Randomized Trial of Monthly Versus As-Needed Intravitreal Ranibizumab for Radiation Retinopathy-Related Macular Edema: 1-Year Outcomes

Efficacy of Intravitreal Injections Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Radiation Retinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

This study aims to appraise the therapeutic effectiveness of intravitreal injections anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) versus alternative therapies in managing radiation retinopathy (RR).

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

METHODS

We obtained comprehensive data retrieval using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library from their inception until December 15, 2023. This review included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomized studies (NRSs) reporting on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) among RR patients treated with intravitreal anti-VEGF. Study selection and data extraction were meticulously performed by two independent reviewers. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0 (RoB 2.0) and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) scales were utilized for bias risk assessment. Quantification of heterogeneity was executed using Q, H, and I2 statistics. The primary endpoint was the BCVA at the final observation point of each study. Secondary endpoints included central retinal thickness (CRT), foveal avascular zone (FAZ) area, and capillary density (CD) at the level of superficial capillary plexus. Subgroup analyses were undertaken to explore potential heterogeneity sources possibly due to treatment duration and study design. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to ascertain result stability.

RESULTS

This analysis incorporated 7 studies (including 3 RCTs) encompassing 922 patients afflicted with RR. Relative to other treatment modalities, intravitreal anti-VEGF therapy was associated with a statistically significant mean decrease in BCVA of -0.34 logMAR (95% CI: -0.39 to -0.30 logMAR; I2 = 87.70%; P < .001), and a substantial reduction in CRT of -34.65 μm (95% CI: -50.70 to -18.60 μm; I2 = 30.40%; P < .001). Additionally, a reduction in the FAZ area by -0.69 mm² (95% CI: -0.91 to -0.46 mm², I2 = 0%; P < .001) was observed. A positive tendency was noted in CD at the superficial capillary plexus between anti-VEGF and other therapeutic interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal anti-VEGF injections, in comparison to other treatments, demonstrate superior efficacy in enhancing BCVA and reducing CRT, thereby underscoring the potential of anti-VEGF in ameliorating radiation retinopathy outcomes. However, the conclusions are constrained by the incorporation of data from some NRSs and the small sample sizes.

Morphological Biomarkers Related to Visual Acuity in Patients With Radiation Retinopathy Treated With Intravitreal Ranibizumab

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Our objective was to monitor variables via spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and identify the most relevant biomarkers related to best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in radiation retinopathy (RR).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A post-hoc analysis of the two-year Ranibizumab for Radiation Retinopathy (RRR) trial analyzed vision and OCT parameters including intraretinal fluid, ellipsoid zone (EZ) disruption, retinal pigment epithelium atrophy, hard exudates, retinal hemorrhage, retinal neovascularization, and subfoveal fluid. BCVA and SD-OCT parameters were evaluated by univariate analysis and a mixed-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty eyes from the RRR trial were included. Intraretinal cyst vertical size (week 24: P = 0.032; week 48: P = 0.021), neovascularization (week 48: P = 0.028; week 72: P = 0.025), and EZ disruption (week 72: P = 0.029; week 104: P = 0.019) were the clinical parameters most relevant to BCVA by univariate analysis in at least two time points. The mixed-effects model confirmed the relevance of intraretinal cyst vertical size (P = 0.001) and neovascularization (P = 0.001) but not EZ disruption (P = 0.119) over the course of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

This study characterizes the course of visual loss in RR by identifying intraretinal cyst vertical size, neovascularization, and EZ disruption as biomarkers of poor BCVA over a span of two years. Larger multicenter studies are needed to confirm these findings. [Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina 2024;55:XX-XX.].

Management of Uveal Melanoma: Updated Cancer Care Alberta Clinical Practice Guideline

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this guideline update is to reassess and update recommendations in the prior guideline from 2016 on the appropriate management of patients with uveal melanoma.

METHODS

In 2021, a multidisciplinary working group from the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team, Cancer Care Alberta, Alberta Health Services was convened to update the guideline. A comprehensive review of new research evidence in PubMed as well as new clinical practice guidelines from prominent oncology groups informed the update. An enhancement in methodology included adding levels of evidence and strength of recommendations. The updated guideline was circulated to all members of the Provincial Cutaneous Tumour Team for review and endorsement.

