Risk factors for eye bank preparation failure of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty tissue

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) Anesthesia Analysis

PURPOSE

Comparison of safety and clinical results of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in topical, peribulbar, or general anesthesia.

METHODS

Retrospective, post hoc matched study of 346 patients who received DMEK surgery with different types of anesthesia (n = 54 topical, n = 137 peribulbar, n = 155 general anesthesia). Outcome criteria were intraoperative complications, endothelial cell count (ECC), central corneal thickness (CCT) and graft rejection rate, rebubbling rate, and visual acuity (VA). Mean follow-up time was 9.4 ± 2.8 months.

RESULTS

The group with topical anesthesia showed intraoperative difficulties such as vitreous pressure (p = 0.01) and difficult graft unfolding (p = 0.4), possibly leading to a higher rebubbling rate (p = 0.03) and therefore graft failure (p = 0.39). However, rebubbling and graft failure occurred more often when the graft preparation was more difficult (p = 0.2, p = 0.13, respectively), which was independent of anesthesia. All three groups achieved comparable functional results regarding VA, ECC, and CCT after 6 months.

CONCLUSION

DMEK under topical anesthesia is feasible and shows comparable final visual outcomes but should be limited to selected cooperative patients and performed by experienced surgeons due to the potential for increased intraoperative challenges.

[Modern techniques and features of selective keratoplasty]

Selective keratoplasty involves replacing the affected layers of the cornea with similar donor tissue. In case of pathological changes in the middle and posterior stroma, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is performed. Chronic corneal edema caused by endothelial dysfunction is an indication for endothelial keratoplasty - Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Compared to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), these operations are characterized by a low risk of damage to intraocular structures and a relatively short rehabilitation period. Complications of selective keratoplasty include the formation of a false chamber between the lamellar graft and the recipient's cornea, ocular hypertension during anterior chamber air tamponade. Persistent epithelial defect can be a sign of primary graft failure in DALK, DSAEK and DMEK. Selective keratoplasty is characterized by a lower incidence of immune rejection than PK. In some cases, DALK can be complicated by corneal changes related to suture fixation of the graft. Long-term postoperative use of topical glucocorticoids can cause ocular hypertension and cataracts.

DMEK surgical training: An instructional guide on various wet-lab methods

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is a partial-thickness corneal transplantation procedure that involves selective transplantation of the Descemet membrane and endothelium. DMEK offers significant advantages over other keratoplasty techniques, such as faster visual rehabilitation, better final visual acuity due to minimal optical interface effects, lower risk of allograft rejection, and less long-term dependence on topical steroids. Despite all its advantages, DMEK has been found to be more challenging than other corneal transplantation techniques, and its steep learning curve appears to be an obstacle to its widespread use and adoption by corneal surgeons worldwide. DMEK surgical training laboratories (wet labs) provide a window of opportunity for surgeons to learn, prepare, manipulate, and deliver these grafts in a risk-free environment. Wet labs are a significant learning tool, especially for those institutions that have limited tissue availability in their local centers. We provide a step-by-step guide for preparing DMEK grafts using different techniques on human and nonhuman models with instructional videos. This article should eventually help the trainees and the educators understand the requirements for performing DMEK and conducting a DMEK wet lab and develop their skills and interests from a wide variety of available techniques.

Gomes J, Güell JL, Casaroli-Marano RP. Corneal Endothelial Cell Cultures from Organotypic Preservation of Older Donor Corneas Are Suitable for Advanced Cell Therapy

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this work was to evaluate the in vitro growth capacity and functionality of human corneal endothelial cells (hCEC) expanded from corneas of elderly (>60 years) donors that were preserved using an organotypic culture method (>15 days, 31°C) and did not meet the clinical criteria for keratoplasty.

METHODS

Cell cultures were obtained from prior descemetorhexis (≥10 mm) and a controlled incubation with collagenase type I followed by recombinant trypsin. Cells were seeded on coated plates (fibronectin-albumin-collagen I) and cultures were expanded using the dual supplemented medium approach (maintenance medium and growth medium), in the presence of a 10 μm Rho-associated protein kinase inhibitor (Y-27632). Cell passages were obtained at culture confluency (∼2 weeks). A quantitative colorimetric WST-1 cell growth assay was performed at different time points of the culture. Morphometric analysis (area assessment and circularity), immunocytochemistry (ZO-1, Na+/K+-ATPase α, Ki67), and transendothelial electrical resistance (TEER) were performed on confluent monolayers.

RESULTS

There was no difference between the cell growth profiles of hCEC cultures obtained from corneas older than 60 years, whether preserved cold or cultivated organotypic corneas. Primary cultures were able to maintain a certain cell circularity index (around 0.8) and morphology (hexagonal) similar to corneal endothelial mosaic. The ZO-1 and Na+/K+-ATPase pump markers were highly positive in confluent cell monolayers at 21 days after isolation (passage 0; P0), but significantly decreased in confluent monolayers after the first passage (P1). A weak expression of Ki67 was observed in both P0 and P1 monolayers. The P0 monolayers showed a progressive increase in TEER values between days 6 and 11 and remained stable until day 18 of culture, indicating a state of controlled permeability in monolayers. The P1 monolayers also showed some functional ability but with decreased TEER values compared to monolayers at P0.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that it is possible to obtain functional hCEC cultures in eye banks, using simplified and standardized protocols, from older donor corneas (>60 years of age), previously preserved under organotypic culture conditions. This tissue is more readily available in our setting, due to the profile of the donor population or due to the low endothelial count (<2,000 cells/mm2) of the donated cornea.

