Actualización práctica de las recomendaciones del Grupo de Psoriasis de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (GPS) para el tratamiento de la psoriasis con terapia biológica. Parte 2 «Manejo de poblaciones especiales, pacientes con comorbilidad y gestión del riesgo»

Consensus Statement from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis Working Group (SWG) and Pediatric Working Group (PWG) on the Management of Pediatric Psoriasis

JUSTIFICATION AND OBJECTIVES

The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis and Pediatric Working Groups (PSW and PWG) have developed a set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis based on the best available evidence and experts' opinion.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology of nominal groups was followed, with help from a scoping review. A coordinator was designated, and a group of experts was selected based on their experience and knowledge on the management of psoriasis. The coordinator defined both the objectives and the key points of the document. Then, with help from a documentalist, a systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library until May 2023. Systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies were included. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents were reviewed. With this information, the coordinator proposed preliminary recommendations that were discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting with all experts. After several review processes, which included an external review, the final document was generated.

RESULTS

Practical recommendations on the evaluation and management of patients with pediatric psoriasis are presented in association with other AEDV documents. The evaluation of the pediatric patient, the definition of the therapeutic objectives, the criteria for indication and selection of treatment are addressed. Practical issues such as therapeutic failure, response maintenance, comorbidity and risk management are also included.

[Translated article] Consensus Statement From the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis Working Group (SWG) and Pediatric Working Group (PWG) on the Management of Pediatric Psoriasis

JUSTIFICATION AND OBJECTIVES

The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis and Pediatric Working Groups (PSW and PWG) have developed a set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis based on the best available evidence and experts' opinion.

METHODOLOGY

The methodology of nominal groups was followed, with help from a scoping review. A coordinator was designated, and a group of experts was selected based on their experience and knowledge on the management of psoriasis. The coordinator defined both the objectives and the key points of the document. Then, with help from a documentalist, a systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library until May 2023. Systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies were included. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents were reviewed. With this information, the coordinator proposed preliminary recommendations that were discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting with all experts. After several review processes, which included an external review, the final document was generated.

RESULTS

Practical recommendations on the evaluation and management of patients with pediatric psoriasis are presented in association with other AEDV documents. The evaluation of the pediatric patient, the definition of the therapeutic objectives, the criteria for indication and selection of treatment are addressed. Practical issues such as therapeutic failure, response maintenance, comorbidity and risk management are also included.

Efficacy and Safety of Risankizumab in Patients with Psoriasis Showing Suboptimal Response to Secukinumab or Ixekizumab: Results from a Phase 3b, Open-Label, Single-Arm (aIMM) Study

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab has demonstrated superior efficacy compared to other psoriasis treatments, including secukinumab, adalimumab, and ustekinumab; switching to risankizumab from other psoriasis treatments has shown superior clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of directly switching patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and a suboptimal response to interleukin (IL)-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab) to risankizumab.

METHODS

This 52-week, phase 3b study enrolled patients (≥ 18 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who had previously been treated with the recommended dose of secukinumab or ixekizumab for ≥ 6 months but did not achieve an optimal response (static Physician's Global Assessment [sPGA] 2/3; body surface are [BSA] 3- < 10%). Patients received subcutaneous risankizumab (150 mg) without washout. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving sPGA of 0/1 at week 16. Secondary endpoints included sPGA 0/1 at week 52, sPGA 0, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) 0/1, and Psoriasis Symptoms Scale (PSS) 0 at weeks 16 and 52. Safety was monitored throughout the study.

