Ultrasound guidance for radial arterial puncture: a randomized controlled trial

Efficacy and Safety of the Distal Radial Artery as an Arterial Blood Sampling Site

Background: Arterial blood sampling is a common clinical procedure, but traditional sampling sites have some limitations. In recent years, distal radial artery (DRA) puncture has been widely used in interventional treatment of cardiovascular diseases and demonstrating certain advantages. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility and safety of blood sampling via the DRA compared with conventional radial artery (CRA) sampling. Methods: This study is a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled trial. Adult subjects requiring blood gas analysis in the intensive care unit of Rushan People's Hospital from February 2024 to July 2024 were enrolled. The primary end point was to test the noninferiority of first-attempt success rate between the two groups. Secondary end points included blood collection time, hemostasis time, and complications within 24 h. Results: The first-attempt success rates for the DRA (n = 90) and CRA (n = 90) groups were 77.8% and 80.0%, respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = .72) (mean difference -2.22%; 95% CI: -14.1% to 9.7%). The DRA group had a slightly longer blood collection time than the CRA group (P < .001) but significantly shorter hemostasis time (86 s vs 215 s, P < .001). There was no significant difference in complication rates within 24 h between the two groups. Conclusion: DRA blood sampling was noninferior to CRA sampling in terms of first-attempt success rate and had the advantage of significantly shorter hemostasis time. This new method was comparable with the traditional method in terms of safety and may provide a valuable alternative for clinical practice.

Guidelines for Performing Ultrasound-Guided Vascular Cannulation: Recommendations of the American Society of Echocardiography

Vascular access is a commonly performed procedure to facilitate patient care. This document provides expert consensus from diverse specialists on best practices and techniques for incorporating ultrasound (US) into vascular access procedures. This update replaces the 2011 American Society of Echocardiography guidelines for US-guided vascular cannulation. It includes recommendations for US-guided access to central and peripheral veins and arteries in adult and pediatric patients based on the strength of the scientific evidence present in the literature. The major roles of US during vascular access include (1) precannulation vessel assessment, (2) dynamic US guidance during cannulation, and (3) identification of local complications. This document discusses the general aspects of anatomic and US imaging of vessels, US-guided vascular cannulation techniques, and the identification of local vascular cannulation complications. Proper training should impart the cognitive knowledge and technical skills necessary to perform US-guided cannulation. There is an increasing body of literature indicating that US-guided vascular access improves success rates and reduces complications, although the quality of the evidence to date remains weak. A gap remains between the existing evidence and guidelines for the use of US in clinical practice. The availability of US equipment and clinical proficiency will more likely influence the role of US-guided vascular access as a standard of care than will future research studies.

Clinical Utility of Ultrasonographic Guidance for Arterial Catheterization in Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES

To compare the success and complication rates of radial artery catheterization using ultrasound guidance versus the conventional palpation technique in obese patients by anesthesia residents with similar levels of experience in both methods, and to measure the skin-to-artery distance of radial, brachial, and dorsalis pedis arteries using ultrasound with standardized anatomic landmarks.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized controlled trial SETTING: Single tertiary center PARTICIPANTS: Eighty adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m2 INTERVENTIONS: Ultrasound guidance or conventional palpation method MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of arterial catheterization. The skin-to-artery distance of the radial artery was significantly greater in the BMI groups of 40 to 49 kg/m2 and ≥50 kg/m2 compared to the BMI group of 30 to 39 kg/m2 (mean difference, 1.0 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.4-1.7; p = 0.0029) for BMI 40-49 kg/m2 vs 30-39 kg/m2 and 1.5 mm (95% CI, 0.6-2.4 mm; p = 0.0015) for ≥50 kg/m2 vs 30-39 kg/m2. Similar findings were observed for the brachial artery. BMI was inversely associated with first-attempt success rates (p = 0.0145) and positively with time to successful catheterization (p = 0.0271). The first-attempt success and vascular complication rates of catheterization did not differ significantly between the ultrasound guidance group (65.0% and 52.5%, respectively) and the conventional palpation group (70.0% [p = 0.6331] and 57.5% [p = 0.6531], respectively).

CONCLUSION

The results of this study do not support the routine use of ultrasonography during radial arterial catheterizations for obese adults when junior practitioners perform the procedure.

Ultrasound-guided puncture vs conventional technique for arterial blood gas analysis sampling in adults: A systematic review

AIM

To compare the efficacy of conventional puncture versus ultrasound-guided puncture for arterial blood gas sampling in adults.

METHOD

A search protocol was developed and applied to three databases (Medline, Cochrane, and Dialnet). Clinical trials published between January 2013 and January 2023, in Spanish or English, were considered. Outcomes in terms of first-attempt success, number of attempts until success, time taken, self-reported iatrogenic pain, and patient or professional experience were collected. The risk of bias for each included study was assessed.

RESULTS

Five randomized clinical trials were selected, with sample sizes ranging from 50 to 238 adult patients treated in emergency settings. Three out of four studies showed higher first-attempt success rates when using ultrasound, and 2 out of 4 studies reported a decrease in iatrogenic pain. Discrepant findings were observed among the studies in terms of time taken and the number of attempts required for success.

CONCLUSIONS

Although current evidence is limited and the findings are heterogeneous, ultrasound-guided arterial puncture may have advantages over conventional puncture in terms of first-attempt success and in reducing iatrogenic pain.

The Effect of Positive Therapeutic Communication on Pain (POPAIN) and Anxiety During Arterial Blood Gas Standardized Procedures in the Emergency Department Compared to Traditional Communication: Protocol for a Monocentric Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

In the emergency department (ED), medical procedures, such as arterial blood gas (ABG) testing, can cause pain and high stress levels. However, ABG testing is a routine procedure assessing the severity of the patient's condition. To reduce the pain of ABG, several methods have been investigated without significant difference in pain perception. Communication, a key element of care, has shown a significant effect on pain perception. A positive communication strategy, including positive, kind, or reassuring words, can reduce pain perception, while negative words can raise this perception, causing discomfort, known as the "nocebo effect." Although some studies have compared the impact of verbal attitudes, particularly in anesthesia and mainly with staff already trained in hypnosis, to the best of our knowledge, none have investigated the effect of communication in the emergency setting, where patients may be more suggestible to the words used.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we will investigate the effect of positive therapeutic communication on pain, anxiety, discomfort, and global satisfaction in patients requiring ABG compared to nocebo and neutral communication.

METHODS

A single-center, double-blind randomized controlled trial (RCT) with 3 parallel arms will be conducted with 249 patients requiring ABG during their ED visit. Patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 groups before receiving ABG: positive communication group, negative communication (nocebo) group, or neutral communication (neutral) group. The communication and the words used by the physicians during hygiene preparation, artery location, and puncture will be imposed in each group. The study will be proposed to each patient corresponding to the inclusion criteria. The physicians will not be trained in hypnosis or in positive therapeutic communication. The procedure will be recorded with audio recorders to test its quality. Intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. The primary endpoint is the onset of pain. The secondary outcomes are patient comfort, patient anxiety, and global satisfaction of the patient with the communication strategy used.

