Outcomes and predictors of recovery in acute-onset cardiomyopathy: A single-center experience of patients undergoing endomyocardial biopsy for new heart failure

Risk and Protective Factors of Poor Clinical Outcomes in Heart Failure with Improved Ejection Fraction Population: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

AIMS

Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) patients could still develop adverse outcomes despite EF improvement. This study evaluates the risk and protective factors of poor clinical outcomes in HFimpEF patients.

METHODS

Systematic searching was done to include studies that evaluate the risks of developing poor outcomes in HFimpEF patients. HFimpEF is defined as improvement of 5-10% EF within 6-12 months or normalization of EF > 40%. Poor clinical outcome is defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular events, HF rehospitalization, and requirement of LVAD/ transplant. Odds ratios of outcome are pooled with random effects model. A subgroup analysis of multivariate analysis-only studies was also conducted.

RESULTS

32 studies comprising 10,740 HFimpEF patients are included. Poor clinical outcomes followed up for approximately 3 years, are seen in 18.9% of HFimpEF patients. Twelve statistically significant factors that increase the risk of outcome are found. Among them, anemia (OR 7.69, CI 3.48-16.99, I2 0%) and baseline NT pro-BNP (OR 3.25) are the two most important predictors. Other significant risk factors are increasing age, ischemic heart disease, NYHA III/IV, diabetes mellitus, atrial fibrillation, dyslipidemia, cerebrovascular disease, hypertension, use of diuretics, and baseline LVEDD. Alternately, protective factors of poor clinical outcome are regression of left atrial diameter (LAD) (OR 0.33, CI: 0.18-0.61, p 0.0003, I2 0%), use beta-blockers, SGLT- 2 inhibitors, and baseline LVEF level (OR 0.60, 0.78, 0.90, respectively).

CONCLUSION

HFimpEF patients are not fully recovered and patient stratification based on risk and protective factors is recommended.

Long-term outcomes and reverse remodelling in recently diagnosed unexplained left ventricular systolic dysfunction

AIMS

In patients with recently diagnosed non-ischaemic LV systolic dysfunction, left ventricular reverse remodelling (LVRR) and favourable prognosis has been documented in studies with short-term follow-up. The aim of our study was to assess the long-term clinical course and stability of LVRR in these patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively studied 133 patients (37 women; 55 [interquartile range 46, 61] years) with recently diagnosed unexplained LV systolic dysfunction, with heart failure symptoms lasting <6 months and LV ejection fraction <40% persisting after at least 1 week of therapy. All patients underwent endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) at the time of diagnosis and serial echocardiographic and clinical follow-up over 5 years. LVRR was defined as the combined presence of (1) LVEF ≥ 50% or increase in LVEF ≥ 10% points and (2) decrease in LV end-diastolic diameter index (LVEDDi) ≥ 10% or (3) LVEDDi ≤ 33 mm/m2. LVRR was observed in 46% patients at 1 year, in 60% at 2 years and 50% at 5 years. Additionally, 2% of patients underwent heart transplantation and 12% experienced heart failure hospitalization. During 5-year follow-up, 23 (17%) of the study cohort died. In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of mortality were baseline right atrial size (OR 1.097, CI 1.007-1.196), logBNP level (OR 2.02, CI 1.14-3.56), and PR interval (OR 1.02, CI 1.006-1.035) (P < 0.05 for all). The number of macrophages on EMB was associated with overall survival in univariate analysis only. LVRR at 1 year of follow-up was associated with a lower rate of mortality and heart failure hospitalization (P = 0.025). In multivariate analysis, independent predictors of LVRR were left ventricular end-diastolic volume index (OR 0.97, CI 0.946-0.988), LVEF (OR 0.89, CI 0.83-0.96), and diastolic blood pressure (OR 1.04, CI 1.01-1.08) (P < 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

LVRR occurs in over half of patients with recent onset unexplained LV systolic dysfunction during first 2 years of optimally guided heart failure therapy and then remains relatively stable during 5-year follow-up. Normalization of adverse LV remodelling corresponds to a low rate of mortality and heart failure hospitalizations during long-term follow-up.

Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy Presenting as Clinical Myocarditis in Women

Patients with arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) classically initially present with ventricular arrhythmias or, less commonly, heart failure. Myocardial inflammation has been implicated in pathogenesis, but clinical myocarditis in ARVC is less described. We therefore studied clinical myocarditis as an initial ARVC presentation, and hypothesized that these patients have distinct clinical and genetic characteristics. Using the Johns Hopkins ARVC Registry, we identified 12 patients (all female, median age 20) referred between 2014 and 2019 diagnosed with myocarditis at presentation who were subsequently diagnosed with ARVC by Task Force Criteria. Majority presented with chest pain (n = 7, 58%) or ventricular arrhythmia (n = 3, 25%). All patients had troponin elevations and left ventricular (LV) function was reduced in 5 (42%). Magnetic resonance imaging demonstrated LV delayed gadolinium enhancement and/or pericardial enhancement in 10 (83%); only 3 (25%) patients had right ventricular abnormalities. Pathogenic genetic variants were identified in 11 (92%) patients: 10 desmoplakin (DSP) and 1 desmoglein-2 (DSG2). Thus, nearly 1/3 (10/32, 31%) of overall DSP ARVC patients were originally diagnosed with myocarditis. Patients were diagnosed with ARVC 1.8 years (IQR 2.7 years) after presentation and 8 (75%) patients did not meet Task Force Criteria without genetic testing. ARVC diagnosis led to an additional 5 (42%) patients referred for implantable cardiac defibrillator and 17 family member diagnoses. In conclusion, ARVC may initially present as myocarditis and these patients have distinct characteristics including female gender, LV involvement and DSP gene variants. Genetic testing is key to ARVC diagnosis and should be considered in select myocarditis patients.

Reduction in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction is Associated with Subsequent Cardiac Events in Outpatients with Chronic Heart Failure

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) is critical for determining the prognosis and treatment of patients with heart failure (HF). However, the influence of serial LVEF changes in patients with stable chronic HF (CHF) has not yet been completely investigated. We analyzed data of 263 outpatients with CHF from the J-MELODIC study cohort and evaluated the frequency of cardiac events. We stratified patients into tertiles based on the relative difference in LVEF in 1 year and that at baseline. We found a significant difference in the cardiac event rate among the three groups (log-rank test, p = 0.042). We identified a relative 11% LVEF reduction as the optimal cutoff value based on the receiver operating characteristics analysis. LVEF (OR, 1.04; 95% CI, 1.01–1.07; p = 0.015) and E/e′ (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01–1.12; p = 0.023) at baseline were predictors of >11% LVEF reduction. After adjusting the variables including age and sex, >11% LVEF reduction was an independent predictor of subsequent cardiac events (HR, 5.79; 95% CI, 2.49–13.2; p < 0.001). In conclusion, patients with 1-year relative >11% LVEF reduction may have subsequent worsening outcomes. Such patients should be carefully followed-up as high risk population for development of cardiac events.

A case of fulminant perimyocarditis leading to extensive ECMO treatment and spinal injury resulting in paraplegia

Perimyocarditis has varying disease manifestations and prognosis. It may rapidly deteriorate into a life-threatening state requiring advanced intensive care including veno-arterial extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation, which may be lifesaving. Close follow-up is warranted to detect both short-term and long-term complications.

Myocarditis: A Clinical Overview

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this paper we will review the modern diagnostic approach to patients with clinically suspected myocarditis as well as the treatment modalities and strategy in light of up-to-date clinical experience and scientific evidence.

RECENT FINDINGS

Rapidly expanding evidence suggests that myocardial inflammation is frequently underdiagnosed or overlooked in clinical practice, although new therapeutic options have been validated. Moreover, the available evidence suggests that subclinical cardiac involvement has negative prognostic impact on morbidity and mortality and should be actively investigated and adequately treated. Myocarditis represents a growing challenge for physicians, due to increased referral of patients for endomyocardial biopsy (EMB) or cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), and requires a highly integrated management by a team of caring physicians.