1
|
Paruchuri SS, Mahmoudzadeh R, Wheeler S, Randolph J. Prevention and management of postcataract cystoid macular edema. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2025; 36:182-188. [PMID: 39976161 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review highlights treatment options, both under investigation and currently available, for treating postcataract macular edema. An update on current clinical studies for postcataract macular edema has been summarized. RECENT FINDINGS Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is a common complication of cataract surgery leading to decreased visual acuity due to inflammation promoting vascular permeability and macular edema. There is no gold standard protocol for treatment with physicians choosing topical NSAIDs and corticosteroids most commonly. Recent developments in a therapeutic approach to PCME include improved delivery methods via implantation and improved drugs and combinational therapies. SUMMARY While PCME treatments are poorly studied due to their common sudden resolution without medical intervention, chronic PCME is debilitating for patients. Clinical studies show hope for improved drug delivery methods, practices to prevent potential PCME, and improved therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Raziyeh Mahmoudzadeh
- Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Ophthalmology, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Jessica Randolph
- Virginia Commonwealth University Department of Ophthalmology, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fouad YA, Karimaghaei S, Elhusseiny AM, Alagorie AR, Brown AD, Sallam AB. Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2025; 36:62-69. [PMID: 39446879 DOI: 10.1097/icu.0000000000001101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME) is the most common postoperative complication of cataract surgery, resulting in visual decline. In this review, we discuss its pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical presentation, and the current available evidence on therapeutic management. RECENT FINDINGS Patients with diabetes mellitus have twice the risk of developing PCME as compared to nondiabetic individuals. Recent large database studies have revealed an increased risk among young, male, and black patients. A previous history of PCME is perhaps the strongest risk factor for fellow eye involvement. SUMMARY PCME generally occurs around 6 weeks postoperatively and is likely a consequence of postoperative inflammation with disruption of the blood-queous and blood-retina barriers. Optical coherence tomography of the macula servers as a key diagnostic tool. There is a lack of large controlled clinical trials to guide treatment approaches. We recommend a stepwise approach for PCME that includes observation if not visually significant versus treatment with topical nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and steroids if symptomatic. Refractory cases can be treated with a periocular steroid injection, followed by intravitreal steroids if still nonresponsive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yousef A Fouad
- Ophthalmology Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Sam Karimaghaei
- Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | | | - Ahmed R Alagorie
- Ophthalmology Department, Tanta University Hospitals, Tanta, Egypt
| | - Andrew D Brown
- Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| | - Ahmed B Sallam
- Ophthalmology Department, Ain Shams University Hospitals, Cairo, Egypt
- Jones Eye Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Green MB, Butler NJ. Topical and Subcutaneous Interferon-Alpha for the Treatment of Refractory Inflammatory Macular Edema. Ocul Immunol Inflamm 2024:1-7. [PMID: 39012757 DOI: 10.1080/09273948.2024.2374439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/18/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the efficacy of topical interferon alpha-2b (tIFN a2b) and subcutaneous pegylated interferon alpha-2a (peg-IFN a2a) in the treatment of refractory pseudophakic (PME) and uveitic (UME) macular edema. METHODS Retrospective case series of patients with PME or UME that was non-responsive to conventional therapies. Topical IFN a2b drops (1 MIU/ml) were commenced four times a day. Non-responders were offered treatment with subcutaneous peg-IFN a2a starting at 180 mcg weekly. RESULTS Seven eyes of seven patients (three UME and four PME) were treated with tIFN a2b. Three eyes had complete ME resolution with tIFN treatment after a mean of 2.66 weeks (range 1-4 weeks) and no recurrence after a mean total course of 11.33 weeks (range 5-20 weeks). Two cases (both PME) had partial responses to tIFN treatment and two cases (both UME) failed to respond. Of the four eyes that incompletely responded to tIFN (treatment range 6 weeks to 4 months), three were treated with peg-IFN a2a, which invariably led to complete and sustained ME resolution. Adverse effects from topical treatment were mild and consisted mainly of superficial irritation. Adverse effects of subcutaneous treatment included nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and leukopenia, though none limited treatment. CONCLUSIONS Topical IFNa-2b appears safe and effective in isolation or in conjunction with topical steroids for the treatment of inflammatory macular edema (IME) in about half of patients in our small series. All partial and non-responders had complete disease resolution with systemic IFN. Topical IFN a2b should be considered in patients with refractory IME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael B Green
- Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, VA Boston Health Care System Jamaica Plain Campus, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Nicholas J Butler
- Department of Ophthalmology, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, VA Boston Health Care System Jamaica Plain Campus, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Department of Ophthalmology, Massachusetts Eye and Ear, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bunjo LJ, Bacchi S, Pietris J, Chan WO. Current management options for the treatment of refractory postoperative cystoid macular edema: A systematic review. Surv Ophthalmol 2024; 69:606-621. [PMID: 38490455 DOI: 10.1016/j.survophthal.2024.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Revised: 03/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 03/17/2024]