Genetic Association between Inflammatory-Related Polymorphism in STAT3, IL-1β, IL-6, TNF-α and Idiopathic Recurrent Implantation Failure

Recurrent implantation failure (RIF) is defined as a failure to achieve pregnancy after multiple embryo transfers. Implantation is closely related to inflammatory gradients, and interleukin-1beta (IL-1β), IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) play a key role in maternal and trophoblast inflammation during implantation. Signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) interacts with cytokines and plays a critical role in implantation through involvement in the inflammation of the embryo and placenta. Therefore, we investigated 151 RIF patients and 321 healthy controls in Korea and analyzed the association between the polymorphisms (STAT3 rs1053004, IL-1β rs16944, IL-6 rs1800796, and TNF-α rs1800629, 1800630) and RIF prevalence. In this paper, we identified that STAT3 rs1053004 (AG, adjusted odds rate [AOR] = 0.623; p = 0.027; GG, AOR = 0.513; p = 0.043; Dominant, AOR = 0.601, p = 0.011), IL-6 rs1800796 (GG, AOR = 2.472; p = 0.032; Recessive, AOR = 2.374, p = 0.037), and TNF-α rs1800629 (GA, AOR = 2.127, p = 0.010, Dominant, AOR = 2.198, p = 0.007) have a significant association with RIF prevalence. This study is the first to investigate the association of each polymorphism with RIF prevalence in Korea and to compare their effect based on their function on inflammation.

Influence of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Patterns on Postoperative Clinical Outcome

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to quantify preparation difficulties and complications during DMEK graft preparation and their influence on clinical outcome.

METHODS

A retrospective evaluation of 214 consecutive DMEK surgeries from the prospective Cologne DMEK database was performed between July 2018 and December 2019. Preparation conditions (such as central and peripheral adherences, tissue fragility, and Descemet membrane splitting) were quantified and divided into 3 groups: easy, difficult, and very difficult preparation. At follow-up (3, 6, and 12 months after DMEK), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count (ECC), and rebubbling rates were evaluated and compared between groups.

RESULTS

An easy preparation was possible in 41.6% of cases (group 1, n = 89), a difficult preparation of the DMEK graft occurred in 30.8% (group 2, n = 66), and a very difficult preparation occurred in 27.6% (group 3, n = 59). There was no difference between groups for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3, 6, and 12 months ( P = 0.179, P = 0.325, and P = 0.682, respectively) or for ECC at 3 and 6 months ( P = 0.537 and P = 0.606, respectively). Only at 12 months, the ECC was slightly significant between groups ( P = 0.045). Regarding the rebubbling rate, there was no difference ( P = 0.585). 17.9% of eyes from group 1, 25.7% of eyes from group 2, and 23.7% of eyes from group 3 received at least 1 rebubbling.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that difficult preparation conditions do not lead to any worsening of visual acuity or rebubbling rate in the 1-year outcome after DMEK. The endothelial cell density at 12 months showed slightly poorer results in the cases of very difficult preparation.

Type II Diabetes Mellitus Causes Extracellular Matrix Alterations in the Posterior Cornea That Increase Graft Thickness and Rigidity

Purpose

There is a pressing need to investigate the impact of type II diabetes mellitus on the posterior cornea in donor tissues given its increasing prevalence and potential impact on endothelial keratoplasty surgical outcomes.

Methods

Immortalized human cultured corneal endothelial cells (CECs; HCEC-B4G12) were grown in hyperglycemic media for 2 weeks. Extracellular matrix (ECM) adhesive glycoprotein expression and advanced glycation end products (AGEs) in cultured cells and corneoscleral donor tissues, as well as the elastic modulus for the Descemet membrane (DMs) and CECs of diabetic and nondiabetic donor corneas, were measured.

Results

In CEC cultures, increasing hyperglycemia resulted in increased transforming growth factor beta-induced (TGFBI) protein expression and colocalization with AGEs in the ECM. In donor corneas, the thicknesses of the DM and the interfacial matrix (IFM) between the DM and stroma both increased from 8.42 ± 1.35 µm and 0.504 ± 0.13 µm in normal corneas, respectively, to 11.13 ± 2.91 µm (DM) and 0.681 ± 0.24 µm (IFM) in non-advanced diabetes (P = 0.013 and P = 0.075, respectively) and 11.31 ± 1.76 µm (DM) and 0.744 ± 0.18 µm (IFM) in advanced diabetes (AD; P = 0.0002 and P = 0.003, respectively). Immunofluorescence in AD tissues versus controls showed increased AGEs (P < 0.001) and markedly increased labeling intensity for adhesive glycoproteins, including TGFBI, that colocalized with AGEs. The elastic modulus significantly increased between AD and control tissues for the DMs (P < 0.0001) and CECs (P < 0.0001).

Conclusions

Diabetes and hyperglycemia alter human CEC ECM structure and composition, likely contributing to previously documented complications of endothelial keratoplasty using diabetic donor tissue, including tearing during graft preparation and reduced graft survival. AGE accumulation in the DM and IFM may be a useful biomarker for determining diabetic impact on posterior corneal tissue.

A Framework for Human Corneal Endothelial Cell Culture and Preliminary Wound Model Experiments with a New Cell Tracking Approach

Cell injection therapy is emerging as an alternative to treat corneal endothelial dysfunction (CED) and to avoid corneal scarring due to bullous keratopathy. However, establishing a standardized culture procedure that provides appropriate cell yield while retaining functional features remains a challenge. Here, we describe a detailed framework obtained from in vitro culture of human corneal endothelial cells (HCECs) and comparative in vivo experimental models for CED treatment with a new cell tracking approach. Two digestion methods were compared regarding HCEC morphology and adhesion. The effect of Y-27632 (ROCKi) supplementation on final cell yield was also assessed. Cell adhesion efficacy with two cell delivery systems (superparamagnetic embedding and cell suspension) was evaluated in an ex vivo human cornea model and in an in vivo rabbit CED model. The injection of supplemented culture medium or balanced salt solution (BSS) was used for the positive and negative controls, respectively. HCEC isolation with collagenase resulted in better morphology and adhesion of cultured HCEC when compared to EDTA. Y-27632 supplementation resulted in a 2.6-fold increase in final cell yield compared to the control. Ex vivo and in vivo adhesion with both cell delivery systems was confirmed by cell tracker fluorescence detection. Corneal edema and opacity improved in both animal groups treated with cultured HCEC. The corneas in the control groups remained opaque. Both HCEC delivery systems seemed comparable as treatments for CED and for the prevention of corneal scarring.

