Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement using 4 different instruments following penetrating keratoplasty

Investigation of microstructural failure in the human cornea through fracture tests

Fracture toughness of the human cornea is one of the critical parameters in suture-involved corneal surgeries and the development of bioengineered mimetics of the human cornea. The present article systematically studied the fracture characteristics of the human cornea to evaluate its resistance to tear in the opening (Mode-I) and trouser tear mode (Mode-III). Tear experiments reveal the dependency of the fracture behavior on the notch size and its location created in the corneal specimens. The findings indicate lamellar tear and collagen fiber pull-out as a failure mechanism in trouser tear and opening mode tests, respectively. Experimental results have shown a localized variation of tear behavior in trouser tear mode and indicated an increasing resistance to tear from the corneal center to the periphery. This article demonstrated the complications of evaluating fracture toughness in opening mode and showed that the limbus was weaker than the cornea and sclera against tearing. The overall outcomes of the present study help in designing experiments to understand the toughness of the diseased tissues, understanding the effect of the suturing location and donor placement, and creating numerical models to study parameters affecting corneal replacement surgery.

International comparisons of intraocular pressures, as measured by Tono-Pen and Goldmann applanation tonometry, in healthy adults: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Investigate intraocular pressure (IOP), as measured by Tono-Pen (TP) and Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT), in healthy adults. Provide an updated synthesis of multinational, primary studies, reported during the 10-year period 2011 to 2021 and offer an evidence-based benchmark, against which IOP can be evaluated across subject variables and pathologies. Three primary research questions are investigated: Is there a statistically significant difference between IOP measured by TP and GAT? If yes, is the difference clinically significant? Is measurement of IOP affected by the country or setting location, in which the measurements are made?

METHODS

An aggregate meta-analysis was conducted on 22 primary studies, from 15 different countries. IOP measurements were made from each healthy adult subject, with both the TP and GAT. Primary studies were identified and data extracted according to recommended preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis protocol guidelines. Meta-analysis summary results are reported as the point estimate of the raw mean difference of IOP.

RESULTS

Meta-analysis reveals a statistically significant difference in raw mean differences in IOP, when measured by TP and GAT, in the healthy adult population. Tono-Pen IOP measurements are higher than GAT IOP measurements. The point estimate for the summary effect size = -0.73 mm Hg, P = .03. The prediction interval for the true effect size, in 95% of all comparable populations, is -4.03 to 2.58 mm Hg. There is no clinically significance difference in IOP when measured by TP and GAT. Meta-regression analysis reveals statistically significant differences in measurement of IOP by countries, R2 analog = 0.75, P = .001. There is no statistically significant difference in measurement of IOP as a function of measurement location setting, R2 analog = -0.17, P = .65.

CONCLUSIONS

IOP measured by TP are marginally higher compared to GAT, in the healthy adult population. However, from a clinical practice perspective, TP and GAT produce similar IOP measurements. There is evidence of significant variabilities in IOP measurements as a function of country. IOP measurements collected in a research laboratory setting are similar to IOP collected in a clinical setting. Results have implications for the primary care physician requiring a portable, inexpensive, reliable, and easily administered instrument to assess IOP.

Intraocular Pressure Measurement after Penetrating Keratoplasty

Assessing the intraocular pressure is a difficult but crucial task in the follow-up of patients that have undergone penetrating keratoplasty. Early recognition of elevated intraocular pressure and/or glaucoma and establishment of the appropriate treatment is essential to ensure the best possible visual outcome for patients dealing with this feared complication. Although Goldmann applanation tonometry is still the gold standard for measuring the intraocular pressure, its limitations in postkeratoplasty eyes, due to postoperative modified corneal morphology, have led to the search for more suitable alternatives. This review is the result of a comprehensive literature search in the MEDLINE database that aims to present glaucoma in the context of perforating keratoplasty, the corneal properties with impact on ocular pressure measurement, and the results achieved with the most important tonometers that have been studied in this pathology. Goldmann applanation tonometry remains the reference for intraocular pressure assessment even in corneas after penetrating keratoplasty. However, some promising alternatives have emerged, the most important of which are the Pascal dynamic contour tonometry, the Tono-Pen XL, the ocular response analyzer, and the iCare. All have advantages and disadvantages but have proved to be appropriate alternatives, especially in cases in which Goldmann applanation tonometry cannot be used.

