Mammography-based Radiomics in Breast Cancer: A Scoping Review of Current Knowledge and Future Needs

A Machine Learning Model Based on Global Mammographic Radiomic Features Can Predict Which Normal Mammographic Cases Radiology Trainees Find Most Difficult

This study aims to investigate whether global mammographic radiomic features (GMRFs) can distinguish hardest- from easiest-to-interpret normal cases for radiology trainees (RTs). Data from 137 RTs were analysed, with each interpreting seven educational self-assessment test sets comprising 60 cases (40 normal and 20 cancer). The study only examined normal cases. Difficulty scores were computed based on the percentage of readers who incorrectly classified each case, leading to their classification as hardest- or easiest-to-interpret based on whether their difficulty scores fell within and above the 75th or within and below the 25th percentile, respectively (resulted in 140 cases in total used). Fifty-nine low-density and 81 high-density cases were identified. Thirty-four GMRFs were extracted for each case. A random forest machine learning model was trained to differentiate between hardest- and easiest-to-interpret normal cases and validated using leave-one-out-cross-validation approach. The model's performance was evaluated using the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Significant features were identified through feature importance analysis. Difference between hardest- and easiest-to-interpret cases among 34 GMRFs and in difficulty level between low- and high-density cases was tested using Kruskal-Wallis. The model achieved AUC = 0.75 with cluster prominence and range emerging as the most useful features. Fifteen GMRFs differed significantly (p < 0.05) between hardest- and easiest-to-interpret cases. Difficulty level among low- vs high-density cases did not differ significantly (p = 0.12). GMRFs can predict hardest-to-interpret normal cases for RTs, underscoring the importance of GMRFs in identifying the most difficult normal cases for RTs and facilitating customised training programmes tailored to trainees' learning needs.

Radiomic analysis of cohort-specific diagnostic errors in reading dense mammograms using artificial intelligence

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to investigate radiologists' interpretation errors when reading dense screening mammograms using a radiomics-based artificial intelligence approach.

METHODS

Thirty-six radiologists from China and Australia read 60 dense mammograms. For each cohort, we identified normal areas that looked suspicious of cancer and the malignant areas containing cancers. Then radiomic features were extracted from these identified areas and random forest models were trained to recognize the areas that were most frequently linked to diagnostic errors within each cohort. The performance of the model and discriminatory power of significant radiomic features were assessed.

RESULTS

We found that in the Chinese cohort, the AUC values for predicting false positives were 0.864 (CC) and 0.829 (MLO), while in the Australian cohort, they were 0.652 (CC) and 0.747 (MLO). For false negatives, the AUC values in the Chinese cohort were 0.677 (CC) and 0.673 (MLO), and in the Australian cohort, they were 0.600 (CC) and 0.505 (MLO). In both cohorts, regions with higher Gabor and maximum response filter outputs were more prone to false positives, while areas with significant intensity changes and coarse textures were more likely to yield false negatives.

CONCLUSIONS

This cohort-based pipeline proves effective in identifying common errors for specific reader cohorts based on image-derived radiomic features.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study demonstrates that radiomics-based AI can effectively identify and predict radiologists' interpretation errors in dense mammograms, with distinct radiomic features linked to false positives and false negatives in Chinese and Australian cohorts.

Study on the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions using a multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning model

Purpose

To develop a multi-modal model combining multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning for the classification of benign and malignant breast lesions, to assist clinicians in better selecting treatment plans.

Methods

A total of 314 patients who underwent breast MRI examinations were included. They were randomly divided into training, validation, and test sets in a ratio of 7:1:2. Subsequently, features of T1-weighted images (T1WI), T2-weighted images (T2WI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE-MRI) were extracted using the convolutional neural network ResNet50 for fusion, and then combined with radiomic features from the three sequences. The following models were established: T1 model, T2 model, DCE model, DCE_T1_T2 model, and DCE_T1_T2_rad model. The performance of the models was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value. The differences between the DCE_T1_T2_rad model and the other four models were compared using the Delong test, with a P-value < 0.05 considered statistically significant.

