Usefulness of the Paramedian Forehead Flap in Nasal Reconstructive Surgery: A Retrospective Series of 41 Patients

Viability and Cosmesis of Right Angle and Vertical Paramedian Forehead Flaps Are Equivalent: A Retrospective Quantitative Study

BACKGROUND

Paramedian forehead flaps (PMFFs) are commonly used for reconstruction of nasal defects. The classic PMFF is vertically oriented while the modified PMFF is designed with a 90-degree angle. No study has compared outcomes between these PMFF designs.

OBJECTIVE

To compare and quantify viability and cosmesis of 90-degree and vertical PMFF.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 70 consecutive patients with a vertical or 90-degree PMFF design for nasal repairs after Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). Cosmetic outcome was assessed on a 10-cm, 100-point, visual analog scale (VAS) by an independent observer using standardized 3-month postoperative photographs. Flap viability was assessed using standardized 3-week postoperative photographs. Descriptive statistics, t -test, and Mann-Whitney test were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were repaired with a vertical PMFF and 22 using the 90-degree PMFF. The mean defect area of vertical and 90-degree designs was equivalent (7.7 ± 4.0 cm 2 vs 8.1 ± 4.0 cm 2 , p = .70). There was no significant difference in cosmetic outcome (75.9 ± 9.4 vs 72.9 ± 6.8, p = .19) or flap viability (3.8% ± 11.6 vs 2.6% ± 7.9, p = .67) between vertical and 90-degree designs.

CONCLUSION

Vertical and 90-degree PMFF designs for nasal repairs after MMS are equivalent in cosmetic outcome and viability.

A Strategy for Integrative Reconstruction of Midface Defects Using an Extended Forehead Flap

Background: Midface reconstruction is challenging because the structures and deformities involved are complicated. In this study, we present a strategy for integrally reconstructing nasal and midface defects, including hair-bearing defects, using extended forehead-expanded flaps. Methods: From 2015 to 2018, a total of 22 patients with midface defects underwent reconstruction with extended forehead-expanded flaps. The far end of the expanded flap, which included scalp hair, was used to cover the upper lip defect (Type 1). In cases with large perioral defects (Type 2), we designed two separate supratrochlear artery flaps, one with a shorter pedicle for nasal reconstruction and the other with a longer pedicle for partial reconstruction. The pedicle of the longer flap was saved for upper lip recovery after pedicle interruption. Results: Among the 22 patients (13 male and 9 female), 17 were caused by burns and 5 by trauma. Nineteen patients had Type 1 defects, and three had Type 2 defects. The average postoperative follow-up was 17.6 ± 4.3 months. Patient satisfaction was excellent in most patients. Conclusions: Our extended forehead flap strategy can achieve aesthetic recovery of nasal and perioral defects with a single expansion treatment. The expanded flap can be flexibly designed to fit diverse midface defects.

Paramedian forehead flap reconstruction for skin tumors involving central subunit of face: An analysis of 37 cases

Introduction

Tumors of facial skin are common in upper part of central subunit of face. Defects after resection require a flap, which is pliable, thin, and has a good colour match. Among the various local flaps available paramedian forehead flap is a good option.

Patients and methods

Patients reconstructed with paramedian forehead flap during the period from January 2015 to March 2020 were included in the study. Data regarding the demographic, clinical characteristics, and treatment details was recorded, and analyzed for postoperative complications and cosmetic outcomes.

Results

Paramedian forehead flap reconstruction was performed in 37 patients who were resected for tumor involving upper central subunit of face. Median age of patients was 57 years. Male to female ratio was 1.4:1. All tumors were resected with a negative margin. Nodal disease was managed by superficial parotidectomy only (4/37), superficial parotidectomy along with supra-omohyoid neck dissection (6/37) and modified neck dissection (1/37). In five patients additional buccal mucosa graft was used to reconstruct conjunctiva. Additional flaps were required in two patients in whom nasolabial and mustarde flaps were used. Partial flap loss occurred in one patient. There was no major flap loss. Surgical site infection developed in only one patient, who had partial flap loss. On subjective assessment, nearly 60% patients described their appearance as good.

