1
|
Mughal NA, Hussain MH, Ahmed KS, Waheed MT, Munir MM, Diehl TM, Zafar SN. Barriers to Surgical Outcomes Research in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Scoping Review. J Surg Res 2023; 290:188-196. [PMID: 37269802 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2023.04.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2023] [Revised: 04/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/30/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Systematic collection and analysis of surgical outcomes data is a cornerstone of surgical quality improvement. Unfortunately, there remains a dearth of surgical outcomes data from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). To improve surgical outcomes in LMICs, it is essential to have the ability to collect, analyze, and report risk-adjusted postoperative morbidity and mortality data. This study aimed to review the barriers and challenges to developing perioperative registries in LMIC settings. METHODS We conducted a scoping review of all published literature on barriers to conducting surgical outcomes research in LMICs using PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and GoogleScholar. Keywords included 'surgery', 'outcomes research', 'registries', 'barriers', and synonymous Medical Subject Headings derivatives. Articles found were subsequently reference-mined. All relevant original research and reviews published between 2000 and 2021 were included. The performance of routine information system management framework was used to organize identified barriers into technical, organizational, or behavioral factors. RESULTS Twelve articles were identified in our search. Ten articles focused specifically on the creation, success, and obstacles faced during the implementation of trauma registries. Technical factors reported by 50% of the articles included limited access to a digital platform for data entry, lack of standardization of forms, and complexity of said forms. 91.7% articles mentioned organizational factors, including the availability of resources, financial constraints, human resources, and lack of consistent electricity. Behavioral factors highlighted by 66.6% of the studies included lack of team commitment, job constraints, and clinical burden, which contributed to poor compliance and dwindling data collection over time. CONCLUSIONS There is a paucity of published literature on barriers to developing and maintaining perioperative registries in LMICs. There is an immediate need to study and understand barriers and facilitators to the continuous collection of surgical outcomes in LMICs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nabiha Akhlaq Mughal
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Muzamil Hamid Hussain
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | | | - Muhammad Talha Waheed
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan; Department of Surgery, City of Hope National Medical Center, Duarte, California
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Medical College, Karachi, Sindh, Pakistan
| | - Thomas M Diehl
- Department of Surgery, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abdelraheem O, Sami DG, Salama M. Online Health Communities: an alternative feasible data registry tool for developing countries. Health Res Policy Syst 2023; 21:28. [PMID: 37024909 PMCID: PMC10077652 DOI: 10.1186/s12961-023-00976-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Given the many challenges facing healthcare access in many developing countries and the added limitations observed in emergencies like COVID-19 pandemic, the authors here discuss an alternative and feasible approach to overcome all these limitations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Omnia Abdelraheem
- Institute of Global Health, and Human Ecology (I-GHHE), The American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Diana G Sami
- Institute of Global Health, and Human Ecology (I-GHHE), The American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Mohamed Salama
- Institute of Global Health, and Human Ecology (I-GHHE), The American University in Cairo, Cairo, Egypt.
- Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt.