Effectiveness of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, the Ocular Response Analyzer and the Corvis ST in Measuring Intraocular Pressure following FS-LASIK

Purpose: To test the performance of the four tonometers in providing IOP measurements that were free of the effects of corneal biomechanics changes caused by refractive surgery.Methods: Four tonometers were employed to provide IOP measurements for 65 participants who accepted Femtosecond laser-assisted LASIK (FS-LASIK). The measurements included GAT-IOP by the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer, DCT-IOP by the Dynamic Contour Tonometer, Goldmann-correlated IOP (ORA-IOPg) and corneal-compensated IOP (ORA-IOPcc) by the Ocular Response Analyzer, and uncorrected IOP (CVS-IOP) and biomechanically corrected IOP (CVS-bIOP) by the Corvis ST. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the association of the differences in IOP caused by FS-LASIK with central corneal thickness (CCT), mean corneal curvature (Km), age, refractive error correction (REC), optical zone diameter (OZD), ablation zone diameter (AZD), residual stromal bed thickness (RSB) and RSB ratio (RSB/CCT). Multiple linear regression models were constructed to explore factors influencing IOP changes.Results: All four tonometers exhibited significant differences between IOP measurements taken pre and post-surgery except for CVS-bIOP in the low to moderate myopia group (t = 1.602, p = .12). CVS-bIOP, followed by DCT-IOP, provided the best agreement between pre and post-FS-LASIK measurements with the lowest differences in IOP and the narrowest limits of agreement. The pre-post IOP differences were also significantly associated with the reduction in CCT in only GAT-IOP, ORA-IOPg, and CVS-IOP. CVS-bIOP and ORA-IOPcc were the only measurements that were not correlated with CCT, Km or age both before and after FS-LASIK.Conclusions: The biomechanically corrected bIOP from the Corvis ST provided post-FS-LASIK measurements that were in closest agreement with those obtained before surgery. In comparison, GAT-IOP, ORA-IOPg, ORA-IOPcc, and CVS-IOP appeared to be more influenced by the changes in corneal biomechanics caused by FS-LASIK.

Corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure assessment after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, long term results

Background

To evaluate corneal biomechanical properties by the Ocular Response Analyzer (ORA) in non keratoconic patients underwent penetrating keratoplasty (PK).

Methods

Corneal hysteresis (CH), corneal resistance factor (CRF), Goldmann- correlated intraocular pressure (IOPg), cornea-compensated IOP (IOPcc) using the ORA, and central graft thickness (CGT) were measured in 30 eyes at least two years after penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic indications. IOP using the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) was also obtained after compensation for graft thickness and astigmatism.

Results

The mean age of patients was 33.1 ± 10.13 years; indications for PK were herpetic corneal scar (53.3%), corneal stromal dystrophy (23.3%), traumatic corneal opacity (10%), chemical corneal opacity (6.7%), and Fuchs endothelial dystrophy (6.7%). Mean CH and CRF were 8.52 ± 1.81 mmHg, and 8.56 ± 1.59 mmHg, respectively. Mean CGT was 532.43 ± 30 μm. Mean IOP GAT, IOPg, and IOPcc were 11.88 ± 3.66, 14.64 ± 4.08, and 17.27 ± 4.60 mmHg, respectively (P < 0.001). No significant association was found between CGT and IOP readings obtained using either the ORA or GAT. There were significant negative association between CH with both IOP GAT and IOPcc, while CRF had significant positive association with IOPg.

Conclusion

After penetrating keratoplasty for non keratoconic patients, graft biomechanics does not return to average values even 2 years after the operation; moreover, intraocular pressure measurement with ORA gives higher values than thickness compensated GAT.

Glaucoma Mini-Shunt Implantation After Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To report the outcomes of patients who underwent miniature glaucoma shunt implantation after secondary glaucoma due to keratoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Prospective study of consecutive clinical cases who underwent mini-glaucoma shunt implantation following keratoplasty. In brief, a fornix-based conjunctival flap was performed, approximately 50% thickness scleral flap. Mitomycin C 0.025% placed under Tenon's capsule. A 25-G needle created entry for mini-shunt. Ex-PRESS model P-50 was inserted. Scleral flap and conjunctiva were closed with 10-0 Nylon. STATA 8.0 and SPSS software were used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Seventeen eyes of 17 patients with a mean age of 39.70 years (SD=18.33, range: 18 to 76). A total of 64.70% were male and 35.30% female. Eleven cases after penetrating keratoplasty, 3 cases after triple procedure, 2 after deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty, and 1 following endothelial keratoplasty. Most of the indications for keratoplasty were keratoconus in 9 cases (52.94%), 4 due to endothelial failure (23.52%), 3 cases of herpetic keratitis (17.64%), and 1 case of post-LASIK ectasia (5.88%). Mean preoperative intraocular pressure was 35.94 mm Hg with maximal medical therapy (SD=9.65, range: 18 to 55). Decreasing intraocular pressure to 12.76 mm Hg postoperatively (SD=2.51, range 10 to 18) (P=0.001). Mean follow-up after mini-glaucoma shunt implantation was 23.76 months (SD=8.73, range: 10 to 35 mo). Preoperative mean uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) was 1.31±0.63 (20/408 Snellen) and postoperative mean UDVA was 0.85±0.40 (20/141 Snellen) (P=0.001). Preoperative mean corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) was 0.83±0.76 (20/135 Snellen) and postoperative mean CDVA was 0.56±0.44 (20/72 Snellen) (P=0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Ex-PRESS miniature glaucoma shunt could be an alternative treatment in postkeratoplasty glaucoma resistant to medical treatment. This technique may be helpful, in trying to avoid corneal damage produced by conventional glaucoma procedures.

