The hypoxia-age-shock index at triage to predict the outcomes of Covid-19 patients

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Door-to-Device Time Segments and Clinical Outcomes for STEMI Patients in Northern Taiwan

Background

Prompt primary percutaneous coronary intervention (pPCI) is crucial for the prognosis and reduction of myocardial damage in ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients. The Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic had multifaceted impacts on healthcare. This study assessed the effects of the pandemic on pPCI procedures and clinical outcomes in emergency STEMI patients.

Methods

This retrospective, single-center study analyzed STEMI patients who underwent pPCI from February 2019 to January 2022. The COVID-19 pandemic was categorized into three periods: pre-COVID-19 (Period-I), early-pandemic (Period-II), and epidemic (Period-III). The impacts on Door-to-Device time, its segments, and clinical outcomes were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences.

Results

A total of 404 STEMI patients were included, with a reduced number in Period-III. Compared to Period-I, the time intervals of Door-to-electrocardiogram (ECG), ECG-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Activation (CCLA), and CCLA-to-Cardiac Catheterization Laboratory Door in Period III were extended by 0.62 minutes (p = 0.006), 3.30 minutes (p = 0.009), and 9.65 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. In contrast, the Angio-to-Device time was shorter in Period- II and III by 2.60 and 4.08 minutes (p < 0.001), respectively. Overall Door-to-Device time increased by 10.06 minutes (p < 0.001) in Period-III but decreased by 3.67 minutes in Period-II (p = 0.017). The odds of achieving a Door-to-Device time ≤ 90 minutes decreased by 70% in Period-III (p = 0.002). Clinical outcomes, including intensive care unit stay, hospital stay, in-hospital mortality, and 30-day readmission rate, remained stable across periods.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic had various effects on different segments of the Door-to-Device procedure, and they were influenced by the complex interplay between infection control measures and clinical workflow. The stability of clinical outcomes reflects the resilience and effective adaptations of the healthcare system during the pandemic.

The FIB-4 scores in the emergency department to predict the outcomes of COVID-19 patients in taiwan

Objective

We aimed to determine the reliability of using the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index in COVID-19 patients without underlying liver illness.

Method

We employed multivariate logistic regression to identify variables that exhibited statistically significant influence on the ultimate outcome. Multilayer perceptron analysis was employed to develop a prediction model for the FIB-4 index concerning ICU admission and intubation rates. However, the scarcity of cases rendered the assessment of the mortality rate unfeasible. We plotted ROC curves to analyze the predictive strength of the FIB-4 index across various age groups.

Result

In univariate logistic regression, only the FIB-4 index and respiratory rate demonstrated statistical significance on all poor outcomes. The FIB-4 index for mortality prediction had an ROC and AUC of 0.863 (95% CI: 0.781-0.9444). It demonstrates predictive power across age groups, particularly for age ≥65 (AUC: 0.812, 95% CI: 0.6571-0.9673) and age <65 (AUC: 0.878, 95% CI: 0.8012-0.9558). Its sensitivity for intubation and ICU admission prediction is suboptimal.

Conclusion

FIB-4 index had promising power in prediction of mortality rate in all age groups.

The new combination of oxygen saturation with age shock index predicts the outcome of COVID-19 pneumonia

Introduction

Emergency departments around the world have been struggling to deal with patients with COVID-19 and presumed COVID-19. Triaging patients who need further medical support is the key matter to emergency physicians as the delay of proper treatment may worsen the results. The aim of this study was to validate the ability of age shock index and hypoxia-age-shock index at the time of presentation to the emergency department to predict case fatality in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia.

Methods

We only included patients who had COVID-19-associated pneumonia who needed in-hospital treatment. The vital signs and oxygen saturation used in the study were collected, especially from the triage sector, before patients were given supplemental oxygen.

Results

A total of 241 patients enrolled in the study. The case fatality rate was 27%. The median age of the study samples was 78 (66-86) years with 133 male and 108 female patients. Hypoxia-age-shock index showed the best performance in analysis (odds ratio 15.1, 95% confidence interval: 5.1-44.4; adjusted odds ratio 8.6, 95% confidence interval: 2.8-26.8).

Conclusion

The hypoxia-age-shock index was a strong predictor for in-hospital mortality of COVID-19 pneumonia. Furthermore, when it was compared with age shock index, hypoxia-age-shock index showed better performance in predicting fatality of the disease.

Shock index in the emergency department as a predictor for mortality in COVID-19 patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

The shock index (SI) ratio serves as a straightforward predictor to identify patients who are either at risk of or experiencing shock. COVID-19 patients with shock face increased mortality risk and reduced chances of recovery. This review aims to determine the role of SI in the emergency department (ED) to predict COVID-19 patient outcomes.

Methods

The systematic search was conducted in PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and ScienceDirect on June 16, 2023. We included observational studies evaluating SI in ED and COVID-19 patient outcomes. Random-effect meta-analysis was done to generate odds ratios of SI as the predictor of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and mortality. The sensitivity and specificity of SI in predicting these outcomes were also pooled, and a summary receiver operating characteristics (sROC) curve was generated.

Results

A total of eight studies involving 4557 participants were included in the pooled analysis. High SI was found to be associated with an increased risk of ICU admission (OR 5.81 [95%CI: 1.18-28.58], p = 0.03). Regarding mortality, high SI was linked to higher rates of in-hospital (OR 7.45 [95%CI: 2.44-22.74], p = 0.0004), within 30-day (OR 7.34 [95%CI: 5.27-10.21], p < 0.00001), and overall (OR 7.52 [95%CI: 3.72-15.19], p < 0.00001) mortality. The sensitivity and specificity of SI for predicting ICU admission were 76.2% [95%CI: 54.6%-89.5%] and 64.3% [95%CI: 19.6%-93.0%], respectively. In terms of overall mortality, the sensitivity and specificity were 54.0% (95%CI: 34.3%-72.6%) and 85.9% (95%CI: 75.8%-92.3%), respectively, with only subtle changes for in-hospital and within 30-day mortality. Adjustment of SI cut-off to >0.7 yielded improved sensitivity (95%CI: 78.0% [59.7%-89.4%]) and specificity (95%CI: 76.8% [41.7%-93.9%]) in predicting overall mortality.

Conclusion

SI in emergency room may be a simple and useful triage instrument for predicting ICU admission and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Future well-conducted studies are still needed to corroborate the findings of this study.