Results

The five models established in this study performed well, with AUC values of 0.53 for the T1 model, 0.62 for the T2 model, 0.79 for the DCE model, 0.94 for the DCE_T1_T2 model, and 0.98 for the DCE_T1_T2_rad model. The DCE_T1_T2_rad model showed statistically significant differences (P < 0.05) compared to the other four models.

Conclusion

The use of a multi-modal model combining multi-sequence breast MRI fusion radiomics and deep learning can effectively improve the diagnostic performance of breast lesion classification.

Early Identification of Pathologic Complete Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Using Multiphase DCE-MRI by Siamese Network in Breast Cancer: A Longitudinal Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Siamese network (SN) using longitudinal DCE-MRI for pathologic complete response (pCR) identification lack a unified approach to phases selection.

PURPOSE

To identify pCR in early-stage NAC, using SN with longitudinal DCE-MRI and introducing IPS for phases selection.

STUDY TYPE

Multicenter, longitudinal.

POPULATION

Center A: 162 female patients (50.63 ± 8.41 years) divided 7:3 into training and internal validation cohorts. Center B: 61 female patients (50.08 ± 7.82 years) were used as an external validation cohort.

FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE

Center A: single vendor 3.0 T with a compressed-sensing volume interpolated breath-hold examination sequence. Center B: single vendor 1.5 T with volume interpolated breath-hold examination sequence.

ASSESSMENT

Patients underwent DCE-MRI before and after two NAC cycles, with tumor regions of interest (ROI) manually delineated. Histopathology was the reference for pCR identification. Models developed included a clinical one, four SN models based on IPS-selected phases, and integrated models combining clinical and SN features.

STATISTICAL TESTS

Model performance was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). The DeLong test was used to compare AUCs. Net reclassification improvement and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) tests were employed for performance comparison. P < 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

In internal and external validation cohorts, the clinical model showed AUCs of 0.760 and 0.718. SN and integrated models, with increasing phases via IPS, achieved AUCs ranging from 0.813 to 0.951 and 0.818 to 0.922. Notably, SN-3 and integrated-3 and integrated-4 outperformed the clinical model. However, input phases beyond 20% did not significantly enhance performance (IDI test: SN-4 vs. SN-3, P = 0.314 and 0.630; integrated-4 vs. integrated-3, P = 0.785 and 0.709).

DATA CONCLUSION

The longitudinal multiphase DCE-MRI based on the SN demonstrates promise for identifying pCR in breast cancer.

EVIDENCE LEVEL

1 TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 4.

Nomogram Utilizing ABVS Radiomics and Clinical Factors for Predicting ≤ 3 Positive Axillary Lymph Nodes in HR+ /HER2- Breast Cancer with 1-2 Positive Sentinel Nodes

BACKGROUND

In HR+ /HER2- breast cancer patients with ≤ 3 positive axillary lymph nodes (ALNs), genomic tests can streamline chemotherapy decisions. Current studies, centered on tumor metrics, miss broader patient insights. Automated Breast Volume Scanning (ABVS) provides advanced 3D imaging, and its potential synergy with radiomics for ALN evaluation is untapped.

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to combine ABVS radiomics and clinical characteristics in a nomogram to predict ≤ 3 positive ALNs in HR+ /HER2- breast cancer patients with 1-2 positive sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs), guiding clinicians in genetic test candidate selection.

METHODS

We enrolled 511 early-stage breast cancer patients: 362 from A Hospital for training and 149 from B Hospital for validation. Using LASSO logistic regression, primary features were identified. A clinical-radiomics nomogram was developed to predict the likelihood of ≤ 3 positive ALNs in HR+ /HER2- patients with 1-2 positive SLNs. We assessed the discriminative capability of the nomogram using the ROC curve. The model's calibration was confirmed through a calibration curve, while its fit was evaluated using the Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test. To determine the clinical net benefits, we employed the Decision Curve Analysis (DCA).

