1
|
Cabo JJS, Miller NL. Nonopioid Pain Management Pathways for Stone Disease. J Endourol 2024; 38:108-120. [PMID: 38009214 DOI: 10.1089/end.2023.0266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: New opioid dependency after urologic surgery is a serious adverse outcome that is well-described in the literature. Patients with stone disease often require multiple procedures because of recurrence of disease and hence are at greater risk for repeat opioid exposures. Despite this, opioid prescribing after urologic surgery remains highly variable and in an emergency setting, opioids are still used commonly in management of acute renal colic. Methods: Two literature searches were performed using PubMed. First, we searched available literature concerning opioid-sparing pathways in acute renal colic. Second, we searched available literature for opioid-sparing pathways in ureteroscopy and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Abstracts were reviewed for inclusion in our narrative review. Results: In the setting of acute renal colic, multiple randomized control trials have shown that nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) attain greater reduction in pain scores, decreased need for rescue medications, and decreased vomiting events in comparison with opioids. NSAIDs also form a core component in management of postureteroscopy pain and have been demonstrated in randomized trials to have equivalent to improved pain control outcomes compared with opioids. Multiple opioid-free pathways have been described for postureteroscopy analgesia with need for rescue narcotics falling under 20% in most studies, including in patients with ureteral stents. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery protocols after percutaneous nephrolithotomy are less well described but have yielded a reduction in postoperative opioid requirements. Conclusions: In select patients, both acute renal colic and after kidney stone surgery, adequate pain management can usually be obtained with minimal or no opioid medication. NSAIDs form the core of most described opioid-sparing pathways for both ureteroscopy and PCNL, with the contribution of other components to postoperative pain outcomes limited because of lack of head-to-head comparisons. However, medications aimed specifically at targeting stent-related discomfort form a key component of most multimodal postsurgical pain management pathways. Further investigation is needed to develop pathways in patients unable to tolerate NSAIDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jackson J S Cabo
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Nicole L Miller
- Department of Urology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alam R, Winoker JS, Alam A, Wu C, Di Carlo HN, Gearhart JP, Matlaga BR. Clinical patterns and implications of prescription opioid use in a pediatric population for the management of urolithiasis in the emergency room. Urolithiasis 2024; 52:25. [PMID: 38197964 DOI: 10.1007/s00240-024-01529-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/11/2024]
Abstract
Extrapolations from the adult population have suggested that opioids should be avoided in the management of pediatric urolithiasis, but the literature is sparse with regards to actual practice patterns and the downstream implications. We sought to investigate the rate of oral opioid administration for children presenting to the emergency room (ER) with urolithiasis and to identify associations between opioid administration and return visits and persistent opioid use. The TriNetX Research and Diamond Networks were used for retrospective exploratory and validation analyses, respectively. Patients <18 years presenting to the emergency room with urolithiasis were stratified by the receipt of oral opioids. Propensity score matching was performed in a 1:1 fashion. Incident cases of opioid administration and risk ratios (RRs) for a return ER visit within 14 days and the presence of an opioid prescription at 6 to 12 months were calculated. Of the 4672 patients in the exploratory cohort, 11.9% were prescribed oral opioids. Matching yielded a total of 1084 patients. Opioids at the index visit were associated with an increased risk of return visits (RR 1.51, 95% CI 1.04-2.20, P = 0.03) and persistent opioid use (RR 4.00, 95% CI 2.20-7.26, P < 0.001). The validation cohort included 6524 patients, of whom 5.7% were prescribed oral opioids. Matching yielded a total of 722 patients and demonstrated that opioids were associated with an increased risk of return visits (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.04-2.16, P = 0.03) but not persistent opioid use (RR 1.70, 95% CI 0.79-3.67, P = 0.17). We find that the opioid administration rate for pediatric urolithiasis appears reassuringly low and that opioids are associated with a greater risk of return visits and persistent use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ridwan Alam
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA.