Abstract
Post-operative cystoid macular edema (PCME) is an important complication following intraocular surgery that often resolves spontaneously without treatment. In some cases, PCME may persist despite initial medical therapy, which can adversely impact visual outcomes. Various topical, intraocular and systemic treatments exist for the prevention and management of cystoid macular edema; however, there is no consensus on treatment of refractory cases in the postoperative setting. In accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed 68 articles describing management options and their outcomes for treatment-resistant cases of PCME. The most commonly reported treatments included steroid (39 studies) and biological-based (17 studies) therapies. We provide an overview of the treatment options for refractory PCME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Layla J Bunjo
- The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
| | - Stephen Bacchi
- Lyell McEwin Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - James Pietris
- University of Queensland, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Weng Onn Chan
- Department of Ophthalmology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia; Adelaide Health and Medical Sciences Building, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Afarid M, Azimi A, Meshksar A, Sanie-Jahromi F. Interferons in vitreoretinal diseases; a review on their clinical application, and mechanism of action. Int Ophthalmol 2024; 44:223. [PMID: 38727788 DOI: 10.1007/s10792-024-03144-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 07/12/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review investigates the therapeutic benefits of interferons (IFNs) in vitreoretinal diseases, focusing on their regulatory roles in innate immunological reactions and angiogenesis. The study aims to categorize the clinical outcomes of IFN applications and proposes a molecular mechanism underlying their action. METHODS A systematic review was conducted using MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, EMBASE, and Google Scholar databases to identify randomized clinical trials, case series, and case-control studies related to IFNs' impact on vitreoretinal diseases (1990-2022). The data synthesis involved an in-depth analysis of the anti-inflammatory and anti-angiogenesis effects of IFNs across various studies. RESULTS Our findings indicate that IFNs exhibit efficacy in treating inflammation-associated vitreoretinal disorders. However, a lack of sufficient evidence exists regarding the suitability of IFNs in angiogenesis-associated vitreoretinal diseases like choroidal neovascularization and diabetic retinopathies. The synthesis of data suggests that IFNs may not be optimal for managing advanced stages of angiogenesis-associated disorders. CONCLUSION While IFNs emerge as promising therapeutic candidates for inflammation-related vitreoretinal diseases, caution is warranted in their application for angiogenesis-associated disorders, especially in advanced stages. Further research is needed to elucidate the nuanced molecular pathways of IFN action, guiding their targeted use in specific vitreoretinal conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad Afarid
- Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Boulevard, Poostchi Street, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Azimi
- Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Boulevard, Poostchi Street, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Aidin Meshksar
- Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Boulevard, Poostchi Street, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Fatemeh Sanie-Jahromi
- Poostchi Ophthalmology Research Center, Department of Ophthalmology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Zand Boulevard, Poostchi Street, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kawali A, Sanjay S, Mohan A, Mahendradas P, Shroff S, Shetty R. Intensive topical interferon therapy in uveitic macular edema. Indian J Ophthalmol 2022; 70:2986-2989. [PMID: 35918958 DOI: 10.4103/ijo.ijo_3210_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To evaluate the efficacy of intensive topical interferon alfa-2b (IFN) therapy in uveitic macular edema (UME). Methods This is a prospective, interventional case study of eyes with UME. Commercially available injection IFN for subcutaneous use was reconstituted to form eye drops and a dose of 6 times/day for 2 weeks, 5 times/day for next 2 weeks, followed by 4, 3, 2, 1 taper per month was prescribed. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) and clinical examination was done at 0, 2, 4, 8 weeks, and further as required. Results Nine eyes of 9 patients with UME were studied. Mean central macular thickness (CMT) at presentation was 522.2 μm (range: 408-803 μm). At 2-week, 1-month, and 2-month follow-up, mean CMT decreased to 451.6 μm (range: 322-524 μm), 375.8 μm (range: 287-480 μm), and 360.3 μm (range: 260-485 μm), respectively. Four eyes which showed inadequate response to previous topical IFN therapy (4 times/day) showed significant improvement with intensive therapy at 1 month follow-up. In 4 eyes, UME resolved completely with mean CMT 285.5 μm (range: 260-312 μm) at 7.5 weeks (range: 4-12 weeks). Study exit was seen in 2 cases due to inadequate response and relapse of uveitis. Mean follow up was 3.38 months (range: 1-5 months). Conclusion Intensive topical IFN therapy can be an alternative therapeutic option in the treatment of UME. Study of intraocular penetration, combination with other drugs, and the efficacy of IFN separately for different uveitic entities may explore new avenues in treatment of UME.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ankush Kawali
- Department of Uveitis and Ocular Immunology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Srinivasan Sanjay
- Department of Uveitis and Ocular Immunology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Ashwin Mohan
- Department of Retina, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Padmamalini Mahendradas
- Department of Uveitis and Ocular Immunology, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Sujani Shroff
- Department of Glaucoma, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| | - Rohit Shetty
- Department of Cornea and Refractive, Narayana Nethralaya, Bangalore, Karnataka, India
| |
Collapse
|