Reconstruction of Moderate-Sized Scalp Defects: A 1-2-3 Rule

Bishop Flap and Sigma Flap to Repair Surgical Defects in High-Tension Anatomical Regions

BACKGROUND

The reconstruction of surgical defects in high-tension anatomical regions is challenging due to the ischemia and subsequent necrosis associated with tension closure. Research on new flaps capable of closing these defects exerting less tension would be a tremendous advancement in dermatological surgery.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a multicenter, retrospective study that used 2 new flaps-the bishop and the sigma ones-to repair surgical defects in high-tension regions such as the scalp, lower extremities, and the nasal pyramid. The bishop flap was used in 9 patients, 5 of whom exhibited their lesion in the nasal pyramid, 2 in the legs and another 2 in the scalp. The sigma flap was used in 6 patients, 5 of whom exhibited scalp lesions and 1 leg lesion.

RESULTS

Uneventful and excellent results were obtained in all 15 patients due to infection, dehiscence, or necrosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Both the bishop and the sigma flaps are a good alternative to repair surgical defects in high-tension regions such as the scalp, lower extremities, or the nasal pyramid.

The 1-2-3 cm Advancement Flap Rule in Scalp Reconstruction

Background Defects of the scalp are surgically challenging for several reasons: anatomical convexity limits tissue displacement, resistance to advancement is different at different points on the scalp, and there is also interindividual variation. For many patients, the idea of undergoing an advanced surgery such as a free flap is not preferred. Hence, a simple technique with a favorable outcome is needed. We hereby introduce our new technique: the 1-2-3 scalp advancement rule. Objectives The objective of this study is to discover a novel way to reconstruct scalp defects secondary to trauma or cancer, without having the patient undergo a big procedure. Material and Methods A total of nine cadaveric heads were used to test the idea of achieving greater advancement and increased scalp mobility to cover a 4×8 cm-sized defect using our proposed 1-2-3 scalp rule. Three steps performed were advancement flap, galeal scoring, and removal of the outer table of the skull. The measurement of advancement was recorded after each step, and the results were analyzed. Results The mobility of the scalp was calculated from the sagittal midline with identical arcs of rotation. With zero tension, we found that the total distance of advancement with a flap had a mean of 9.78 mm, while the advancement for the same flap after galeal scoring had a mean of 20.5 mm, and after removing the outer table, the mean advancement was 30.2 mm. Conclusion To create a tension-free closure necessary for optimal outcome for scalp defects, our study showed that increased distances were possible using galeal scoring and outer table removal, increasing the distance of advancement by 10.63 mm and 20.42 mm, respectively.