1
|
Praeder R, Solberg T, Yorke AA. Underserved communities in the radiation therapy land of plenty - Physicists' perspective. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2024; 25:e14252. [PMID: 38174822 PMCID: PMC10795431 DOI: 10.1002/acm2.14252] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Timothy Solberg
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| | - Afua A. Yorke
- Department of Radiation OncologyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleWashingtonUSA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Flores LE, Sargent M, Draeger B, Petereit DG, McClelland S. Validation of Navigator-Assisted Hypofractionation (NAVAH) Program Survey to Aid American Indian Breast Cancer Patients. Am J Clin Oncol 2023; 46:335-336. [PMID: 37291730 DOI: 10.1097/coc.0000000000001023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Laura E Flores
- University of Nebraska Medical Center, College of Allied Health Professions, Omaha, NE
| | | | - Beth Draeger
- Regional Health John T. Vucurevic Cancer Care Institute, Rapid City
| | - Daniel G Petereit
- Avera Walking Forward Program
- University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD
| | - Shearwood McClelland
- Departments of Radiation Oncology
- Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McClelland S, Sun Y, Spratt DE. Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN): a randomized phase II study protocol. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:379-388. [PMID: 37795393 PMCID: PMC10547410 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 40% of patients with metastatic cancer will have spinal metastatic disease. Historically treated with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) with limited durability in pain control, the increased lifespan of this patient population has necessitated more durable treatment results via spine radiosurgery/stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). The goal of this study is to assess three-month pain freedom rates via the Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN) randomized trial. Materials and methods This study is a prospective randomized three-arm phase II trial which will recruit patients with symptomatic spine metastases. All patients will be randomized to standard-of care SBRT (24 Gy in 2 fractions), single-fraction SBRT (19 Gy in 1 fraction), or EBRT (8 Gy in 1 fraction), with the primary endpoint of three-month pain freedom (using the Brief Pain Inventory). We expect that SPORTSMEN will help definitively answer the efficacy of spine SBRT versus EBRT for achieving pain freedom, while defining the safety and efficacy of 19 Gy single-fraction spine SBRT. Local control will be defined according to Spine Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (SPINO) criteria. Discussion This is the first phase II trial to objectively assess optimal spine SBRT dosing in the treatment of symptomatic spine metastatic disease, while assessing spine SBRT versus EBRT. Findings should allow for better determination of the efficacy of two-fraction spine SBRT versus EBRT in the United States, as well as for the novel single-fraction 19 Gy spine SBRT regimen in patients with symptomatic spine metastases. Trial Registration Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT05617716 (registration date: November 14, 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
- Department of Neurological Surgery, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Yilun Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| | - Daniel E. Spratt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospitals Seidman Cancer Center Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mantz CA, Thaker NG, Deville C, Hubbard A, Pendyala P, Mohideen N, Kavadi V, Winkfield KM. A Medicare Claims Analysis of Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Access to Radiation Therapy Services. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities 2023; 10:501-508. [PMID: 35064522 DOI: 10.1007/s40615-022-01239-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Revised: 12/20/2021] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Reduced access and utilization of radiation therapy (RT) is a well-documented healthcare disparity observed among racial and ethnic minority groups in the USA and a contributor to the inferior health outcomes observed among Black, Hispanic, and Native American patient groups. What is less understood are the points during the process of care following RT consultation at which patients either fail to complete their prescribed treatment or encounter delays. Identification of those points where significant differences exist among different patient groups may help identify opportunities to close gaps in the access of clinically indicated RT. METHODS AND MATERIALS This analysis examines 261,559 RT episodes abstracted from Medicare claims and beneficiary data between 2016 and 2018 to determine rates of treatment initiation following planning and timeliness of treatment completion for different racial groups. RESULTS Failure to initiate treatment was observed to be 29.3% relatively greater for Black, Hispanic, and Native American patients than for White and Asian patients. Among episodes for which treatment was initiated, Black and Hispanic patients were observed to require a significantly greater number of calendar days (when adjusted for fraction number) for completion than for White, Asian, and Native American patients. CONCLUSIONS There appears to be a patient cohort for which RT disparities may be more marginal in their effects-allowing for access to consultation and treatment prescription but not for treatment initiation or timely completion of treatment-and may therefore permit effective solutions to help address current differences in cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Anne Hubbard