RESULTS

In the training group, 81.2% patients had ≤ 3 metastatic ALNs, and 83.2% in the validation group. We developed a clinical-radiomics nomogram by analyzing clinical characteristics and rad-scores. Factors like positive SLNs (OR=0.077), absence of negative SLNs (OR=11.138), lymphovascular invasion (OR=0.248), and rad-score (OR=0.003) significantly correlated with ≤ 3 positive ALNs. The clinical-radiomics nomogram, with an AUC of 0.910 in training and 0.882 in validation, outperformed the rad-score-free clinical nomogram (AUCs of 0.796 and 0.782). Calibration curves and the HL test (P values 0.688 and 0.691) confirmed its robustness. DCA showed the clinical-radiomics nomogram provided superior net benefits in predicting ALN burden across specific threshold probabilities.

CONCLUSION

We developed a clinical-radiomics nomogram that integrated radiomics from ABVS images and clinical data to predict the presence of ≤ 3 positive ALNs in HR+ /HER2- patients with 1-2 positive SLNs, aiding oncologists in identifying candidates for genomic tests, bypassing ALND. In the era of precision medicine, combining genomic tests with SLN biopsy refines both surgical and systemic patient treatments.

Breast cancer risk prediction using machine learning: a systematic review

Background

Breast cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related fatalities among women worldwide. Conventional screening and risk prediction models primarily rely on demographic and patient clinical history to devise policies and estimate likelihood. However, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, particularly deep learning (DL), have shown promise in the development of personalized risk models. These models leverage individual patient information obtained from medical imaging and associated reports. In this systematic review, we thoroughly investigated the existing literature on the application of DL to digital mammography, radiomics, genomics, and clinical information for breast cancer risk assessment. We critically analyzed these studies and discussed their findings, highlighting the promising prospects of DL techniques for breast cancer risk prediction. Additionally, we explored ongoing research initiatives and potential future applications of AI-driven approaches to further improve breast cancer risk prediction, thereby facilitating more effective screening and personalized risk management strategies.

Objective and methods

This study presents a comprehensive overview of imaging and non-imaging features used in breast cancer risk prediction using traditional and AI models. The features reviewed in this study included imaging, radiomics, genomics, and clinical features. Furthermore, this survey systematically presented DL methods developed for breast cancer risk prediction, aiming to be useful for both beginners and advanced-level researchers.

Results

A total of 600 articles were identified, 20 of which met the set criteria and were selected. Parallel benchmarking of DL models, along with natural language processing (NLP) applied to imaging and non-imaging features, could allow clinicians and researchers to gain greater awareness as they consider the clinical deployment or development of new models. This review provides a comprehensive guide for understanding the current status of breast cancer risk assessment using AI.

Conclusion

This study offers investigators a different perspective on the use of AI for breast cancer risk prediction, incorporating numerous imaging and non-imaging features.

Computer-extracted global radiomic features can predict the radiologists' first impression about the abnormality of a screening mammogram

OBJECTIVE

Radiologists can detect the gist of abnormal based on their rapid initial impression on a mammogram (ie, global gist signal [GGS]). This study explores (1) whether global radiomic (ie, computer-extracted) features can predict the GGS; and if so, (ii) what features are the most important drivers of the signals.

METHODS

The GGS of cases in two extreme conditions was considered: when observers detect a very strong gist (high-gist) and when the gist of abnormal was not/poorly perceived (low-gist). Gist signals/scores from 13 observers reading 4191 craniocaudal mammograms were collected. As gist is a noisy signal, the gist scores from all observers were averaged and assigned to each image. The high-gist and low-gist categories contained all images in the fourth and first quartiles, respectively. One hundred thirty handcrafted global radiomic features (GRFs) per mammogram were extracted and utilized to construct eight separate machine learning random forest classifiers (All, Normal, Cancer, Prior-1, Prior-2, Missed, Prior-Visible, and Prior-Invisible) for characterizing high-gist from low-gist images. The models were trained and validated using the 10-fold cross-validation approach. The models' performances were evaluated by the area under receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). Important features for each model were identified through a scree test.

