Variation in use and dosing escalation of renin angiotensin system, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist, angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor and beta-blocker therapies in heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: Association of comorbidities

Association Between Cardiovascular Disease and Chronic Kidney Disease Prevalence and Characteristics in Saudi Arabia

Introduction Cardiovascular disease (CVD), including coronary artery disease (CAD), is a leading global cause of death. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a significant risk factor, particularly in data-scarce Saudi Arabia, due to shared risk factors. A study aims to assess the CVD-CKD relationship, identifying clinical characteristics and risk factors to improve prevention and care in this context, filling a knowledge gap in Saudi Arabia's healthcare map. Methodology It is a single-center retrospective study aimed at evaluating the relationship between cardiovascular disease and chronic kidney disease, conducted between January 2023 and October 2023. Data was sourced from patient files using a data sheet based on a previous study. The data was cleaned in MS Excel (Redmond, USA) and analyzed in IBM Corp. Released 2022. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 29.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. Results Our study contains predominantly males (61%), aged 61-80 (54.1%), with a normal body mass index (BMI) (<25) (61.5%) and a high prevalence of smoking (72.3%). Diabetes, hypertension, and smoking were prevalent risk factors. The relationship between CAD severity, renal dysfunction, and ejection fraction (EF) was explored, emphasizing the association between declining renal function and more advanced CAD stages, as well as the decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) with decreasing EF. Age, smoking, CAD, and decreasing EF were linked to renal dysfunction, while smoking, stroke history, peripheral vascular disease (PVD), BMI, and decreasing EF were associated with CAD stage severity. Conclusion Our study explored that as CAD severity increases, renal function decreases, showing both CVD and CKD connected with each other, and a similar correlation occurs between decreasing EF and decreasing eGFR, revealing significant associations with various risk factors. Further research is warranted to explore potential interventions aimed at mitigating the synergistic impact of CVD and CKD on patient morbidity and mortality.

Non-cardiac comorbidities and intensive up-titration of oral treatment in patients recently hospitalized for heart failure: Insights from the STRONG-HF trial

AIMS

To assess the potential interaction between non-cardiac comorbidities (NCCs) and the efficacy and safety of high-intensity care (HIC) versus usual care (UC) in the STRONG-HF trial, including stable patients with improved but still elevated natriuretic peptides.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In the trial, eight NCCs were reported: anaemia, diabetes, renal dysfunction, severe liver disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease/asthma, stroke/transient ischaemic attack, psychiatric/neurological disorders, and malignancies. Patients were classified by NCC number (0, 1, 2 and ≥3). The treatment effect of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint, 180-day death or heart failure (HF) rehospitalization, was compared by NCC number and by each individual comorbidity. Among the 1078 patients, the prevalence of 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs was 24.3%, 39.8%, 24.5% and 11.4%, respectively. Achievement of full doses of HF therapies at 90 and 180 days in the HIC was similar irrespective of NCC number. In HIC, the primary endpoint occurred in 10.0%, 16.6%, 13.6% and 26.2%, in those with 0, 1, 2 and ≥3 NCCs, respectively, as compared to 19.1%, 25.4%, 23.3% and 26.2% in UC (interaction-p = 0.80). The treatment benefit of HIC versus UC on the primary endpoint did not differ significantly by each individual comorbidity. There was no significant treatment interaction by NCC number in quality-of-life improvement (p = 0.98) or the incidence of serious adverse events (p = 0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

In the STRONG-HF trial, NCCs neither limited the rapid up-titration of HF therapies, nor attenuated the benefit of HIC on the primary endpoint. In the context of a clinical trial, the benefit-risk ratio favours the rapid up-titration of HF therapies even in patients with multiple NCCs.

Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Tolerability in Patients With Heart Failure and Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial

BACKGROUND

In the COAPT (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation) trial, a central committee of heart failure (HF) specialists optimized guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMT) and documented medication and goal dose intolerances before patient enrollment.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to assess the rates, reasons, and predictors of GDMT intolerance in the COAPT trial.