RESULTS

The study included 244 patients. sPGA 0/1 was achieved by 57.4% and 62.3% at week 16 and 52. At week 16, sPGA 0, DLQI 0/1, and PSS 0 were achieved by 20.5%, 40.2%, and 20.9%, respectively. At week 52, these proportions increased to 27.1% for sPGA 0, 47.2% for DLQI 0/1, and 27.5% for PSS 0. Most frequently reported adverse events (reported in ≥ 5% of patients) in risankizumab-treated patients were COVID-19 infection (8.6%) and nasopharyngitis (5.7%). No new safety signals were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Directly switching to risankizumab improved outcomes and QoL in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis who had suboptimal responses to anti-IL-17 inhibitors (secukinumab or ixekizumab). The safety results are consistent with previously reported safety of risankizumab. This study supports the efficacy of risankizumab in patients previously treated with biologics, including IL-17 inhibitors, and suggests a direct switch to risankizumab for improved clinical outcomes and QoL.

CLINICAL TRIALS

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04102007.

Early intervention and cumulative life course impairment in psoriasis: a review

Psoriasis is a chronic, systemic, inflammatory disease affecting the skin, joints and other organs. Psoriasis negatively affects patients' quality of life, causing social anxiety and negative coping, thus determining a cumulative life course impairment (CLCI). The concept of CLCI in psoriasis is reinforced by the understanding that psoriasis-associated comorbidities and stigma accumulate over a patient's life course, resulting from an interaction between the burden of stigmatization, physical and psychological comorbidities, coping strategies and external factors. The concept may help identify more vulnerable patients and facilitate more appropriate treatment decisions or earlier referrals. Although some potential risk factors for CLCI have been clarified, no all-encompassing screening tools are available. Patients at risk for CLCI should be identified by applying clinical, personal and psychosocial indicators and predictors individually. Early intervention in psoriasis treatment could improve long-term patient outcomes and modify the disease course. However, more research is needed to clearly define what constitutes 'early' intervention and to identify the most effective strategies for implementation. From a preventive point of view, it is helpful to identify early interventions aimed at reducing the risk of CLCI and establishing a new life course trajectory in patients with psoriasis. This review summarizes the latest developments in CLCI and psoriasis, highlighting knowledge gaps and future directions to make control of CLCI a possible goal for therapies.

Real-world outcomes in patients with malignancy and moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with guselkumab

Background

The treatment of psoriasis in patients with a personal history of cancer is a matter of debate and limited evidence is available to guide clinicians.

Objectives

To report a multicenter real-life experience of a group of patients with psoriasis undergoing treatment with guselkumab and a history of cancer.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective Spanish study enrolling patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and neoplasia being treated with guselkumab for their psoriasis.

Results

Twenty patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and at least 12 weeks of ongoing treatment were included. For the analysis, a 52 week follow-up period was evaluated in terms of efficacy and safety. Most of the malignancies in these patients were solid tumors. The percentage of patients achieving psoriasis area and severity index ≤3 at week 12 and week 52 was 80% and 87.5%, respectively, whereas 68.8% of patients achieved psoriasis area and severity index ≤1. A 52-week survival rate of 100% in the study population was observed (n = 20), including those patients with concomitant active cancers (n = 14). No adverse effects or dropouts related to guselkumab safety profile were detected.

Limitations

Modest sample size and the retrospective nature of the study.

Conclusion

Guselkumab not only demonstrates high effectiveness in treating psoriasis but also exhibits a favorable safety profile in patients with neoplasms.

Perceived quality of life in patients with psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 and 23 inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness in terms of quality of life perceived by adult patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors and to identify associated factors.

METHOD

Cross-sectional observational study including adult patients diagnosed with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors for at least 12 or 16 weeks in follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included: 65% male, median age 54 years (SD=13). The included patients were treated with ixekizumab 35%, guselkumab 25%, secukinumab 17.5%, brodalumab 15% and risankizumab 7.5%. Psoariasis area severity index (PASI) reduction was 94.6% (RIC 76.8-100%), DLQI of 1 (RIC 0-2.75), DLQI ≤ 1, 60%. The most affected health dimensions were symptoms and perceptions (57.5%), activities of daily living (27.5%) and discomfort caused with treatment (17.5%). No association was found between DLQI score < 1 and demographic, comorbidities and treatment-related variables. The median PASI reduction in patients with DLQI<1 was superior to patients with DLQI > 1 (100% vs 90.2%, p=0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors achieve adequate therapeutic targets achieving the target set according to clinical practice guideline recommendations (score ≤1 on the DLQI questionnaire and 90-100% reduction in the PASI index) and in accordance with the results of recent meta-analyses and real-life studies. A greater reduction of the PASI index is observed in the group reaching the quality of life target, there being the possibility of using patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