Tonometry after Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments for Keratoconus

SIGNIFICANCE

Reliable intraocular pressure (IOP) measurement after intrastromal corneal ring segments (ICRS) implantation is a challenge because of altered corneal morphology. In this study, IOP is measured with four tonometers, compared with Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) values and the influence of corneal parameters is established.

PURPOSE

This study compares IOP measurements made using different tonometers in patients implanted with ICRS and assesses the effects of central corneal thickness (CCT), corneal curvature, and corneal astigmatism on the IOP measurements obtained.

METHODS

In this cross-sectional study, IOP was measured using three different tonometers in 91 eyes of 91 patients with corneal ectasia implanted at least 6 months previously with ICRS. The tonometers tested were the TonoPen XL, Pascal dynamic contour tonometer (DCT), and iCare Pro rebound tonometer. GAT measurements were used as reference. Agreement among the IOPs provided by the different tonometers and the influence of corneal variables on the IOP measurements obtained were assessed using the Bland-Altman method, intraclass correlation coefficients, and multiple linear regression analysis.

RESULTS

Mean IOP differences were GAT versus TonoPen XL -0.8 ± 3.07 mm Hg, GAT versus DCT -1.0 ± 3.26 mm Hg, and GAT versus iCare Pro 0.8 ± 2.92 mm Hg. Our multiple linear regression analysis identified CCT as a confounding factor affecting all the tonometer readings but DCT-IOP.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients fitted with ICRS, IOP measurements made using the iCare Pro and TonoPen XL showed most agreement with GAT. Intraocular pressure measurements made by DCT were unaffected by corneal topographic factors though this procedure slightly overestimated GAT readings.

Examiner Handedness and the Effects on Intraocular Pressure Readings Using the Tono-Pen XL

PURPOSE

To assess the effect of examiner handedness on intraocular pressure (IOP) readings using the Tono-Pen XL in eyes without corneal pathology or previous ocular surgeries.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients 18 years of age or older were included in this prospective study. Participants who had a history of corneal conditions or other characteristics that would prevent reliable IOP measurements were excluded. Five experienced examiners, 2 right-hand dominant and 3 left-hand dominant, took bilateral IOP measurements with a Tono-Pen XL. Each participant was tested by 2 examiners, 1 left-handed and 1 right-handed, in a random order. The time between each examiner's measurements was 15 minutes. A paired t test was used to compare IOP differences between "near" (right eye for right-hand or left eye for left-hand dominant examiner) and "far" (right eye by left-hand or left eye by right-hand dominant examiner) measurements for each eye.

RESULTS

Forty-six participants with a mean age of 33.8 years (±12.8) were enrolled. No significant difference in IOP between near and far eyes was found (IOP difference=IOPfar-IOPnear=-0.11 [±2.74] mm Hg; P=0.70). Right-hand dominant examiners consistently measured significantly higher IOP (0.83±2.03 mm Hg; P=0.008) compared with left-hand dominant examiners, regardless of the relative position of the eye with respect to the examiner.

CONCLUSIONS

The results suggest that IOP readings are not influenced by the positioning of the patient relative to the dominant hand of the examiner.

Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE)

Background

Corneal biomechanical properties are always compromised after corneal refractive surgeries thus leading to underestimated intraocular pressure (IOP) that complicates the management of IOP. We investigated the changes in postoperative baseline of IOP values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).

