Real-Time Photographic- and Fluorescein Angiographic-Guided Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: Randomized PRIME Trial Outcomes

Longitudinal Quantitative Ultrawidefield Angiographic Features in Diabetic Retinopathy Treated with Aflibercept from the Intravitreal Aflibercept as Indicated by Real-Time Objective Imaging to Achieve Diabetic Retinopathy Improvement Trial

OBJECTIVE

To report longitudinal trends of quantitative ultrawidefield fluorescein angiography (qUWFA) biomarkers in the Intravitreal Aflibercept as Indicated by Real-Time Objective Imaging to Achieve Diabetic Retinopathy Improvement (PRIME) diabetic retinopathy (DR) clinical trial.

DESIGN

Post hoc analysis of the PRIME prospective randomized DR clinical trial comparing intravitreal aflibercept treatment based on the DR severity score (DRSS) or quantitative leakage index for DR improvement (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03531294).

PARTICIPANTS

Patients were enrolled with a DRSS level of 47A to 71A and best-corrected visual acuity of 20/800 or better. Key exclusion criteria were previous intravitreal injection, panretinal photocoagulation, vitrectomy, central-involving macular edema, or vitreous hemorrhage.

METHODS

A previously validated, machine learning-based qUWFA analysis platform was used for panretinal leakage index assessment and differentiation of generalized and perivascular leakage phenotypes. Additionally, microaneurysm count and ischemic index were quantified in panretinal and macular regions. The trends in these biomarkers and therapeutic response were studied over 1 year.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Longitudinal trends of qUWFA biomarkers. The impact of these qUWFA metrics on treatment response was assessed by studying their associations with time to 2-step DRSS improvement and number of treatment-free days.

RESULTS

Forty eyes from 40 subjects with DR were enrolled. Lower baseline generalized leakage was noted in eyes that attained the 2-step DRSS improvement in < 16 weeks (1.9% vs. 2.8%; P = 0.026). Baseline macular perivascular-generalized leakage ratio had a significant correlation with the number of treatment-free days (r = 0.4; P = 0.012). At the end of 1 year, therapy significantly reduced the mean panretinal (3.9% vs. 5.8%; P = 0.002) and macular (6.2% vs. 12.2%; P = 0.008) generalized leakage indices compared with baseline, as well as the mean panretinal perivascular leakage index (1.5% vs. 2.3%; P = 0.002). The mean panretinal ischemic index demonstrated a small but likely clinically insignificant decrease from 12.5% at baseline to 11.6% at year 1 (P = 0.016).

CONCLUSIONS

Down-trending leakage indices and microaneurysm counts were demonstrated over 1 year of anti-VEGF therapy. At baseline, DR eyes with lower generalized leakage responded to therapy more rapidly. Eyes with greater perivascular leakage relative to generalized leakage showed a longer-lasting anti-VEGF treatment response.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

Clinically Labeled Contrastive Learning for OCT Biomarker Classification

This article presents a novel positive and negative set selection strategy for contrastive learning of medical images based on labels that can be extracted from clinical data. In the medical field, there exists a variety of labels for data that serve different purposes at different stages of a diagnostic and treatment process. Clinical labels and biomarker labels are two examples. In general, clinical labels are easier to obtain in larger quantities because they are regularly collected during routine clinical care, while biomarker labels require expert analysis and interpretation to obtain. Within the field of ophthalmology, previous work has shown that clinical values exhibit correlations with biomarker structures that manifest within optical coherence tomography (OCT) scans. We exploit this relationship by using the clinical data as pseudo-labels for our data without biomarker labels in order to choose positive and negative instances for training a backbone network with a supervised contrastive loss. In this way, a backbone network learns a representation space that aligns with the clinical data distribution available. Afterwards, we fine-tune the network trained in this manner with the smaller amount of biomarker labeled data with a cross-entropy loss in order to classify these key indicators of disease directly from OCT scans. We also expand on this concept by proposing a method that uses a linear combination of clinical contrastive losses. We benchmark our methods against state of the art self-supervised methods in a novel setting with biomarkers of varying granularity. We show performance improvements by as much as 5% in total biomarker detection AUROC.