RESULTS

The Prior-Visible model achieved the highest AUC of 0.84 followed by the Prior-Invisible (0.83), Normal (0.82), Prior-1 (0.81), All (0.79), Prior-2 (0.77), Missed (0.75), and Cancer model (0.69). Cluster shade, standard deviation, skewness, kurtosis, and range were identified to be the most important features.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that GRFs can accurately classify high- from low-gist images.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Global mammographic radiomic features can accurately predict high- from low-gist images with five features identified to be valuable in describing high-gist images. These are critical in providing better understanding of the mammographic image characteristics that drive the strength of the GGSs which could be exploited to advance breast cancer (BC) screening and risk prediction, enabling early detection and treatment of BC thereby further reducing BC-related deaths.

Predicting Breast Cancer Risk Using Radiomics Features of Mammography Images

Mammography images contain a lot of information about not only the mammary glands but also the skin, adipose tissue, and stroma, which may reflect the risk of developing breast cancer. We aimed to establish a method to predict breast cancer risk using radiomics features of mammography images and to enable further examinations and prophylactic treatment to reduce breast cancer mortality. We used mammography images of 4000 women with breast cancer and 1000 healthy women from the 'starting point set' of the OPTIMAM dataset, a public dataset. We trained a Light Gradient Boosting Machine using radiomics features extracted from mammography images of women with breast cancer (only the healthy side) and healthy women. This model was a binary classifier that could discriminate whether a given mammography image was of the contralateral side of women with breast cancer or not, and its performance was evaluated using five-fold cross-validation. The average area under the curve for five folds was 0.60122. Some radiomics features, such as 'wavelet-H_glcm_Correlation' and 'wavelet-H_firstorder_Maximum', showed distribution differences between the malignant and normal groups. Therefore, a single radiomics feature might reflect the breast cancer risk. The odds ratio of breast cancer incidence was 7.38 in women whose estimated malignancy probability was ≥0.95. Radiomics features from mammography images can help predict breast cancer risk.

Use of Pretreatment Multiparametric MRI to Predict Tumor Regression Pattern to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Breast Cancer

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To develop an easy-to-use model by combining pretreatment MRI and clinicopathologic features for early prediction of tumor regression pattern to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in breast cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 420 patients who received NAC and underwent definitive surgery in our hospital from February 2012 to August 2020. Pathologic findings of surgical specimens were used as the gold standard to classify tumor regression patterns into concentric and non-concentric shrinkage. Morphologic and kinetic MRI features were both analyzed. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to select the key clinicopathologic and MRI features for pretreatment prediction of regression pattern. Logistic regression and six machine learning methods were used to construct prediction models, and their performance were evaluated with receiver operating characteristic curve.

RESULTS

Two clinicopathologic variables and three MRI features were selected as independent predictors to construct prediction models. The apparent area under the curve (AUC) of seven prediction models were in the range of 0.669-0.740. The logistic regression model yielded an AUC of 0.708 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.658-0.759), and the decision tree model achieved the highest AUC of 0.740 (95% CI: 0.691-0.787). For internal validation, the optimism-corrected AUCs of seven models were in the range of 0.592-0.684. There was no significant difference between the AUCs of the logistic regression model and that of each machine learning model.

CONCLUSION

Prediction models combining pretreatment MRI and clinicopathologic features are useful for predicting tumor regression pattern in breast cancer, which can assist to select patients who can benefit from NAC for de-escalation of breast surgery and modify treatment strategy.