RESULTS

On average, 2000 ABG procedures are performed each year in the EDs of hospitals. In this study, 249 patients are expected to be included. With a projected positive response rate of 80%, we intend to include 25 (10%) patients per month. The inclusion period began in April 2023 and will run until July 2024. We hope to publish the results of the study during the fall of 2024.

CONCLUSIONS

To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first RCT assessing the use of positive communication on pain and anxiety in patients undergoing the ABG procedure in the ED. A reduction in pain, discomfort, and anxiety is expected when using positive communication. If the results are positive, this could be useful to the medical community and encourage clinicians to monitor their communication during care.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05434169; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05434169.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

PRR1-10.2196/42043.

Comparison between the long-axis in-plane and short-axis out-of-plane approaches for ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation: a meta-analysis and systematic review

BACKGROUND

The two most common methods for ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation are the long-axis in-plane (LA-IP) and short-axis out-of-plane (SA-OOP) approaches. However, it is uncertain which method is more advantageous. We conducted a meta-analysis of reported randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing the two techniques in terms of success rate, cannulation time, and complications.

METHODS

We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library database for RCTs comparing the LA-IP and SA-OOP techniques for ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation published from inception through April 31, 2022. The Cochrane Collaboration's Risk of Bias Tool was used to evaluate the methodological quality of each RCT. Review Manager 5.4 and Stata/SE 17.0 were used to analyze the two primary outcome measures (first-attempt success rate and total success rate) and two secondary outcome measures (cannulation time and complications).

RESULTS

A total of 13 RCTs with 1,377 patients were included. There were no significant differences in first-attempt success rate (risk ratio [RR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.78-1.12; P = 0.45; I² = 84%) and overall success rate (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.95-1.02; P = 0.48; I² = 57%). When compared with the LA-IP technique, the SA-OOP technique was associated with an increased incidence of posterior wall puncture (RR, 3.01; 95% CI, 1.27-7.14; P = 0.01; I² = 79%) and hematoma (RR, 2.15; 95% CI, 1.05-4.37; P = 0.04; I² = 63%). There was no significant difference in the incidence of vasospasm between techniques (RR, 1.26; 95% CI, 0.37-4.23; P = 0.07; I² = 53%).

CONCLUSIONS

The present results suggest that the SA-OOP technique is associated with a higher incidence of posterior wall puncture and hematoma than the LA-IP technique, whereas success rates are similar for the two ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation techniques. These findings should be experimentally evaluated in a more rigorous manner due to high inter-RCT heterogeneity.

Ultrasound-guided arterial cannulation in the paediatric population

BACKGROUND

In arterial line cannulation in children and adolescents, traditional methods of locating the artery include palpation and Doppler auditory assistance. It is unclear whether ultrasound guidance is superior to these methods. This is an update of a review originally published in 2016.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of ultrasound guidance compared with traditional techniques (palpation, Doppler auditory assistance) for assisting arterial line placement at all potential sites in children and adolescents.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science from inception to 30 October 2022. We also searched four trials registers for ongoing trials, and we checked the reference lists of included studies and relevant reviews for other potentially eligible trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound guidance versus other techniques (palpation or Doppler auditory assistance) to guide arterial line cannulation in children and adolescents (aged under 18 years). We planned to include quasi-RCTs and cluster-RCTs. For RCTs with both adult and paediatric populations, we planned to include only the paediatric population data.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed the risk of bias of included trials and extracted data. We used standard Cochrane meta-analytical procedures, and we applied the GRADE method to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included nine RCTs reporting 748 arterial cannulations in children and adolescents (under 18 years of age) undergoing different surgical procedures. Eight RCTs compared ultrasound with palpation, and one compared ultrasound with Doppler auditory assistance. Five studies reported the incidence of haematomas. Seven involved radial artery cannulation and two involved femoral artery cannulation. The people performing arterial cannulation were physicians with different levels of experience. The risk of bias varied across studies, with some studies lacking details of allocation concealment. It was not possible to blind practitioners in any case; this adds a performance bias that is inherent to the type of intervention studied in our review. Compared to traditional methods, ultrasound guidance probably causes a large increase in first-attempt success rates (risk ratio (RR) 2.01, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.64 to 2.46; 8 RCTs, 708 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and probably causes a large reduction in the risk of complications such as haematoma formation (RR 0.26, 95% CI 0.14 to 0.47; 5 RCTs, 420 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). No studies reported data about ischaemic damage. Ultrasound guidance probably improves success rates within two attempts (RR 1.78, 95% CI 1.25 to 2.51; 2 RCTs, 134 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and overall rate of successful cannulation (RR 1.32, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.59; 6 RCTs, 374 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). In addition, ultrasound guidance probably reduces the number of attempts to successful cannulation (mean difference (MD) -0.99 attempts, 95% CI -1.15 to -0.83; 5 RCTs, 368 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and duration of the cannulation procedure (MD -98.77 seconds, 95% CI -150.02 to -47.52, 5 RCTs, 402 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). More studies are needed to confirm whether the improvement in first-attempt success rates is more pronounced in neonates and younger children compared to older children and adolescents.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We identified moderate-certainty evidence that ultrasound guidance for arterial cannulation compared with palpation or Doppler auditory assistance improves first-attempt success rate, second-attempt success rate and overall success rate. We also found moderate-certainty evidence that ultrasound guidance reduces the incidence of complications, the number of attempts to successful cannulation and the duration of the cannulation procedure.

Ultrasound guidance versus conventional technique for radial artery puncture in septic shock patients: A pilot study

BACKGROUND

Arterial puncture, for obtaining an analysis of blood gas, is an interventional procedure often performed in emergency departments and intensive care units. This study compares the ultrasound (US) guided method with the conventional digital palpation method in radial artery puncture (RAP) for blood gas analysis in septic shock patients.

METHODS

This is a prospective, single-centre study. Septic shock patients over 18 years of age who needed a RAP sample for blood gas analysis were included. Patients with local infection or trauma at the puncture site, arteriovenous fistula, vascular graft, coagulopathy, a positive Allen test, or did not want to participate were excluded. Patients were randomized into two groups and RAP was obtained with either the US-guided method or the conventional method. The main outcomes were success at first entry, the number of attempts before success, and the time to success.

RESULTS

The 50 eligible patients were randomized into two groups. First entry success rate for the US-guided group and the conventional group was 80% and 42%, respectively. The number of attempts before success and time to success was significantly higher in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

The US-guided method has been found to be more successful in terms of first entry success, the number of attempts before success, and the time to success when compared to the conventional method.

The application of the acoustic shadowing facilitates guidance in radial artery puncture and cannulation teaching in standardized training for residents: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Radial artery cannulation is a crucial investigative procedure for measuring patients' blood pressure invasively and serial blood gases. However, radial artery cannulation can be challenging for medical residents, and it is necessary to establish a facile and straightforward teaching strategy. This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency of acoustic shadowing-facilitated ultrasound guidance on radial artery cannulation teaching for medical residents.

METHODS

A total of 116 medical postgraduates who underwent standardized residency training programs in the Department of Anesthesiology were randomly divided into a new ultrasound-guided teaching group and a traditional ultrasound-guided teaching group. In the new ultrasound-guided teaching group, radial artery puncture technique was taught by acoustic shadowing-facilitated ultrasound guidance. The training included both theoretical and practical components. After the training, the success rate of the first puncture attempt, the success rate of the catheterization, the ultrasonic positioning time, and the catheterization time of the two groups were compared in a unified manner. A questionnaire on the subjective evaluation of the various aspects of the program by participants was conducted at the end of the training period.

