|
1
|
Meng YJ, Mankuzhy NP, Chawla M, Lee RP, Yorke ED, Zhang Z, Gelb E, Lim SB, Cuaron JJ, Wu AJ, Simone CB, Gelblum DY, Lovelock DM, Harris W, Rimner A. A Prospective Study on Deep Inspiration Breath Hold Thoracic Radiation Therapy Guided by Bronchoscopically Implanted Electromagnetic Transponders. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1534. [PMID: 38672616 PMCID: PMC11048337 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Revised: 04/03/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Electromagnetic transponders bronchoscopically implanted near the tumor can be used to monitor deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) for thoracic radiation therapy (RT). The feasibility and safety of this approach require further study. METHODS We enrolled patients with primary lung cancer or lung metastases. Three transponders were implanted near the tumor, followed by simulation with DIBH, free breathing, and 4D-CT as backup. The initial gating window for treatment was ±5 mm; in a second cohort, the window was incrementally reduced to determine the smallest feasible gating window. The primary endpoint was feasibility, defined as completion of RT using transponder-guided DIBH. Patients were followed for assessment of transponder- and RT-related toxicity. RESULTS We enrolled 48 patients (35 with primary lung cancer and 13 with lung metastases). The median distance of transponders to tumor was 1.6 cm (IQR 0.6-2.8 cm). RT delivery ranged from 3 to 35 fractions. Transponder-guided DIBH was feasible in all but two patients (96% feasible), where it failed because the distance between the transponders and the antenna was >19 cm. Among the remaining 46 patients, 6 were treated prone to keep the transponders within 19 cm of the antenna, and 40 were treated supine. The smallest feasible gating window was identified as ±3 mm. Thirty-nine (85%) patients completed one year of follow-up. Toxicities at least possibly related to transponders or the implantation procedure were grade 2 in six patients (six incidences, cough and hemoptysis), grade 3 in three patients (five incidences, cough, dyspnea, pneumonia, and supraventricular tachycardia), and grade 4 pneumonia in one patient (occurring a few days after implantation but recovered fully and completed RT). Toxicities at least possibly related to RT were grade 2 in 18 patients (41 incidences, most commonly cough, fatigue, and pneumonitis) and grade 3 in four patients (seven incidences, most commonly pneumonia), and no patients had grade 4 or higher toxicity. CONCLUSIONS Bronchoscopically implanted electromagnetic transponder-guided DIBH lung RT is feasible and safe, allowing for precise tumor targeting and reduced normal tissue exposure. Transponder-antenna distance was the most common challenge due to a limited antenna range, which could sometimes be circumvented by prone positioning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuzhong Jeff Meng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Nikhil P. Mankuzhy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Mohit Chawla
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Robert P. Lee
- Department of Medicine, Pulmonary Service, Section of Interventional Pulmonology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (M.C.); (R.P.L.)
| | - Ellen D. Yorke
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Zhigang Zhang
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA;
| | - Emily Gelb
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Seng Boh Lim
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - John J. Cuaron
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Abraham J. Wu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Charles B. Simone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- New York Proton Center, New York, NY 10035, USA; (C.B.S.II)
| | - Daphna Y. Gelblum
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
| | - Dale Michael Lovelock
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Wendy Harris
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (E.D.Y.); (S.B.L.); (D.M.L.); (W.H.)
| | - Andreas Rimner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10021, USA; (Y.J.M.); (N.P.M.); (E.G.); (J.J.C.); (A.J.W.); (C.B.S.II); (D.Y.G.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center—University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site DKTK-Freiburg, Robert-Koch-Strasse 3, 79106 Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|