The soil and the seed: The relationship between Descemet's membrane and the corneal endothelium

Descemet's membrane (DM), the basement membrane of the corneal endothelium, is formed from the extracellular matrix (ECM) secreted by corneal endothelial cells. The ECM supports the growth and function of the corneal endothelial cells. Changes to DM are central to the diagnosis of the most common corneal endothelial disease, Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Changes in DM are also noted in systemic diseases such as diabetes mellitus. In FECD, the DM progressively accumulates guttae, "drop-like deposits" that disrupt the corneal endothelial cell monolayer. While the pathophysiologic changes to corneal endothelial cells in the course of FECD have been well described and reviewed, the changes to DM have received limited attention. The reciprocity of influence between the corneal endothelial cells and DM demands full attention to the latter in our search for novel treatment and preventive strategies. In this review, we discuss what is known about the formation and composition of DM and how it changes in FECD and other conditions. We review characteristics of guttae and the interplay between corneal endothelial cells and guttae, particularly as it might apply to future cell-based and genetic therapies for FECD.

Effects of Systemic Diseases on Graft Preparation in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of the systemic diseases and drugs of the donor on Descemet membrane (DM) graft preparation.

METHODS

Seventy-eight corneas of 58 donors, of whom the DM grafts were used in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) surgery, between January 2018 and January 2020, were enrolled in this retrospective study. The hospital records of the donors were analyzed. Age, sex, blood type, systemic diseases, and drugs; complete blood count; biochemistry panel for liver and kidney functions in the past 48 hours; and the drugs used in the hospital, if any, in the past 24 hours were recorded. The grafts with tears that occurred while preparation were included in group 1, and the successful grafts with no tears were included in group 2.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences in the characteristics of the donors between groups. However, breast cancer and the use of sevelamer were found to be significantly higher in group 1 ( P =0.010, P =0.033, respectively). No statistically significant difference in the use of other drugs was found between groups.

CONCLUSION

Although diabetic donors have been reported to be inappropriate candidates for the preparation of DM grafts for DMEK, most of the donors with several systemic diseases including diabetes can be used in DMEK surgery, with the right technique in DM graft preparation.

The Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study (COMEDOS) - design and review of the influence of donor characteristics on Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) outcome

Background

Posterior lamellar keratoplasty and especially Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are gaining interest worldwide. Little is known about the influence of donor factors on DMEK outcome. Here we provide an overview of the existing peer-reviewed literature on this topic and present the design of the upcoming cooperation study COMEDOS (Cologne-Mecklenburg-Vorpommern DMEK Donor Study).

Methods

A literature search of PubMed and MEDLINE was conducted to retrieve articles published between September 2013 and May 2021. Seventeen peer-reviewed articles were selected. Design and concept of the prospective COMEDOS are outlined.

Results

Main interest parameters were the donor diabetes mellitus status, age, and lens status. There is a large heterogeneity regarding the sample size, study design, and investigated parameters. There seems to be a consensus that younger donors are associated with tighter rolls, a more difficult preparation, and unfolding setting. Diabetic donors seem to increase the risk of tissue tearing due to adherences and result more frequently in preparation failure. The COMEDOS aims not only to analyze the diabetes status of the donor, but also to correlate all donor systemic comorbidities and their ophthalmologic history to the DMEK clinical outcome. Furthermore, a correlation of Descemet membrane lamella preparation and surgery outcome is planned.

Conclusion

Currently, there is a lack of knowledge regarding the effect and impact of donor tissue characteristics on DMEK outcome and complications. An in-depth investigation is planned by the upcoming COMEDOS to close this knowledge gap.

The Last 200 Surgeon-Loaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue Versus the First 200 Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes from using eye bank-prepared, endothelium-out preloaded Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue with those obtained with endothelium-out surgeon-loaded DMEK tissue using the same surgical technique at 1 site.

METHODS

This study retrospectively reviewed 400 consecutive cases of DMEK from March 2016 to April 2018. The last 200 cases using surgeon-loaded tissue were compared with the first 200 cases using preloaded tissue. Statistical analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, binomial logistic regression, Kruskal-Wallis 1-way analysis of variance, Student t test, or Pearson χ tests.

RESULTS

Comparing surgeon-loaded versus preloaded DMEK tissue, respectively, no statistical difference was found in the mean 6-month postoperative values for endothelial cell loss (32.9% ± 18.5% vs. 29.9% ± 16.4%, P = 0.31), best corrected visual acuity (20/26 vs. 20/25, P = 0.54), or change in central corneal thickness (-14.4% ± 8.9% vs. -15.6% ± 11.7%, P = 0.43). The mean 1-year endothelial cell loss was also not significantly different (37.6% ± 17.2% vs. 33.2% ± 14.8%, P = 0.07). Overall, the rebubble rate for surgeon-loaded tissue was 17.5% and 12.5% for preloaded tissue, a statistically nonsignificant difference. Operative outcomes for mean tissue scroll tightness (1-4) and tissue unscroll time (minutes) for surgeon-loaded and preloaded tissue were similar between groups (2.4 vs. 2.2, P = 0.12 and 3.5 vs. 3.3 minutes, P = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

Tissue that is trephinated, stained, and loaded into an injector by the eye bank and then shipped to the surgeon had no difference in clinical outcomes compared with tissue where the surgeon performs these steps. The safety and speed of using preloaded tissue should be considered by DMEK surgeons.

Donor DMEK Tissue Characteristics: Association With Rebubble Rate and 6-Month Endothelial Cell Loss

PURPOSE

To determine whether specific donor characteristics influence postoperative rebubble rate and 6-month endothelial cell loss (ECL) in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 857 DMEK surgeries using eye bank-prepared donor tissue was performed between September 2013 and April 2018. DMEK graft characteristics including donor age, preoperative endothelial cell density (ECD), preservation time, death-to-preservation time, and donor diabetes status were analyzed for correlation with rebubble rate and 6-month postoperative ECL. Subgroup analyses of donor age, preoperative ECD, preservation time, death-to-preservation time, preparation-to-surgery time, and diabetes severity were also performed. Statistically significant relationships between donor characteristics and rebubble rate or 6-month postoperative ECL were determined using Pearson correlation, one-way analysis of variance, t test, and χ analysis.