RESULTS

The study included 101 medical residents. The success rate for radial artery puncture at the first attempt in the new ultrasound-guided teaching group was 78.43%. It was significantly higher than that of the traditional ultrasound-guided group (58.00%, odds ratio = 0.380; 95% CI = 0.159 to 0.908; p = 0.027). The success rate for the first arterial catheterization in the new ultrasound-guided teaching group was significantly higher than that of the traditional ultrasound-guided group (74.51% vs. 52.00%, odds ratio = 0.371; 95% CI = 0.160 to 0.858; p = 0.019). The ultrasonic positioning time and catheterization time in minutes in the new ultrasound-guided teaching group were significantly shorter than that of the traditional ultrasound-guided group (14.36 ± 3.31 vs. 18.02 ± 4.95, p < 0.001; 10.43 ± 2.38 vs. 14.78 ± 8.02, p = 0.012). However, no significant differences were observed in the incidence of local hematomas and teaching satisfaction scores between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Acoustic shadowing facilitates ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture and catheterization is beneficial in the standardized training and teaching of residents. It improves the success rate of the first attempt at radial artery puncture and catheterization and shortens the time of ultrasound location and catheterization.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry on 28 May 2021.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ChiCTR2100046833 .

Interventions to reduce arterial puncture-related pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Arterial puncture-related pain remains unaddressed across several clinical settings. Analgesic techniques are not routinely employed before arterial puncture despite the recommendation that local anesthesia be used, except in emergencies. A comprehensive review of interventions aimed at reducing arterial puncture-related pain and their potential effectiveness is lacking, and the benefit of some interventions is uncertain.

OBJECTIVE

To describe interventions aimed at reducing arterial puncture-related pain and provide an estimate of their effectiveness.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis (PROSPERO no. CRD42020212299).

DATA SOURCE(S)

PubMed, CINAHL EBSCO, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Scopus were searched from their inception to 7 October 2020. No temporal or language limits were applied.

METHODS

Published, quantitative studies on interventions aimed at reducing arterial puncture-related pain among adults were included. Screening, quality appraisal, and data extraction were undertaken independently by two reviewers. Random effects meta-analyses were performed to assess the association between interventions aimed at reducing arterial puncture-related pain and patients' perceived pain using difference in means (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A funnel plot and Egger test were used to assess publication bias.

RESULTS

The titles and abstracts of the 2446 identified articles were screened, and 43 and 31 studies were finally included in the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Interventions to reduce arterial puncture-related pain included: topical anesthetics (n = 16), cryotherapy (n = 9), local anesthetic infiltration (n = 5), narrower needle gage (n = 5), ultrasound-guided procedure (n = 3), topical anesthetics combined with local anesthetic infiltration (n = 1), iontophoresis using anesthetics (n = 1), engineered blood gas syringe (n = 1), jet injector (n = 1), and local massage (n = 1). Topical anesthetics [MD -0.58, 95% CI -1.00, -0.15], cryotherapy [MD -1.13, 95% CI -1.72, -0.53], and local anesthetic infiltration [MD -1.13, 95% CI -1.72, -0.53] reduced arterial puncture-related pain. No benefit was found for narrower needle gage [MD -0.07, 95% CI -0.86, 0.71] or ultrasound-guided procedure [MD -1.74, 95% CI -3.51, 0.03]. No publication bias was detected.

CONCLUSIONS

Local anesthetic infiltration provided the greatest pain reduction and should be considered standard practice. Cryotherapy may be a safe, convenient alternative to local anesthetic infiltration. Topical anesthetics had limited benefit, and their lengthy time of onset makes them unsuitable for critical or emergency situations, though they may represent an option when comorbid conditions make cooling impossible. Caution must be used when interpreting these results, given the high risk of bias in the methods of included studies and the heterogeneity across the studies.

Comparison of Ultrasound-Guided Direct versus Ultrasound-Guided Dart Technique of Radial Artery Cannulation: A Randomized Control Study

Background:

Three different types of cannulation method for radial artery are Direct technique, Seldinger technique, and modified Seldinger technique (Dart). Their comparative efficacy has been studied using palpatory method but not with ultrasound guidance.

Aims:

We compared the efficacy of ultrasound-guided Direct and ultrasound-guided Dart technique of arterial cannulation.

Settings and Design:

One hundred and sixty patients posted for elective surgeries were included in prospective randomized control, single-blind study in a tertiary care center.

Materials and Methods:

The study comprised of two groups: Direct method (n = 80) and Dart method (n = 80), which were compared for the rate of successful cannulation within 5 min. The secondary objectives were time for successful cannulation, number of attempts, and rate of complications (hematoma, posterior wall puncture, and needle reinsertion) between two groups.

Statistical Analysis:

The group comparison for continuously distributed data was compared using the independent sample t-test. The Chi-square test was used for the group comparison of categorical data. Binary logistic regression was conducted to ascertain significant predictors for successful cannulation in 5 min.

Results:

Cannulation success rate was similar in both Direct (57.5%) and Dart (55%) groups. There was no significant difference in time for successful cannulation, number of attempts, number of needle redirection, and posterior wall puncture. However, the incidence of hematoma (Direct 22.5% [18]; Dart 8% [10]) was significant. There was better success rate of cannulation (n = 90) in patients with normal pulse and bigger radial artery lumen.

Conclusion:

There was no significant difference between Dart and Direct technique with the use of ultrasound guidance.

Ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults

BACKGROUND

Arterial vascular access is a frequently performed procedure, with a high possibility for adverse events (e.g. pneumothorax, haemothorax, haematoma, amputation, death), and additional techniques such as ultrasound may be useful for improving outcomes. However, ultrasound guidance for arterial access in adults is still under debate.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects of ultrasound guidance for arterial (other than femoral) catheterisation in adults.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, LILACS, and CINAHL on 21 May 2021. We also searched IBECS, WHO ICTRP, and ClinicalTrials.gov on 16 June 2021, and we checked the reference lists of retrieved articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), including cross-over trials and cluster-RCTs, comparing ultrasound guidance, alone or associated with other forms of guidance, versus other interventions or palpation and landmarks for arterial (other than femoral) guidance in adults.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently performed study selection, extracted data, assessed risk of bias, and assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 48 studies (7997 participants) that tested palpation and landmarks, Doppler auditory ultrasound assistance (DUA), direct ultrasound guidance with B-mode, or any other modified ultrasound technique for arterial (axillary, dorsalis pedis, and radial) catheterisation in adults. Radial artery Real-time B-mode ultrasound versus palpation and landmarks Real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance may improve first attempt success rate (risk ratio (RR) 1.44, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.29 to 1.61; 4708 participants, 27 studies; low-certainty evidence) and overall success rate (RR 1.11, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.16; 4955 participants, 28 studies; low-certainty evidence), and may decrease time needed for a successful procedure (mean difference (MD) -0.33 minutes, 95% CI -0.54 to -0.13; 4902 participants, 26 studies; low-certainty evidence) up to one hour compared to palpation and landmarks. Real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance probably decreases major haematomas (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.23 to 0.56; 2504 participants, 16 studies; moderate-certainty evidence). It is uncertain whether real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance has any effect on pseudoaneurysm, pain, and quality of life (QoL) compared to palpation and landmarks (very low-certainty evidence). Real-time B-mode ultrasound versus DUA One study (493 participants) showed that real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance probably improves first attempt success rate (RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.11 to 1.64; moderate-certainty evidence) and time needed for a successful procedure (MD -1.57 minutes, 95% CI -1.78 to -1.36; moderate-certainty evidence) up to 72 hours compared to DUA. Real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance may improve overall success rate (RR 1.13, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.29; low-certainty evidence) up to 72 hours compared to DUA. Pseudoaneurysm, major haematomas, pain, and QoL were not reported. Real-time B-mode ultrasound versus modified real-time B-mode ultrasound Real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance may decrease first attempt success rate (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.55 to 0.84; 153 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), may decrease overall success rate (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.86 to 1.01; 153 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence), and may lead to no difference in time needed for a successful procedure (MD 0.04 minutes, 95% CI -0.01 to 0.09; 153 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) up to one hour compared to modified real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance. It is uncertain whether real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance has any effect on major haematomas compared to modified real-time B-mode ultrasound (very low-certainty evidence). Pseudoaneurysm, pain, and QoL were not reported. In-plane versus out-of-plane B-mode ultrasound In-plane real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance may lead to no difference in overall success rate (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.05; 1051 participants, 8 studies; low-certainty evidence) and in time needed for a successful procedure (MD -0.06 minutes, 95% CI -0.16 to 0.05; 1134 participants, 9 studies; low-certainty evidence) compared to out-of-plane B-mode ultrasound up to one hour. It is uncertain whether in-plane real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance has any effect on first attempt success rate or major haematomas compared to out-of-plane B-mode ultrasound (very low-certainty evidence). Pseudoaneurysm, pain, and QoL were not reported. DUA versus palpation and landmarks DUA may lead to no difference in first attempt success rate (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.90 to 1.14; 666 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) or overall success rate (RR 0.99, 95% CI 0.92 to 1.07; 666 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) and probably increases time needed for a successful procedure (MD 0.45 minutes, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.70; 500 participants, 1 study; moderate-certainty evidence) up to 72 hours compared to palpation and landmarks. Pseudoaneurysm, major haematomas, pain, and QoL were not reported. Oblique-axis versus long-axis in-plane B-mode ultrasound Oblique-axis in-plane B-mode ultrasound guidance may increase overall success rate (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.05 to 1.53; 215 participants, 2 studies; low-certainty evidence) up to 72 hours compared to long-axis in-plane B-mode ultrasound. It is uncertain whether oblique-axis in-plane B-mode ultrasound guidance has any effect on first attempt success rate, time needed for a successful procedure, and major haematomas compared to long-axis in-plane B-mode ultrasound. Pseudoaneurysm, pain, and QoL were not reported. We are uncertain about effects in the following comparisons due to very low-certainty evidence and unreported outcomes: real-time B-mode ultrasound versus palpation and landmarks (axillary and dorsalis pedis arteries), real-time B-mode ultrasound versus near-infrared laser (radial artery), and dynamic versus static out-of-plane B-mode ultrasound (radial artery).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance may improve first attempt success rate, overall success rate, and time needed for a successful procedure for radial artery catheterisation compared to palpation, or DUA. In addition, real-time B-mode ultrasound guidance probably decreases major haematomas compared to palpation. However, we are uncertain about the evidence on major haematomas and pain for other comparisons due to very low-certainty evidence and unreported outcomes. We are also uncertain about the effects on pseudoaneurysm and QoL for axillary and dorsalis pedis arteries catheterisation. Given that first attempt success rate and pseudoaneurysm are the most relevant outcomes for people who underwent arterial catheterisation, future studies must measure both. Future trials must be large enough to detect effects, use validated scales, and report longer-term follow-up.

Ultrasound-guided dynamic needle tip positioning technique for radial artery cannulation in elderly patients: A prospective randomized controlled study

Background

Radial artery cannulation, which is a useful procedure for anesthetic management, is often challenging in elderly patients. Recently, the dynamic needle tip positioning (DNTP) technique was introduced to facilitate ultrasound-guided vascular catheterization. Therefore, we performed this prospective, parallel group, randomized, controlled trial to compare the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique with the palpation method in elderly patients.

Methods

For this study, 256 patients aged 65 years or older were randomly allocated to the ultrasound-guided DNTP technique group (DNTP group) or the palpation method group (palpation group). The primary outcome was first-attempt success rate. The secondary outcomes were overall success rate, numbers of attempts and redirections, cannulation time, and incidence of complications.

Results

The first-attempt success rate (85.9% vs. 72.3%; relative risk [RR], 1.47; 95% CI 1.25–1.72; P<0.001) and the overall success rate (99.2% vs. 93.0%; RR, 1.07; 95% CI 1.02–1.12; P = 0.01) were significantly higher in the DNTP group compared to the palpation group. The numbers of attempts [1 (1,1) vs. 1 (1,3), P<0.001] and redirections [0 (0,1) vs. 2 (0,4), P<0.001] were significantly lower in the DNTP group. The cannulation time for successful attempts was 42 (32,55) seconds in the DNTP group and 53 (36,78) seconds in the palpation group (P<0.001). The incidence of hematoma was significantly lower in the DNTP group (7% vs. 24.2%; RR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.14–0.59; P<0.001).

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided radial artery cannulation with the DNTP technique improved the efficiency of radial artery cannulation in elderly patients by increasing the success rate while minimizing complications.

Effects of ultrasound-guided techniques for radial arterial catheterization: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether ultrasound-guided techniques are superior compared to traditional palpation techniques in patients undergoing radial artery catheterization (RAC).

METHODS

Electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The relative risks (RRs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to calculate the pooled effect estimates using the random effects model for categories and continuous data, respectively.

RESULTS

A total of 19 RCTs comprising a total of 3220 individuals were selected for final analysis. The pooled RR suggested that ultrasound-guided techniques were associated with higher incidence of first attempt success than traditional palpation techniques (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.21-1.59; P < 0.001). Moreover, we noted that ultrasound-guided techniques were associated with fewer mean attempts to success (WMD, -0.80 s; 95% CI, -1.35 to -0.25; P = 0.004) and a shorter mean time to success (WMD, -41.18 s; 95% CI, -75.43 to -6.93; P = 0.018) than traditional palpation techniques. Furthermore, individuals using ultrasound-guided techniques had a reduced risk of hematoma (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.22-0.72; P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that ultrasound-guided techniques were superior compared to traditional palpation techniques for RAC in terms of efficacy and complications.

Magnetic needle-tracking device for ultrasound guidance of radial artery puncture: A randomized study on a simulation model

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound-guidance of radial artery catheter insertion improves the first attempt success and reduces the occurrence of hematomas. Needle-tracking devices optimize needle-ultrasound beam alignment by displaying in real-time the needle tip position. We compared the median time need by experienced physicians to achieve radial artery puncture using either a conventional ultrasonography device (CUD) or a magnetic needle-tracking ultrasound device (MUD) in a simulation training arm model.

