Relationship of female sex to outcomes after myocardial infarction with persistent total occlusion of the infarct artery: analysis of the Occluded Artery Trial (OAT)

Sex Differences in Revascularization, Treatment Goals, and Outcomes of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: Insights From the ISCHEMIA Trial

BACKGROUND

Women with chronic coronary disease are generally older than men and have more comorbidities but less atherosclerosis. We explored sex differences in revascularization, guideline-directed medical therapy, and outcomes among patients with chronic coronary disease with ischemia on stress testing, with and without invasive management.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The ISCHEMIA (International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches) trial randomized patients with moderate or severe ischemia to invasive management with angiography, revascularization, and guideline-directed medical therapy, or initial conservative management with guideline-directed medical therapy alone. We evaluated the primary outcome (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or hospitalization for unstable angina, heart failure, or resuscitated cardiac arrest) and other end points, by sex, in 1168 (22.6%) women and 4011 (77.4%) men. Invasive group catheterization rates were similar, with less revascularization among women (73.4% of invasive-assigned women revascularized versus 81.2% of invasive-assigned men; P<0.001). Women had less coronary artery disease: multivessel in 60.0% of invasive-assigned women and 74.8% of invasive-assigned men, and no ≥50% stenosis in 12.3% versus 4.5% (P<0.001). In the conservative group, 4-year catheterization rates were 26.3% of women versus 25.6% of men (P=0.72). Guideline-directed medical therapy use was lower among women with fewer risk factor goals attained. There were no sex differences in the primary outcome (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] for women versus men, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.77-1.13]; P=0.47) or the major secondary outcome of cardiovascular death/myocardial infarction (adjusted HR, 0.93 [95% CI, 0.76-1.14]; P=0.49), with no significant sex-by-treatment-group interactions.

CONCLUSIONS

Women had less extensive coronary artery disease and, therefore, lower revascularization rates in the invasive group. Despite lower risk factor goal attainment, women with chronic coronary disease experienced similar risk-adjusted outcomes to men in the ISCHEMIA trial.

REGISTRATION

URL: http://wwwclinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01471522.

In-hospital outcomes of delayed stenting in hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: the CCC (Care for Cardiovascular Disease in China) project

Background

For hemodynamically stable patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) who missed the reperfusion window, optimal timing for delayed revascularization remains controversial.

Methods

We investigated 7,698 consecutive patients without cardiogenic shock, serious heart failure, or thrombolysis who underwent delayed stenting (12 hours to 28 days after STEMI) at multiple centers in China. The patients were divided according to delayed PCI timing into very early (12-72 hours), early (3-7 days), intermediate (7-14 days) and late (14-28 days) groups. The primary outcome was in-hospital rate of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE); secondary outcomes were in-hospital rates of all bleeding events, heart failure and sudden cardiac arrest (SCA). All endpoint events were a composite of the primary and secondary endpoints.

Results

In-hospital MACE rate was similar among groups (P=0.588). Patients who underwent late vs. very early, early and intermediate delayed PCI had higher in-hospital rates of secondary events (13% vs. 8.0%, 8.1% and 0.3%, P<0.001) and heart failure (11.8% vs. 6.2%, 6.3% and 7.6%, P<0.001, respectively). For all in-hospital events, the late vs. intermediate group was at higher risk (OR =1.26, 95% CI: 1.02 to 1.56, P=0.029); and in subgroup analysis, patients with Killip class II or III heart failure had similar rates (OR =1.02, 95% CI: 0.74 to 1.40, P=0.908); while women (OR =1.67, 95% CI: 1.07 to 2.62, P=0.024), and smokers (OR =1.46, 95% CI: 1.05 to 2.02, P=0.023) had higher rates.

Conclusions

Late delayed PCI (14-28 days) after STEMI was associated with a higher incidence of in-hospital adverse events particularly in women and smokers but not with Killip class II-III heart failure, which might allow medical treatment to improve function.

A Novel Risk Scoring System to Predict Cardiovascular Death in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction: CHA2DS2-VASc-CF Score

The present study aimed to determine the long-term prognostic validity of the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI). In addition, we formulated a novel scoring system, the CHA₂DS₂-VASc-CF (which includes cigarette smoking and a family history of coronary artery disease as risk factors). This study included 4373 consecutive patients with AMI who presented to the emergency department of our hospital and underwent cardiac catheterization procedures between December 2009 and September 2016. Among these patients, 1427 were diagnosed with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and 2946 were diagnosed with non-STEMI. The study included 4373 patients. The study population was divided into 2 groups according to the occurrence of cardiovascular death during the follow-up period. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the CHA₂DS₂-VASc-CF score, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, major adverse cardiac events, current cigarette smoking, older age, hypertension, and family history of coronary artery disease were significantly higher, and that the left ventricular ejection fraction and glomerular filtration rate were significantly lower in the cardiovascular death (+) group. Using a cutoff score of >3 for the CHA₂DS₂-VASc-CF score, long-term cardiovascular death was predicted with a sensitivity of 78.4% and specificity of 76.4%. The CHA₂DS₂-VASc-CF score is suitable for use in all patients with AMI, regardless of the type of treatment, presence of atrial fibrillation, and type of AMI. This risk score, which is easy to calculate, provides important prognostic data. In the future, we think that interventional cardiologists will be able to use this novel scoring system to identify patients with a high risk of long-term cardiovascular death.

Sex differences in long-term mortality after myocardial infarction: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Studies of sex differences in long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction have reported mixed results. A systematic review is needed to characterize what is known about sex differences in long-term outcomes and to define gaps in knowledge.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We searched the Medline database from 1966 to December 2012 to identify all studies that provided sex-based comparisons of mortality after acute myocardial infarction. Only studies with at least 5 years of follow-up were reviewed. Of the 1877 identified abstracts, 52 studies met the inclusion criteria, of which 39 were included in this review. Most studies included fewer than one-third women. There was significant heterogeneity across studies in patient populations, methodology, and risk adjustment, which produced substantial variability in risk estimates. In general, most studies reported higher unadjusted mortality for women compared with men at both 5 and 10 years after acute myocardial infarction; however, many of the differences in mortality became attenuated after adjustment for age. Multivariable models varied between studies; however, most reported a further reduction in sex differences after adjustment for covariates other than age. Few studies examined sex-by-age interactions; however, several studies reported interactions between sex and treatment whereby women have similar mortality risk as men after revascularization.

CONCLUSIONS

Sex differences in long-term mortality after acute myocardial infarction are largely explained by differences in age, comorbidities, and treatment use between women and men. Future research should aim to clarify how these differences in risk factors and presentation contribute to the sex gap in mortality.