| | - Jared S Winoker
- The Smith Institute for Urology at Lenox Hill, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, NY, USA
| | - Ayman Alam
- Department of Urology, Oakland University William Beaumont School of Medicine, Royal Oak, MI, USA
| | - Charlotte Wu
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Heather N Di Carlo
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - John P Gearhart
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| | - Brian R Matlaga
- Department of Urology, The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 600 N. Wolfe St., Marburg 134, Baltimore, MD, 21287, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alghamdi YA, Morya RE, Bahathiq DM, Bokhari AF, Alaboud AK, Abdulhamid AS, Ghaddaf AA, Jamjoom M. Comparison of acetaminophen, ketamine, or ketorolac versus morphine in the treatment of acute renal colic: A network meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med 2023; 73:187-196. [PMID: 37679264 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2023.08.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 08/14/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal colic is a disease in which a calculus obstructs the urinary tract, resulting in severe pain do ureteric peristaltic movements. Other symptoms, such as hematuria, nausea, and vomiting, may accompany the pain. This network meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of different analgesic agents for the treatment of acute renal colic. METHODS Medline, Embase, and CENTRAL databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared different analgesic agents, either alone or in combination were included. For the management of acute renal colic, analgesic agents were selected based on the current standard medical practice. The medications included intravenous acetaminophen, ketamine, ketorolac, and morphine. This study sought to evaluate the pain score on the visual analog scale (VAS) at 15, 30, and 60 min; adverse events; and the utilization of rescue therapy. The efficacy of different analgesic agents was explored through a frequentist network meta-analysis using the Netmeta statistical package in R software. All treatments were ranked using the Netrank function, yielding P-scores. RESULTS Twelve RCTs were deemed eligible. As per the P-scores, acetaminophen was the most effective in reducing pain score at 15 min (P-score = 0.74). Ketorolac was the most effective in reducing the pain score at 30 and 60 min (P-score = 0.84) (P-score = 0.99), whereas morphine was the least effective (P-score = 0.07). Moreover, morphine was correlated with the highest odds of adverse events after treatment (P-score = 0.89). Morphine was the most frequently required rescue therapy in cases of suboptimal pain relief (P-score = 0.96). CONCLUSION This network meta-analysis demonstrated that ketorolac and acetaminophen were the most effective analgesic agents according to the pain score. Morphine showed the highest adverse event profile and the highest rate at which rescue therapy was required for the management of acute renal colic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasir A Alghamdi
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Roaa E Morya
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dena M Bahathiq
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah F Bokhari
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad K Alaboud
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed S Abdulhamid
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah A Ghaddaf
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maan Jamjoom
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia; Department of Emergency Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Ministry of National Guard-Health Affairs, Jeddah 21423, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Recent trends in the prescription of opioids in the emergency department in patients with urolithiasis. Int Urol Nephrol 2023; 55:1109-1116. [PMID: 36913168 DOI: 10.1007/s11255-023-03545-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2023] [Accepted: 02/28/2023] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Pain management is central in the treatment of urolithiasis. We aimed to estimate the impact of the 2017 Department of Health and Human Services declaration of an opioid crisis on prescribing patterns of opioids and NSAIDs in emergency department visits for urolithiasis. METHODS The National Health Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NHAMCS) was queried for emergency department visits of adults with a diagnosis of urolithiasis. The association between urolithiasis and narcotic and NSAIDs prescription patterns was evaluated and compared at pre-declaration (2014-2016) to post-declaration (2017-2018) periods. RESULTS Opioids were prescribed in about 211 million (41.1%) out of 513 million emergency department visits, over a 5-year period. Diagnosis of urolithiasis accounted for 1.9% of the visits (6.0 million). The use of opioids was higher in urolithiasis (82.7%) compared to non-urolithiasis diagnosis (40.3%), as well as the use of multiple opioids per visit (p < 0.01 for all). There was an overall decrease in opioid prescriptions in the post-declaration period, - 4.3% for urolithiasis (p = 0.254) and - 5.6% for non-urolithiasis visits (p < 0.05). A decrease in the use of hydromorphone (- 47.5%. p < 0.001), an increase in the use of morphine (+ 59.7% p = 0.006), and an increase of 'other' opioids (+ 98.8%, p < 0.041), were observed. Opioids combined with NSAIDs comprised 72.6% of the opioid prescriptions and 62.3% of all analgesic prescriptions in visits with urolithiasis diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS The use of opioids when managing urolithiasis decreased 4.3% after the crisis declaration; however, statistically are not different from pre-declaration numbers. Most often, opioids were prescribed with NSAIDs in urolithiasis patients.