Direct Clinical Effects of Cardiac Radioablation in the Treatment of a Patient With Therapy-Refractory Ventricular Tachycardia Storm

Patient selection, ventricular tachycardia substrate delineation, and data transfer for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association of the European Society of Cardiology and the Heart Rhythm Society

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a novel, non-invasive, and promising treatment option for ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). It has been applied in highly selected patients mainly as bailout procedure, when (multiple) catheter ablations, together with anti-arrhythmic drugs, were unable to control the VAs. Despite the increasing clinical use, there is still limited knowledge of the acute and long-term response of normal and diseased myocardium to STAR. Acute toxicity appeared to be reasonably low, but potential late adverse effects may be underreported. Among published studies, the provided methodological information is often limited, and patient selection, target volume definition, methods for determination and transfer of target volume, and techniques for treatment planning and execution differ across studies, hampering the pooling of data and comparison across studies. In addition, STAR requires close and new collaboration between clinical electrophysiologists and radiation oncologists, which is facilitated by shared knowledge in each collaborator's area of expertise and a common language. This clinical consensus statement provides uniform definition of cardiac target volumes. It aims to provide advice in patient selection for STAR including aetiology-specific aspects and advice in optimal cardiac target volume identification based on available evidence. Safety concerns and the advice for acute and long-term monitoring including the importance of standardized reporting and follow-up are covered by this document. Areas of uncertainty are listed, which require high-quality, reliable pre-clinical and clinical evidence before the expansion of STAR beyond clinical scenarios in which proven therapies are ineffective or unavailable.

Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Stereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation in Ventricular Tachycardia: A Comprehensive Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Purpose

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) has emerged as a promising non-invasive treatment for refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT), offering a novel alternative for patients who are poor candidates for catheter ablation. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates the safety, efficacy, and technical aspects of STAR across preclinical studies, case reports, case series, and clinical trials.

Methods and Materials

A systematic review identified 80 studies published between 2015 and 2024, including 12 preclinical studies, 47 case reports, 15 case series, and 6 clinical trials. Data on patient demographics, treatment parameters, and clinical outcomes were extracted. Meta-analyses were performed for pooled mortality rates, VT burden reduction, and acute toxicities, with subgroup analyses exploring cardiomyopathy type, age, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and treatment modality.

Results

The pooled 6- and 12-month mortality rates were 16% (95% CI: 11-21%) and 32% (95% CI: 26-39%), respectively. VT burden reduction at 6 months was 75% (95% CI: 73-77%), with significant heterogeneity (I2 = 98.8%). Grade 3+ acute toxicities were observed in 7% (95% CI: 4-11%), with pneumonitis being the most common. Subgroup analyses showed comparable outcomes between LINAC- and CyberKnife-based treatments, with minor differences based on patient characteristics and cardiomyopathy type.

Conclusions

STAR demonstrates significant potential in reducing VT burden and improving patient outcomes. While favorable acute safety profiles and efficacy support clinical adoption, variability in treatment protocols underscores the need for standardized practices. Future studies should aim to optimize patient selection, establish robust dosimetric standards, and evaluate long-term safety.

Interobserver variability in target definition for stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation

Background

Stereotactic arrhythmia radioablation (STAR) is a potential new therapy for patients with refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). The arrhythmogenic substrate (target) is synthesized from clinical and electro-anatomical information. This study was designed to evaluate the baseline interobserver variability in target delineation for STAR.

Methods

Delineation software designed for research purposes was used. The study was split into three phases. Firstly, electrophysiologists delineated a well-defined structure in three patients (spinal canal). Secondly, observers delineated the VT-target in three patients based on case descriptions. To evaluate baseline performance, a basic workflow approach was used, no advanced techniques were allowed. Thirdly, observers delineated three predefined segments from the 17-segment model. Interobserver variability was evaluated by assessing volumes, variation in distance to the median volume expressed by the root-mean-square of the standard deviation (RMS-SD) over the target volume, and the Dice-coefficient.

Results

Ten electrophysiologists completed the study. For the first phase interobserver variability was low as indicated by low variation in distance to the median volume (RMS-SD range: 0.02-0.02 cm) and high Dice-coefficients (mean: 0.97 ± 0.01). In the second phase distance to the median volume was large (RMS-SD range: 0.52-1.02 cm) and the Dice-coefficients low (mean: 0.40 ± 0.15). In the third phase, similar results were observed (RMS-SD range: 0.51-1.55 cm, Dice-coefficient mean: 0.31 ± 0.21).

Conclusions

Interobserver variability is high for manual delineation of the VT-target and ventricular segments. This evaluation of the baseline observer variation shows that there is a need for methods and tools to improve variability and allows for future comparison of interventions aiming to reduce observer variation, for STAR but possibly also for catheter ablation.

Non-invasive stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia: results of the prospective STARNL-1 trial

AIMS

Stereotactic arrhythmia radiotherapy (STAR) is suggested as potentially effective and safe treatment for patients with therapy-refractory ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the current prospective knowledge base and experience with STAR is limited. In this study we aimed to prospectively evaluate the efficacy and safety of STAR.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The StereoTactic Arrhythmia Radiotherapy in the Netherlands no.1 was a pre-post intervention study to prospectively evaluate efficacy and safety of STAR. In patients with therapy-refractory VT, the pro-arrhythmic region was treated with a 25 Gy single radiotherapy fraction. The main efficacy measure was a reduction in the number of treated VT-episodes by ≥50%, comparing the 12 months before and after treatment (or end of follow-up, excluding a 6-week blanking period). The study was deemed positive when ≥50% of patients would meet this criterion. Safety evaluation included left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary function, and adverse events. Six male patients with an ischaemic cardiomyopathy were enrolled, and median age was 73 years (range 54-83). Median left ventricular ejection fraction was 38% (range 24-52). The median planning target volume was 187 mL (range 93-372). Four (67%) patients completed the 12-month follow-up, and two patients died (not STAR related) during follow-up. The main efficacy measure of ≥50% reduction in treated VT-episodes at the end of follow-up was achieved in four patients (67%). The median number of treated VT-episodes was reduced by 87%. No reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction or pulmonary function was observed. No treatment related serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

STAR resulted in a ≥ 50% reduction in treated VT-episodes in 4/6 (67%) patients. No reduction in cardiac and pulmonary function nor treatment-related serious adverse events were observed during follow-up.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Register-NL7510.