METHODS

Fifty experienced residents and physicians performed two punctures in randomized order with the CUD and the MUD. The primary outcome was puncture duration; the secondary outcomes were puncture success, rate of accidental vein puncture, and practitioner's comfort (subjective scale 0-10).

RESULTS

The median [lower-upper quartile] puncture time was 10 [6-14] seconds when using CUD and 4 [3-7] seconds when using MUD (P < .01). In the multivariate analysis, MUD use was associated with decreased puncture duration whatever the puncture order (OR 1.13 [1.07-1.20], P < .01). The participants performed 99 (99%) successful punctures: 50 with the MUD (100%) and 49 with the CUD (98%). There was no accidental venous puncture. The practitioner's comfort level was 6.5 [6, 7] with the CUD and 8 [7-9] with the MUD (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

MUD reduced radial artery puncture time and improved physician comfort in a simulation training arm model.

Workflow of Ultrasound-Guided Arterial Access

Arterial line cannulations frequently are performed in various clinical settings to facilitate hemodynamic monitoring and metabolic assessments. Palpation-guided technique generally is performed due to the superficial nature of the peripheral arteries; however, this approach may be challenging in patients with obesity, edema, and hypotension. Difficult line placements are a significant contributor of reduced operating room efficiency due to time delays seen in procedural workflow. Real-time ultrasound guidance is shown to improve success rates of arterial cannulation and reduction in multiple attempts, leading to time efficiency and less likelihood of arterial spasms or hematoma formation. In this report, the authors demonstrate the workflow of ultrasound-guided arterial line cannulation, outline the features of their institutional multi-modal training project for quality improvement, and evaluate the possible effect of the initiative on surgical delays seen with difficult line placements.

Reducing pain by using venous blood gas instead of arterial blood gas (VEINART): a multicentre randomised controlled trial

Introduction

Venous sampling for blood gas analysis has been suggested as an alternative to arterial sampling in order to reduce pain. The main objective was to compare pain induced by venous and arterial sampling and to assess whether the type of sampling would affect clinical management or not.

Methods

We performed an open-label randomised multicentre prospective study in four French EDs during a 4-week period. Non-hypoxaemic adults, whose medical management required blood gas analysis, were randomly allocated using a computer-generated randomisation list stratified by centres with an allocation ratio of 1:1 using random blocks to one of the two arms: venous or arterial sampling. The primary outcome was the maximal pain during sampling, using the visual analogue scale. Secondary outcomes pertained to ease of sampling as rated by the nurse drawing the blood, and physician satisfaction regarding usefulness of biochemical data.

Results

113 patients were included: 55 in the arterial and 58 in the venous sampling group. The mean maximal pain was 40.5 mm±24.9 mm and 22.6 mm±20.2 mm in the arterial group and the venous group, respectively, accounting for a mean difference of 17.9 mm (95% CI 9.6 to 26.3) (p<0.0001). Ease of blood sampling was greater in the venous group as compared with the arterial group (p=0.02). The usefulness of the results, evaluated by the prescriber, did not significantly differ (p=0.25).

Conclusions

Venous blood gas is less painful for patients than ABG in non-hypoxaemic patients. Venous blood gas should replace ABG in this setting.

Trial registration number

NCT03784664.

Place de l’échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence

L’échographie clinique en médecine d’urgence (ECMU) devient une pratique intégrée à l’exercice de la spécialité. Quatre étapes semblent nécessaires au déploiement de cet outil : l’existence de preuves scientifiques sur sa pertinence clinique, l’implantation d’échographes dans les structures d’urgences (SU), la formation des médecins et l’objectivation d’un impact secondaire à son utilisation. Les preuves sur la pertinence diagnostique des techniques utilisées datent des années 1990 pour la majorité des applications utilisées aujourd’hui. La disponibilité d’un échographe adapté est également nécessaire. Si la majorité des SU disposent aujourd’hui d’un échographe, selon les recommandations françaises, toutes le devraient. Des échographes de mieux en mieux adaptés à la pratique de l’ECMU arrivent sur le marché. L’objectif doit être de permettre des examens rapides et fiables. Pour cela, une ergonomie épurée et l’implication de techniques d’intelligence artificielle semblent être l’avenir. Les médecins doivent également être formés. En France, l’utilisation de l’ECMU va se généraliser grâce à la formation de tous les nouveaux internes de médecine d’urgence. Cependant, beaucoup d’urgentistes exerçant actuellement doivent encore être formés. Pour répondre à cette demande, de nombreuses formations sont aujourd’hui accessibles. Enfin, peu de données sur l’impact clinique secondaire à l’utilisation de cet outil dans les SU sont disponibles. Après avoir défini l’ECMU, l’objectif de ce texte est d’expliquer la place de l’échographie clinique dans la spécialité de médecine d’urgence. Des perspectives d’évolution de l’ECMU sont également proposées.

Ultrasound guidance in difficult radial artery puncture for blood gas analysis: A prospective, randomized controlled trial

Background

Ultrasound (US) guidance has yet to prove its applicability in radial arterial blood gas analysis (ABGA) punctures. The main objective of our study was to compare the number of first-attempt successes (NFAS) for radial arterial puncture in difficult patients with or without US guidance. The Secondary aims were to compare the number of punctures (NOP), puncture time, and patient pain.

Methods

In this single-center, randomized controlled trial, patients who required a radial ABGA and in whom the arterial puncture was assessed as difficult (because of non-palpable radial arteries or two previous puncture failures by a nurse) were assigned to the US group or no-US (NUS) group (procedure performed by a trained physician).

Results

Thirty-six patients were included in the US group and 37 in the NUS groups. The NFAS was 7 (19%) in the NUS group and 19 (53%) in the US group. The relative risk of success in the US group was 2.79 (95% CI,1.34 to 5.82), p = 0.01. In the NUS and US groups, respectively, the median NOP was 3 [2; 6] vs. 1 [1; 2], estimated difference −2.0 (95%CI, −3.4 to −0.6), p < 0.01; the respective puncture time was 3.1 [1.6; 5.4] vs. 1.4 [0.6; 3.1] min, estimated difference −1.45 (95%CI, −2.57 to −0.39), p = 0.01; the respective median patient pain was 6 [4; 8] vs. 2 [1; 4], estimated difference −4.0 (95%CI, −5.8 to −2.3); p < 0.01.

Conclusion

US guidance by a trained physician significantly improves the rate of success in difficult radial ABGA patients.

Application of Optimized Ultrasonic Localization System for Radial Artery Puncture by Intern Doctors: A Randomized Trial

BACKGROUND Ultrasound with developing line may by suitable for medical personnel who are inexperienced in the use of ultrasound-guided radial artery puncture. In this trial, we assessed whether this technology could increase the success rate of radial artery puncture performed by interns. MATERIAL AND METHODS Seventy-seven patients undergoing general anesthesia were enrolled and randomly divided into 2 groups: an ultrasound with developing line group and a traditional ultrasound group. All radial artery punctures were performed by interns who received theoretical explanation (including video demonstration of puncture) and on-site guidance puncture once. The primary end-point was the success rate of cannulation at the first attempt and the secondary end-point was cannulation failure rate. RESULTS The success rate of cannulation at the first attempt in ultrasound in the developing line group was significantly higher than that in the traditional ultrasound group (proportion difference: 34.21%, 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.5483 to -0.1334; P=0.0025). However, no significant between-group difference was observed with respect to failure rate (mean difference 95% CI, (-0.0084 to 0.2743; P=0.0866). The ultrasonic location time in the ultrasound with developing line group was significantly lower than that in the traditional ultrasound group (mean difference -12.4 seconds, 95% CI, 10.64 to 13.98 s; P<0.0000). CONCLUSIONS Use of ultrasound with developing line significantly improved the success rate of radial artery puncture performed by interns as compared to that with use of traditional dynamic ultrasound guidance technology.