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Fairfax, VA, USA
| | - Praveen Pendyala
- Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, North Brunswick, NJ, USA
| | | | | | - Karen M Winkfield
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Roubidoux MA, Kaur JS, Rhoades DA. Health Disparities in Cancer Among American Indians and Alaska Natives. Acad Radiol 2022; 29:1013-1021. [PMID: 34802904 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2021.10.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Revised: 10/15/2021] [Accepted: 10/20/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN) are underserved populations who suffer from several health disparities, 1 of which is cancer. Malignancies, especially cancers of the breast, liver, and lung, are common causes of death in this population. Health care disparities in this population include more limited access to diagnostic radiology because of geographic and/or health system limitations. Early detection of these cancers may be enabled by improving patient and physician access to medical imaging. Awareness by the radiology community of the cancer disparities among this population is needed to support research targeted to this specific ethnic group and to support outreach efforts to provide more imaging opportunities. Providing greater access to imaging facilities will also improve patient compliance with screening recommendations, ultimately improving mortality in these populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marilyn A Roubidoux
- Department of Radiology, Michigan Medicine, TC 2910, 1500 E. Medical Center Drive, Ann Arbor, Mi 48109-5326.
| | - Judith S Kaur
- Department of Hematology and Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Dorothy A Rhoades
- Department of Internal Medicine, Stephenson Cancer Center and the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hill C, Deville C, Kiess A, Narang A, Ratnanather T, Bienstock J, Brinckerhoff L, Hodukavich A, Anderson R, Alcorn S, DeWeese T, Viswanathan A, Page BR. Establishing a Deaf and American Sign Language Inclusive Residency Program. ACADEMIC MEDICINE : JOURNAL OF THE ASSOCIATION OF AMERICAN MEDICAL COLLEGES 2022; 97:357-363. [PMID: 34670241 DOI: 10.1097/acm.0000000000004469] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Improving diversity in residency programs has been increasingly emphasized as a means to address gender, racial, and ethnic disparities in medicine. However, limited attention has been given to the potential benefits of training physicians with differences other than gender or race and ethnicity. Americans with a disability represent about 27% of the U.S. population, whereas 1%-3% of physician trainees report having a disability. In 2013, a national survey identified only 86 physicians or trainees reporting deafness or hearing loss as a disability. To date, there are no published strategies on how to create an inclusive program for Deaf trainees. Herein, the authors report on the development of a Deaf and American Sign Language (ASL) inclusive residency program that can serve as an academic model for other programs, in any medical specialty, seeking to create an accessible training program for Deaf physicians and that can be adapted for trainees with other disabilities. In March 2017, the radiation oncology residency program at Johns Hopkins University matched an ASL-signing Deaf resident who would begin the program in July 2018. In preparation, department leadership engaged key stakeholders and leaders within the university's health system and among the department faculty, residents, and staff as well as the incoming resident to create an ASL inclusive program. A 5-step transition process for the training program was ultimately developed and implemented. The authors focused on engaging the Deaf trainee and interpreters, engaging health system and departmental leadership, contracting a training consultant and developing oral and written training materials for faculty and staff, and optimizing the workspace via accommodations. Through collaborative preparation, a Deaf and ASL-signing resident was successfully integrated into the residency program. The proposed 5-step transition process provides an effective, engaging model to encourage other institutions that are seeking to employ similar inclusivity initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colin Hill
- C. Hill is a radiation oncology resident, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Curtiland Deville
- C. Deville Jr is associate professor, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Ana Kiess
- A. Kiess is assistant professor, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Amol Narang
- A. Narang is assistant professor, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Tilak Ratnanather
- T. Ratnanather is associate research professor, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Jessica Bienstock
- J. Bienstock is associate dean of graduate medical education, Office of the Vice Dean for Education, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Loring Brinckerhoff
- L. Brinckerhoff is a disability and learning consultant, Learning Resources and Support Student Affairs, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Aaron Hodukavich
- A. Hodukavich is an Americans with Disabilities Act compliance officer, Office of Institutional Equity, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Roberta Anderson
- R. Anderson is director of nursing, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sara Alcorn
- S. Alcorn is assistant professor, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Theodore DeWeese
