Literature Review of Percutaneous Stenting for Palliative Treatment of Malignant Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS)

Safety and efficacy of the Abre™ venous stent in treating thoracic venous stenosis/occlusion: a single-center experience

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes, technical success, and complications associated with the placement of Abre™ venous stents for central venous stenosis/occlusion (CVS/CVO).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted, identifying 21 patients who underwent Abre™ venous stent placement for SVC syndrome at a single institution. Demographic and clinical data were collected, including stent configurations, procedural details, and follow-up outcomes. Primary stent patency, symptom resolution, and survival rates were analyzed. Survival curves were generated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and complications were recorded.

RESULTS

Facial and/or upper extremity edema was present in all patients, and malignancy accounted for SVC syndrome in 71.4% of cases, with lung cancer as the predominant etiology (66.6%). The technical success rate was 100%. Clinical symptom resolution was achieved in all patients. The 30-day mortality rate was 23.8%, with all cases involving oncology patients. At six months, cross-sectional imaging showed a primary stent patency rate of 93%, and this remained stable through 12 months. The mean survival time for the cancer subgroup was 337.2 ± 343 days, while the overall cohort mean was 885.8 ± 453.7 days.

CONCLUSION

The Abre™ venous stent demonstrates potential as an effective stent for SVC syndrome, achieving high symptom relief and patency rates. However, further long-term studies and randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings.

Safety and Effectiveness of Abre Self-Expanding Venous Stent for Treatment of Superior Vena Cava Syndrome

PURPOSE

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome is a constellation of symptoms that results from partial or complete SVC obstruction. Endovascular SVC stenting is an effective treatment for SVC syndrome with rapid clinical efficacy and low risk of complications. In this study, we assess the technical and clinical outcomes of a cohort of patients with SVC syndrome treated with the AbreTM self-expanding venous stent (Medtronic, Inc, Minneapolis, MN, USA).

METHODS

An institutional database was used to retrospectively identify patients with SVC syndrome treated with AbreTM venous self-expanding stent placement between 2021-2023. Patient demographic data, technical outcomes, treatment effectiveness, and adverse events were obtained from the electronic medical record. Nineteen patients (mean age 58.6) were included in the study. Thirteen interventions were performed for malignant compression of the SVC, 5 for central venous catheter-related SVC stenosis, and 1 for HD fistula-related SVC stenosis refractory to angioplasty.

RESULTS

Primary patency was achieved in 93% of patients (17/19). Two patients (7%) required re-intervention with thrombolysis and angioplasty within 30 days post-stenting. Mean duration of clinical and imaging follow-up were 228.7 ± 52.7 and 258.7 ± 62.1 days, respectively. All patients with clinical follow-up experienced significant improvement in clinical symptoms post-intervention. No stent related complications were identified post-intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment of SVC syndrome with the AbreTM self-expanding venous stent has high rates of technical and clinical success. No complications related to stent placement were identified in this study.

Safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome

PURPOSE

To investigate the safety and efficacy of large-bore uncovered stents for treating malignant superior vena cava syndrome.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 115 patients (89 men, 26 women; mean age 63.2 years; range 21-83 years) who underwent endovascular large-bore (≥18 mm in diameter) uncovered stent placement between August 2015 and July 2022. One patient was lost to follow-up. Therefore, 114 patients were available for follow-up.

RESULTS

Stent placement was technically successful in all 115 patients. Minor procedure-related complications occurred in nine (7.8 %) patients. One hundred eight (93.9 %) patients experienced complete or marked symptomatic relief (Kishi score ≤ 2) at a mean of 3 days after procedure. The cumulative stent patency rates were 98.2 %, 95 %, 93.7 %, 91.5 %, 83.5 %, and 83.5 % at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18, and 24 months, respectively. Stent occlusion occurred in ten (8.8 %) of 114 patients at a mean of 215 days (range 1-732 days) due to thrombosis (n = 7) and tumor ingrowth (n = 3). Stent occlusion did not occur in 21 patients who underwent subsequent central venous catheter insertion. The median patient survival time was 159 days (95 % confidence interval 102-216 days). Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed adjuvant anticancer treatment (p = 0.001) and tumor response (p < 0.001) as independent predictors of patient survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Endovascular placement of large-bore uncovered stents was a safe and effective treatment for malignant superior vena cava syndrome. Large-bore stent placement can effectively prevent stent occlusion by tumor ingrowth in most cases, and it can provide a sufficient diameter for subsequent insertion of central venous catheters.

Treatment and Management of the Clinical Manifestations of Advanced Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVES

People with advanced breast cancer (ABC) experience complex and debilitating physical symptoms of their disease that can have a profound effect on quality of life. This report provides an overview of the clinical manifestations related to different metastatic sites in ABC and potential oncologic emergencies.

DATA SOURCES

Date sources include peer-reviewed papers sourced in electronic databases (CINAHL, MEDLINE, Google Scholar) and national and international best practice guidelines.