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cunningham D, Anastasio AT, Cochrane NH, Ryan SP, Bolognesi M, Seyler TM. Opioid Legislation Decreases Opioid Prescribing in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2022; 46:142-150. [PMID: 36508483 DOI: 10.3928/01477447-20221207-05] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of opioid-limiting legislation on perioperative opioid prescriptions in total knee arthroplasty. The hypothesis was that opioid legislation has reduced opioid prescription filling above levels anticipated by national trends. This study retrospectively evaluated opioid prescription filling for all patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty in a commercially available insurance database between 2010 and 2018 (n=1,068,764). Initial discharge and 90-day cumulative oxycodone 5-mg equivalents filled were tabulated. Opioid prescription filling was evaluated over time and between states with and without opioid-limiting legislation using analysis of variance and multivariable linear and logistic regression. States with and without opioid legislation had significant reductions in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume (all P<.001). However, the magnitude of this reduction was larger in states with opioid legislation. Legislation targeting duration and volume had the largest impact on initial post-act opioid prescription filling volume compared with states without legislation in an estimated "pre-act" time frame. Legislation targeting duration and volume and no specific target had the largest impact on cumulative post-act opioid prescription filling volume. States without legislation still had large, significant reductions in filling volume, but the magnitude was not as great as in states with opioid legislation. States with and without opioid legislation had significant decreases in initial and cumulative opioid prescription filling volume. However, the magnitude of reduction was larger in states that enacted legislation. Younger age, pre-operative opioid use, and higher comorbidity burden were associated with greater opioid use postoperatively. [Orthopedics. 202x;4x(x):xx-xx.].
Collapse
|
6
|
Daoust R, Paquet J, Marquis M, Chauny JM, Williamson D, Huard V, Arbour C, Émond M, Cournoyer A. Evaluation of Interventions to Reduce Opioid Prescribing for Patients Discharged From the Emergency Department: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2143425. [PMID: 35024834 PMCID: PMC8759006 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.43425] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Limiting opioid overprescribing in the emergency department (ED) may be associated with decreases in diversion and misuse. Objective To review and analyze interventions designed to reduce the rate of opioid prescriptions or the quantity prescribed for pain in adults discharged from the ED. Data Sources MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO, and Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials databases and the gray literature were searched from inception to May 15, 2020, with an updated search performed March 6, 2021. Study Selection Intervention studies aimed at reducing opioid prescribing at ED discharge were first screened using titles and abstracts. The full text of the remaining citations was then evaluated against inclusion and exclusion criteria by 2 independent reviewers. Data Extraction and Synthesis Data were extracted independently by 2 reviewers who also assessed the risk of bias. Authors were contacted for missing data. The main meta-analysis was accompanied by intervention category subgroup analyses. All meta-analyses used random-effects models, and heterogeneity was quantified using I2 values. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was the variation in opioid prescription rate and/or prescribed quantity associated with the interventions. Effect sizes were computed separately for interrupted time series (ITS) studies. Results Sixty-three unique studies were included in the review, and 45 studies had sufficient data to be included in the meta-analysis. A statistically significant reduction in the opioid prescription rate was observed for both ITS (6-month step change, -22.61%; 95% CI, -30.70% to -14.52%) and other (odds ratio, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.45-0.70) study designs. No statistically significant reduction in prescribed opioid quantities was observed for ITS studies (6-month step change, -8.64%; 95% CI, -17.48% to 0.20%), but a small, statistically significant reduction was observed for other study designs (standardized mean difference, -0.30; 95% CI, -0.51 to -0.09). For ITS studies, education, policies, and guideline interventions (6-month step change, -33.31%; 95% CI, -39.67% to -26.94%) were better at reducing the opioid prescription rate compared with prescription drug monitoring programs and laws (6-month step change, -11.18%; 95% CI, -22.34% to -0.03%). Most intervention categories did not reduce prescribed opioid quantities. Insufficient data were available on patient-centered outcomes such as pain relief or patients' satisfaction. Conclusions and Relevance This systematic review and meta-analysis found that most interventions reduced the opioid prescription rate but not the prescribed opioid quantity for ED-discharged patients. More studies on patient-centered outcomes and using novel approaches to reduce the opioid quantity per prescription are needed. Trial Registration PROSPERO Identifier: CRD42020187251.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Raoul Daoust