METHODS

Baseline use, dose, and intolerances of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs), angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors (ARNIs), beta-blockers, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) were analyzed in patients with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≤40%, in whom maximally tolerated doses of these agents as assessed by an independent HF specialist were required before enrollment.

RESULTS

A total of 464 patients had LVEF ≤40% and complete medication information. At baseline, 38.8%, 39.4%, and 19.8% of patients tolerated 3, 2, and 1 GDMT classes, respectively (any dose); only 1.9% could not tolerate any GDMT. Beta-blockers were the most frequently tolerated GDMT (93.1%), followed by ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs (68.5%), and then MRAs (55.0%). Intolerances differed by GDMT class, but hypotension and kidney dysfunction were most common. Goal doses were uncommonly achieved for beta-blockers (32.3%) and ACEIs/ARBs/ARNIs (10.2%) due to intolerances limiting titration. Only 2.2% of patients tolerated goal doses of all 3 GDMT classes.

CONCLUSIONS

In a contemporary trial population with HF, severe mitral regurgitation, and systematic HF specialist-directed GDMT optimization, most patients had medical intolerances prohibiting 1 or more GDMT classes and achieving goal doses. The specific intolerances noted and methods used for GDMT optimization provide important lessons for the implementation of GDMT optimization in future clinical trials. (Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation [The COAPT Trial] [COAPT]; NCT01626079).

Polypharmacy and risk of mortality among patients with heart failure following hospitalization: a nested case-control study

Heart failure (HF) is associated with morbidity, rehospitalization and polypharmacy. The incidence rate of mortality in HF patients with polypharmacy is poorly studied. We examine the association of polypharmacy with mortality risk in incident hospitalized HF patients with a primary diagnosis after discharge from the hospital using Quebec administrative databases, Canada from 1999 to 2015. Polypharmacy, cardiovascular (CV) polypharmacy and non-CV polypharmacy were respectively defined as exposure to ≥ 10 drugs, ≥ 5 CV drugs and ≥ 5 non-CV drugs within three months prior to the case or the control selection date. We conducted a nested case-control study to estimate rate ratios (RR) of all-cause mortality using a multivariate conditional logistic regression during one-year of follow-up. We identified 12,242 HF patients with a mean age of 81.6 years. Neither CV polypharmacy (RR  0.97, 95%CI 0.82-1.15) nor non-CV polypharmacy (RR  0.93, 95%CI 0.77-1.12) were associated with lower mortality risk. However, all polypharmacy (RR 1.31, 95%CI 1.07-1.61) showed an association with mortality risk. Myocardial infarction, valvular disease, peripheral artery disease, diabetes, major bleeding, chronic kidney disease, high comorbidity score, high Frailty score, hydralazine and spironolactone users were associated with increasing mortality risk, ranging from 15 to 61%, while use of angiotensin II inhibitors, beta-blockers, statins, anticoagulant, and antiplatelets were associated with lower risk, ranging from 23 to 32%.

Perceptions of Changes in Practice Patterns and Patient Care among Heart Failure Nurses During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Background

The Coronavirus (COVID-19) had a profound impact on the delivery of care in both hospital and outpatient settings across the United States. Patients with heart failure (HF) and healthcare providers had to abruptly adapt.

Objective

To describe how the COVID-19 pandemic affected practice patterns of HF nurses.

Methods

Practicing HF nurses completed a cross-sectional, anonymous, web-based survey of perceptions of HF practice. Analyses involved descriptive and comparative statistics.

Results

Of 171 nurses who completed surveys, outpatient HF visits decreased and 63.2% added telehealth visits. Despite spending about 29 min educating patients during visits, 27.5% of nurses perceived that the pandemic decreased patients’ abilities to provide optimal self-care. Nurses reported decreased ability to collect objective data (62.4%; n = 78), although subjective assessment stayed the same (41.6%; n = 52).

Conclusion

Nurses’ practice patterns provided insight into patient care changes made during COVID-19. Most core components of HF management were retained, but methods of delivery during the pandemic differed.