Comparative effectiveness of standard CPR vs active compression-decompression CPR with CardioPump for treatment of cardiac arrest

Comparison of manual chest compression versus mechanical chest compression for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest is a life-threatening condition that requires immediate intervention to increase the prospect of survival. There are various ways to achieve cardiopulmonary resuscitation in such patients, either through manual chest compression or mechanical chest compression. Thus, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to investigate the differences between these interventions.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Scopus were explored from inception to May 2023. Additionally, the bibliographies of relevant studies were searched. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool for Randomized Controlled Trials, Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and the Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies-I tools were utilized to perform quality and risk of bias assessments.

RESULTS

There were 24 studies included within this quantitative synthesis, featuring a total of 111,681 cardiac arrest patients. Overall, no statistically significant differences were observed between the return of spontaneous circulation, survival to hospital discharge, short-term survival, and long-term survival. However, manual chest compression was associated with a significantly superior favorability of neurological outcomes (OR: 1.41; 95% CI: 1.07, 1.84; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Although there were no major differences between the strategies, the poorer post-resuscitation neurological outcomes observed in mechanical chest compression indicate the need for further innovation and advancements within the current array of mechanical devices. However, future high-quality studies are necessary in order to arrive at a valid conclusion.

Blood flow maintenance by cardiac massage during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: Classical theories, newer hypotheses, and clinical utility of mechanical devices

The mechanisms by which closed chest cardiac massage produces and maintains blood flow during cardiopulmonary resuscitation are still debated. To date, two main theories exist: the "cardiac pump", which assumes that blood flow is driven by direct cardiac compression and the "chest pump", which hypothesizes that blood flow is caused by changes in intrathoracic pressure. Newer hypotheses including the "atrial pump", the "lung pump", and the "respiratory pump" were also proposed. We reviewed studies supporting these different theories as well as the clinical evidences on the utility of mechanical devices proposed to optimize cardiopulmonary resuscitation, in view of their pathophysiological assumptions with regard to the underlying theory. On the basis of current evidence, a single theory is probably not sufficient to explain how cardiac massage produces blood flow. This suggests that different simultaneous mechanism might be involved. The relative importance of these mechanisms depends on several factors, including delay from collapse to starting of resuscitation, compression force and rate, body habitus, airway pressure, and presenting electrocardiogram. The complexity of the physiologic events occurring during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, together with the need of adequate training for a correct and prompt utilization of mechanical devices, might also partially explain the disappointing results of these devices in most clinical studies.

Cardiothoracic injuries after CardioPump CPR: a report of two cases and review of the literature

Although many clinical trials have demonstrated its efficacy during active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR), the Ambu® CardioPump seems likely to cause severe and sometimes lethal injuries. In this paper, we report two cases observed at the Institute of Legal Medicine of Nancy, France. A 67-year-old man collapsed in the street, in the presence of witnesses, and without any sign of trauma. The autopsy revealed a flail chest, a wound of the left ventricle, a rupture of the right ventricle, and a wrenching of the inferior vena cava. A 71-year-old woman was found in her apartment during an accidental fire. The autopsy revealed a sternal fracture, many rib fractures, and a perforation of the superior vena cava, the pericardium, and the heart. Despite articles focusing on complications of the use of the CardioPump in the late 1990s, this technique is still used in practice. These two cases emphasize that iatrogenic injuries must be taken into account in the CardioPump benefit/risk balance and the relevance of its daily use.