RESULTS

The overall rate of rebubble after 857 surgeries performed by 7 surgeons during the study period was 12.6%. There was no significant relationship between postoperative rebubble rate and donor age, preoperative ECD, preservation time, death-to-preservation time, preparation-to-surgery time, or donor diabetes status. The subgroup analysis of these characteristics also yielded no significant relationship with rebubble rate. There was also no significant relationship between 6-month postoperative ECL and analyzed donor factors.

CONCLUSIONS

Donor characteristics such as higher donor age, lower preoperative ECD (<2500), longer preservation time, and donor diabetes did not increase the rebubble rate or the 6-month ECL after DMEK. These results indicate that common surgeon preferences for donor tissues that are younger, fresher, with higher cell count, and without diabetes do not translate into superior postsurgical outcomes.

Corneal Donor Characteristics and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Success: A Scoping Review

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to review published data on donor characteristics and the influence on preoperative Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation and intraoperative graft manipulation.

METHODS

A systematic review of PubMed, EMBASE, OVID MEDLINE, and EBSCOhost was conducted up to April 2020. Studies were screened and predefined data criteria extracted. Eleven studies were found to meet the inclusion criteria.

RESULTS

Research regarding donor characteristics and the relationship to DMEK graft preparation and intraoperative graft manipulation was found to be limited because of the overall low-quality data. However, there was a trend of evidence supporting donor diabetes increasing the risk of graft tearing and consequent preparation failure and younger donors producing tighter scrolls complicating intraoperative graft unfolding.

CONCLUSIONS

Further research into the area is warranted to better understand how donor characteristics impact preoperative DMEK graft preparation and intraoperative graft manipulation.

A novel device to visualize Descemet membrane during donor preparation for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty

The aim of this study was to describe a novel device for improved visualization of descemet membrane (DM) during donor preparation for descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). Comparative analysis was performed using this device (group 1) versus conventional technique (group 2) between an experienced and a trainee surgeon. A total of 20 eyes were analyzed in each group. Average time for DM peeling by experienced surgeon was 238.8 + 17.2 s in group 1 and 382.8 + 36.3 s in group 2 (P < 0.0001), and for trainee surgeon it was 519 + 30.8 s and 686.8 + 31.9 s (P < 0.0001). Retro-illumination made it easier to identify the peripheral cut edge of DM and abnormal adhesions to the underlying stroma during peeling. In group 2, DM tear occurred in 2/10 eyes with an experienced surgeon and 4/10 eyes with a trainee surgeon. Our novel device with retro-illumination allows DM peeling for donor preparation in DMEK to be performed safely with reduced risk of tissue damage.

Corneal endothelial dysfunction: Evolving understanding and treatment options

The cornea is exquisitely designed to protect the eye while transmitting and focusing incoming light. Precise control of corneal hydration by the endothelial cell layer that lines the inner surface of the cornea is required for optimal transparency, and endothelial dysfunction or damage can result in corneal edema and visual impairment. Advances in corneal transplantation now allow selective replacement of dysfunctional corneal endothelium, providing rapid visual rehabilitation. A series of technique improvements have minimized complications and various adaptations allow use even in eyes with complicated anatomy. While selective endothelial keratoplasty sets a very high standard for safety and efficacy, a shortage of donor corneas in many parts of the world restricts access, prompting a search for alternatives. Clinical trials are underway to evaluate the potential for self-recovery after removal of dysfunctional central endothelium in patients with healthy peripheral endothelium. Various approaches to using cultured human corneal endothelial cells are also in clinical trials; these aim to multiply cells from a single donor cornea for use in potentially hundreds of patients. Pre-clinical studies are underway with induced pluripotent stem cells, endothelial stem cell regeneration, gene therapy, anti-sense oligonucleotides, and various biologic/pharmacologic approaches designed to treat, prevent, or retard corneal endothelial dysfunction. The availability of more therapeutic options will hopefully expand access around the world while also allowing treatment to be more precisely tailored to each individual patient.

A Novel Approach of Harvesting Viable Single Cells from Donor Corneal Endothelium for Cell-Injection Therapy

Donor corneas with low endothelial cell densities (ECD) are deemed unsuitable for corneal endothelial transplantation. This study evaluated a two-step incubation and dissociation harvesting approach to isolate single corneal endothelial cells (CECs) from donor corneas for corneal endothelial cell-injection (CE-CI) therapy. To isolate CECs directly from donor corneas, optimization studies were performed where donor Descemet’s membrane/corneal endothelium (DM/CE) were peeled and incubated in either M4-F99 or M5-Endo media before enzymatic digestion. Morphometric analyses were performed on the isolated single cells. The functional capacities of these cells, isolated using the optimized simple non-cultured endothelial cells (SNEC) harvesting technique, for CE-CI therapy were investigated using a rabbit bullous keratopathy model. The two control groups were the positive controls, where rabbits received cultured CECs, and the negative controls, where rabbits received no CECs. Whilst it took longer for CECs to dislodge as single cells following donor DM/CE incubation in M5-Endo medium, CECs harvested were morphologically more homogenous and smaller compared to CECs obtained from DM/CE incubated in M4-F99 medium (p < 0.05). M5-Endo medium was hence selected as the DM/CE incubation medium prior to enzymatic digestion to harvest CECs for the in vivo cell-injection studies. Following SNEC injection, mean central corneal thickness (CCT) of rabbits increased to 802.9 ± 147.8 μm on day 1, gradually thinned, and remained clear with a CCT of 385.5 ± 38.6 μm at week 3. Recovery of corneas was comparable to rabbits receiving cultured CE-CI (p = 0.40, p = 0.17, and p = 0.08 at weeks 1, 2, and 3, respectively). Corneas that did not receive any cells remained significantly thicker compared to both SNEC injection and cultured CE-CI groups (p < 0.05). This study concluded that direct harvesting of single CECs from donor corneas for SNEC injection allows the utilization of donor corneas unsuitable for conventional endothelial transplantation.