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d’Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean Paquet
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Martin Marquis
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Jean-Marc Chauny
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d’Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - David Williamson
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Faculté de Pharmacie, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Vérilibe Huard
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d’Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Caroline Arbour
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Faculté des Sciences Infirmières, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Marcel Émond
- Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d’Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université Laval, Québec, Québec, Canada
| | - Alexis Cournoyer
- Study Center in Emergency Medicine, Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, Le Centre Intégré Universitaire de Santé et de Services Sociaux (CIUSSS) du Nord-de-l’Île de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Département de Médecine Familiale et de Médecine d’Urgence, Faculté de Médecine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de Recherche de l’Hôpital du Sacré-Coeur de Montréal, CIUSSS du Nord de-l’Île-de-Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Lee JY, Andonian S, Bhojani N, Bjazevic J, Chew BH, De S, Elmansy H, Lantz-Powers AG, Pace KT, Schuler TD, Singal RK, Wang P, Ordon M. Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Abridged version. Can Urol Assoc J 2021; 15:383-393. [PMID: 34847343 PMCID: PMC8631858 DOI: 10.5489/cuaj.7652] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Y. Lee
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Sero Andonian
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Naeem Bhojani
- Department of Urology, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Jennifer Bjazevic
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Ben H. Chew
- Department of Urologic Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shubha De
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Hazem Elmansy
- Urology, Northern Ontario School of Medicine, Thunder Bay, ON, Canada
| | | | - Kenneth T. Pace
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Trevor D. Schuler
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Rajiv K. Singal
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Peter Wang
- London Health Sciences Centre, Western University, London, ON, Canada
| | - Michael Ordon
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Opioid Analgesics and Persistent Pain After an Acute Pain Emergency Department Visit: Evidence from a Cohort of Suspected Urolithiasis Patients. J Emerg Med 2021; 61:637-648. [PMID: 34690022 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2021] [Revised: 07/19/2021] [Accepted: 09/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Severe acute pain is still commonly treated with opioid analgesics in the United States, but this practice could prolong the duration of pain. OBJECTIVES Estimate the risk of experiencing persistent pain after opioid analgesic use after emergency department (ED) discharge among patients with suspected urolithiasis. METHODS We analyzed data collected for a longitudinal, multicenter clinical trial of ED patients with suspected urolithiasis. We constructed multilevel models to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) of reporting pain at 3, 7, 30, or 90 days after ED discharge, using multiple imputation to account for missing outcome data. We controlled for clinical, demographic, and institutional factors and used weighting to account for the propensity to be prescribed an opioid analgesic at ED discharge. RESULTS Among 2413 adult ED patients with suspected urolithiasis, 62% reported persistent pain 3 days after discharge. Participants prescribed an opioid analgesic at discharge were OR 2.51 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.82-3.46) more likely to report persistent pain than those without a prescription. Those who reported using opioid analgesics 3 days after discharge were OR 2.24 (95% CI 1.77-2.84) more likely to report pain at day 7 than those not using opioid analgesics at day 3, and those using opioid analgesics at day 30 had OR 3.25 (95% CI 1.96-5.40) greater odds of pain at day 90. CONCLUSIONS Opioid analgesic prescription doubled the odds of persistent pain among ED patients with suspected urolithiasis. Limiting opioid analgesic prescribing at ED discharge for these patients might prevent persistent pain in addition to limiting access to these medications.