[Translated article] Perceived quality of life in patients with psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effectiveness in terms of quality of life perceived by adult patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors and to identify associated factors.

METHOD

Cross-sectional observational study including adult patients diagnosed with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors for at least 12 or 16 weeks in follow-up, respectively.

RESULTS

Forty-one patients were included: 65% male, median age 54 years (SD=13). The included patients were treated with ixekizumab 35%, guselkumab 25%, secukinumab 17.5%, brodalumab 15%, and risankizumab 7.5%. Psoariasis area severity index (PASI) reduction was 94.6% (RIC 76.8-100%), DLQI of 1 (RIC 0-2.75), DLQI≤1 60%. The most affected health dimensions were symptoms and perceptions (57.5%), activities of daily living (27.5%), and discomfort caused with treatment (17.5%). No association was found between DLQI score <1 and demographic, comorbidities, and treatment-related variables. The median PASI reduction in patients with DLQI<1 was superior to patients with DLQI>1 (100% vs 90.2%, p=.025).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors achieve adequate therapeutic targets achieving the target set according to clinical practice guideline recommendations (score ≤1 on the DLQI questionnaire and 90-100% reduction in the PASI index) and in accordance with the results of recent meta-analyses and real-life studies. A greater reduction of the PASI index is observed in the group reaching the quality of life target, there being the possibility of using patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.

[Translated article] Recommendations from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group on the Management of Patients with Cancer and Psoriasis

Several studies suggest that patients with psoriasis have a higher incidence of neoplasms, especially of the skin, which could be associated with the use of therapies to treat psoriasis. Furthermore, the evidence available on the safety profile of some treatments in this context, and the management of these patients is scarce, which is why clinical practice guidelines with recommendations on the management of psoriasis in cancer patients are ambiguous. This study provides recommendations on the management and use of the therapies currently available for these patients. They are the result of a Delphi consensus reached by 45 dermatologists of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group, and their goal is to help specialists in the field in their decision-making processes.

Recommendations from the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group on the Management of Patients with Cancer and Psoriasis

Several studies suggest that patients with psoriasis have a higher incidence of neoplasms, especially of the skin, which could be associated with the use of therapies to treat psoriasis. Furthermore, the evidence available on the safety profile of some treatments in this context, and the management of these patients is scarce, which is why clinical practice guidelines with recommendations on the management of psoriasis in cancer patients are ambiguous. This study provides recommendations on the management and use of the therapies currently available for these patients. They are the result of a Delphi consensus reached by 45 dermatologists of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology Psoriasis Working Group, whose goal is to help specialists in the field in their decision-making processes.

Choosing the right biologic treatment for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: the impact of comorbidities

INTRODUCTION

Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease often associated with several comorbidities, such as psoriatic arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, obesity, diabetes mellitus or cardiovascular diseases, infections, or cancer, among others. With the progressive aging of the population, a growing number of patients with psoriasis can be expected to present multiple comorbidities. Currently, there is a wide range of biological treatments available for moderate to severe psoriasis, including tumor necrosis alpha (TNF) inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitor, IL17 inhibitors, and IL23 inhibitors.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to describe the specific characteristics of these drugs in relation to psoriasis comorbidities, in order to facilitate decision-making in clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Some of the biological treatments can influence comorbidities, in some cases even improving them. Therefore, comorbidities are a key factor when deciding on one biological treatment over another. The development of new drugs is expanding the therapeutic arsenal for psoriasis. A high level of expertise in the field with a detailed knowledge of the characteristics of every drug is imperative to provide personalized medicine.