RESULTS

New and modified recommendations address provider training requirements, diagnostic imaging for the detection of metastases, neo-adjuvant pre-enucleation radiotherapy, intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents for radiation retinopathy, genetic prognostic testing, surveillance following definitive local therapy, and systemic therapy for patients with metastatic uveal melanoma.

DISCUSSION

The recommendations represent evidence-based standards of care agreed to by a large multidisciplinary group of healthcare professionals.

Visual outcome and ocular complications in patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma after eye-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

We report visual outcomes and ocular complications in patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma who had eye-sparing surgery followed by radiotherapy.

METHODS

This review included consecutive patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma who underwent eye-sparing surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy or concurrent chemoradiation therapy between 2007 and 2018. Clinical data, including details of ophthalmological examinations and radiation treatment were reviewed.

RESULTS

The study included 23 patients, 15 males and 8 females, with median age 51 years. Twenty patients (87%) received intensity-modulated proton therapy; 3 (13%) received intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Nineteen patients (83%) received concurrent chemotherapy. After a median follow-up time of 37 months (range: 8-83), 13 patients (57%) had best-corrected visual acuity 20/40 or better, 3 (13%) had moderate vision loss (between 20/40 and 20/200) and 7 (30%) had severe vision loss (20/200 or worse). The most common ocular complications were dry eye disease (21 patients; 91%), radiation retinopathy (16; 70%) and cataract progression (11; 49%). Tumour crossing the orbital midline (p=0.014) and Hispanic ethnicity (p=0.014) were associated with increased risk of severe vision loss. The risk of radiation retinopathy was significantly different among the three racial groups; Hispanic patients (n=3) had the highest rate of retinopathy (p<0.001). Tumour size, initial T category and total prescribed radiation dose were not significantly associated with severe vision loss.

CONCLUSION

Eye-sparing surgery followed by adjuvant radiotherapy in patients with lacrimal gland carcinoma has a reasonable overall visual prognosis. Patients with tumours crossing the orbital midline and Hispanic patients have a higher risk of severe vision loss.

INTRAVITREAL FLUOCINOLONE ACETONIDE IMPLANT FOR RADIATION RETINOPATHY: Report of Preliminary Findings

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of a 0.18 mg intravitreal fluocinolone acetonide (FA) implant (Yutiq, EyePoint Pharmaceuticals, Watertown, MA) as a treatment option for patients with radiation retinopathy-related cystoid macular edema.

METHODS

A retrospective review of seven patients treated for uveal melanoma who developed radiation retinopathy-related cystoid macular edema. They were initially treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and/or steroid injections and then transitioned to intravitreal FA implant. Primary outcomes include best-corrected visual acuity, central subfield thickness, and number of additional injections.

RESULTS

After FA implant insertion, best-corrected visual acuity and central subfield thickness remained stable in all patients. The variance in best-corrected visual acuity decreased from 75.5 ETDRS letters (range 0-199 letters) to 29.8 (range 1.2-134) after FA implant insertion. Mean central subfield thickness was 384 µ m (range 165-641) and 354 µ m (range 282-493) before and after FA implant insertion, resulting in a 30- µ m mean reduction. The number of intravitreal injections (average 4.9, range 2-10) decreased after intravitreal FA implant insertion with only two patients requiring one additional FA implant (average 0.29, range 0-1) over a mean of 12.1 months (range 0.9-18.5) follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Intravitreal FA implant is an effective treatment for cystoid macular edema radiation retinopathy. The slow release of steroid allows for sustained control of macular edema, which correlated with stable visual acuity and decreased injection burden for patients.

Long-term visual outcomes after ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma

BACKGROUND

To assess the long-term visual outcomes in patients with posteriorly located choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy between January 2013 and December 2015.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted on consecutive patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for post-equatorial choroidal melanoma with available Snellen visual acuity before and after treatment, and the development and treatment of radiation complications.

