1
|
Wang S, Ji T, Yu D, Dai Y, Zhang B, Liu L. Grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma using diffusion MRI with a multimodal apparent diffusion model. Front Oncol 2025; 15:1507263. [PMID: 40182026 PMCID: PMC11965134 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1507263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/05/2025] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the feasibility of utilizing parameters derived from a multimodal apparent diffusion (MAD) model to distinguish between low- and high-grade clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). Method Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) scans with 12 b-values (0 - 3000 s/mm²) were conducted on 54 patients diagnosed with ccRCC (30 low-grade and 24 high-grade). The MAD model parameters, including diffusion coefficients (Dr, Dh, Dui, Df) representing restricted diffusion, hindered diffusion, unimpeded diffusion, and flow, respectively, were computed. Proportions corresponding to these diffusion types (fr, fh, fui, ff) and the heterogeneous nature of hindered diffusion (αh) were also obtained. Parameters were compared between low- and high-grade groups. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of these parameters, compared with the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from a mono-exponential model. Result Significant differences between low- and high-grade ccRCC were observed in Dh (low-grade: 1.360 ± 0.11 μm2/ms; high-grade group, 1.254 ± 0.13 μm2/ms; P = 0.0327), fr (low-grade: 0.06 ± 0.005; high-grade: 0.08 ± 0.009; P = 0.0233), and αh (low-grade: 0.872 ± 0.22; high-grade: 0.896 ± 0.39; P = 0.0294). Additionally, the ADC values (low-grade: 0.924 ± 0.08 μm2/ms; high-grade group, 0.854 ± 0.04 μm2/ms; P = 0.0323) showed statistical significance. The combination of Dh, fr, and αh provided the highest diagnostic accuracy of 0.667, with a sensitivity of 0.750, specificity of 0.734, and area under the curve of 0.796, outperforming individual parameters and ADC. Conclusion The MAD diffusion model shows promise as a non-invasive imaging tool for distinguishing between low- and high-grade ccRCC, which may aid in preoperative planning and personalized treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuang Wang
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Tuo Ji
- Urology Department 1st Inpatient Area, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Dan Yu
- Department of MR Research Collaboration, United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, Beijing, China
| | - Yimeng Dai
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Butian Zhang
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Lin Liu
- Department of Radiology, China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Altmann S, Grauhan NF, Mercado MAA, Steinmetz S, Kronfeld A, Paul R, Benkert T, Uphaus T, Groppa S, Winter Y, Brockmann MA, Othman AE. Deep Learning Accelerated Brain Diffusion-Weighted MRI with Super Resolution Processing. Acad Radiol 2024; 31:4171-4182. [PMID: 38521612 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2024.02.049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 02/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/26/2024] [Indexed: 03/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the clinical feasibility and image quality of accelerated brain diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) with deep learning image reconstruction and super resolution. METHODS 85 consecutive patients with clinically indicated MRI at a 3 T scanner were prospectively included. Conventional diffusion-weighted data (c-DWI) with four averages were obtained. Reconstructions of one and two averages, as well as deep learning diffusion-weighted imaging (DL-DWI), were accomplished. Three experienced readers evaluated the acquired data using a 5-point Likert scale regarding overall image quality, overall contrast, diagnostic confidence, occurrence of artefacts and evaluation of the central region, basal ganglia, brainstem, and cerebellum. To assess interrater agreement, Fleiss' kappa (ϰ) was determined. Signal intensity (SI) levels for basal ganglia and the central region were estimated via automated segmentation, and SI values of detected pathologies were measured. RESULTS Intracranial pathologies were identified in 35 patients. DL-DWI was significantly superior for all defined parameters, independently from applied averages (p-value <0.001). Optimum image quality was achieved with DL-DWI by utilizing a single average (p-value <0.001), demonstrating very good (80.9%) to excellent image quality (14.5%) in nearly all cases, compared to 12.5% with very good and 0% with excellent image quality for c-MRI (p-value <0.001). Comparable results could be shown for diagnostic confidence. Inter-rater Fleiss' Kappa demonstrated moderate to substantial agreement for virtually all defined parameters, with good accordance, particularly for the assessment of pathologies (p = 0.74). Regarding SI values, no significant difference was found. CONCLUSION Ultra-fast diffusion-weighted imaging with super resolution is feasible, resulting in highly accelerated brain imaging while increasing diagnostic image quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sebastian Altmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - Nils F Grauhan
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Mario Alberto Abello Mercado
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Steinmetz
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Andrea Kronfeld
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Roman Paul
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics (IMBEI), University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Rhabanusstr. 3/Tower A, 55118 Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Timo Uphaus
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Sergiu Groppa
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Yaroslav Winter
- Department of Neurology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany; Department of Neurology, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstr, 35043 Marburg, Germany
| | - Marc A Brockmann
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Ahmed E Othman
- Department of Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Mainz, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|