[Translated article] Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analysed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation).

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (-78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI, and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (-80.6%), 1.9 (-65.5%), 3.3 (-30.7%), and 9.0 (-66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in 6 patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only 2 (3%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analysed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA. Implementing this type of agreement can provide a direct or indirect benefit for all the agents involved in the process, providing valuable information for decision-making.

Risk-sharing agreement based on health outcomes for the treatment of moderate-severe psoriasis with certolizumab pegol

OBJECTIVE

To provide evidence of the effectiveness of certolizumab pegol (CZP) in real clinical practice in adult patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (PsO) in the context of a risk-sharing agreement (RSA).

METHODS

Retrospective observational study based on variables collected in the RSA for treatment with CZP of adult patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO. Ten Spanish hospitals where the RSA was implemented participated. The percentage of patients who achieved the target clinical response of the RSA at the follow-up visit (week 16) was evaluated: absolute Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) value ≤3 for biologic naïve population, and ≤5 in case of previous failure to a single biologic drug. In addition, the improvement in the scores of other scales included in the study was analyzed: Body Surface Area (BSA), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Physician's Global Assessment (PGA), and Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI). A descriptive analysis was performed for the total population and by patient subgroups (naive vs. non-naive to biologic, male vs. female, and with vs. without discontinuation).

RESULTS

Sixty-six patients were included, 12 men and 54 women. 90.9% achieved the target clinical response, with a mean reduction of 8 (-78.4%) absolute PASI points. Improvement was observed in BSA, PGA, NAPSI and DLQI, with a reduction of 11.3 (-80.6%), 1.9 (-65.5%), 3.3 (-30.7%) and 9.0 (-66.4%) absolute value points, respectively. Despite not achieving the therapeutic target set in the RSA in six patients (9%) (the cost of the drug was assumed by the laboratory), only two (3%) discontinued treatment.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that CZP is effective in real clinical practice in patients with moderate-severe plaque PsO, with an improvement in absolute PASI and DLQI, as well as other scales, both for the total population and in the subgroups analyzed. Nearly 91% of patients reached the therapeutic target fixed in the RSA. Implementing this type of agreement can provide a direct or indirect benefit for all the agents involved in the process, providing valuable information for decision-making.

Bimekizumab: Short-Term Effectiveness and Safety in Real Clinical Practice in Andalucia, Spain

Introduction: Psoriasis, a chronic inflammatory skin disease, affects 2-10% of the population globally. Bimekizumab (BMK), a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17, is a dual inhibitor of IL17 A and F that has shown efficacy in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. This real-world evidence (RWE) study aims to assess BMK's efficiency and safety in naïve and refractory patients. Material and methods: A retrospective analysis of a multicenter observational study included 22 patients treated with BMK from April 2023 to February 2023 in five Andalusian hospitals. Ethical approval was obtained, and patients provided informed consent. Assessment criteria encompassed Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), body surface area (BSA), VAS pruritus, Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and minimum disease activity (MDA) at 0, 4, 12, and 24 weeks. Results: Patients, predominantly with plaque psoriasis, exhibited significant improvements in PASI (baseline 15.7 to 0.4 at week 16), BSA (baseline 20.7 to 0.43 at week 16), DLQI (baseline 17.93 to 0.43 at week 16), and pruritus (baseline 7.12 to 0.4 at week 16). At week 16, 95.4% achieved MDA. No safety concerns or treatment discontinuations were reported. Discussion: This RWE study aligns with pivotal clinical trials, confirming BMK's efficacy and safety. Notably, BMK demonstrated rapid and sustained psoriasis clearance, even in challenging areas. The study's limitations include a small sample size, suggesting the need for further exploration of patient-reported outcomes. Conclusion: Bimekizumab exhibited optimal efficacy and safety profiles in treating moderate to severe plaque psoriasis in a real-world setting. Rapid response, sustained clearance, and favorable safety outcomes contribute to improved patient experiences. Future research could delve into patient-reported outcomes and expand sample sizes to enhance the understanding of BMK's real-world effectiveness.