Eye care providers' emerging roles in early detection of diabetes and management of diabetic changes to the ocular surface: a review

US adults visit eye care providers more often than primary healthcare providers, placing these doctors in a prime position to help identify and manage patients with prediabetes and diabetes. Currently, diabetes is identified in eye clinics in an advanced stage, only after visible signs of diabetic retinopathy. Recent ophthalmic research has identified multiple subclinical and clinical changes that occur in the anterior segment of the eye with metabolic disease. The corneal epithelium exhibits increased defects and poor healing, including an increased risk of neurotrophic keratitis. Increased thickness and stiffness of the cornea artificially alters intraocular pressure. There is damage to the endothelial cells and changes to the bacterial species on the ocular surface, both of which can increase risk of complications with surgery. Decreased corneal sensitivity due to a loss of nerve density predispose patients with metabolic disease to further neurotrophic complications. Patients with diabetes have increased Meibomian gland dysfunction, blepharitis and reduced tear production, resulting in increased rates of dry eye disease and discomfort. Early detection of metabolic disease may allow eye care providers to be more proactive in recommending referral and intervention in order to reduce the risk of blindness and other diabetes-related morbidity. Continued research is needed to better understand the time course of changes to the anterior segment and what can be done to better detect and diagnose patients with prediabetes or undiagnosed diabetes and provide improved care for these patients.

Parameters Associated With Endothelial Cell Density Variability After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty

PURPOSE

To evaluate which parameters may affect endothelial cell loss after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) by comparing eyes in the low vs high quartile of endothelial cell loss over a follow-up period of 4 years.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Donor endothelial cell density (ECD) decline was evaluated for 351 eyes of 275 patients up to 4 years after DMEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (FECD). Eyes with a postoperative endothelial cell loss in the lower quartile at all available follow-up moments were assigned to Group 1 (n = 51) and those in the upper quartile to Group 2 (n = 42). Multinomial regression was used to assess which covariates were related to greater ECD decline.

RESULTS

Mean endothelial cell loss as compared to preoperative donor ECD for the entire study group was 33 (±16)%, 36 (±17)%, and 52 (±18)% at 1, 6, and 48 months postoperatively. Endothelial cell loss of Group 1 was 12 (±7)%, 13 (±6)%, and 26 (±8)% at, respectively, 1, 6, and 48 months postoperatively, and 59 (±10)%, 64 (±9)%, and 75 (±5)% in Group 2. Partial graft detachment, donor death cause cardiovascular/stroke (vs cancer), postoperative complications other than graft detachment, and severity of preoperative FECD (all P < .01) showed the strongest relation with greater ECD decline.

CONCLUSIONS

DMEK eyes with a completely attached graft and operated in an early stage of FECD may show the lowest endothelial cell loss postoperatively.

The effects of diabetes mellitus on the corneal endothelium: A review

The corneal endothelium plays a critical role in maintaining corneal clarity. There is an expected decline in cell density with age and disease, and maintaining the health of this cell layer is important as corneal endothelial cells generally are amitotic in vivo. Diabetes mellitus is a highly prevalent disease that damages the corneal endothelium. Diabetes causes structural and functional impairments in the corneal endothelium that decrease cellular reserve in response to stress. These effects have implications to consider for diabetic patients undergoing anterior segment surgery, and for corneal surgeons who use diabetic donor tissue and treat diabetic patients. In this review, we discuss the specifics of how diabetes mellitus impacts the corneal endothelium including alterations in cell morphology, cell density, ultrastructure, pump and barrier function, cataract surgery outcomes, and corneal transplant outcomes with attention to the use of diabetic donor tissue and diabetic transplant recipients.

Donor Diabetes Mellitus Severity and Corneal Transplant Suitability in a US Eye Bank Donor Population

PURPOSE

To determine whether donor diabetes mellitus (DM) severity is associated with differences in endothelial cell density (ECD) and surgically unsuitable tissue.

METHODS

Raw data were obtained from Saving Sight Eye Bank (Kansas City, MO) including 10,454 donated eyes from 5346 eligible donors from July 2014 through May 2017. Donors were grouped into 5 categories by their insulin use and the presence of microvascular end-organ complications. The categories were non-DM (NDM), noninsulin-dependent DM without complications (NIDDMnc), noninsulin-dependent DM with complication (NIDDMc), insulin-dependent DM without complications, and insulin-dependent DM with complication. Outcome variables included ECD and tissue transplant suitability. Mixed effects models were used to adjust for the random effect of repeated measures and fixed effects of donor age, race, lens status, and death to refrigeration and death to preservation times. Interaction effects of DM severity group and donor age and DM severity group and lens status were included in the models.

RESULTS

One thousand six hundred eighty-four (32.1%) donors had a diagnosis of DM. Six hundred fifty-eight donors were in the NIDDMnc group, 225 in the NIDDMc group, 404 in the insulin-dependent DM without complication group, and 397 in the insulin-dependent DM with complication group. Compared with non-DM, donors with DM were older (P < 0.001) and more likely to be pseudophakic (P < 0.001). DM severity groups did not affect adjusted ECD at mean donor age. There was no statistically significant ECD interaction between DM severity group and lens status. There was a statistically significant ECD crossover interaction with NIDDMnc and donor age (P < 0.001). In phakic eyes, NIDDMc was associated with a statistically significantly lower odds of transplant suitability (odds ratio 0.62, P = 0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

DM severity does not affect lowering adjusted ECD at mean donor age. DM severity and pseudophakia were not associated with lower adjusted ECD. NIDDMnc was associated with an attenuation of the age-dependent decrease in ECD. NIDDMc was associated with decreased transplant suitability in phakic eyes. Future studies should include age, lens status, and interaction effects in their models of ECD and transplant suitability.

Constructing a Novel Three-Dimensional Biomimetic Corneal Endothelium Graft by Culturing Corneal Endothelium Cells on Compressed Collagen Gels

Background:

Endothelium allotransplantation is the primary treatment for corneal decompensation. The worldwide shortage of donor corneal tissue has led to increasing pressure to seek an alternative for surgical restoration of corneal endothelium. Compressed collagen (CC) gels have excellent biocompatibility, simple preparation course and easy to be manipulated. This study aimed to form a new biomimetic endothelium graft by CC.

Methods:

We expanded bovine corneal endothelial cells (B-CECs) on laminin-coated CC to form a biomimetic endothelium graft. Scanning electron microscope was used for ultrastructural analysis and tight junction protein ZO-1 expression was tested by immunohistochemistry.