RESULTS

There were 219 patients with posterior choroidal melanoma treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy. Median follow up was 56.5 months, range 12-81 months. Final visual acuity was ≥6/12 in 97 (44.3%) patients, 6/12 to 6/60 in 57 (26.0%), <6/60 in 55 (25.1%) and 10 (4.6%) eyes were enucleated. Radiation maculopathy was the most common radiation complication encountered, occurring in 53 (24.2%) patients. Of these, final visual acuity was 6/12 in 10 patients (18.9%), 6/12 to 6/60 in 26 (49.1%), <6/60 in 16 (30.2%) and 1 eye (1.9%) was enucleated. Twenty-five (47%) with radiation maculopathy were treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy, 27 (51%) were monitored and one (2%) was treated with scatter photocoagulation. Eyes treated with intravitreal anti-angiogenic therapy had better final vision than those observed or treated with retinal laser (chi-square, p = 0.04). On multivariate analysis, close proximity to the optic nerve and fovea, and large or notched plaque type was associated with final vision worse than 6/12.

CONCLUSION

Most patients treated with ruthenium plaque brachytherapy for posterior choroidal melanoma retain 6/60 vision, with almost half retaining 6/12 vision at long term follow up.

Ocular Brachytherapy (Interventional Radiotherapy): Preserving the Vision

Uveal melanoma represents the most common intraocular neoplasia among adults. Brachytherapy (interventional radiotherapy; IRT) has a great advantage, when compared with enucleation, both in terms of organ and function sparing. The Collaborative Ocular Melanoma Study introduced into clinical practice a standardised procedure that allowed the equivalence of IRT with enucleation in terms of overall survival to be demonstrated. IRT is carried out by placing a plaque in direct contact with the sclera under the uveal melanoma. Several radioactive sources may be used, including 106-ruthenium, 125-iodine, 103-palladium and 90-strontium. It is a multidisciplinary procedure requiring the collaboration of interventional radiation oncologists and ophthalmologists in the operating theatre and medical physicists for an accurate treatment time calculation. It also relies on ultrasound imaging to identify the lesion and verifiy the correct plaque placement. An emerging tool of paramount importance could be the use of artificial intelligence and predictive models to identify those patients at higher risk of developing late side-effects and therefore who may deserve preventive and supportive therapies.

Radiation retinopathy intricacies and advances in management

Background: Radiation retinopathy is a chronic, progressive, vision-threatening complication from exposure to various radiation sources. While several treatment modalities are available, proper management for this disease is a continuing challenge with no consensus on the most efficacious.Objective: The aim of this article is to provide an updated review of the published literature on the course of the disease, available treatments and their efficacies, frequency of regimen, core issues in patient management, and additional newer treatment modalities, including possible prophylactic approaches.Value: We also highlighted the challenges encountered with managing chronically treated patients through an analysis of a clinical case report on a patient who was treated for several years with different modalities after a diagnosis of radiation retinopathy.

New Therapeutic Perspectives in the Treatment of Uveal Melanoma: A Systematic Review

Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare disease, but the most common primary intraocular cancer, mostly localized in the choroid. Currently, the first-line treatment options for UM are radiation therapy, resection, and enucleation. However, although these treatments could potentially be curative, half of all patients will develop metastatic disease, whose prognosis is still poor. Indeed, effective therapeutic options for patients with advanced or metastatic disease are still lacking. Recently, the development of new treatment modalities with a lower incidence of adverse events, a better disease control rate, and new therapeutic approaches, have merged as new potential and promising therapeutic strategies. Additionally, several clinical trials are ongoing to find new therapeutic options, mainly for those with metastatic disease. Many interventions are still in the preliminary phases of clinical development, being investigated in phase I trial or phase I/II. The success of these trials could be crucial for changing the prognosis of patients with advanced/metastatic UM. In this systematic review, we analyzed all emerging and available literature on the new perspectives in the treatment of UM and patient outcomes; furthermore, their current limitations and more common adverse events are summarized.

Radiation Retinopathy: Detection and Management Strategies

A gradual shift in trend from primary enucleation to globe salvaging radiation therapy for the management of ocular tumors has resulted in the rise of several post-treatment ocular complications including radiation retinopathy. Radiation retinopathy is a chronic, progressive, and occlusive vasculopathy that can manifest anytime between 1 month to 15 years after starting radiation therapy. The aim of treatment in most of these cases is to prevent further vision loss. Treatment options such as laser photocoagulation, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor and intraviral steroids have been described. However, despite several advances in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, a significant proportion of eyes with radiation retinopathy eventually go blind. This review summarises some of the clinical features, investigative modalities, and recent therapeutic strategies used in the management of radiation retinopathy.