Prediction of Clinical Molecular Typing of Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma Using 18F-FDG PET/CT Dual-Phase Imaging

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diagnostic value of Fluorine-18-labeled 2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography and computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) dual-phase imaging for the different molecular subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical imaging data of 164 women with invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast confirmed by pathology who underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging were retrospectively analyzed. The maximum standard uptake values (SUVmax) of the early and delayed phases of the lesion were measured and recorded as SUVmax1 and SUVmax2, respectively, and the retention index (RI) was calculated. We analyzed the change rule of SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and RI for the different molecular subtypes and molecular marker expression groups. The diagnostic threshold of different molecular marker expression status was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

RESULTS

SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 were highest in the TNBC group and lowest in the luminal A group (p<0.001). TNBC and HER2 overexpression groups had higher RI than the luminal A and B groups (p<0.001), with no significant difference between the TNBC and HER2 overexpression groups or between the luminal A and B groups (p=0.640 and 0.345, respectively). The ER- and PR-negative groups had significantly higher SUVmax1, SUVmax2, and RI than the PR-positive group (p<0.001). The HER2-positive group had higher SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 than the negative group (p<0.001). The Ki67 overexpression group had higher SUVmax1 and SUVmax2 levels than the low expression group (p<0.001). There was no significant difference in RI between HER2-positive and negative groups or between Ki67 high and low expression groups (p=0.904 and 0.216, respectively). For ER-negative and positive expression status, the maximum area under the curve (AUC) of SUVmax2 was 0.852, diagnostic threshold was 10.87, sensitivity was 79.6%, and specificity was 74.5%. For PR-negative and positive expression status, the AUC of SUVmax2 was 0.858, diagnostic threshold was 10.45, sensitivity was 83.1%, and specificity was 75.3%. For HER2-negative and positive expression status, the AUC of SUVmax1 was 0.714, diagnostic threshold was 9.28, sensitivity was 79.6%, and specificity was 60.9%. For Ki67 high- and low expression status, the AUC of SUVmax2 was 0.915 at maximum, diagnostic threshold was 10.21, sensitivity was 83.4%, and specificity was 93.9%.

CONCLUSION

18F-FDG PET/CT dual-phase imaging facilitates the prediction of the expression of molecular markers and subtypes of invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast and the development of more tailored treatment plans for patients with this disease.

Global Radiomic Features from Mammography for Predicting Difficult-To-Interpret Normal Cases

This work aimed to investigate whether global radiomic features (GRFs) from mammograms can predict difficult-to-interpret normal cases (NCs). Assessments from 537 readers interpreting 239 normal mammograms were used to categorise cases as 120 difficult-to-interpret and 119 easy-to-interpret based on cases having the highest and lowest difficulty scores, respectively. Using lattice- and squared-based approaches, 34 handcrafted GRFs per image were extracted and normalised. Three classifiers were constructed: (i) CC and (ii) MLO using the GRFs from corresponding craniocaudal and mediolateral oblique images only, based on the random forest technique for distinguishing difficult- from easy-to-interpret NCs, and (iii) CC + MLO using the median predictive scores from both CC and MLO models. Useful GRFs for the CC and MLO models were recognised using a scree test. The CC and MLO models were trained and validated using the leave-one-out-cross-validation. The models' performances were assessed by the AUC and compared using the DeLong test. A Kruskal-Wallis test was used to examine if the 34 GRFs differed between difficult- and easy-to-interpret NCs and if difficulty level based on the traditional breast density (BD) categories differed among 115 low-BD and 124 high-BD NCs. The CC + MLO model achieved higher performance (0.71 AUC) than the individual CC and MLO model alone (0.66 each), but statistically non-significant difference was found (all p > 0.05). Six GRFs were identified to be valuable in describing difficult-to-interpret NCs. Twenty features, when compared between difficult- and easy-to-interpret NCs, differed significantly (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed in difficulty between low- and high-BD NCs (p = 0.709). GRF mammographic analysis can predict difficult-to-interpret NCs.

Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning to Create Targeted Test Sets to Improve Specific Mammography Reader Cohort Performance: A Feasibility Study

Mammography interpretation is challenging with high error rates. This study aims to reduce the errors in mammography reading by mapping diagnostic errors against global mammographic characteristics using a radiomics-based machine learning approach. A total of 36 radiologists from cohort A (n = 20) and cohort B (n = 16) read 60 high-density mammographic cases. Radiomic features were extracted from three regions of interest (ROIs), and random forest models were trained to predict diagnostic errors for each cohort. Performance was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and AUC. The impact of ROI placement and normalization on prediction was investigated. Our approach successfully predicted both the false positive and false negative errors of both cohorts but did not consistently predict location errors. The errors produced by radiologists from cohort B were less predictable compared to those in cohort A. The performance of the models did not show significant improvement after feature normalization, despite the mammograms being produced by different vendors. Our novel radiomics-based machine learning pipeline focusing on global radiomic features could predict false positive and false negative errors. The proposed method can be used to develop group-tailored mammographic educational strategies to help improve future mammography reader performance.

A classification model for detection of ductal carcinoma in situ by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy based on deep structured semantic model

At present, deep learning is widely used in spectral data processing. Deep learning requires a large amount of data for training, while the collection of biological serum spectra is limited by sample numbers and labor costs, so it is impractical to obtain a large amount of serum spectral data for disease detection. In this study, we propose a spectral classification model based on the deep structured semantic model (DSSM) and successfully apply it to Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) detection. Compared with the traditional deep learning model, we match the spectral data into positive and negative pairs according to whether the spectra are from the same category. The DSSM structure is constructed by extracting features according to the spectral similarity of spectra pairs. This new construction model increases the data amount used for model training and reduces the dimension of spectral data. Firstly, the FT-IR spectra are paired. The spectra pairs are labeled as positive pairs if they come from the same category, and the spectra pairs are labeled as negative pairs if they come from different categories. Secondly, two spectra in each spectra pair are put into two deep neural networks of the DSSM structure separately. Then the spectral similarity between the output feature maps of two deep neural networks is calculated. The DSSM structure is trained by maximizing the conditional likelihood of the spectra pairs from the same category. Thirdly, after the training of DSSM is done, the training set and testing set are input into two deep neural networks separately. The output feature maps of the training set are put into the reference library. Lastly, the k-nearest neighbor (KNN) model is used for classification according to Euclidean distances between the output feature map of each unknown sample to the reference library. The category of the unknown sample is judged according to the categories of k nearest samples. We also use principal component analysis (PCA) to reduce dimension for comparison. The accuracies of the KNN model, principal component analysis-k nearest neighbor (PCA-KNN) model, and deep structured semantic model-k nearest neighbor (DSSM-KNN) model are 78.8%, 72.7%, and 97.0%, which proves that our proposed model has higher accuracy.

Whole-Tumor ADC Texture Analysis Is Able to Predict Breast Cancer Receptor Status

There are different breast cancer molecular subtypes with differences in incidence, treatment response and outcome. They are roughly divided into estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER and PR) negative and positive cancers. In this retrospective study, we included 185 patients augmented with 25 SMOTE patients and divided them into two groups: the training group consisted of 150 patients and the validation cohort consisted of 60 patients. Tumors were manually delineated and whole-volume tumor segmentation was used to extract first-order radiomic features. The ADC-based radiomics model reached an AUC of 0.81 in the training cohort and was confirmed in the validation set, which yielded an AUC of 0.93, in differentiating ER/PR positive from ER/PR negative status. We also tested a combined model using radiomics data together with ki67% proliferation index and histological grade, and obtained a higher AUC of 0.93, which was also confirmed in the validation group. In conclusion, whole-volume ADC texture analysis is able to predict hormonal status in breast cancer masses.

