Vascular basis for the treatment of myocardial ischemia study: trial design and baseline characteristics

Torcetrapib/atorvastatin combination therapy

Elevated blood levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) are associated with an increased risk for atherosclerotic coronary heart disease (CHD). Atorvastatin is a statin drug that inhibits 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl coenzyme A reductase (the rate-limiting step of cholesterol production) and primarily lowers LDL-C levels. Atorvastatin has also been shown to significantly reduce CHD events. However, as with all statins (and all other monotherapy lipid-altering drugs), atorvastatin alone reduces the risk of CHD in only a minority of patients relative to placebo. Conversely, it is low levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol that are associated with increased CHD risk. Torcetrapib is a cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitor that primarily raises high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibition has generally been shown to reduce atherosclerosis in rabbits. Taken together, atorvastatin and torcetrapib provide striking improvements in lipid levels, and complementary actions upon important lipid parameters. This review examines the chemistry, mechanism of action, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, safety/tolerability and efficacy of the combination torcetrapib/atorvastatin agent that is currently in development and that provides complementary lipid benefits towards the goal of reducing CHD risk beyond that of atorvastatin alone.

Current strategies for the prevention of angina in patients with stable coronary artery disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Angina pectoris affects at least 6.6 million people in the US and approximately 400,000 new cases of stable angina occur each year. Angina may be one of the first signs of ischemic heart disease, although it is likely not causally related to the likelihood of plaque rupture leading to an acute coronary syndrome. Modalities for treatment of angina should be used maximally to improve quality of life and decrease cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The current recommended pharmacologic and invasive approaches, as well as novel therapies, are reviewed.

RECENT FINDINGS

Antiischemic agents, including beta-blockers, nitrates and calcium channel blockers, remain the mainstay in the prevention of angina. Revascularization via percutaneous interventions or coronary bypass surgery are appropriate in specific cases or when medical treatment fails. Noninvasive treatment options for refractory angina, metabolic agents, and vasodilator therapies are adding to the armamentarium to prevent and treat angina.

SUMMARY

A multifaceted approach is optimal to address the prevention of angina. Once angina is recognized, there are many modalities that lessen the incidence of daily life-induced and exercise-induced angina and ischemia. Angina management is best addressed by pharmacologic and lifestyle interventions.

Effect of Intensive Lipid Lowering, With or Without Antioxidant Vitamins, Compared With Moderate Lipid Lowering on Myocardial Ischemia in Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease

Background— Lipid lowering with statins prevents adverse cardiac events. Both lipid-lowering and antioxidant therapies may favorably affect vasomotor function and thereby improve ischemia.

Methods and Results— In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 300 patients with stable coronary disease, a positive exercise treadmill test, 48-hour ambulatory ECG with ≥1 episode of ischemia, and fasting total cholesterol of 180 to 250 mg/dL were assigned to 1-year treatment with intensive atorvastatin to reduce LDL to <80 mg/dL (n=96), intensive atorvastatin to reduce LDL to <80 mg/dL plus antioxidant vitamins C (1000 mg/d) and E (800 mg/d) (n=101), or diet and low-dose lovastatin, if needed, to reduce LDL to <130 mg/dL (n=103; control group). Ischemia end points, including ambulatory ECG monitoring and exercise treadmill testing, and endothelial assessment using brachial artery flow-mediated dilation were obtained at baseline and at 6 and 12 months. Baseline characteristics were similar in all groups. LDL decreased from ≈153 mg/dL at baseline in the 2 atorvastatin groups to ≈83 mg/dL at 12 months (each P <0.0001) and from 147 to 120 mg/dL in the control group ( P <0.0001). During ambulatory ECG monitoring, mean number of ischemic episodes per 48 hours decreased 31% to 61% in each group (each P <0.001; P =0.15 across groups), without a change in daily heart rate activity. Mean duration of ischemia for 48 hours decreased 26% to 62% in each group (each P <0.001; P =0.06 across groups). Mean exercise duration to 1-mm ST-segment depression significantly increased in each group, but total exercise duration and mean sum of maximum ST depression were unchanged. Angina frequency decreased in each group. There was no incremental effect of supplemental vitamins C and E on any ischemia outcome. Flow-mediated dilation studies indicated no meaningful changes.

Conclusions— Intensive lipid lowering with atorvastatin to an LDL level of 80 mg/dL, with or without antioxidant vitamins, does not provide any further benefits in ambulatory ischemia, exercise time to onset of ischemia, and angina frequency than moderate lipid lowering with diet and low-dose lovastatin to an LDL level of <120 mg/dL.