- Global Brain Health Institute (GBHI), Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kapanadze G, Berg J, Sun Y, Gerdin Wärnberg M. Facilitators and barriers impacting in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Program (TQIP) implementation across country income levels: a scoping review. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e068219. [PMID: 36806064 PMCID: PMC9944272 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-068219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Trauma is a leading cause of mortality and morbidity globally, disproportionately affecting low/middle-income countries (LMICs). Understanding the factors determining implementation success for in-hospital Trauma Quality Improvement Programs (TQIPs) is critical to reducing the global trauma burden. We synthesised topical literature to identify key facilitators and barriers to in-hospital TQIP implementation across country income levels. DESIGN Scoping review. DATA SOURCES PubMed, Web of Science and Global Index Medicus databases were searched from June 2009 to January 2022. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Published literature involving any study design, written in English and evaluating any implemented in-hospital quality improvement programme in trauma populations worldwide. Literature that was non-English, unpublished and involved non-hospital TQIPs was excluded. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two reviewers completed a three-stage screening process using Covidence, with any discrepancies resolved through a third reviewer. Content analysis using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research identified facilitator and barrier themes for in-hospital TQIP implementation. RESULTS Twenty-eight studies met the eligibility criteria from 3923 studies identified. The most discussed in-hospital TQIPs in included literature were trauma registries. Facilitators and barriers were similar across all country income levels. The main facilitator themes identified were the prioritisation of staff education and training, strengthening stakeholder dialogue and providing standardised best-practice guidelines. The key barrier theme identified in LMICs was poor data quality, while high-income countries (HICs) had reduced communication across professional hierarchies. CONCLUSIONS Stakeholder prioritisation of in-hospital TQIPs, along with increased knowledge and consensus of trauma care best practices, are essential efforts to reduce the global trauma burden. The primary focus of future studies on in-hospital TQIPs in LMICs should target improving registry data quality, while interventions in HICs should target strengthening communication channels between healthcare professionals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George Kapanadze
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johanna Berg
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Emergency and Internal Medicine, Skånes universitetssjukhus Malmö, Malmo, Sweden
| | - Yue Sun
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Gerdin Wärnberg
- Department of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Function Perioperative Medicine and Intensive Care, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Puvanachandra P, Ssesumugabo C, Balugaba BE, Ivers R, Kobusingye O, Peden M. The epidemiology and characteristics of injuries to under 5's in a secondary city in Uganda: a retrospective review of hospital data. Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot 2022; 29:550-555. [PMID: 35797975 DOI: 10.1080/17457300.2022.2089686] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
Child injuries are largely preventable yet cause significant mortality and morbidity globally. Injury data from low-income countries is limited for children under the age of 5 and therefore the current understanding of the magnitude of injuries in this age group is low. Hospital-based registries are one mechanism by which injury data can be gathered. This paper presents findings from a retrospective hospital record review of 4 hospitals in Jinja, a rural setting in Uganda, involving the extraction of data for children under the age of 5-years who sustained an injury during a 6-month period in 2019. A total of 225 injury cases were retrieved from the hospitals. Over half (57.3%) of the events occurred among males. The majority (92%) suffered one injury per injury event. Most of the injuries occurred among those aged 13 to 24 months (32.9%). Burns (32%) and cuts (20%) were the most common cause of injury. This study presents a hospital-based analysis of injuries amongst under 5's in rural Uganda. It provides information on the characteristics of children entering healthcare facilities in Uganda and highlights the burden of paediatric injuries in the hospital setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Puvanachandra
- The George Institute for Global Health, UK, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - C Ssesumugabo
- School of Public Health, Makerere School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - B E Balugaba
- School of Public Health, Makerere School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - R Ivers
- School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - O Kobusingye
- School of Public Health, Makerere School of Public Health, Kampala, Uganda
| | - M Peden
- The George Institute for Global Health, UK, Imperial College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tirupakuzhi Vijayaraghavan BK, Gupta E, Ramakrishnan N, Beane A, Haniffa R, Lone N, de Keizer N, Adhikari NKJ. Barriers and facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries: A scoping review. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0266836. [PMID: 35511911 PMCID: PMC9071139 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0266836] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background
Improvements in health-related outcomes for critically ill adults in low and lower-middle income countries need systematic investments in research capacity and infrastructure. High-quality research has been shown to strengthen health systems; yet, research contributions from these regions remain negligible or absent. We undertook a scoping review to describe barriers and facilitators for the conduct of critical care research.
Methods
We searched MEDLINE and EMBASE up to December 2021 using a strategy that combined keyword and controlled vocabulary terms. We included original studies that reported on barriers or facilitators to the conduct of critical care research in these settings. Two reviewers independently reviewed titles and abstracts, and where necessary, the full-text to select eligible studies. For each study, reviewers independently extracted data using a standardized data extraction form. Barriers and facilitators were classified along the lines of a previous review and based on additional themes that emerged. Study quality was assessed using appropriate tools.