Radiomics model of diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background signal suppression (DWIBS) for predicting axillary lymph node status in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

In breast cancer diagnosis and treatment, non-invasive prediction of axillary lymph node (ALN) metastasis can help avoid complications related to sentinel lymph node biopsy.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to develop and evaluate machine learning models using radiomics features extracted from diffusion-weighted whole-body imaging with background signal suppression (DWIBS) examination for predicting the ALN status.

METHODS

A total of 100 patients with histologically proven, invasive, clinically N0 breast cancer who underwent DWIBS examination consisting of short tau inversion recovery (STIR) and DWIBS sequences before surgery were enrolled. Radiomic features were calculated using segmented primary lesions in DWIBS and STIR sequences and were divided into training (n = 75) and test (n = 25) datasets based on the examination date. Using the training dataset, optimal feature selection was performed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm, and the logistic regression model and support vector machine (SVM) classifier model were constructed with DWIBS, STIR, or a combination of DWIBS and STIR sequences to predict ALN status. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to assess the prediction performance of radiomics models.

RESULTS

For the test dataset, the logistic regression model using DWIBS, STIR, and a combination of both sequences yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.765 (95% confidence interval: 0.548-0.982), 0.801 (0.597-1.000), and 0.779 (0.567-0.992), respectively, whereas the SVM classifier model using DWIBS, STIR, and a combination of both sequences yielded an AUC of 0.765 (0.548-0.982), 0.757 (0.538-0.977), and 0.779 (0.567-0.992), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of machine learning models incorporating with the quantitative radiomic features derived from the DWIBS and STIR sequences can potentially predict ALN status.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Breast Imaging: A Scientometric Umbrella Review

Artificial intelligence (AI), a rousing advancement disrupting a wide spectrum of applications with remarkable betterment, has continued to gain momentum over the past decades. Within breast imaging, AI, especially machine learning and deep learning, honed with unlimited cross-data/case referencing, has found great utility encompassing four facets: screening and detection, diagnosis, disease monitoring, and data management as a whole. Over the years, breast cancer has been the apex of the cancer cumulative risk ranking for women across the six continents, existing in variegated forms and offering a complicated context in medical decisions. Realizing the ever-increasing demand for quality healthcare, contemporary AI has been envisioned to make great strides in clinical data management and perception, with the capability to detect indeterminate significance, predict prognostication, and correlate available data into a meaningful clinical endpoint. Here, the authors captured the review works over the past decades, focusing on AI in breast imaging, and systematized the included works into one usable document, which is termed an umbrella review. The present study aims to provide a panoramic view of how AI is poised to enhance breast imaging procedures. Evidence-based scientometric analysis was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline, resulting in 71 included review works. This study aims to synthesize, collate, and correlate the included review works, thereby identifying the patterns, trends, quality, and types of the included works, captured by the structured search strategy. The present study is intended to serve as a "one-stop center" synthesis and provide a holistic bird's eye view to readers, ranging from newcomers to existing researchers and relevant stakeholders, on the topic of interest.

Radiomics and Its Applications and Progress in Pancreatitis: A Current State of the Art Review

Radiomics involves high-throughput extraction and analysis of quantitative information from medical images. Since it was proposed in 2012, there are some publications on the application of radiomics for (1) predicting recurrent acute pancreatitis (RAP), clinical severity of acute pancreatitis (AP), and extrapancreatic necrosis in AP; (2) differentiating mass-forming chronic pancreatitis (MFCP) from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC), focal autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) from PDAC, and functional abdominal pain (functional gastrointestinal diseases) from RAP and chronic pancreatitis (CP); and (3) identifying CP and normal pancreas, and CP risk factors and complications. In this review, we aim to systematically summarize the applications and progress of radiomics in pancreatitis and it associated situations, so as to provide reference for related research.