Results:

The biomimetic endothelium graft, we conducted had normal cell morphology, ultrastructure and higher cell density (3612.2 ± 43.4 cells/mm²). ZO-1 localization at B-CECs membrane indicated the bioengineered graft possess the basic endothelium function.

Conclusions:

A biomimetic endothelium graft with B-CECs expanded on CC sheet was constructed, which possessed cells' morphology similar to that of in vivo endothelial cells and specific basic function of endothelium layer. This method provided the possibility of using one donor's cornea to form multiple uniformed endothelium grafts so as to overcome the shortage of cadaveric cornea tissue.

Donor, Recipient, and Operative Factors Associated with Graft Success in the Cornea Preservation Time Study

PURPOSE

To associate donor, recipient, and operative factors with graft success 3 years after Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) in the Cornea Preservation Time Study (CPTS).

DESIGN

Cohort study within a multicenter, double-masked, randomized clinical trial.

PARTICIPANTS

One thousand ninety individuals (1330 study eyes) with a median age of 70 years undergoing DSAEK for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (94% of eyes) or pseudophakic or aphakic corneal edema (PACE; 6% of eyes).

METHODS

Eyes undergoing DSAEK were randomized to receive a donor cornea with preservation time (PT) of 0 to 7 days (n = 675) or 8 to 14 days (n = 655). Donor, recipient, and operative parameters were recorded prospectively. Graft failure was defined as regraft for any reason, a graft that failed to clear by 8 weeks after surgery, or an initially clear graft that became and remained cloudy for 90 days. Failure in the first 8 weeks was classified further as primary donor failure or early failure, in the absence or presence of operative complications, respectively. Proportional hazards and logistic regression models were used to estimate risk ratios (RR) and 99% confidence intervals (CIs) for graft failure.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Graft success at 3 years.

RESULTS

One thousand two hundred fifty-one of 1330 grafts (94%) remained clear at 3 years and were considered successful. After adjusting for PT, tissue from donors with diabetes (RR, 2.35; 99% CI, 1.03-5.33) and operative complications (RR, 4.21; 99% CI, 1.42-12.47) were associated with increased risk for primary or early failure. Preoperative diagnosis of PACE (RR, 3.59; 99% CI, 1.05-12.24) was associated with increased risk for late failure by 3 years after surgery compared with Fuchs dystrophy. Graft success showed little variation among other factors evaluated, including donor age (RR, 1.19 per decade; 99% CI, 0.91-1.56 per decade), preoperative donor endothelial cell density (RR, 1.10 per 500 cells; 99% CI, 0.74-1.63 per 500 cells), graft diameter (RR, 1.22 per 1 mm; 99% CI, 0.39-3.76 per 1 mm), and injector use for graft insertion (RR, 0.92; 99% CI, 0.40-2.10).

CONCLUSIONS

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty success in the early and entire postoperative period is more likely when the donor did not have diabetes and was without operative complications and in the long-term postoperative period in recipients with Fuchs dystrophy compared with those with PACE. Mechanisms whereby diabetic donors and PACE recipients reduce the rate of graft success after DSAEK warrant further study.

Does Fluid Temperature Affect Corneal Endothelium-Descemet Membrane Scroll Formation? An In Vitro Study

Objectives:

To investigate whether unfolding time of Descemet membrane (DM) graft rolls changes at various fluid temperatures.

Materials and Methods:

The study was prospective, ex vivo, and experimental. The study was conducted at the tertiary center for corneal disease in Adana Numune Training and Research Hospital between June 2014 and June 2015. DMs were divided into 4 categories according to baseline roll tightness and these were distributed among 4 different groups using 4 different balanced salt solution (BSS) temperatures (8, 16, 23, and 36 °C). Sixteen donor corneas were obtained from the hospital eye bank.

Results:

DM roll formations may vary according to the donor cornea received. Some form tighter rolls while others can form a more open roll. No differences in roll tightness were observed in any of the DM rolls after 5 or 10 minutes in the different BBS temperatures. In all groups, neither tightening nor opening was observed in DM roll formations.

Conclusion:

Different BSS temperatures were found to have no effects on DM unfolding time in this study.

Validity of Postmortem Glycated Hemoglobin to Determine Status of Diabetes Mellitus in Corneal Donors

PURPOSE

To examine the stability of postmortem glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) measurement and its relationship to premortem glycemia.

METHODS

Postmortem blood samples were obtained from 32 donors (8 known diabetic) and shipped on ice to a central laboratory to examine the stability of HbA1c measurements during the first 9 postmortem days. Thirty-nine other suspected diabetic donors underwent comparison of premortem and postmortem HbA1c measurements.

RESULTS

Postmortem HbA1c measurements remained stable after 9 postmortem days (all measurements within ±0.2% from baseline with a mean difference of 0.02% ± 0.10%). Of the premortem measurements obtained within 90 days before death, 79% were within ±1.0% of the postmortem measurements compared with 40% for measurements more than 90 days apart. Three of the postmortem HbA1c measurements exceeded 6.5% (considered a threshold for diabetes diagnosis), although the medical histories did not indicate any previous diabetes diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Postmortem HbA1c testing is feasible with current eye bank procedures and is reflective of glycemic control of donors during 90 days before death. HbA1c testing could potentially be a useful adjunct to review of the medical history and records for donor assessment for endothelial keratoplasty suitability and long-term graft success.

[Influence of the donor age on graft survival : Is the demographic change also important for corneal tissue donation?]

The success of corneal transplantation highly depends on the quality of the used graft. Various factors play a crucial role such as a perfect stroma without optically relevant, centrally located cloudiness or changes (e. g. scars) or an adherent Descemet membrane. One of the most important parameters is the quality of the endothelial cell layer with a sufficiently large endothelial cell count. An open question is so far whether the donor age affects corneal quality and therefore has an impact on the success of transplantation. A comprehensive review of the available literature revealed that a large amount of scientific data on the influence of donor age exist to answer this question. In a variety of studies, no significant dependence of graft quality of donor age could be detected. Rather the studies prove that graft survival depends primarily on the state of the endothelial cell layer, and postoperative endothelial cell loss must be considered as a major cause of graft failure. Extensive quality assurance procedures in tissue preparation and cornea processing in the eye banks in Germany (Europe) ensures that only corneas with tested high quality are allocated for transplantation regardless of the donor age. Against the background of an aging population, the use of grafts from older donors should not be waived.