Durability and long-term outcomes of biologic therapies in psoriasis

INTRODUCTION

Significant advances in psoriasis treatment have taken place since the introduction of biologics. Tumor necrosis factor inhibitors were the first class of biologics approved and at that time greatly improved psoriasis treatment. However, newer biologics, directed to interleukin(IL)-23/IL-17 pathways central to psoriasis pathogenesis, have improved complete or nearly complete clearance rates and are characterized by an excellent safety profile.Real-world setting experiences have generally confirmed the results of clinical trials, but real-world data regarding newer biologics is relatively scarce.

AREAS COVERED

We provide an extensive review of real-world survival of biologic treatments for moderate to severe psoriasis.

EXPERT OPINION

There is growing and consistent evidence of higher drug survival of IL-23 inhibitors, possibly due to their favorable efficacy and safety profiles, dosing convenience and persistence of response despite treatment interruption; eventual confirmation of their potential role as modifiers of the natural history of psoriasis might provide additional reasons for therapeutic persistence of this class of biologics.

Tildrakizumab improves high burden skin symptoms, impaired sleep and quality of life of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis patients in conditions close to clinical practice

BACKGROUND

Tildrakizumab (TIL) is an interleukin (IL)-23p19 inhibitor for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis with long-term efficacy and safety demonstrated in Phase III trials. Studies conducted in conditions closer to clinical practice are needed.

OBJECTIVES

The TRIBUTE study (open-label, Phase IV) assessed the efficacy and impact on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of TIL 100 mg in adult moderate-to-severe psoriasis patients (naïve to IL-23/Th17 pathway inhibitors) in conditions similar to clinical practice.

METHODS

Key efficacy measure was Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI). HRQoL was evaluated using the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and Skindex-16. Additional patient-reported outcomes included Pain-, Pruritus- and Scaling-Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), Medical Outcome Study (MOS)-Sleep, Work Productivity and Activity Impairment (WPAI), Patient Benefit Index (PBI) and Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM).

RESULTS

One hundred and seventy-seven patients were enrolled (six patients did not complete the study). After 24 weeks, the proportion of patients achieving PASI scores ≤ 3, PASI 75, PASI 90 and DLQI 0/1 was 88.4%, 92.5%, 74.0% and 70.4%, respectively. Skindex-16 overall score improved (mean absolute change from baseline, MACB [95%CI]: -53.3 [-58.1, -48.5]). Significant benefits (MACB [95%CI]) were found on pruritus-, pain- and scaling-NRS scores (-5.7 [-6.1, -5.2], -3.5 [-4.1, -3.0] and -5.7 [-6.2, -5.2], respectively), MOS-Sleep (-10.4 [-13.3, -7.4] Sleep problems Index II) and WPAI (-36.4 [-42.6, -30.2] activity impairment, -28.2 [-34.7, -21.7] productivity loss, -27.0 [-32.9, -21.1] presenteeism and -6.8 [-12.1, -1.5] absenteeism). 82.7% of patients reported PBI ≥ 3 and the mean (SD) global TSQM score was high (80.5 [18.5]). Only one serious treatment-emergent adverse event was reported (not-related to TIL).

CONCLUSIONS

TIL 100 mg treatment after 24 weeks in conditions close to real clinical practice showed a quick and high improvement in psoriasis signs and HRQoL. Patient reported improvements in sleep outcomes and work productivity, relevant benefits and high treatment satisfaction. The safety profile was favourable and consistent with Phase III trials.