Role of vascular ultrasound scanning in repeated trans-radial coronary artery intervention (prospective randomized study)

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to detect if pre-procedure vascular ultrasound scanning (VUS) of radial arteries (RAs) can increase the radial access success (RAS) rate and/or reduce the vascular access time (VAT), by guiding the choice of the proper access site for repeated trans-radial interventions (TRIs).

BACKGROUND

Currently, repeated-TRIs are encountered more frequently in most of the cath. labs. However, structural changes of the RAs after TRA may hinder it is usage for repeated-TRI. VUS is the most accurate noninvasive test for assessing RAs, nonetheless, its role in the setting of repeated-TRIs has not been studied before.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We randomly assigned 300 patients undergoing repeated-TRI, to either planning the vascular access site based upon the result of VUS that was performed pre-procedural (group A, 150 patients) or to be left to the operator's discretion (group B, 150 patients).

RESULTS

In group A (143/145 [98.6%]), RAS rate was only numerically higher than group B (143/150 [95.3%]), P = 0.08. There was a statistically significant differences between both groups in VAT [(1.25 ± 0.17 min), vs. (4.95 ± 0.87 min) for group A and B, respectively, P = 0.02] and in procedure duration [(37.2 ± 19.8 min) vs. (51.8 ± 18.6 min) for group A and B, respectively, P = 0.04]. RA spasm was more common in group B [18% (27/150)] than group A [2% (3/145)], P = 0.001.

CONCLUSION

VUS of RAs prior to repeated-TRI is associated with significant reduction in VAT, procedure duration, RA spasm and a mild increase in the RAS rate.

Improved Success Rate of Arterial Puncture for Blood Gas Analysis Through Standardization

Background

Arterial puncture for blood gas analysis is a common procedure in hospitals. The aim of the study is to determine if standardizing technique elements of the arterial puncture process could improve the success rate of technicians through the full scope of an academic medical center.

Methods

The study is conducted by the Blood Gas Laboratory at University of Utah Health's main campus. During the baseline period, technicians tallied whether arterial puncture attempts were successful or unsuccessful from December 2014 through February 2015. A small team reviewed the steps of performing arterial puncture and selected segments of the process for standardization. Starting in March 2015, staff were trained individually in the standard processes. All staff continued to tally outcomes of puncture attempts through March 2017.

Results

During the baseline period, the puncture success rate was 83.6%. From April 2015 through March 2017 the success rate was 89.2%.

Conclusion

Standardizing arterial puncture technique for blood gas analysis leads to fewer punctures.

Comparison between ultrasound guided technique and digital palpation technique for radial artery cannulation in adult patients: An updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Possible advantages and risks associated with ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation in-comparison to digital palpation guided method in adult patients are not fully known. We have compared ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation with digital palpation technique in this meta-analysis.

DESIGN

Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

SETTING

Trials conducted in operating room, emergency department, cardiac catheterization laboratory.

PATIENTS

PubMed and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) were searched (from 1946 to 20th November 2017) to identify prospective randomized controlled trials in adult patients.

INTERVENTION

Two-dimensional ultrasound guided radial artery catheterization versus digital palpation guided radial artery cannulation.

MEASUREMENTS

Overall cannulation success rate, first attempt success rate, time to cannulation and mean number of attempts to successful cannulation. Odds ratio (OR) and standardized mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for categorical and continuous variables respectively.

RESULTS

Data of 1895 patients from 10 studies have been included in this meta- analysis. Overall cannulation success rate was similar between ultrasound guided technique and digital palpation [OR (95% CI) 2.01 (1.00, 4.06); p = 0.05]. Ultrasound guided radial artery cannulation is associated with higher first attempt success rate of radial artery cannulation in comparison to digital palpation [OR (95% CI) 2.76 (186, 4.10); p < 0.001]. No difference was seen in time to cannulate [SMD (95% CI) -0.31 (-0.65, 0.04); p = 0.30] and mean number of attempt [MD (95% CI) -0.65 (-1.32, 0.02); p = 0.06] between USG guided technique with palpation technique.

CONCLUSION

Radial artery cannulation by ultrasound guidance may increase the first attempt success rate but not the overall cannulation success when compared to digital palpation technique. However, results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution due presence of heterogeneity.

Ultrasound-Guided Radial Artery Compression to Assess Blood Pressure

INTRODUCTION

We proposed using compression sonography to observe the coaptation and collapse of the radial artery as a surrogate for automated cuff blood pressures (BP). We hypothesize that the pressure required to achieve coaptation and complete collapse of the artery would correlate to the diastolic and systolic BP, respectively. This pilot study was to assess the feasibility of ultrasound-guided radial artery compression (URAC) for BP measurement and compare patient comfort levels during automated cuff with URAC measurements.

METHODS

This was a prospective cohort pilot study with a convenience sampling of 25 adult patients at a single urban emergency department. URAC pressure was measured, followed by cuff manometry on the same arm. A 100mL normal saline bag was connected to the Stryker pressure monitor and placed on the volar wrist. Pressure was applied to the bag with a linear transducer and the radial artery was observed for coaptation of the anterior and posterior walls and complete collapse. Pressures required for coaptation and collapse were recorded from the Stryker display. Patient level of comfort was also documented during the URAC method, with patients reporting either "more," "same" or "less" comfort in comparison to automated cuffs. We analyzed data using intraclass correlation and paired t-tests. Interrater reliability was calculated using intraclass correlation.

RESULTS

The mean cuff systolic BP was 138.6 ± 22.1 mmHg compared to 126.9 ± 19.8 mmHg for the URAC systolic BP (p=0.02). For diastolic BP, there was no significant difference between the cuff BP and the URAC BP (83.7 ± 13.0 cuff vs. 86.5 ± 19.8 URAC, p=0.46). The intraclass correlation (ICC) for systolic BP was 0.48 (p=0.04) and 0.57 (p=0.02) for diastolic BP. The agreement between the two observers was 0.88 for identifying coaptation on ultrasound (diastolic pressure) and was 0.92 for identifying collapse (systolic pressure). Eighty percent (20/25) of subjects found the URAC method more comfortable than the cuff measurement, and the remainder found it the same (5/20).

CONCLUSION

This pilot study showed statistically significant moderate correlation between automated cuff diastolic BP and URAC measurements for vessel coaptation. Additionally, most patients found the URAC method more comfortable than traditional cuff measurements. Compression ultrasonography shows promise as an alternative method of BP measurement, though future studies are needed.