Scanning electron microscopy assessment of the Descemet membrane interface during DMEK graft preparation

We set out to determine microscopic characteristics of the Descemet membrane interface during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation. Ten corneas were partially prepared, preserving half of the Descemet membrane attached to the stroma to enable visualisation of the Descemet-stroma interface. This tissue was prepared for viewing with a scanning electron microscope. The Descemet-stroma interface was categorised into three regions: centre, mid-periphery and periphery. We classified adhesions in these regions as either minor thread-like adhesions or major bridge-like adhesions with stromal detachments. We found a region-specific differentiation of the Descemet-stroma morphology. The presence of minor (P = 0,0001) and major (P = 0,0001) adhesions at the explored regions of the Descemet-stroma interface were found to be statistically significant. Fibrotic linear adhesions were predominant in the centre and mid-periphery, whereas the larger bridge-like adhesions were found mainly in the periphery. In addition, we observed a positive correlation between the size of the adhesions and the presence of ruptures in the underlying stromal bed. Viewing of the Descemet-stroma interface with electron microscopy reveals morphological differences between the centre of a graft and its periphery. These findings are of potential clinical relevance in terms of developing a better understanding of tissue behaviour during graft preparation.

Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Safety and Outcomes: A Report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology

PURPOSE

To review the published literature on the safety and outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) for the surgical treatment of corneal endothelial dysfunction.

METHODS

Literature searches were last conducted in the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases most recently in May 2017. The searches, which were limited to English-language abstracts, yielded 1085 articles. The panel reviewed the abstracts, and 47 were determined to be relevant to this assessment.

RESULTS

After DMEK surgery, the mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ranged from 20/21 to 20/31, with follow-up ranging from 5.7 to 68 months. At 6 months, 37.6% to 85% of eyes achieved BCVA of 20/25 or better and 17% to 67% achieved BCVA of 20/20 or better. Mean endothelial cell (EC) loss was 33% (range, 25%-47%) at 6 months. Overall change in spherical equivalent was +0.43 diopters (D; range, -1.17 to +1.2 D), with minimal induced astigmatism of +0.03 D (range, -0.03 to +1.11 D). The most common complication was partial graft detachment requiring air injection (mean, 28.8%; range, 0.2%-76%). Intraocular pressure elevation was the second most common complication (range, 0%-22%) after DMEK, followed by primary graft failure (mean, 1.7%; range, 0%-12.5%), secondary graft failure (mean, 2.2%; range, 0%-6.3%), and immune rejection (mean, 1.9%; range, 0%-5.9%). Overall graft survival rates after DMEK ranged from 92% to 100% at last follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity after Descemet's stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSEK) ranged from 20/34 to 20/66 at 9 months. The most common complications after DSEK were graft detachment (mean, 14%; range, 0%-82%), endothelial rejection (mean, 10%; range, 0%-45%), and primary graft failure (mean, 5%; range, 0%-29%). Mean EC loss after DSEK was 37% at 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence reviewed supports DMEK as a safe and effective treatment for endothelial failure. With respect to visual recovery time, visual outcomes, and rejection rates, DMEK seems to be superior to DSEK and to induce less refractive error with similar surgical risks and EC loss compared with DSEK. The rate of air injection and repeat keratoplasty were similar in DMEK and DSEK after the learning curve for DMEK.

Eye bank prepared versus surgeon cut endothelial graft tissue for Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty: An observational study

The purpose of this article is to examine outcomes of Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) performed with cornea bank (CB) prestripped tissue and surgeon stripped tissue (SST).This retrospective study examined subjects who underwent DMEK with CB or surgeon prepared tissue for Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), corneal thickness, endothelial cell count (ECC), and complications were examined before and throughout a 6-month postoperative period.Eleven CB and 22 SST subjects were included. Six months after surgery, BCVA was 20/20 or better in 36.4% of CB and 22.7% of SST subjects (P = .43). Median logMAR BCVA was 0.10 (0.00-0.20, 20/25) in group CB and 0.10 (0.10-0.30, 20/25) in group SST. Median preoperative corneal thickness was 614.0 μm (577.5-662.0 μm) and 658.0 μm (606.0-689.0 μm) in CB and SST subjects, respectively (P = .37). Six months after surgery, median corneal thickness was lower in the CB group (571.0 μm [478.0-592.0 μm]), than in the SST group (576.0 μm [531.0-607.0 μm], P = .02). At 6 months, median ECC was 1500.0 cell/mm (1321.5-2049.0 cell/mm, 41% decrease) in group CB and 1403.0 cell/mm (972.5-2010.7 cell/mm, 46% decrease) in group SST (P = .70). Rebubbling was required in 5 CB (45.5%) and 15 SST (68.2%) subjects (P = .39).Fuchs' dystrophy patients have good anatomic and functional DMEK results. Similar outcomes and complication rates occurred with eye bank and surgeon prepared donor tissue.

[A new technique to facilitate donor preparation for DMEK surgery]

BACKGROUND

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is becoming more and more the method of choice to treat corneal endothelial diseases in specialized centers. The reasons that prevent this technique from becoming widespread are the delicate donor tissue preparation. By inverting the curvature of the cornea from convex to concave after mounting onto an artificial anterior chamber, we developed a combined manual delamination and hydrodissection technique, which allows a rapid and endothelium-preserving method of separating donor Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Experiments were perfomed with 60 donor corneas that were not suitable for transplantation. Donor age ranged between 42 and 94 years. Two experimental groups were formed: 1 inverse manual delamination (n = 16) and 2 combined manual delamination and hydrodissection (n = 44). All experiments were undertaken by an experienced surgeon who was, however, not experienced with these techniques. We examined the frequency of Descemet membrane rupture as well as the amount of induced endothelial damage (trypan blue staining with quantitative image analysis).