Conclusion

Facial reconstruction in area of dorsum of nose and medial aspect of both eyelids using paramedian forehead flaps is a simple and quick procedure.

Utility of Indocyanine Green Angiography to Identify Clinical Factors Associated With Perfusion of Paramedian Forehead Flaps During Nasal Reconstruction Surgery

Importance

Identifying factors affecting forehead flap neovascularization during nasal reconstruction surgical procedures using quantitative dynamics of fluorescence from indocyanine green angiography may be associated with reduced vascular complications.

Objectives

To identify quantifiable forehead flap perfusion measures using indocyanine green angiography during nasal reconstruction procedures and to evaluate clinical factors associated with neovascularization.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Retrospective cohort study of 71 patients at a tertiary referral center of Stanford University, Stanford, California, between January 1, 2010, and March 31, 2018, undergoing forehead flap nasal reconstruction surgery with flap perfusion assessed by indocyanine green angiography.

Exposures

Indocyanine green angiography was performed intraoperatively to record forehead flap neovascularization during the second stage of nasal reconstruction surgery after temporary clamping of the pedicle.

Main Outcomes and Measures

With use of quantifiable data of fluorescence dynamics, flap perfusion in association with a reference point in the cheek after pedicle clamping was assessed by 2 methods: (1) ingress (arterial inflow) and egress (venous outflow) flap-to-cheek ratio and (2) flap-to-cheek perfusion (fluorescence) ratio at 3 time points (midpoint of indocyanine green flap inflow, maximum fluorescence [peak], and midpoint of indocyanine green flap outflow) and their calculated mean. Association of the perfusion measures with patient and procedural factors was performed using linear regression models.

Results

Of the 71 patients included in the study, 43 (61%) were men; the mean (SD) age was 71.1 (11.0) years. The mean (SD) flap-to-cheek inflow ratio was 0.48 (0.40), peak fluorescence ratio was 0.59 (0.34), and outflow ratio was 0.88 (0.42). The calculated mean (SD) flap-to-cheek perfusion ratio of these measures was 0.65 (0.35). The mean (SD) flap-to-cheek ingress ratio was 0.54 (0.36) and egress ratio was 0.65 (0.98). With use of a multivariable regression model, the time between stages was positively associated with flap-to-cheek ingress ratio (β, 0.015; 95% CI, 0.001 to 0.030), and cartilage grafting was negatively associated with flap-to-cheek outflow ratio (β, -0.240; 95% CI, -0.472 to -0.008).

Conclusions and Relevance

The findings suggest that indocyanine green angiography is an effective method to quantify relative neovascularization perfusion of forehead flaps. Future applications may include the use of this technology to aid in early flap division and ensure adequate perfusion among high-risk patients.

Level of Evidence

NA.

Reconstruction of Large Facial Defects via Excision of Skin Cancer Using Two or More Regional Flaps

BACKGROUND

Free-flap surgery and skin grafting can be used to reconstruct large facial defects that may result after skin cancer removal by Mohs micrographic surgery (MMS). However, these two methods may produce low postsurgical patient satisfaction with aesthetics, and free-flap surgery may produce an undue burden for the majority of skin cancer patients, who are of advanced age. Hence, the authors examined outcomes of large facial defect reconstruction using multiple flaps.

METHODS

Among patients undergoing MMS for skin cancer at Pusan National University Hospital between January 2013 and December 2015, we evaluated 7 patients (2 males, 5 females; average age, 73.14 years) treated for large facial defects from basal cell carcinoma. Based on operative and follow-up records, we investigated the number and type of flaps used, postsurgical complications, and patients' post-surgical satisfaction.

RESULTS

Two and 3 types of flaps were used for 5 and 2 patients, respectively. Most frequently used were nasolabial flaps (7 times in 6 patients) and forehead flaps (once in each of 4 patients). The average follow-up period was 14 months, with no complications-including necrosis, hematoma, or wound dehiscence-observed. Post-surgical satisfaction averaged 4.4 out of a maximum of 5 points.

CONCLUSIONS

Reconstruction using two or more flaps for large facial defects after skin cancer removal using MMS produced satisfactory outcomes while preventing aesthetic problems. Practitioners should consider using multiple flaps when choosing a reconstruction method for large facial defects following skin cancer removal.