Collapse
|
9
|
Meltzer AC, Wolfson AB, Mufarrij P, MacPherson C, Montano N, Kirkali Z, Burrows PK, Jackman SV. Analgesic and Opioid Use for Patients Discharged from the Emergency Department with Ureteral Stones. J Endourol 2021; 35:1067-1071. [PMID: 33213185 DOI: 10.1089/end.2020.0835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective: The aim of this study was to describe and characterize the analgesic and opioid use for patients discharged from the emergency department (ED) with renal colic due to ureteral stone. Methods: This is a secondary analysis of a multicenter prospective trial of ED patients diagnosed by CT scan as having a symptomatic ureteral stone <9 mm in diameter. Participants were contacted after randomization on days 2, 7, 15, 20, and 29 and reported opioid and nonopioid analgesic use and stone passage. CT scan was repeated on day 29 to 36 to confirm passage. Results: Of 403 participants, 314 (77.9%) took an analgesic after discharge and 199 (49.4%) took opioids. Opioids were more commonly used by younger patients (p = 0.04) and those with a family history of stones (p = 0.003). Stone size and tamsulosin use were not associated with analgesic utilization. Shorter time to passage and more distal stone location were associated with less analgesic and opioid use. For those who did not expel a stone, 55.0% took opioids at any time, and for those who did expel a stone, 31.9% took opioids before the stone was expelled and 15.7% took opioids at any time after the stone was expelled. Conclusions: Factors associated with increased use of analgesics in patients discharged from the ED include a longer time to stone passage, no spontaneous passage, and proximal position of the stone in the ureter. Some patients continued to use analgesics after the stone had passed, but most stopped using analgesics by day 29. The study has been registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov (NCT00382265).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Meltzer
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Allan B Wolfson
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Patrick Mufarrij
- Department of Urology, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Cora MacPherson
- The George Washington University Biostatistics Center, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Nataly Montano
- Department of Emergency Medicine, George Washington University School of Medicine & Health Sciences, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Ziya Kirkali
- National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - Stephen V Jackman
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kadioglu E, Kaya M, Yildirim H. Transversus abdominis plane block: A new method in renal colic pain management. Am J Emerg Med 2020; 38:2116-2118. [PMID: 33071076 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.07.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2020] [Revised: 07/02/2020] [Accepted: 07/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent decades, regional plane blocks via ultrasonography have become very popular in regional anesthesia and are more commonly used in pain management. The transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a procedure where local anesthetics are applied to block the anterior divisions of the tenth thoracic intercostal through the first lumbar nerves (T10-L1) into the anatomic space formed amidst the internal oblique and transversus abdominis muscles located in the antero-lateral part of the abdomen wall. The most important advantage of this block method is that ultrasonographic identification is easier and its complications are fewer compared with central neuroaxial or paravertebral blocks. Here, we describe three cases where pain management in renal colic was treated with the TAP block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emine Kadioglu
- University of Kutahya Health Sciences, Medical Scholl, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kutahya, Turkey.
| | - Murtaza Kaya
- University of Kutahya Health Sciences, Medical Scholl, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kutahya, Turkey.
| | - Harun Yildirim
- University of Kutahya Health Sciences, Medical Scholl, Department of Emergency Medicine, Kutahya, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|