Retinal Cell Damage in Diabetic Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), the most common microvascular complication that occurs in diabetes mellitus (DM), is the leading cause of vision loss in working-age adults. The prevalence of diabetic retinopathy is approximately 30% of the diabetic population and untreated DR can eventually cause blindness. For decades, diabetic retinopathy was considered a microvascular complication and clinically staged by its vascular manifestations. In recent years, emerging evidence has shown that diabetic retinopathy causes early neuronal dysfunction and neurodegeneration that may precede vascular pathology and affect retinal neurons as well as glial cells. This knowledge leads to new therapeutic strategies aiming to prevent dysfunction of retinal neurons at the early stage of DR. Early detection and timely treatment to protect retinal neurons are critical to preventing visual loss in DR. This review provides an overview of DR and the structural and functional changes associated with DR, and discusses neuronal degeneration during diabetic retinopathy, the mechanisms underlying retinal neurodegeneration and microvascular complications, and perspectives on current and future clinic therapies.

Update on the Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: Anti-VEGF Agents for the Prevention of Complications and Progression of Nonproliferative and Proliferative Retinopathy

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is a microvascular disease caused by poorly controlled blood glucose, and it is a leading cause of vision loss in people with diabetes. In this review we discuss the current management of DR with particular focus on the use of intraocular anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. Intraocular anti-VEGF agents were first studied in the 1990s, and now several of these agents are either FDA approved or used off-label as first-line treatments for DR. Recent evidence shows that anti-VEGF agents can halt the progression of markers of DR severity, reduce the risk of DR worsening, and reduce the onset of new macular edema. These significant benefits have been demonstrated in patients with proliferative DR and the milder nonproliferative DR (NPDR). A wealth of evidence from recent trials and meta-analyses has detailed the intraoperative and postoperative benefits of adjunctive anti-VEGF therapy prior to pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for proliferative DR with vitreous hemorrhage. In this review, we also discuss literature comparing various anti-VEGF injection regimens including monthly, quarterly, as-needed, and treat and extend protocols. Combination protocols with panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) or PPV are also discussed. Current evidence suggests that anti-VEGF therapies are effective therapy for NPDR and PDR and may also provide significant benefits when used adjunctively with other DR treatment modalities such as PRP or PPV.

Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor for proliferative diabetic retinopathy