- T. DeWeese is vice dean for clinical affairs and president of the clinical practice association, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Akila Viswanathan
- A. Viswanathan is professor and director, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Brandi R Page
- B.R. Page is assistant professor, Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
McClelland S, Petereit DG, Zeitlin R, Takita C, Suneja G, Miller RC, Deville C, Siker ML. Improving the Clinical Treatment of Vulnerable Populations in Radiation Oncology. Adv Radiat Oncol 2020; 5:1093-1098. [PMID: 33305069 PMCID: PMC7718519 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2020.07.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2020] [Revised: 06/11/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The increasing role of radiation oncology in optimal cancer care treatment brings to mind the adage that power is never a gift, but a responsibility. A significant part of the responsibility we in radiation oncology bear is how to ensure optimal access to our services. This article summarizes the discussion initiated at the 2019 American Society for Radiation Oncology Annual Meeting educational panel entitled “Improving the Clinical Treatment of Vulnerable Populations in Radiation Oncology: Latin, African American, Native American, and Gender/Sexual Minority Communities.” By bringing the discussion to the printed page, we hope to continue the conversation with a broader audience to better define the level of responsibility our field bears in optimizing cancer care to the most vulnerable patient populations within the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | | | - Ross Zeitlin
- Departmment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Cristiane Takita
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Miami Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, Miami, Florida
| | - Gita Suneja
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
| | - Robert C. Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Curtiland Deville
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Johns Hopkins Kimmel Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Malika L. Siker
- Departmment of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
- Corresponding author: Malika L. Siker, MD
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
McClelland S, Waddle MR, Miller RC. Tying Reimbursement to Best Early-Stage Breast Cancer Oncologic Practice. JCO Oncol Pract 2020; 16:631-634. [DOI: 10.1200/op.20.00187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN
| | - Mark R. Waddle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Florida, Jacksonville, FL
| | - Robert C. Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Patel SH, Ebrahimi S, Northfelt DW, Mathews TE, Omar FM, Martinez ED, DeWees TA, Okamoto JM. Understanding American Indian Perceptions Toward Radiation Therapy. Cancer Control 2020; 27:1073274820945991. [PMID: 32735143 PMCID: PMC7658722 DOI: 10.1177/1073274820945991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2020] [Revised: 06/29/2020] [Accepted: 07/08/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Many American Indian (AI) and Alaska native (AN) patients do not complete guideline-concordant cancer care for the 4 most common cancers. Our aim was to better understand AI/AN attitudes toward radiation therapy (RT). Patients eligible for this survey study were AI/AN patients with cancer at the Phoenix Indian Medical Center who either received previous RT or were recommended to receive RT. An 18-item questionnaire was administered to each of the 50 participants from October 1, 2018, through February 15, 2019. Willingness to travel for RT was compared to respondent characteristics, concerns regarding RT, and obstacles to obtain RT. Duration of RT was important to 78% of patients: 24% would consider traveling 25 miles or more for a standard course, and 48% would travel that distance for a shorter course (P < .001). The top-ranked barriers to RT were transportation, cost of treatment, and insurance compatibility. The top-ranked concerns about RT were adverse effects, cost of treatment, and fear of RT. Concerns about adverse effects were associated with the radiation team's inability to explain the treatment (P = .05). Transportation concerns were significantly associated with accessibility (P = .02), communication with the RT team (P = .02), and fear of RT (P = .04). AI/AN patients are concerned about the adverse effects of RT and the logistics of treatment, particularly costs, transportation, and insurance compatibility. Use of culturally specific education and hypofractionation regimens may increase acceptance of RT for AI/AN patients with cancer, and this hypothesis will be tested in a future educational intervention-based study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samir H. Patel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Sasha Ebrahimi
- Mayo Clinic Alix School of Medicine, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Donald W. Northfelt
- Division of Hematology and Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Timothy E. Mathews
- Oncology Center of Excellence, Phoenix Indian Medical Center, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| | - Farhia M. Omar
- Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Erika D. Martinez
- Office of Health Disparities Research, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | - Todd A. DeWees
- Health Services Research, Mayo Clinic Scottsdale, AZ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