Methods

Twenty-two eyes (−6.76 ± 1.39D) of 22 moderate and high myopes, (28.36 ± 7.14 years, 12 male and 10 female) were involved in this prospective study. IOP values were measured using a non-contact tomometer (NCT-IOP), an ocular response analyzer (corneal-compensated IOP, IOPcc and Goldmann-correlated IOP, IOPg) and a Corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST-IOP) preoperatively, at 20 min and 24 h, postoperatively. Repeated measures analysis of variance (RM-ANOVA), Pearson’s correlation analysis and multiple linear regression models (stepwise) were performed. Cut-off P values were 0.05.

Results

Except for IOPcc, NCT-IOP, IOPg, and CST-IOP values significantly decreased after SMILE procedure (All P values <0.05). ΔCCT, as well as ΔMRSE and ΔKm, did not significantly correlated with ΔNCT-IOP, ΔIOPcc, ΔIOPg or ΔCST-IOP, (all P values >0.05). Multiple linear regression models (stepwise) showed that the practical post-operative IOP value was the main predictor of the theoretical post-operative NCT-IOP, IOPcc and IOPg values (all P values <0.001). The postoperative applanation time 1 (AT1) value (B = 8.079, t = 4.866, P < 0.001), preoperative central corneal thickness (CCT) value (B = 0.035, t = 2.732, P = 0.014) and postoperative peak distance (PD) value (B = 0.515, t = 2.176, P = 0.043) were the main predictors of the theoretical post-operative CST-IOP value.

Conclusions

IOP values are underestimated when assessed after SMILE by using NCT-IOP, IOPg and CST-IOP. The practical postoperative IOPcc value and theoretical post-operative CST-IOP value may be more preferable for IOP assessment in the early phase after SMILE.

Trial registration

Current Controlled Trials ChiCTRONRC13003114. Retrospectively registered 17 March 2013

Measuring Intraocular Pressure in Patients With Keratoconus With and Without Intrastromal Corneal Ring Segments

PURPOSE

To compare intraocular pressure (IOP) measurements made using 5 tonometers in keratoconic eyes with and without intrastromal corneal ring segments.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

This was an observational case series study. A total of 147 eyes of 147 patients with keratoconus, 74 of which had undergone corneal ring segment placement, were prospectively evaluated. IOP was measured using the tonometers Tonopen XL, Pascal dynamic contour tonometer, iCare Pro, ocular response analyzer (ORA), and Goldmann applanation (GAT) in random order. The Bland-Altman method was used to examine interinstrument agreement. Effects on readings of central corneal thickness, corneal curvature, and corneal astigmatism were assessed by multivariate regression analysis.

RESULTS

Smallest mean IOP differences with GAT measurements in eyes without and with ring segments, respectively, were detected for iCare Pro [0.2 (2.9) mm Hg and 0.4 (3.0) mm Hg, P=0.914] and greatest differences for ORA Goldmann-correlated IOP [5.8 (3.3) mm Hg and 6.0 (3.1) mm Hg, P=0.363]. Best agreement with GAT was shown by iCare Pro (ICC=0.829; 95% CI, 0.721-0.896) and worse agreement by ORA corneal-compensated IOP (ICC=-0.145; 95% CI, -0.826 to 0.283). All but the dynamic contour tonometer readings were influenced by central corneal thickness, yet these measurements were affected by the presence of ring segments (P=0.017) and corneal astigmatism (P=0.030). Corneal curvature only affected ORA Goldmann-correlated IOP (P=0.029).

CONCLUSIONS

All 5 tonometers provided reliable IOP readings in the keratoconic eyes regardless of the presence of corneal ring segments. iCare Pro readings were most consistent with GAT, whereas ORA readings were least consistent with this reference standard.

De novo ocular hypertension after Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty: comparative 3-year incidence, risk factors, and outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare the 3-year incidence of de novo ocular hypertension (OHT) after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) and penetrating keratoplasty (PK). For DSAEK, to evaluate predictors for OHT and 2-year outcomes after OHT development.

METHODS

This was a review of the prospective Singapore Corneal Transplant Study at a single tertiary referral center. Consecutive DSAEKs and PKs for Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (FED) and pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (PBK) in eyes without pre-existing glaucoma were analyzed. OHT incidence after DSAEK and PK were compared using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis, and OHT risk factors identified using Cox proportional regression. OHT was defined: intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥ 24 mmHg or ≥ 10 mmHg from baseline. Secondary outcomes 2 years after OHT development in DSAEK were rates of glaucoma medical therapy failure, IOP success, graft failure and rejection, and best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BSCVA).