BACKGROUND

Proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) is an advanced complication of diabetic retinopathy that can cause blindness. It consists of the presence of new vessels in the retina and vitreous haemorrhage. Although panretinal photocoagulation (PRP) is the treatment of choice for PDR, it has secondary effects that can affect vision. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF), which produces an inhibition of vascular proliferation, could improve the vision of people with PDR.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of anti-VEGFs for PDR and summarise any relevant economic evaluations of their use.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (which contains the Cochrane Eyes and Vision Trials Register; 2022, Issue 6); Ovid MEDLINE; Ovid Embase; the ISRCTN registry; ClinicalTrials.gov, and the WHO ICTRP. We did not use any date or language restrictions. We last searched the electronic databases on 1 June 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing anti-VEGFs to another active treatment, sham treatment, or no treatment for people with PDR. We also included studies that assessed the combination of anti-VEGFs with other treatments. We excluded studies that used anti-VEGFs in people undergoing vitrectomy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias (RoB) for all included trials. We calculated the risk ratio (RR) or the mean difference (MD), and 95% confidence intervals (CI). We used GRADE to assess the certainty of evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 15 new studies in this update, bringing the total to 23 RCTs with 1755 participants (2334 eyes). Forty-five per cent of participants were women and 55% were men, with a mean age of 56 years (range 48 to 77 years). The mean glycosylated haemoglobin (Hb1Ac) was 8.45% for the PRP group and 8.25% for people receiving anti-VEGFs alone or in combination. Twelve studies included people with PDR, and participants in 11 studies had high-risk PDR (HRPDR). Twelve studies were of bevacizumab, seven of ranibizumab, one of conbercept, two of pegaptanib, and one of aflibercept. The mean number of participants per RCT was 76 (ranging from 15 to 305). Most studies had an unclear or high RoB, mainly in the blinding of interventions and outcome assessors. A few studies had selective reporting and attrition bias. No study reported loss or gain of 3 or more lines of visual acuity (VA) at 12 months. Anti-VEGFs ± PRP probably increase VA compared with PRP alone (mean difference (MD) -0.08 logMAR, 95% CI -0.12 to -0.04; I2 = 28%; 10 RCTS, 1172 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may increase regression of new vessels (MD -4.14 mm2, 95% CI -6.84 to -1.43; I2 = 75%; 4 RCTS, 189 eyes; low-certainty evidence) and probably increase a complete regression of new vessels (RR 1.63, 95% CI 1.19 to 2.24; I2 = 46%; 5 RCTS, 405 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP probably reduce vitreous haemorrhage (RR 0.72, 95% CI 0.57 to 0.90; I2 = 0%; 6 RCTS, 1008 eyes; moderate-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may reduce the need for vitrectomy compared with eyes that received PRP alone (RR 0.67, 95% CI 0.49 to 0.93; I2 = 43%; 8 RCTs, 1248 eyes; low-certainty evidence). Anti-VEGFs ± PRP may result in little to no difference in the quality of life compared with PRP alone (MD 0.62, 95% CI -3.99 to 5.23; I2 = 0%; 2 RCTs, 382 participants; low-certainty evidence). We do not know if anti-VEGFs ± PRP compared with PRP alone had an impact on adverse events (very low-certainty evidence). We did not find differences in visual acuity in subgroup analyses comparing the type of anti-VEGFs, the severity of the disease (PDR versus HRPDR), time to follow-up (< 12 months versus 12 or more months), and treatment with anti-VEGFs + PRP versus anti-VEGFs alone. The main reasons for downgrading the certainty of evidence included a high RoB, imprecision, and inconsistency of effect estimates.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Anti-VEGFs ± PRP compared with PRP alone probably increase visual acuity, but the degree of improvement is not clinically meaningful. Regarding secondary outcomes, anti-VEGFs ± PRP produce a regression of new vessels, reduce vitreous haemorrhage, and may reduce the need for vitrectomy compared with eyes that received PRP alone. We do not know if anti-VEGFs ± PRP have an impact on the incidence of adverse events and they may have little or no effect on patients' quality of life. Carefully designed and conducted clinical trials are required, assessing the optimal schedule of anti-VEGFs alone compared with PRP, and with a longer follow-up.

Longitudinal Quantitative Ultrawide-field Fluorescein Angiography Dynamics in the RUBY Diabetic Macular Edema Study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the longitudinal change in quantitative ultrawide-field angiographic (UWFA) parameters and correlate them with functional outcomes and spectral domain-OCT metrics.

DESIGN

This study is a post hoc analysis of the phase II RUBY study: a prospective, randomized trial of patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with either intravitreal aflibercept injection (IAI) or combined IAI/nesvacumab (antiangiopoietin 2 mAb).

SUBJECTS

Subjects with DME that underwent UWFA across all treatment groups (n = 44).

METHODS

A machine learning-enabled feature extraction system generated panretinal quantitative UWFA metrics, including leakage, ischemia, and microaneurysm (MA) burden. Zonal assessments were performed corresponding to the macula, midperiphery, and far periphery.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Changes in ischemic area and index (proportion of nonperfusion in analyzable retina), leakage area and index (proportion of leakage in analyzable retina), and MA count at baseline, week 12, week 24, and week 36 were analyzed. Spectral-domain-OCT quantitative metrics, such as central subfield thickness, ellipsoid zone (EZ) integrity parameters, intraretinal fluid (IRF) volume, and subretinal fluid (SRF) volume were extracted via a machine learning-enhanced OCT feature extraction platform and analyzed. Additionally, the effect of these changes on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean panretinal leakage index, zonal leakage area, and panretinal MA count improved significantly between baseline and week 36. Panretinal ischemic index decreased between baseline and week 36, with some aspects showing significant improvement. Mean BCVA significantly improved from baseline to week 36. There was a significant inverse correlation between change in BCVA and change in macular leakage area. A direct correlation was observed between both baseline macular leakage area and panretinal leakage index with IRF volume, SRF volume, and EZ disruption on OCT.

