hold. Three radiologists detected and characterized lesions at standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR, reported confidence, and scored image quality. Contrast-to-noise ratios for liver metastases were recorded. Summary statistics were reported, and a generalized linear mixed model was used. Results Fifty-one participants (mean age ± standard deviation, 57 years ± 13; 31 men) were evaluated. The mean volume CT dose index was 65.1% lower with reduced-dose CT (12.2 mGy) than with standard-dose CT (34.9 mGy). A total of 161 lesions (127 metastases, 34 benign lesions) with a mean size of 0.7 cm ± 0.3 were identified. Subjective image quality of reduced-dose DLIR was superior to that of standard-dose FBP (P < .001). The mean contrast-to-noise ratio for liver metastases of reduced-dose DLIR (3.9 ± 1.7) was higher than that of standard-dose FBP (3.5 ± 1.4) (P < .001). Differences in detection were identified only for lesions 0.5 cm or smaller: 63 of 65 lesions detected with standard-dose FBP (96.9%; 95% CI: 89.3, 99.6) and 47 lesions with reduced-dose DLIR (72.3%; 95% CI: 59.8, 82.7). Lesion accuracy with standard-dose FBP and reduced-dose DLIR was 80.1% (95% CI: 73.1, 86.0; 129 of 161 lesions) and 67.1% (95% CI: 59.3, 74.3; 108 of 161 lesions), respectively (P = .01). Lower lesion confidence was reported with a reduced dose (P < .001). Conclusion Deep learning image reconstruction (DLIR) improved CT image quality at 65% radiation dose reduction while preserving detection of liver lesions larger than 0.5 cm. Reduced-dose DLIR demonstrated overall inferior characterization of liver lesions and reader confidence. Clinical trial registration no. NCT03151564 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

CT Noise-Reduction Methods for Lower-Dose Scanning: Strengths and Weaknesses of Iterative Reconstruction Algorithms and New Techniques

Iterative reconstruction (IR) algorithms are the most widely used CT noise-reduction method to improve image quality and have greatly facilitated radiation dose reduction within the radiology community. Various IR methods have different strengths and limitations. Because IR algorithms are typically nonlinear, they can modify spatial resolution and image noise texture in different regions of the CT image; hence traditional image-quality metrics are not appropriate to assess the ability of IR to preserve diagnostic accuracy, especially for low-contrast diagnostic tasks. In this review, the authors highlight emerging IR algorithms and CT noise-reduction techniques and summarize how these techniques can be evaluated to help determine the appropriate radiation dose levels for different diagnostic tasks in CT. In addition to advanced IR techniques, we describe novel CT noise-reduction methods based on convolutional neural networks (CNNs). CNN-based noise-reduction techniques may offer the ability to reduce image noise while maintaining high levels of image detail but may have unique drawbacks. Other novel CT noise-reduction methods are being developed to leverage spatial and/or spectral redundancy in multiphase or multienergy CT. Radiologists and medical physicists should be familiar with these different alternatives to adapt available CT technology for different diagnostic tasks. The scope of this article is (a) to review the clinical applications of IR algorithms as well as their strengths, weaknesses, and methods of assessment and (b) to explore new CT image reconstruction and noise-reduction techniques that promise to facilitate radiation dose reduction. ^©RSNA, 2021.