RESULTS

There were 108 (96.4%) DSAEKs and 216 (96%) PKs. The 1-, 2- and 3-year de novo OHT incidence was not significantly different between DSAEK (36.1%, 47.2%, 47.2%, respectively) and PK (35.7%, 44.9%, 45.8%, respectively; P = 0.914). OHT incidence did not differ in subgroup analyses of multiple clinical variables (P > 0.1). OHT predictors after DSAEK were: fellow eye glaucoma (hazard ratio [HR] 3.20, P = 0.004), age <60 years (HR 2.41, P = 0.016), concurrent goniosynechiolysis (HR 3.29, P = 0.021), post-graft complications or procedures (HR 2.85, P = 0.006). Two years after OHT onset, 29.7% of DSAEKs failed glaucoma medical therapy requiring trabeculectomy. Complete and qualified IOP success was achieved in 23.5% and 76.5%, respectively. Graft failure developed in 9.8% and graft rejection in 5.9%. At 6 months, 1, and 2 years from OHT onset, 86.3%, 88.3%, and 92.1% achieved BSCVA 20/40, respectively.

CONCLUSION

DSAEK and PK have comparable OHT risks. A significant 30% of DSAEK eyes with OHT require filtration surgery. Effective IOP control and good graft and visual outcomes are achieved with treatment.

Ultrasound biomicroscopic evaluation of anterior segment cysts as a risk factor for ocular hypertension and closure angle glaucoma

AIM

To investigate the relationship between the ultrasound biomicroscopic (UBM) features of anterior-segment cysts (ASCs) and increased intraocular pressure (IOP) as a risk factor for closed-angle glaucoma (CAG).

METHODS

Totally 24 eyes with recently diagnosed ASCs were divided into two groups. First group with ASC and ocular normotension (n=13), second group with ASC and ocular hypertension (n=11). An ophthalmologic examination, including tonometry, slit-lamp biomicroscopy (SLBM), gonioscopy, fundoscopy, pentacam, and UBM, was performed. The features of the ASCs were compared with the IOP.

RESULTS

ASCs were accurately diagnosed and delineated in 24 eyes using UBM. IOP was elevated in those ASCs with a secondary aetiology (P=0.027), iridociliary location (P=0.006), deformed shape (P=0.013), increased size (P=0.001) and elongated pupillary aperture (P=0.009). However, the count (P=0.343) of ASCs, anterior chamber depth (ACD; P=0.22) and axial lenght (AL; P=0.31) were not associated with ocular hypertension. Correlations were found between the IOP and ASC size (r=-0.712; P=0.003), anterior chamber angle (ACA; r=-0.985; P<0.001), angle opening area (AOA; r=0.885; P<0.001), angulation of iris (r=-0.776, P<0.001), and affected iris quadrant (r =-0.655, P=0.002).

CONCLUSION

Ocular hypertension in some eyes with ASC might be associated with various mechanisms, including secondary aetiology, iridociliary location, deformed shape, increased size and elongated pupill, which can be determined by UBM.

Evaluation of a novel Scheimpflug-based non-contact tonometer in healthy subjects and patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the agreement of intraocular pressure (IOP) and central corneal thickness (CCT) measurements obtained with the non-contact tonometer Corvis Scheimpflug Technology (Corvis ST, OCULUS, Wetzlar, Germany) versus Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and ultrasound-based corneal pachymetry (US-CCT).

METHODS

Eye healthy participants, patients with ocular hypertension (OHT) and patients with open-angle glaucoma were included in this prospective study. In each participant, GAT, US-CCT and measurements with Corvis ST were obtained (Corvis-IOP and Corvis-CCT). Accuracy and repeatability were tested by correlation and regression analyses, Bland-Altman plots and assessment of intraclass correlation coefficients.

RESULTS

A consecutive series of 188 right study eyes of 188 participants (142 eyes with glaucoma, 10 eyes with OHT and 36 control eyes) were included in this prospective study. The mean GAT of all included was 14.5±4.8 mm Hg compared with mean Corvis-IOP of 15.4±5.6 mm Hg (Spearman's r=0.75, p<0.0001). Mean US-CCT was 544.56±40.0 µm compared with Corvis-CCT of 545.2±46.5 µm (Pearson's r=0.78, p<0.0001). Bland-Altman plots of all included eyes as well as subgroup analyses revealed good agreement of the IOP and CCT measurement techniques. High intraclass correlation coefficient values in 17 patients with repeated measurements revealed very good repeatability (0.942 and 0.937 for Corvis-IOP and Corvis-CCT, respectively). Corvis-IOP but not GAT showed a trend of dependence on CCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Obtaining CCT and measuring IOP with the Corvis ST reveals very good repeatability and good accuracy in healthy subjects and patients with OHT and glaucoma when compared with standardised US pachymetry or GAT.