Heart failure medications prescribed at discharge for patients with left ventricular assist devices

Impact of renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibition on morbidity and mortality during long-term continuous-flow left ventricular assist device support: An IMACS report

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) improves survival and reduces adverse cardiac events in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction, but the benefit is not well-defined following left ventricular assist device (LVAD).

METHODS

We analyzed the ISHLT IMACS registry for adults with a primary, continuous-flow LVAD from January 2013 to September 2017 who were alive at postoperative month 3 without a major adverse event, and categorized patients according to treatment an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI/ARB) or mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA). Propensity score matching was performed separately for ACEI/ARB vs none (n = 4,118 each) and MRA vs none (n = 3,892 each).

RESULTS

Of 11,494 patients included, 50% were treated with ACEI/ARB and 38% with MRA. Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly better for patients receiving ACEI/ARB (p < 0.001) but not MRA (p = 0.31). In Cox proportional hazards analyses adjusted for known predictors of mortality following LVAD, ACEI/ARB use (hazard ratio 0.81 [95% confidence interval 0.71-0.93], p < 0.0001) but not MRA use (hazard ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 0.88-1.21], p = 0.69) was independently associated with lower mortality. Among patients treated with an ACEI/ARB, there was a significantly lower unadjusted risk of cardiovascular death (p < 0.001), risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01), and creatinine level (p < 0.001). MRA therapy was associated with lower risk of gastrointestinal bleeding (p = 0.01) but higher risk of hemolysis (p < 0.01). Potential limitations include residual confounding and therapy crossover.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest a benefit for ACEI/ARB therapy in patients with heart failure after LVAD implantation.

Practice patterns in the management of congestive heart failure and post-discharge quality of life: A hospital-based cross-sectional study

Objective:

The objective of the study is to identify the etiology, risk factors, frequency of major and minor components of the Framingham criteria for heart failure, discharge medications, mortality, and quality of life after discharge from the hospital, for patients who were admitted to the in-patient unit of a tertiary care hospital in central India, with a diagnosis of congestive heart failure (CHF).

Methods:

This hospital-based cross-sectional study involved retrospective chart review of patients who were admitted to the in-patient unit with a diagnosis of CHF. These patients were then attempted to reach via their telephone numbers listed in the medical records and their current quality of life was assessed using Euro-QoL 5D questionnaire.

Results:

In the 69 patients who were admitted to the hospital with congestive cardiac failure during the pre-defined period, ischemic heart disease was the most common etiology and smoking was the most common risk factor for the development of CHF. The most common findings based on Framingham criteria were dyspnea on mild exertion, rales and bilateral ankle edema. It was determined that one-fourth of the individuals were non-compliant to the medical treatment and more than half of the patients had a poor health score.

Conclusion:

Smoking remains to be a major risk factor for patients to develop ischemic heart disease and subsequent CHF. Patients with congestive cardiac failure also had severe deterioration in their quality of life after discharge from the hospital, implying the need for improving efforts toward prevention and better management.

Short-Term Efficacy and Safety of Tolvaptan in Patients with Left Ventricular Assist Devices

Tolvaptan is an effective therapy for heart failure patients with symptomatic congestion and hyponatremia. The efficacy of its use in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) is unknown. The aim of this study was to assess the clinical efficacy and safety of tolvaptan in LVAD patients. We retrospectively reviewed medical records of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between January 2014 and August 2018. Among 217 consecutive LVAD patients, tolvaptan was used in 20 patients. Mean age was 46 ± 14 years old and 14 patients were males. The duration of tolvaptan therapy was 4 (interquartile range 1-8) days. Urine volume significantly increased from 2,623 ± 1,109 ml/day before tolvaptan to 4,308 ± 1,432 ml/day during tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). Serum sodium increased from 127 ± 3 to 133 ± 3 mEq/L at the end of tolvaptan therapy (p < 0.001). No patients developed hypernatremia (serum sodium >150 mEq/L). The 90-day overall survival following tolvaptan therapy was 89% in both the tolvaptan group and a propensity score-matched non-tolvaptan group (p = 0.918). Survival free of heart failure readmissions was also comparable between the groups (p = 0.751). In conclusion, short-term use of tolvaptan following LVAD implantation is a safe and effective therapy to augment diuresis and improve hyponatremia.

Neurohormonal Blockade During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support

Neurohormonal blockade (NHB) is the mainstay of therapy for patients with systolic heart failure (HF). However, the efficacy in patients with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) remains unknown. Of all, 114 LVAD patients (57 [48, 65] years old and 78% male) were enrolled and followed during the early period (6 months after index discharge), and 98 were followed during the late period (6-12 months following index discharge). Of them, 46% were on beta-blocker (BB), 49% on angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi) and/or angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), and 51% on aldosterone antagonist at baseline. Prevalence of BB and ACEi/ARB use increased during the study period. During the early period, similar event rates were found irrespective of the NHB uses. During the late period, BB was associated with reduced HF readmission, and ACEi/ARB was associated with reduced HF readmission and gastrointestinal bleeding (p < 0.05 for all). In conclusion, BB and ACEi/ARB use during the late period was associated with a reduction in HF recurrence in LVAD patients. Further prospective randomized control trials are warranted to clarify the utility of NHB therapy in LVAD patients.

Clinical Presentation, Predictors, and Outcomes Among Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonist (MRA)-Eligible Acute Heart Failure Patients in the Heart Function Assessment Registry Trial in Saudi Arabia (HEARTS)

Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) therapy is indicated after myocardial infarction in patients with acute heart failure (AHF) with an ejection fraction ≤40% and lacking contraindications. We analyzed clinical presentations, predictors, and outcomes of MRA-eligible patients within a prospective registry of patients with AHF from 18 hospitals in Saudi Arabia, from 2009 to 2010. For this subgroup, mortality rates were followed until 2013, and the clinical characteristics, management, predictors, and outcomes were compared between MRA-treated and non-MRA-treated patients. Of 2609 patients with AHF, 387 (14.8%) were MRA eligible, of which 146 (37.7%) were prescribed MRAs. Compared with non-MRA-treated patients, those prescribed MRAs more commonly exhibited non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, acute on chronic heart failure, past history of ischemic heart disease, and severe left ventricular systolic dysfunction; were more commonly administered oral furosemide and digoxin; and had higher in-hospital recurrent congestive HF rates. Mortality did not significantly differ ( P > .05) between groups. In Saudi Arabia, 37.7% of eligible patients received MRA treatment, which is higher than that in developed countries. The lack of long-term survival benefit raises concerns about systematic problems, for example, proper follow-up and management after hospital discharge, warranting further investigation.