When Numbers Lie: The Lessons the True Hurricane Maria Death Toll Should Teach Us About the Necessity of Addressing Radiation Therapy Access Disparities in the United States. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 102:672-673. [PMID: 30174133 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/15/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
11
|
McClelland S, Kaleem T, Bernard ME, Ahmed HZ, Sio TT, Miller RC. The pervasive crisis of diminishing radiation therapy access for vulnerable populations in the United States-Part 4: Appalachian patients. Adv Radiat Oncol 2018; 3:471-477. [PMID: 30370344 PMCID: PMC6200890 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Compared with the rest of the United States, the population of Appalachia has lower education levels, higher rates of poverty, and limited access to health care. The presence of disparities in radiation therapy (RT) access for Appalachian patients with cancer has rarely been examined. Methods and materials The National Cancer Institute initiatives toward addressing disparities in treatment access for rural populations were examined. An extensive literature search was undertaken for studies investigating RT access disparities in Appalachian patients, beginning with the most common cancers in these patients (lung, colorectal, and cervical). Results Although the literature investigating RT access disparities in Appalachia is relatively sparse, studies examining lung, colorectal, cervical, prostate, head and neck, breast, and esophageal cancer, as well as lymphoma, indicate an unfortunate commonality in barriers to optimal RT access for Appalachian patients with cancer. These barriers are predominantly socioeconomic in nature (low income and lack of private insurance) but are exacerbated by paucities in both the number and quality of radiation centers that are accessible to this patient population. Conclusions Regardless of organ system, there are significant barriers for Appalachian patients with cancer to receive RT. Such diminished access is alarming and warrants resources devoted to addressing these disparities, which often go overlooked because of the assumption that the overall wealth of the United States is tangibly applicable to all of its citizens. Without intelligently targeted investments of time and finances in this arena, there is great risk of exacerbating rather than alleviating the already heavy burden facing Appalachian patients with cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Tasneem Kaleem
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Mark E Bernard
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky
| | - Hiba Z Ahmed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Terence T Sio
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Robert C Miller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
McClelland S, Jaboin JJ. In Regard to Palmer et al. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2018; 101:999-1000. [PMID: 29976514 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2018.04.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2018] [Accepted: 04/11/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Jerry J Jaboin
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
McClelland S, Perez CA. The pervasive crisis of diminishing radiation therapy access for vulnerable populations in the United States-part 3: Hispanic-American patients. Adv Radiat Oncol 2017; 3:93-99. [PMID: 29904731 PMCID: PMC6000066 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2017.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2017] [Revised: 11/30/2017] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Health disparities have profoundly affected underrepresented minorities throughout the United States, particularly with regard to access to evidence-based interventions such as surgery or medication. The degree of disparity in access to radiation therapy (RT) for Hispanic-American patients with cancer has not been previously examined in an extensive manner. Methods and materials An extensive literature search was performed using the PubMed database to examine studies investigating disparities in RT access for Hispanic-Americans. Results A total of 34 studies were found, spanning 10 organ systems. Disparities in access to RT for Hispanic-Americans were most prominently studied in cancers of the breast (15 studies), prostate (4 studies), head and neck (4 studies), and gynecologic system (3 studies). Disparities in RT access for Hispanic-Americans were prevalent regardless of the organ system studied and were compounded by limited English proficiency and/or birth outside of the United States. A total of 26 of 34 studies (77%) involved analysis of a population-based database, such as Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result (15 studies); Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Result-Medicare (4 studies); National Cancer Database (3 studies); or a state tumor registry (4 studies). Conclusions Hispanic-Americans in the United States have diminished RT access compared with Caucasian patients but are less likely to experience concomitant disparities in mortality than other underrepresented minorities that experience similar disparities (ie, African-Americans). Hispanic-Americans who are born outside of the United States and/or have limited English proficiency may be more likely to experience substandard RT access. These results underscore the importance of finding nationwide solutions to address such inequalities that hinder Hispanic-Americans and other underrepresented minorities throughout the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shearwood McClelland
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, Oregon
| | - Carmen A Perez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, New York University, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|