Bimekizumab in the Treatment of Plaque Psoriasis: Focus on Patient Selection and Perspectives

Psoriasis is a chronic systemic inflammatory disease that significatively impairs patients' quality of life. Biological treatments are highly effective and safe and have led to breakthroughs in the management of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. However, therapeutic response can be unsatisfactory or lost with time, leading to discontinuation of treatment. Bimekizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that specifically inhibits both interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis has been demonstrated in Phase 2 and Phase 3 clinical trials. Bimekizumab may offer some advantages over other biological treatments, making it especially indicated for certain patients. This narrative review aims to summarize the latest published evidence on the use of bimekizumab for the treatment of moderate-severe plaque psoriasis, focusing on patient selection and therapeutic perspectives. Bimekizumab has been shown to be more efficacious than adalimumab, secukinumab and ustekinumab in clinical trials, with high estimated probabilities of achieving complete (approximately 60%) or almost complete clearance (approximately 85%) of psoriasis at weeks 10-16, and a good safety profile. Response to bimekizumab is usually fast and maintained in the long term for both biologic-naive patients and those resistant to previous biologic treatments. The usual maintenance dose of 320 mg every 8 weeks makes bimekizumab especially convenient for non-compliant patients. Moreover, the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab have also been demonstrated in psoriasis affecting challenging-to-treat areas, psoriatic arthritis and hidradenitis suppurativa. In conclusion, dual inhibition of IL-17A and IL-17F with bimekizumab is a good therapeutic option for moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

[Translated article] Common Approach to Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Psoriasis: Consensus-Based Recommendations From a Multidisciplinary Group of Experts

Recent years have seen concerted efforts to understand the relation between psoriasis and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Not only is MALFD diagnosed more often in patients with psoriasis, but its clinical course is also more aggressive. A common approach is therefore needed to enable early detection of liver disease coincident with psoriasis. Especially important is an analysis of risks and benefits of potentially hepatotoxic treatments. This consensus paper presents the recommendations of a group of experts in dermatology and hepatology regarding screening for MALFD as well as criteria for monitoring patients and referring them to hepatologists when liver disease is suspected.

Common Approach to Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease in Patients With Psoriasis: Consensus-Based Recommendations From a Multidisciplinary Group of Experts

Recent years have seen concerted efforts to understand the relation between psoriasis and metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD). Not only is MALFD diagnosed more often in patients with psoriasis, but its clinical course is also more aggressive. A common approach is therefore needed to enable early detection of liver disease coincident with psoriasis. Especially important is an analysis of risks and benefits of potentially hepatotoxic treatments. This consensus paper presents the recommendations of a group of experts in dermatology and hepatology regarding screening for MALFD as well as criteria for monitoring patients and referring them to hepatologists when liver disease is suspected.

Biologic treatment of psoriasis in oncologic patients

INTRODUCTION

There is a complex interplay between psoriasis and cancer, with therapeutic implications. Patients with psoriasis have an increased risk of developing several types of cancer, and safety concerns have arisen regarding biologic therapies and cancer. On the other hand, biologics can provide adequate control of psoriasis that appears or worsens as an immune-related adverse event following immune enhancing checkpoint inhibitor therapy for cancer, thus allowing prosecution of oncologic treatment without impairing its efficacy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We performed a retrospective observational study of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis under biological treatment and cancer who were treated at our Department between January 2009 and June 2022.

RESULTS

We included 31 adult patients with psoriasis and cancer; in 16 the diagnosis of cancer preceded the inception of biological treatment, and 9 of those patients were in remission. Most malignancies arose in the genitourinary system, followed by breast, hematologic, colorectal, thyroid, and others. Anti-IL23p19 biologics were most frequently used (36%), followed by anti-TNF (32%), anti-IL-17 (16%) and anti-IL-12/23 (16%) agents. All patients showed improvement of psoriasis after biologic initiation.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologic treatment for moderate-severe psoriasis should be considered in oncologic patients since it is not formally contraindicated and is safe. Moreover, the efficacy and safety profile of IL-23 and IL-17 inhibitors may be advantageous for those patients.