Ultrasound Guidance and Other Determinants of Successful Peripheral Artery Catheterization in Critically Ill Children

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral arterial catheterization is a common invasive procedure performed in critically ill children. However, the benefits of using ultrasound guidance for this procedure in critically ill children, especially when used by inexperienced trainees, are unclear. Our aims were to evaluate whether the use of ultrasound guidance for the placement of radial arterial catheters reduced time and improved success when compared with the palpation method and also to determine patient and trainee variables that influence procedure outcomes. Finally, we evaluated whether adoption of ultrasound guidance among trainees comes at the expense of learning landmark-based methods.

DESIGN

Prospective observational cohort.

SETTING

University affiliated PICU.

PATIENTS

A total of 208 procedures performed by 45 trainees in 192 unique patients (1 mo to 20 yr old) were observed.

INTERVENTION

Implementation of ultrasound curriculum.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The main outcome measures were time and number of attempts required for the procedure. Compared with palpation method, ultrasound guidance was associated with reduced procedure time (8.1 ± 5.2 min compared with 16.5 ± 8.8 min; p < 0.001), reduced number of attempts (3.1 ± 2.6 attempts compared with 6.9 ± 4.2 attempts; p < 0.001), and improved first attempt success rate (28% compared with 11%; p = 0.001) even after adjusting for key confounders in multivariate random effects models. The factors most likely to interfere with peripheral arterial catheterization are patient age, patient systolic blood pressure, patient body mass index, degree of fluid overload, and trainee months in fellowship. The use of ultrasound guidance mitigates the influence of each of these factors. We found no evidence that the adoption of ultrasound guidance by trainees is associated with reduced proficiency in landmark-based methods.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of ultrasound guidance by trainees for radial artery catheterization in critically ill children is associated with improved outcomes compared with the palpation method.

A Practical Training Program for Peripheral Radial Artery Catheterization in Adult Patients: A Prospective, Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

The main cause of unsuccessful peripheral radial artery catheterization using traditional palpation is imprecisely locating the arterial center. The authors evaluated factors causing disparities between the arterial centers determined by palpation versus ultrasound. The authors applied them to create and test a novel catheterization training program.

METHODS

The arterial central axis was determined by ultrasound and palpation in 350 adults. Potential independent predictors of disparity included sex, body mass index, pulse pressure, transverse arterial diameter, subcutaneous arterial depth, chronic hypertension, and experience as an anesthesiologist (less than 3 vs. greater than or equal to 3 yr). Using the results, the authors developed a radial artery catheterization training program. It was tested by enrolling 20 first-year interns, randomized to a training or control group. The time to successful insertion was the primary outcome measure. The success rate and time required for catheterization by palpation were evaluated in 100 adult patients per group.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of central axis disparity were pulse pressure, subcutaneous radial artery depth, years of experience, and chronic hypertension. Training improved the catheterization time (training group 56 ± 2 s vs. control group 109 ± 2 s; difference -53 ± 3 s; 95% CI, -70 to -36 s; P < 0.0001) and total success rate (training group 83 of 100 attempts, 83%; 95% CI, 75 to 90 vs. control group 57 of 100, 57%; 95% CI, 47 to 66; odds ratio, 3.7; 95% CI, 2.7 to 5.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Misjudging the central axis position of the radial artery is common with a weak pulse and/or deep artery. The authors' program, which focused on both these issues, shortened the time for palpation-guided catheterization and improved success.

Development and psychometric evaluation of the arterial puncture self-efficacy scale

BACKGROUND

Arterial puncture for arterial blood gases (ABG) analysis can be a risky, painful, difficult-to-perform procedure that is often insufficiently practised and generates stress and discomfort amongst patients and healthcare professionals. Self-efficacy is a key component in the acquisition of procedural skills. Therefore, professionals' self-efficacy in arterial puncture should be measured before attempting the procedure on real patients.

OBJECTIVE

To develop and psychometrically assess a self-efficacy scale in arterial puncture.

DESIGN

An observational cross-sectional design was used in this study.

SETTING

Faculty of Education Sciences, Nursing and Physiotherapy in a higher education institution in the south of Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

A convenience sample of 342 nursing students entered and completed the study. All participants met the following inclusion criteria: (1) ≥18years old and (2) enrolled in a nursing degree programme during the 2014/2015 academic year. Participants were 74% female (n=254) and their age ranged from 18 to 50, with a mean age of 21.74years (SD=5.14).

METHOD

The Arterial Puncture Self-Efficacy Scale (APSES) was developed and psychometrically tested. Reliability and content validity were studied. Predictive validity and concurrent validity assessed criterion validity. In addition, principal component analysis and known-group analysis evaluated construct validity.

RESULTS

Principal component analysis revealed the two-subscale structure of the final 22-item version of the Arterial Puncture Self-Efficacy Scale (APSES). A total Cronbach's alpha coefficient of 0.97 showed its high reliability. The APSES' content validity index was excellent (S-CVI/Ave=0.95). Predictive and concurrent validity analysis demonstrated the good criterion validity of the tool. Supporting the APSES' sensitivity and specificity, known-groups analysis evidenced significant differences (p<0.001) in self-efficacy levels between groups.

CONCLUSION

The APSES showed good psychometric properties for measuring self-efficacy in arterial puncture for ABG analysis.

Erratum: Concordance and limits between transcutaneous and arterial carbon dioxide pressure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure: a single-center, prospective, and observational study

Abstract

After publication of this article (Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med 23:40, 2015), it came to light that an earlier version had been published in error. This erratum contains the correct version of the article, which incorporates revisions made in response to reviewer comments. Additionally, one of the authors was inadvertently omitted from the author list. This author, Justin Yan, has been included in the corrected author list above.

Background

Transcutaneous CO₂ (PtCO₂) is a continuous and non-invasive measure recommended by scientific societies in the management of respiratory distress. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between PtCO₂ and arterial partial pressure of CO₂ (PaCO₂) by arterial blood gas analysis in emergency patients with dyspnoea, and to determine the factors that interfere with this correlation.

Methods

From January to June 2014, all adult patients admitted to the RR with dyspnoea during business hours were included in the study if arterial blood gas measurements were indicated. A sensor measuring the PtCO₂ was attached to the ear lobe of the patient before the gas analysis. Anamnesis, clinical and laboratory parameters were identified.

Results

Ninety patients with dyspnoea were included (104 pairs of measurements). The median (IQR) age was 79 years (69 – 85). The correlation between PtCO₂ and PaCO₂ was R² =.83 (p<.001) but became lower for values of PaCO₂ above 60 mm Hg. The mean bias (± SD) between the two methods of measurement (Bland-Altman analysis) was −1.4 mm Hg (± 7.7) with limits of agreement from −16.4 to 13.7 mm Hg. In univariate analysis, PaO₂ interfered with this correlation. After multivariate analysis, temperature (OR = 3.01; 95 % CIs [1.16, 7.80]) and PaO₂ (OR = 1.22; 95 % CIs [1.02, 1.47]) significantly interfered with this correlation.

Conclusions

There is a significant correlation between PaCO₂ and PtCO₂ values for patients admitted to the emergency department for acute respiratory failure. One limiting factor to routine use of PtCO₂ measurements in the emergency department is the presence of hyperthermia.

Concordance and limits between transcutaneous and arterial carbon dioxide pressure in emergency department patients with acute respiratory failure: a single-center prospective observational study

Introduction

Transcutaneous CO ₂ (PtCO ₂) is a continuous and non-invasive measure recommended by scientific societies in the management of respiratory distress. The objective of this study is to evaluate the correlation between PtCO ₂ and blood pressure of CO ₂ (PaCO ₂) by blood gas analysis in emergency patients with dyspnoea and to determine the factors that interfere in this correlation.