CONCLUSIONS

Assessment of UWFA parameters demonstrates a significant improvement in panretinal leakage index, leakage area, and MA burden in eyes treated with IAI with or without nesvacumab. A numeric reduction in panretinal ischemic index and area was noted. The analysis also shows the critical association of leakage with visual and OCT features. This highlights the potential role of UWFA in disease burden assessment, with leakage parameters serving as a primary end point.

FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE(S)

Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found after the references.

Exploring the angiographic-biologic phenotype in the IMAGINE study: quantitative UWFA and cytokine expression

BACKGROUND

This study investigates the association of intraocular cytokine expression and ultrawide-field fluorescein angiography (UWFA) quantitative imaging biomarkers and their association with angiographical feature response after antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy in diabetic macular oedema (DME).

METHODS

The IMAGINE DME study is a post hoc imaging biomarker and intraocular cytokine assessment from the DAVE study, a prospective DME clinical trial that included aqueous humour sampling and UWFA imaging. Fifty-four cytokines associated with inflammation and angiogenesis were evaluated through multiplex arrays. UWFA parameters were assessed using an automated feature analysis platform to determine ischaemic and leakage indices and microaneurysm (MA) count. Eyes were classified into UWFA responder or non-responder groups based on longitudinal quantitative UWFA parameter improvement. Cytokine expression was correlated with UWFA metrics and evaluated in the context of therapeutic response.

RESULTS

Twenty-one eyes were included with a mean age of 55±10 years. Increased panretinal leakage index correlated with VEGF (r=0.70, p=0.0005), angiopoietin-like 4 (r=0.77, p=4.6E-5) and interleukin (IL)-6 (r=0.64, p=0.002). Panretinal ischaemic index was associated with tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases 1 (TIMP-1, r=0.49, p=0.03) and peripheral ischaemia correlated with VEGF (r=0.45, p=0.05). MA count correlated with increased monocyte chemotactic protein-4 (MCP-4, r=0.60, p=0.004) and platelet and endothelial cell adhesion molecule 1 (PECAM-1, r=0.58, p=0.005). Longitudinal MA reduction was associated with decreased baseline VEGF and urokinase receptor (uPAR) (p<0.05). High baseline VEGF and IL-6 were associated with dramatic reduction in macular leakage (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Baseline and longitudinal quantitative UWFA imaging parameters correlated with multiple aqueous humour cytokine concentrations, including VEGF and IL-6. Further research is needed to assess the possible implications of using these findings for evaluating treatment response.

Diabetic retinopathy: Involved cells, biomarkers, and treatments

Diabetic retinopathy (DR), a leading cause of vision loss and blindness worldwide, is caused by retinal neurovascular unit dysfunction, and its cellular pathology involves at least nine kinds of retinal cells, including photoreceptors, horizontal and bipolar cells, amacrine cells, retinal ganglion cells, glial cells (Müller cells, astrocytes, and microglia), endothelial cells, pericytes, and retinal pigment epithelial cells. Its mechanism is complicated and involves loss of cells, inflammatory factor production, neovascularization, and BRB impairment. However, the mechanism has not been completely elucidated. Drug treatment for DR has been gradually advancing recently. Research on potential drug targets relies upon clear information on pathogenesis and effective biomarkers. Therefore, we reviewed the recent literature on the cellular pathology and the diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers of DR in terms of blood, protein, and clinical and preclinical drug therapy (including synthesized molecules and natural molecules). This review may provide a theoretical basis for further DR research.

Final Outcomes from the Randomized RECOVERY Trial of Aflibercept for Retinal Nonperfusion in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

PURPOSE

Retinal nonperfusion (RNP) is an important biomarker for diabetic retinopathy (DR). Data suggest that consistent anti-VEGF pharmacotherapy can slow RNP development. The RECOVERY trial evaluated the impact of aflibercept (Eylea, Regeneron) on RNP among eyes with proliferative DR (PDR).