Two-year results for ranibizumab for radiation retinopathy (RRR): a randomized, prospective trial

PURPOSE

To assess the efficacy of a treat-and-extend strategy with intravitreal ranibizumab for radiation-related macular edema.

METHODS

Forty eyes with radiation-induced macular edema and decreased visual acuity were enrolled in the phase IIb, prospective clinical trial and randomized into 3 cohorts: (A) monthly ranibizumab, (B) monthly ranibizumab with targeted retinal photocoagulation (TRP), or (C) as-needed ranibizumab and TRP. In year 2, all subjects entered a treat-and-extend protocol for ranibizumab. The primary outcome measure was mean change in early treatment diabetic retinopathy study (ETDRS) best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) from baseline.

RESULTS

Through year 1, the mean change in ETDRS BCVA was significantly different between the three cohorts (p < 0.001); cohort A saw the largest gain with + 4.0 letters. Significant anatomic improvements were also seen in all cohorts. Comparatively, through year 2, cohorts A, B, and C had a mean change in ETDRS BCVA of - 1.9, - 3.9, and + 1.3 letters, respectively; additionally, no significant differences were found in absolute ETDRS BCVA across time (ANOVA, p = 0.123). Overall, 90% of eyes maintained VA 20/200 or better and 33.3% of subjects gained at least one line of vision. There were no significant differences in mean central macular thickness for any cohort compared to baseline (p = 0.09). The presence of retinal hemorrhage and intraretinal exudates stayed consistent from year 1 to year 2 for all cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

Among eyes with radiation-related macular edema, a treat-and-extend regimen with ranibizumab may not result in as many visual and anatomic improvements as monthly injections. However, treat-and-extend still may prevent serious visual complications compared to historical controls.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02222610.

Damage to the Superior Retinae After 30 Gy Whole-Brain Radiation

Purpose

The most common treatment protocol for whole-brain radiation therapy (WBRT) is 30 Gy in 10 fractions. This regimen entails a low risk of radiation retinopathy, with fewer than a dozen reported cases. We describe a case of radiation retinopathy that was confined to the superior retinae. These regions were the only portions of the eyes that were included in the treatment field.

Methods and Materials

Observational case report consisting of clinical examination, review of radiation treatment planning and implementation, computerized visual field testing, and fundus photography.

Results

A 36-year-old man with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma developed radiation retinopathy 16 months after WBRT to 30 Gy in 10 fractions. The retinopathy was largely confined to the superior halves of the retinae. There was corresponding geographic inferior visual field loss in both eyes. Review of the patient's treatment protocol revealed that the superior retinae received a substantial radiation dose, approaching 30 Gy, whereas the inferior retinae were essentially outside the treatment field.

Conclusions

In this patient, the correlation between the treatment field and the resulting local development of radiation retinopathy demonstrated unequivocally that the relatively low dose used in routine WBRT (ie, 30 Gy in 10 fractions) can induce radiation retinopathy.

Recent advancements in the management of retinoblastoma and uveal melanoma

Retinoblastoma in children and uveal melanoma in adults can pose a serious threat to both vision and life. For many decades, enucleation was often the only option to treat these intraocular malignancies. For retinoblastoma, intra-arterial chemotherapy is often utilized as the primary treatment at advanced academic centers and has dramatically improved local tumor control and eye salvage rates. For uveal melanoma, both plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation have served as widely utilized therapies with a local failure rate of approximately 1–10%, depending on the series. Major recent advancements have allowed for a better understanding of the genomics of uveal melanoma and the impact of certain mutations on metastatic susceptibility. Gene expression profile stratifies uveal melanomas into two classes: low-risk (class 1) and high-risk (class 2). A loss-of-function mutation of BAP1 is associated with a class 2 gene expression profile and therefore confers worse prognosis due to elevated risk of metastasis. On the other hand, gain-of-function mutations of EIF1AX and SF3B1 correspond to a gene expression profile of class 1A and class 1B and confer a better prognosis. Preferentially expressed antigen in melanoma (PRAME) is an antigen that increases metastatic susceptibility when expressed in uveal melanoma cells. In addition to plaque brachytherapy and proton beam irradiation, both of which have demonstrated superb clinical outcomes, scientists are actively investigating newer therapeutic modalities as either primary therapy or adjuvant treatment, including a novel nanoparticle therapy and immunotherapy.