RESULTS

Significant lesions of Descemet's membrane that would have led to a loss of the graft occurred in 25% of the manual delamination cases and in 4.5% using the combined technique. Endothelial damage induced by both techniques was low (6 and 5.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSION

For DMEK donor preparation, a combination of manual delamination and hydrodissection was shown to be a safe and endothelium-protective technique to separate Descemet membranes from the underlying stroma. A very rapid learning curve for the combination technique is of specific additional interest for beginners in DMEK surgery.

Descemet membrane adhesion strength is greater in diabetics with advanced disease compared to healthy donor corneas

Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) is an increasingly popular surgical procedure for treating ocular diseases that require a corneal transplant. Previous studies have found that tissue tearing during surgical preparation is more likely elevated in eyes from donors with a history of diabetes mellitus. To quantify these potential differences, we established an experimental technique for quantifying the force required to separate the endothelium-Descemet membrane complex (EDM) from stroma in human donor corneal tissue, and we assessed differences in adhesion strength between diabetic and non-diabetic donor corneas. Transplant suitable corneas were obtained from 23 donors 50-75 years old with an average preservation to assay time of 11.5 days. Corneas were classified from a medical records review as non-diabetic (ND, n = 9), diabetic without evidence of advanced disease (NAD, n = 8), or diabetic with evidence of advanced disease (AD, n = 10). Corneas were sectioned into 3 mm wide strips and the EDM peeled from the stroma. Using the force-extension data obtained from mechanical peel testing, EDM elastic peel tension (T_E), elastic stiffness (S_E), average delamination tension (T_D), and maximum tension (T_MAX) were calculated. Mean T_E, S_E, T_D, and T_MAX values for ND corneas were 0.78 ± 0.07 mN/mm, 0.37 ± 0.05 mN/mm/mm, 0.78 ± 0.08 mN/mm, and 0.94 ± 0.17 mN/mm, respectively. NAD values did not differ significantly. However, AD values for T_E (1.01 ± 0.18 mN/mm), T_D (1.09 ± 0.21 mN/mm), and T_MAX (1.37 ± 0.24 mN/mm) were greater than ND and NAD corneas (P < 0.05). S_E did not differ significantly between groups. These findings provide proof of the concept that chronic hyperglycemia from diabetes mellitus results in a phenotypically more adhesive interface between Descemet membrane and the posterior stroma in donor corneal tissue. Results of this study provide a foundation for further investigations into the impact of diabetes on the posterior cornea, eye banking, and keratoplasty.

DMEK lenticule preparation using an air dissection technique: central versus peripheral injection

PURPOSE

To compare 2 sites of air injection to prepare donor lenticules for Descemet membrane (DM) endothelial keratoplasty.

METHODS

Fifty-one human corneoscleral buttons from donors aged 4 to 57 years were used. Corneoscleral buttons were placed endothelial side up and a 27-G needle was inserted just outside Schwalbe line and advanced immediately beneath the endothelium. Air was injected centrally inside the 8-mm zone (group 1) or peripherally approximately 1 mm in front of the limbus (group 2). Air injection was continued to extend the DM detachment as far as possible into the corneal periphery. Comparisons of central versus peripheral air injection were performed for reproducibility, the rate of usable tissue, and the type and diameter of the acquired bubble.

RESULTS

The mean donor age was 30.0 ± 12.9 years. A big bubble was achieved following central or peripheral air injection in all cases. A usable donor lenticule (≥ 8.0 mm) was achieved in 95.7% of cases in group 1 and 89.3% of cases in group 2 (p>0.99). Both injection sites were comparable with regard to the diameter of the achieved bubbles (9.57 ± 2.11 mm versus 10.22 ± 2.34 mm, respectively, p = 0.32), the chance of complete DM detachment (39.1% versus 53.6%, respectively, p = 0.25), and the risk of bubble bursting (4.4% versus 7.1%, respectively, p = 0.41). The odds of a type 2 bubble increased by 11.86 for peripheral air injections compared to central injections (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Both injection sites exhibited comparable rates of usable donor lenticules. However, peripheral air injection was more likely to yield stroma-free grafts.

Repeat Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty: Secondary Grafts with Early Intervention Are Comparable with Fellow-Eye Primary Grafts

PURPOSE

To evaluate the outcomes of secondary Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) after failed primary DMEK.

DESIGN

Retrospective, interventional case series.

PARTICIPANTS

Fifty-five DMEK recipients 42 to 89 years of age.

METHODS

An initial consecutive series of 1655 DMEK surgeries was reviewed to identify cases of secondary DMEK after failed primary DMEK (n = 55). A paired fellow-eye analysis was performed with a subgroup of 29 patients who underwent secondary DMEK in 1 eye and successful primary DMEK in the fellow eye.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA), central corneal thickness, and 1-year endothelial cell loss.

RESULTS

The median follow-up after DMEK regraft was 18 months (range, 3-61 months). All 55 regrafts cleared, 8 (15%) had air reinjected to promote attachment, 1 eye (2%) with trabeculectomy and progressive synechiae demonstrated late endothelial failure, and no rejection episodes occurred (0%). In the paired analysis, the median duration of endothelial decompensation before the regraft was 21 days (range, 2-133 days). At 1, 3, 6, or 12 months, CDVA did not differ between the primary and secondary grafts in fellow eyes (mean difference, ≤2 Snellen letters; P > 0.05 at all examinations). At 1 year, the visual acuity was ≥20/20 in 61%, ≥20/25 in 81%, and ≥20/40 in 100% of the secondary grafts in the paired analysis, excluding 1 eye with retinal problems. Vision differed by ≤1 line between fellow eyes in all but the 1 patient with the longest time to regraft (133 days), who demonstrated central haze and irregular astigmatism from anterior stromal scarring during that period. At 1 year, CDVA associated with the scarring was 20/40 versus 20/20 for the fellow-eye primary graft. The central corneal thickness was comparable between fellow-eye primary and secondary grafts at 3, 6, and 12 months (mean difference at 1 year, 2 μm; P = 0.57). The 1-year endothelial cell loss was comparable in primary and secondary grafts (27% vs. 31%, respectively; P = 0.58).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients who received prompt intervention to minimize the duration of central corneal decompensation, the visual outcomes with secondary DMEK matched the fellow-eye visual outcomes with primary DMEK.