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized clinical trial with treatment crossover in the second year.

SUBJECTS

Eyes with PDR and RNP.

METHODS

At baseline, the subjects were randomized 1:1 to monthly (arm 1) or quarterly (arm 2) intravitreal 2 mg aflibercept. At the beginning of year 2, the treatment arms were crossed over so that the monthly-dosed subjects subsequently received quarterly dosing and the quarterly-dosed subjects subsequently received monthly dosing.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Change in total RNP area (mm²) through year 2. Secondary outcomes included Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) scores; best-corrected visual acuity; central subfield thickness; additional measures of RNP, including ischemic index (ISI); and adverse event incidence. Means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Among all subjects, from baseline to year 2, the mean RNP increased from 235 mm² to 402 mm² (P < 0.0001), and the ISI increased from 25.8% to 50.4% (P < 0.0001). Increases in the mean RNP (P < 0.0001) and ISI (P < 0.0001) were also observed from year 1 to year 2. The mean total RNP increased from 264 mm² at baseline to 386 mm² (P < 0.0001) at year 2 in arm 1 and from 207 mm² at baseline to 421 mm² (P < 0.0001) at year 2 in arm 2 (P = 0.023, arm 1 vs. arm 2). Increases in the mean RNP for both treatment arms (P < 0.0001) were also specifically observed within year 2 (P = 0.32, arm 1 vs. arm 2). Compared with baseline, the DRSS scores at the end of year 2 improved in 82% (n = 27) of subjects and remained stable in 18% (n = 6), with no subjects experiencing worsening; at 2 years, the DRSS scores had improved by 2 or more steps in 65% (n = 11) and 81% (n = 13) of subjects in arms 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Through year 2 of the RECOVERY trial, both treatment arms experienced significant increases in RNP. Despite the expansion of the RNP area in nearly all subjects, 82% of subjects demonstrated an improvement in DRSS levels from baseline, with no subjects experiencing worsening in DRSS scores.

Mechanistic study of silica nanoparticles on the size-dependent retinal toxicity in vitro and in vivo

Background

Silica nanoparticles (SiO₂ NPs) are extensively applied in the biomedical field. The increasing medical application of SiO₂ NPs has raised concerns about their safety. However, studies on SiO₂ NP-induced retinal toxicity are lacking.

Methods

We investigated the retinal toxicity of SiO₂ NPs with different sizes (15 and 50 nm) in vitro and in vivo along with the underlying mechanisms. The cytotoxicity of SiO₂ NPs with different sizes was assessed in R28 human retinal precursor cells by determining the ATP content and LDH release. The cell morphologies and nanoparticle distributions in the cells were analyzed by phase-contrast microscopy and transmission electron microscopy, respectively. The mitochondrial membrane potential was examined by confocal laser scanning microscopy. The retinal toxicity induced by SiO₂ NPs in vivo was examined by immunohistochemical analysis. To further investigate the mechanism of retinal toxicity induced by SiO₂ NPs, reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation, glial cell activation and inflammation were monitored.

Results

The 15-nm SiO₂ NPs were found to have higher cytotoxicity than the larger NPs. Notably, the 15-nm SiO₂ NPs induced retinal toxicity in vivo, as demonstrated by increased cell death in the retina, TUNEL-stained retinal cells, retinal ganglion cell degeneration, glial cell activation, and inflammation. In addition, The SiO₂ NPs caused oxidative stress, as demonstrated by the increase in the ROS indicator H₂DCF-DA. Furthermore, the pretreatment of R28 cells with N-acetylcysteine, an ROS scavenger, attenuated the ROS production and cytotoxicity induced by SiO₂ NPs.

Conclusions

These results provide evidence that SiO₂ NPs induce size-dependent retinal toxicity and suggest that glial cell activation and ROS generation contribute to this toxicity.

Graphical Abstract

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12951-022-01326-8.

