Arabic translation and linguistic validation of the questionnaire Bladder Cancer Index

Urdu Translation and Linguistic Validation of the Bladder Cancer Index Questionnaire

Background

This study aimed to translate the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) questionnaire to Urdu and validate it to assess the quality of life of patients with bladder cancer.

Material and methods

After forward and backward translation of the BCI questionnaire into Urdu, content validity was calculated using the content validity index (CVI) based on input from five health experts regarding the clarity and relevance of the questionnaire. Construct validity was measured by comparing the inter-scale domains and subdomains of BCI and by comparing BCI with Short Form 36 (SF-36) using correlations. For assessment of reliability, Cronbach’s alpha was calculated to measure internal consistency and for test-retest reliability, the questionnaire was re-administered four weeks later and the correlation of responses at baseline and at a four-week time point was evaluated.

Results

The questionnaire has good content validity for clarity (0.91) and relevance (0.87). The construct validity of BCI was also adequately displayed by moderate to high correlation between different subdomains of BCI (Pearson’s r: urinary - 0.62, bowel - 0.78, sexual function - 0.43) and low to moderate correlation between responses of BCI compared with SF-36 (Pearson’s r mostly >0.45). Test-retest reliability was excellent (Pearson’s r 0.90-0.98), and there was good internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha 0.79-0.92) in the different domains of the questionnaire.

Conclusion

The Urdu-translated BCI is a valid and reliable tool to measure the impact of bladder cancer on the quality of life of patients.

Comparison of Health-Related Quality of Life Between Japanese and American Patients with Bladder Cancer as Measured by a Newly Developed Japanese Version of the Bladder Cancer Index

INTRODUCTION: The aim of this study is to characterize health related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese patients after bladder cancer surgery and to perform cross-cultural comparison between Japanese and American patients. METHODS: Firstly, we cross-sectionally assessed HRQOL of 371 patients in Japan using the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI-Japanese). HRQOL of the four groups of patients (native bladder without intravesical therapy, native bladder with intravesical therapy, cystectomy with ileal conduit, and cystectomy with neobladder) were assessed. Secondly, we compared the Japanese with the American cohort (n = 315) from the original BCI paper. After adjusting for age and gender, the differences in each BCI subdomain score was analyzed. RESULTS: Among Japanese patients, the urinary domain function score was significantly lower among the cystectomy with neobladder group, compared to the cystectomy with ileal conduit group (p < 0. 01). Despite this, the urinary bother was comparable between the two groups. Although there were apparent differences between Japanese and American patients, there were few differences in Urinary and Bowel HRQOL. In three of the four treatment groups (other than native bladder with intravesical therapy), Japanese patients were more likely than Americans to report poor sexual function (p < 0.05). However, Japanese patients were less likely than Americans to be bothered by their lower sexual function, regardless of treatment (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: HRQOL outcomes following treatment of bladder cancer in Japan are comparable to those in the USA, except for sexual functioning and sexual bother. The BCI can be used for cross-cultural assessments of HRQOL in bladder cancer patients.

Health-related quality of life in Japanese patients with bladder cancer measured by a newly developed Japanese version of the Bladder Cancer Index

Introduction

We validated a Japanese version of the Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) as a tool for measuring health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in bladder cancer patients treated with various surgical procedures.

Methods

The reliability and validity of the Japanese BCI were examined in 397 Japanese patients with bladder cancer via cross-sectional analysis. The patients simultaneously completed the Short Form (SF)-12, EQ-5D, and the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General and Bladder (FACT-G and FACT-BL). The differences in BCI subscales among various treatment groups were analyzed.

Results

This study involved 397 patients (301 males and 96 females), with a mean age of 70 years and a median disease duration of 29 months (IQR: 12–66 months). Of these patients, 221 underwent transurethral resection of a bladder tumor, and 176 patients underwent radical cystectomy (ileal conduit: 101 patients, ileal neobladder: 49, and ureterostomy: 26). Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was ≥ 0.78 for all subscales, except the bowel bother subscale. Despite moderate correlations being detected between the function and bother score in urinary and bowel domains, the sexual function score was inversely correlated with the sexual bother score (r = − 0.19). A missing value percentage of > 15% was associated with old age (p < 0.05). The mean domain scores differed significantly among distinct clinically relevant treatment groups.

Conclusions

Although revisions are needed to make it easier for elderly patients to comprehend, we confirmed the reliability and validity of the Japanese BCI. The Japanese BCI could be used for cross-cultural assessments of HRQOL in bladder cancer patients.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s10147-020-01770-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.