Results
We identified 2693 citations, evaluated 49 studies and identified 6 for inclusion. Of the included studies, four were qualitative, one was a cross-sectional survey and one was reported as an ‘analysis’. The total number of participants ranged from 20–100 and included physicians, nurses, allied healthcare workers and researchers. Barriers identified included limited funding, poor institutional & national investment, inadequate access to mentors, absence of training in research methods, limited research support staff, and absence of statistical support. Our review identified potential solutions such as developing a mentorship network, streamlining of regulatory processes, implementing a centralized institutional research agenda, developing a core-outcome dataset and enhancing access to low-cost technology.
Conclusion
Our scoping review highlights important barriers to the conduct of critical care research in low and lower-middle income countries, identifies potential solutions, and informs researchers, policymakers and governments on the steps necessary for strengthening research systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Ena Gupta
- Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Einstein Health Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States of America
| | | | - Abi Beane
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Rashan Haniffa
- Mahidol-Oxford Tropical Research Unit, Bangkok, Thailand
- Department of Anaesthesia and Critical Care Medicine, University College London, London, United Kingdom
| | - Nazir Lone
- Usher Institute, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Nicolette de Keizer
- Department of Medical Informatics, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Neill K. J. Adhikari
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lazem M, Sheikhtaheri A. Barriers and facilitators for the implementation of health condition and outcome registry systems: a systematic literature review. J Am Med Inform Assoc 2022; 29:723-734. [PMID: 35022765 PMCID: PMC8922163 DOI: 10.1093/jamia/ocab293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2021] [Revised: 09/29/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Health condition and outcome registry systems (registries) are used to collect data related to diseases and other health-related outcomes in specific populations. The implementation of these programs encounters various barriers and facilitators. Therefore, the present review aimed to identify and classify these barriers and facilitators. MATERIALS AND METHODS Some databases, including PubMed, Embase, ISI Web of Sciences, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Ovid, ProQuest, and Google Scholar, were searched using related keywords. Thereafter, based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, the required data were collected using a data extraction form and then analyzed by the content analysis method. The obtained data were analyzed separately for research and review studies, and the developed and developing countries were compared. RESULTS Forty-five studies were reviewed and 175 unique codes were identified, among which 93 barriers and 82 facilitators were identified. Afterward, these factors were classified into the following 7 categories: barriers/facilitators to management and data management, poor/improved collaborations, technological constraints/appropriateness, barriers/facilitators to legal and regulatory factors, considerations/facilitators related to diseases, and poor/improved patients' participation. Although many of these factors have been more cited in the literature related to the developing countries, they were found to be common in both developed and developing countries. CONCLUSION Lack of budget, poor performance of managers, low data quality, and low stakeholders' interest/motivation on one hand, and financing, providing adequate training, ensuring data quality, and appropriate data collection on the other hand were found as the most common barriers or facilitators for the success of the registry implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mina Lazem
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Abbas Sheikhtaheri
- Department of Health Information Management, School of Health Management and Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran,Corresponding Author: Abbas Sheikhtaheri, PhD, Health Management and Economics Research Center, Health Management Research Institute, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Yasemi St, Valiasr Ave, Tehran, Iran;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Senderowicz L, Pearson E, Hackett K, Huber-Krum S, Francis JM, Ulenga N, Bärnighausen T. 'I haven't heard much about other methods': quality of care and person-centredness in a programme to promote the postpartum intrauterine device in Tanzania. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:e005775. [PMID: 34162627 PMCID: PMC8230964 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 05/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Programmes promoting the postpartum intrauterine device (PPIUD) have proliferated throughout South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa in recent years, with proponents touting this long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) method's high efficacy and potential to meet contraceptive unmet need. While critiques of LARC-first programming abound in the Global North, there have been few studies of the impact of LARC-centric programmes on patient-centred outcomes in the Global South. METHODS Here, we explore the impact of a PPIUD intervention at five Tanzanian hospitals and their surrounding satellite clinics on quality of contraceptive counselling and person-centred care using 20 qualitative in-depth interviews with pregnant women seeking antenatal care at one of those clinics. Using a modified version of the contraceptive counselling quality framework elaborated by Holt and colleagues, we blend deductive analysis with an inductive approach based on open coding and thematic analysis. RESULTS Interpersonal aspects of relationship building during counselling were strong, but a mix of PPIUD intervention-related factors and structural issues rendered most other aspects of counselling quality low. The intervention led providers to emphasise the advantages of the IUD through biased counselling, and to de-emphasise the suitability of other contraceptive methods. Respondents reported being counselled only about the IUD and no other methods, while other respondents reported that other methods were mentioned but disparaged by providers in relation to the IUD. A lack of trained providers meant that most counselling took place in large groups, resulting in providers' inability to conduct needs assessments or tailor information to women's individual situations. DISCUSSION As implemented, LARC-centric programmes like this PPIUD intervention may decrease access to person-centred contraceptive counselling and to accurate information about a broad range of contraceptive methods. A shift away from emphasising LARC methods to more comprehensive, person-centred contraceptive counselling is critical to promote contraceptive autonomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leigh Senderowicz
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
- Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Erin Pearson
- Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Technical Excellence, Ipas, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kristy Hackett
- Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sarah Huber-Krum
- Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Joel Msafiri Francis
- Medicine and Primary Care, School of Clinical Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand Faculty of Health Sciences, Johannesburg, South Africa
- Management and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Nzovu Ulenga
- Management and Development for Health, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Till Bärnighausen
- Global Health and Population, Harvard University T H Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Institute of Global Health, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sawe HR, Reynolds TA, Weber EJ, Mfinanga JA, Coats TJ, Wallis LA. Development and pilot implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form to inform a national trauma registry in a low-resource setting: lessons from Tanzania. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e038022. [PMID: 33033093 PMCID: PMC7545631 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-038022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2020] [Revised: 08/16/2020] [Accepted: 09/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Trauma registries are an integral part of a well-organised trauma system. Tanzania, like many low and middle-income countries, does not have a trauma registry. We describe the development, structure, implementation and impact of a context appropriate standardised trauma form based on the adaptation of the WHO Data Set for Injury (DSI), for clinical documentation and use in a national trauma registry. SETTING Our study was conducted in emergency units of five regional referral hospitals in Tanzania. PROCEDURES Mixed methods participatory action research was employed. After an assessment of baseline trauma documentation, we conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposefully selected sample of 33 healthcare providers from all participating hospitals to understand, develop, pilot and implement a standardised trauma form. We compared the number and types of variables captured before and after the form was implemented. OUTCOMES Change in proportion of variables of DSI captured after implementation of a standardised trauma documentation form. RESULTS Piloting and feedback informed the development of a context appropriate standardised trauma documentation paper form with carbonless copy that could be used as both the clinical chart and data capture. Among 721 patients (seen by 21 clinicians) during the initial 30-day pilot, overall variable capture was 86.4% of required variables. After modifications of the form and training of healthcare providers, the form was implemented for 7 months, during which the capture improved to 96.3% among 6302 patients (seen by 31 clinicians). The providers reported the form was user-friendly, resulted in less time documenting, and served as a guide to managing trauma patients. CONCLUSIONS The development and implementation of a contextually appropriate, standardised trauma form were successful, yielding increased capture rates of injury variables. This system will facilitate expansion of the trauma registry across the country and inform similar initiatives in Sub-Saharan Africa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hendry R Sawe
- Emegency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Teri A Reynolds
- Integrated Health Services, World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Ellen J Weber
- Emergency Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Juma A Mfinanga
- Emergency Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Timothy J Coats
- Cardiovascular Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK
| | - Lee A Wallis
- Emergency Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|