CONCLUSION

People living with ABC experience multiple symptoms of disease that can impact on quality of life and physical functioning. The most common sites of metastatic disease are bone, lung, liver and brain. Clinical manifestations of ABC include pain, pathologic fractures, pleural effusions, and ascites. Potential oncologic emergencies related to these metastatic sites include hypercalcemia, malignant spinal cord compression, superior vena cava obstruction, and raised intracranial pressure.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

It is important for nurses to have informed knowledge and understanding of these clinical manifestations. This will enable them to be vigilant and perform targeted patient evaluation to assess signs and symptoms with a view to identifying potentially life-threatening emergencies and initiating interventions or appropriate referral or follow-up accordingly.

AngioJetTM rheolytic thrombectomy with covered balloon-expandable stent deployment in a superior vena cava syndrome: a case report

The Superior Vena Cava Syndrome (SVCS) is a rare mediastinal syndrome, frequently due to compression by a mediastinal malignant leading to venous flow obstruction through the Superior Vena Cava (SVC) towards the heart. The symptoms may consist of edema of the upper body and distended veins, dyspnea up to a life-threatening condition. Restoring the SVC flow by endovascular means can be beneficial in order to achieve a rapid relief of the clinical symptoms. A 51-year-old male with a recent diagnosis of squamous cell lung tumor diagnosis presented to the emergency department with persistent cough, neck and face swelling, and distended jugular veins on clinical examination. No dyspnea and normal vital parameters were reported. Computed Tomography angiography (CT) examination demonstrated thrombosis of subclavian veins and SVC due to compression by malignancy. Compression also involved the right upper lobar bronchus. Through a percutaneous transvenous right humeral access, phlebography confirmed total occlusion of the right subclavian vein, brachiocephalic venous trunk, and superior vena cava. We performed AngioJetTM (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA) rheolytic endovascular thrombectomy. The phlebography demonstrated the unlying hemodynamic stenosis due to the ab-extrinsic compression and underwent stenting with a covered balloon-expandable stent. The final phlebography confirmed the patency of the stent and restoration of venous flow. Although there was a complete recovery of the symptoms, the patient died from respiratory complications caused by malignancy involvement. AngioJetTM mechanical thrombectomy and covered balloon-expandable stent deployment is a useful solution for SVCS to quickly achieve relief of the clinical symptoms. There are few case series where thrombectomy and primary stent placement are studied. Further follow-up studies are needed to understand the patency of treated vessels better.

Comparison between 1-week and 2-week palliative radiotherapy courses for superior vena cava syndrome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of palliative radiation therapy (RT) for superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome from lung cancer and to compare the 2-week and 1-week schedules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on lung cancer patients with palliative RT for SVC syndrome. Patients received 30 Gy in 10 fractions (2-week group) or 20 Gy in 5 fractions (1-week group) between July 2012 and June 2022. Treatment outcomes were evaluated at 1 to 2 months after RT. The tumor response and recanalization were evaluated based on the computed tomography (CT).

RESULTS

Of the 39 patients, 24 received a 2-week course RT and 15 received a 1-week course of RT. The most common SVC-associated symptoms were edema (51.3%) and dyspnea (43.6%). There were no significant differences in performance status, histology, and grade of SVC. Symptom relief in symptomatic patients was comparable (85.7% in the 2-week group vs. 91.6% in the 1-week group; p = 0.581). There were no significant differences between the 2-week and 1-week groups in recanalization rates (62.5% vs. 60.0%; p = 0.876), tumor responses (75% vs. 60.0%; p = 0.876), and 6-month overall survival rates (29.2% vs. 36.4%; p = 0.726). In each of the two groups, one patient was consulted for re-irradiation. The median survival were 3.7 months for the 2-week group and 4.4 months for the 1-week group.

CONCLUSION

In patients with SVC syndrome, the palliative effect of a 1-week course was equivalent to that of a 2-week course. Given the poor prognosis, a 1-week course may be an option.

Interventions for superior vena cava syndrome

Superior vena cava (SVC) syndrome refers to the clinical manifestations of cerebral venous hypertension secondary to obstruction of the SVC and/or the innominate veins. The most common cause of SVC syndrome is malignancy like small cell lung cancer and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but there is an increasing trend of benign etiologies secondary to thrombosis due to central lines/ pacemakers or mediastinal fibrosis. Supportive measures include head elevation, diuresis, supplemental oxygen, and steroids. Thrombolysis with or without endovenous stenting is required emergently in those with airway compromise or symptoms secondary to cerebral edema. Definitive treatment in those with malignancy is multidisciplinary; this requires radiotherapy, chemotherapy, SVC stenting, oncologic surgery and SVC bypass or reconstruction. Endovascular treatment is the primary modality for palliation in malignancy and in those with benign etiology. Surgery is reserved for those who have failed or are unsuitable for endovascular treatment. In patients with benign disease endovenous stenting and open surgery provide excellent symptom relief and are safe and effective.