Quantitative Imaging Biomarkers in Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Diabetic Eye Disease: A Step Closer to Precision Medicine

The management of retinal diseases relies heavily on digital imaging data, including optical coherence tomography (OCT) and fluorescein angiography (FA). Targeted feature extraction and the objective quantification of features provide important opportunities in biomarker discovery, disease burden assessment, and predicting treatment response. Additional important advantages include increased objectivity in interpretation, longitudinal tracking, and ability to incorporate computational models to create automated diagnostic and clinical decision support systems. Advances in computational technology, including deep learning and radiomics, open new doors for developing an imaging phenotype that may provide in-depth personalized disease characterization and enhance opportunities in precision medicine. In this review, we summarize current quantitative and radiomic imaging biomarkers described in the literature for age-related macular degeneration and diabetic eye disease using imaging modalities such as OCT, FA, and OCT angiography (OCTA). Various approaches used to identify and extract these biomarkers that utilize artificial intelligence and deep learning are also summarized in this review. These quantifiable biomarkers and automated approaches have unleashed new frontiers of personalized medicine where treatments are tailored, based on patient-specific longitudinally trackable biomarkers, and response monitoring can be achieved with a high degree of accuracy.

The 2-Year Leakage Index and Quantitative Microaneurysm Results of the RECOVERY Study: Quantitative Ultra-Widefield Findings in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Treated with Intravitreal Aflibercept

Eyes with proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR) have been shown to improve in the leakage index and microaneurysm (MA) count after intravitreal aflibercept (IAI) treatment. The authors investigated these changes via automatic segmentation on ultra-widefield fluorescein angiography (UWFA). Forty subjects with PDR were randomized to receive either 2 mg IAI every 4 weeks (Arm 1) or every 12 weeks (Arm 2) through Year 1. After Year 1, Arm 1 switched to quarterly IAI and Arm 2 to monthly IAI through Year 2. By Year 2, the Arm 1 leakage index decreased by 43% from Baseline (p = 0.03) but increased by 59% from Year 1 (p = 0.04). Arm 2 decreased by 61% from Baseline (p = 0.008) and by 31% from Year 1 (p = 0.12). Both cohorts exhibited a significant decline in MAs from Baseline to Year 2 (871 to 410; p < 0.001; 776 to 207; p < 0.001, respectively). Subjects with an improved leakage and MA count showed a more significant improvement in the Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Scale (DRSS) score. Moreover, central subfield thickness (CST) was positively associated with changes in the leakage index. In conclusion, the leakage index and MA counts significantly improved from Baseline following IAI treatment, and monthly injections provided a more rapid and sustained reduction in these parameters compared with quarterly injections.

Real-Time Diabetic Retinopathy Severity Score Level versus Ultra-Widefield Leakage Index-Guided Management of Diabetic Retinopathy: Two-Year Outcomes from the Randomized PRIME Trial

The prospective PRIME trial applied real-time, objective imaging biomarkers to determine individualized retreatment needs with intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAI) among eyes with diabetic retinopathy (DR). 40 eyes with nonproliferative or proliferative DR without diabetic macular edema received monthly IAI until a DR severity scale (DRSS) level improvement of ≥2 steps was achieved. Eyes were randomized 1:1 to DRSS- or PLI- guided management. At the final 2-year visit, DRSS level was stable or improved compared to baseline in all eyes, and mean PLI decreased by 11% (p = 0.73) and 23.6% (p = 0.25) in the DRSS- and PLI-guided arms. In both arms, the percent of pro re nata (PRN) visits requiring IAI was significantly higher in year 2 versus 1 (p < 0.0001). The percent of PRN visits receiving IAI during year 1 was significantly correlated with the percent of PRN visits with IAI during year 2 (p < 0.0001). Through week 104, 77.4% of instances of DRSS level worsening in the DRSS-guided arm were preceded by or occurred alongside an increase of PLI. Overall, consistent IAI re-treatment interval requirements were observed longitudinally among individual patients. Additionally, PLI increases appeared to precede DRSS level worsening, highlighting PLI as a valuable biomarker in the management of DR.