Methods

From January to June 2014, all patients admitted to resuscitation room of the emergency department targeted for arterial blood gases were included prospectively. A sensor measuring the PtCO ₂ was attached to the ear lobe of the patient before the gas analysis. Anamnesis, clinical and laboratory parameters were identified.

Results

90 patients with dyspnoea were included (with 104 pairs of measurements), the median age was 79 years [69-85]. The correlation between PtCO ₂ and PaCO ₂ was R ²= 0.83 (p <0.001) but became lower for values of PaCO ₂>60 mm Hg. The mean bias (±SD) between the two methods of measurement (Bland-Altman analysis) was -1.4 mm Hg (±7.7) with limits of agreement of -16.4 to 13.7 mm Hg. In univariate analysis, PaO ₂ interfered in this correlation. After multivariate analysis, the temperature (OR = 3.01, 95% CI = 1.16-7.09) and the PaO ₂ (OR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.02-1.47) were found to be significant.

Conclusions

In patients admitted in emergency unit for acute respiratory failure, there is a significant correlation between PaCO ₂ and PtCO ₂, mainly for values below 60 mm Hg. The two limiting factors of use are hyperthermia and users training.

Risk factors of failed transradial approach for percutaneous coronary interventions in Chaoshan Chinese: a locally retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

Transradial approach PCI reduces vascular complications compared with a transfemoral approach (TFA). TRA-PCI failure has been reported in 5-10% of cases. Reported studies showed that age > 75 years, previous CABG, short stature, female sex, and cardiogenic shock were independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure. However, related risk factors and causes of TRA-PCI failure are not well characterized, especially among Asians.

OBJECTIVES

To explore the risk factors and causes of transfemoral approach (TRA)-PCI failure in Chaoshan area.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed our databases for all patients who underwent TRA-PCI from January 2011 to June 2014 in the First Affiliated Hospital of Shantou University Medical College. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine independent risk factors of TRA-PCI failure and the causes of TRA-PCI failure.

RESULTS

A total of 1,276 patients underwent TRA-PCI. From univariate analyses, patients in the TRA-PCI failure group were significantly in women, and more likely to be age > 75 years compared with TRA-PCI success group. Besides, patients in the TRA-PCI failure group were significantly more likely to suffer from left main coronary disease, more heparin dose, longer fluoroscopy time, and more PCI procedural failure compared with the TRA-PCI successful group. From multivariate analysis, female and age > 75 years were independent predictors of TRA-PCI failure. The causes of TRA-PCI failure included unsuccessful radial artery puncture in 34, vascular anomaly in 54, and the problems of guide catheter and guide wire in 26 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Being female and age > 75 years were independent risk factors of TRA-PCI failure. TRA-PCI failures indicated more possibility to suffer from left main coronary disease. The causes of TRA-PCI failure were complicated, among of those vascular abnormalities was an important factor.

Ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Since a previous meta-analysis reported that ultrasound guidance was associated with a higher first-attempt success rate in catheterization of the radial artery, a number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported inconsistent results. The aim of the present study is to conduct an updated meta-analysis to clarify the role of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization.

METHODS

A systematic literature search of PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted using specific search terms. Eligible studies were RCTs that compared ultrasound guidance with traditional palpation for radial artery catheterization. The Mantel-Haenszel method using the random effects model was adopted in this meta-analysis.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs with 482 patients were included. Compared with traditional palpation, ultrasound guidance significantly increased the first-attempt success rate of radial artery catheterization (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.07-2.14, P = 0.02). Subgroup analyses suggested that the superiority of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization was significant when the technique was operated by experienced users, performed in small children and infants, and on elective procedures in the operating room. In addition, ultrasound guidance significantly reduced mean-attempts to success (WMD -1.13, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.69, P<0.00001), mean-time to success (WMD -74.77s, 95% CI -137.89s to -11.64s, P = 0.02), and the occurrence of hematoma (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07-0.41, P = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present meta-analysis suggests a clear benefit from ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization compared with the traditional palpation. Preliminary training and familiarization with the ultrasound-guided technique is needed before applying it for radial artery catheterization, especially for inexperienced operators.

Effects of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: an updated meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous meta-analyses have shown that ultrasound guidance is an effective technique for radial artery catheterization. However, these reports neglected to include several non-English language studies. Therefore, an updated meta-analysis including more eligible studies was performed to assess the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Wanfang, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure literature databases. The outcome measure was the rate of first-attempt success. Two investigators identified the randomized controlled trials (RCTs) for inclusion and independently extracted data from these RCTs. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the Jadad score. The relative risk (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated and pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eleven RCTs involving 803 patients met the inclusion criteria. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization was generally associated with a 47% improvement, as compared with the palpation technique, in terms of the rate of first-attempt success (RR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.22-1.76; P < .0001). Specifically, the ultrasound-guided technique significantly improved the rate of first-attempt success for adult (RR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.13-1.72; P = .002) and pediatric (RR, 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.47; P = .008) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Adult and pediatric patients benefited from ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in terms of the rate of first-attempt success. Given the potential bias and significant heterogeneity of the available data in the present study, further investigation is required to confirm the present findings and to identify other effects of the ultrasound-guided technique.

Efficacy of ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

INTRODUCTION

Ultrasound guidance has emerged as an adjunct for central vein catheterization in both adults and children. However, the use of ultrasound guidance for radial arterial catheterization has not been well established. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy of ultrasound guidance for radial artery catheterization.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing ultrasound guidance with other techniques (palpation or Doppler) in adult or pediatric patients requiring radial artery catheterization were included. The primary outcome was first-attempt success.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs enrolling 546 patients met the inclusion criteria, and all the selected trials were considered as at high risk of bias. Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization was associated with an increased first-attempt success (relative risk (RR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.02 to 2.35). There was significant heterogeneity among the studies (I2 = 74%). Ultrasound-guided radial artery catheterization in small children and infants also provided an increased chance for first-attempt success (RR 1.94, 95% CI 1.31 to 2.88). Ultrasound guidance further significantly reduced mean attempts to success (weighted mean difference (WMD) -1.13, 95% CI -1.58 to -0.69), mean time to success (WMD -72.97 seconds, 95% CI -134.41 to -11.52), and incidence of the complication of hematoma (RR 0.17, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound guidance is an effective and safe technique for radial artery catheterization, even in small children and infants. However, the results should be interpreted cautiously due to the heterogeneity among the studies.

Blood total carbon dioxide content and bicarbonate can be used together to predict blood pH correctly in venous blood samples

Blood gas analyses are needed to reveal any kind of acid-base imbalance in some patients. Traditionally, arterial punctures are performed to obtain the blood samples for blood gas analyses. Arterial puncture is not a completely safe procedure. It may cause serious problems including arterial thrombosis, arteriovenous fistula, pseudoaneurysms and hematoma. In this retrospective reviewing, it was aimed to yield novel formulations to predict the blood pH only from CtCO2 and HCO3 values which can easily be measured in venous blood samples obtained for other diagnostic and follow-up purposes.