Complications of Preseptal Versus Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Benign Essential Blepharospasm: A Randomized Controlled Trial

TFOS Lifestyle: Impact of elective medications and procedures on the ocular surface

The word "elective" refers to medications and procedures undertaken by choice or with a lower grade of prioritization. Patients usually use elective medications or undergo elective procedures to treat pathologic conditions or for cosmetic enhancement, impacting their lifestyle positively and, thus, improving their quality of life. However, those interventions can affect the homeostasis of the tear film and ocular surface. Consequently, they generate signs and symptoms that could impair the patient's quality of life. This report describes the impact of elective topical and systemic medications and procedures on the ocular surface and the underlying mechanisms. Moreover, elective procedures performed for ocular diseases, cosmetic enhancement, and non-ophthalmic interventions, such as radiotherapy and bariatric surgery, are discussed. The report also evaluates significant anatomical and biological consequences of non-urgent interventions to the ocular surface, such as neuropathic and neurotrophic keratopathies. Besides that, it provides an overview of the prophylaxis and management of pathological conditions resulting from the studied interventions and suggests areas for future research. The report also contains a systematic review investigating the quality of life among people who have undergone small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE). Overall, SMILE refractive surgery seems to cause more vision disturbances than LASIK in the first month post-surgery, but less dry eye symptoms in long-term follow up.

Botulinum Neurotoxin Type a Injection Combined with Absorbable Punctal Plug Insertion: An Effective Therapy for Blepharospasm Patients with Dry Eye

Blepharospasm patients often have dry eye manifestations. Botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) injection has been the main management for blepharospasm and absorbable punctal plug (APP) insertion is shown to be effective in the treatment of dry eye. However, there have been no studies investigating the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP in blepharospasm patients with dry eye. In this retrospective study, 17 blepharospasm patients with dry eye treated by BoNT-A injection and 12 receiving BoNT-A plus APP treatment were enrolled. The efficacy was evaluated according to the Jankovic rating scale, Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI), fluorescein staining (FL), fluorescein tear break-up time (FBUT) and Schirmer I test (SIT). Both BoNT-A and BoNT-A+APP treatment effectively reduced the functional impairment of blepharospasm. At baseline, all the patients had high OSDI scores (BoNT-A group: 82.48 ± 7.37, BoNT-A+APP group: 78.82 ± 4.60, p = 0.112), but relatively low degrees of FL (BoNT-A group: 3.18 ± 1.01, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.50 ± 1.24, p = 0.466), FBUT (BoNT-A group: 1.71 ± 0.77, BoNT-A+APP group: 2.17 ± 0.58, p = 0.077) and SIT (BoNT-A group: 2.53 ± 0.99, BoNT-A+APP group: 3.17 ± 1.23, p = 0.153). After treatment, OSDI, FL, FBUT and SIT were all obviously restored in the two groups. When comparing the changing rates, only OSDI (BoNT-A group: -52.23% ± 15.57%, BoNT-A+APP group: -61.84% ± 9.10%, p = 0.047) and FL (BoNT-A group: -22.55% ± 25.98%, BoNT-A+APP group: -41.94% ± 14.46%, p = 0.016) showed significant differences between the two groups. This study suggests that OSDI is not applicable in the diagnosis of dry eye among blepharospasm patients. For blepharospasm patients with severe dry eye symptoms, especially those with fluorescein staining in the cornea, the combined treatment of BoNT-A and APP is more effective than using BoNT-A alone.

Preseptal and Pretarsal Botulinum Toxin Injection in Hemifacial Spasm and Blepharospasm: A 10-Year Comparative Study

Purpose

Preseptal and pretarsal botulinum toxin injections are approved for treatment of hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm. However, the long-term data is limited. We compared the efficacy, safety, and costs between preseptal and pretarsal injection in hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm.

Patients and Methods

The data were retrieved between 2011 and 2021. Consecutive hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm botulinum toxin patients were categorized as preseptal or pretarsal. Study outcomes were the difference in pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale, self-reporting scales, time-related treatment, safety, and cost.

Results

Of 152 botulinum toxin-injected patients, 117 (77.0%) patients had hemifacial spasm and 35 (33.0%) patients had blepharospasm. Analysis included data pertinent to 1665 injections in hemifacial spasm (920 preseptal and 745 pretarsal) and 527 injections in blepharospasm (210 preseptal and 317 pretarsal). The difference between pre-and post-treatment modified Jankovic scale was lower in the preseptal group than in the pretarsal group in both hemifacial spasm and blepharospasm (1.5±0.8 vs 1.8±0.6, P-value <0.001 and 1.8±0.8 vs 3.1±0.9, P-value <0.001). There was no difference in duration of maximum response in hemifacial spasm between groups, while the blepharospasm with preseptal had a longer duration than blepharospasm with pretarsal. The preseptal injection was associated with more adverse events overall than the pretarsal (9.4% vs 5.2%, P-value <0.001). The total dose and cost per session in the preseptal group is lower for onabotulinum toxin but higher for abobotulinum toxin.

Conclusion

Pretarsal injections reduced symptom severity with fewer side effects. Further studies on the pharmacoeconomics of both techniques are required.

Botulinum toxin for motor disorders

Botulinum neurotoxins are a group of biological toxins produced by the gram-negative bacteria Clostridium botulinum. After intramuscular injection, they produce dose-related muscle relaxation, which has proven useful in the treatment of a large number of motor and movement disorders. In this chapter, we discuss the utility of botulinum toxin treatment in three major and common medical conditions related to the dysfunction of the motor system, namely dystonia, tremor, and spasticity. A summary of the existing literature is provided along with different techniques of injection including those recommended by the authors.

Is It Worth Using Botulinum Toxin Injections for the Management of Mild to Moderate Blepharoptosis?

BACKGROUND

Mild ptosis can be aesthetically displeasing for patients, especially in unilateral cases. However, some patients do not desire to undergo a surgical repair. Botulinum toxin injection might be an option in these cases.

OBJECTIVES

The authors sought to objectively examine the effects of botulinum neurotoxin A (BoNT-A) injection into the orbicularis oculi muscle in the management of blepharoptosis.

METHODS

In this prospective study, 8 patients with mild to moderate ptosis received application of BoNT-A in the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle. Standardized photographs were obtained at baseline and 2, 4, and 24 weeks. Digital image analysis software (Image J) was employed for objective analysis. Primary outcomes were the margin reflex distance-1 and qualitative changes on a 4-point scale.

RESULTS

A significant increase in the margin reflex distance-1 on the treated side (baseline: 2.00 ± 1.13 mm; week 2: 2.52 ± 1.13 mm; P = 0.003) and a significant reduction (baseline: 3.23 ± 0.92 mm, week 2: 3.07 ± 0.96; P = 0.0268) on the contralateral eyelid were observed at week 2. After 24 weeks, the effect of BoNT-A diminished, and no significant difference from baseline was observed in either eyelid. Subjectively, 87.5% of patients reported improvement in their eyelid ptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Botulinum toxin injection in the pretarsal orbicularis oculi muscle can be an option to temporarily manage ptosis in patients who do not desire to undergo a surgical procedure. This alternative treatment can also be employed to manage temporary ptosis induced by botulinum toxin diffusion to the levator aponeurosis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4