Comparison of maxillary anterior tooth movement between Invisalign and fixed appliances

Unveiling the role of artificial intelligence applied to clear aligner therapy: A scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To conduct a scoping review on the application of artificial intelligence (AI) in clear aligner therapy and to assess the extent of AI integration and automation in orthodontic software currently available to orthodontists.

DATA AND SOURCES

A systematic electronic literature search was performed in the following databases: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Scopus. Also, grey literature resources up to March 2024 were reviewed. English-language studies on potential AI applications for clear aligner therapy were included based on an independent evaluation by two reviewers. An assessment of the automation steps in orthodontic software available on the market up to March 2024 was also conducted.

STUDY SELECTION AND RESULTS

Out of 708 studies, 41 were included. Sixteen articles focused on tooth segmentation, four on registration of digital models, 13 on digital setup, and eight on remote monitoring. Moreover, 13 aligner software programs were identified and assessed for their level of automation. Only one software demonstrated complete automation of the steps involved in the orthodontic digital workflow.

CONCLUSIONS

None of the 13 identified aligner software programs were evaluated in the 41 included studies. However, AI-based tooth segmentation achieved 98 % accuracy, while AI effectively merged CBCT and IOS data, supported digital measurements, predicted treatment outcomes, and showed potential for remote monitoring.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

AI applications in clear aligner therapy are on the rise. This scoping review enables orthodontists to identify AI-based solutions in orthodontic planning and understand its implications, which can potentially enhance treatment efficiency, accuracy, and predictability.

A study on the compressive strength of three-dimensional direct printing aligner material for specific designing of clear aligners

BACKGROUND

The demand for orthodontic treatment using clear aligners has been gradually increasing because of their superior esthetics compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the compressive strength of three-dimensional direct printing aligners (3DPA) with that of conventional thermo-forming aligners (TFA) to determine their clinical applicability. In the experimental group, the 3DPA material TC-85 (TC-85 full) was used to create angular protrusions called rectangular pressure areas (RPA). A protrusion akin to the power ridge typically employed in conventional TFAs was created using glycol-modified polyethylene terephthalate (PETG; Control 1). RPA was created using the same TC-85 without filling the protrusions (TC-85 blank; Control 2). Compression cycle tests were conducted on an LTM 3 h electrodynamic testing machine (Zwick Roell, Germany), with 500 cycles and compression depths of 100, 300, 500, and 700 µm. Twenty specimens were tested for PETG, 17 for the TC-85 blank, and 19 for the TC-85 full.

RESULTS

Changes in the compressive force were assessed based on the material and thickness. The results indicated significantly higher and broader ranges of compressive strength for specimens fabricated with the 3DPA material TC-85 compared with those fabricated using PETG. Among the TC-85 specimens, TC-85 full demonstrated the highest statistically significant compressive strength .

CONCLUSIONS

3DPA technology enables precise modifications in the shape and inner thickness at specific dental sites, including the creation of ridges in targeted areas, of aligners. These alterations enhance the biomechanical capability of aligners to exert selective forces necessary for desired tooth movement while reducing the number of attachments, thereby demonstrating the clinical potential of 3D-printed aligners in orthodontic treatment.

Comparison of treatment effects between clear aligners and fixed appliances in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization

OBJECTIVES

The biomechanics in achieving molar distalization may differ between fixed appliances and clear aligners in the control of tooth movement. The objective of this study was to compare the treatment effects between clear aligners (CA) and fixed appliances (FA) in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.

METHODS

The sample consisted of 46 subjects with mild-to-moderate crowding. A total of 22 patients treated with clear aligners (age, 25.66 ± 6.11 years old) and 24 patients treated with fixed appliances (age, 24.04 ± 4.95 years old) for miniscrew-assisted molar distalization were included in this study. The dental and skeletal changes were evaluated by the pre- and post-treatment lateral cephalograms.

RESULTS

Significant changes were found with the vertical variables SN-OP angle (2.24 ± 3.22°, P < .05) and SN-MP angle (0.73 ± 1.15°, P < .05) for the FA group when compared with the CA group (SN-OP angle 0.41 ± 2.26° and SN-MP angle -0.21 ± 1.38°, P > .05). Both treatment groups achieved a 2-3 mm. molar distalization with significant intrusion of the upper molars. The CA group showed significantly less distal tipping of molars (U6^PP angle -2.29 ± 3.29° and L6^MP angle -2.92 ± 2.49°, P < .05) compared to the FA group (-5.24 ± 4.28° and -5.53 ± 5.03°, P < .05). In addition, significant retraction and lingual inclination of the upper and lower incisors were found in both groups.

LIMITATIONS

The changes of tooth position were evaluated by 2D lateral cephalograms, not 3D measurements.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to fixed appliances, clear aligners seemed to have better control of vertical dimension and distal tipping of molars in patients treated with miniscrew-assisted molar distalization.

Treatment outcome comparison of Invisalign vs fixed appliance treatment in first premolar extraction patients

INTRODUCTION

In this study, we compared the dentitional changes after Invisalign and conventional orthodontic treatment with 4 first premolar extractions.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 57 patients whose orthodontic treatment involved the extraction of 4 first premolars because of bialveolar protrusion. A total of 27 patients were treated with Invisalign (mean age, 25.5 ± 5.2 years) and 30 patients with the fixed appliance (mean age, 24.4 ± 5.8 years). The angular and linear changes of the maxillary and mandibular central incisors, second premolars, first molars, and second molars were measured from the recordings on the basis of the lateral cephalograms taken before and after treatment. The angular changes of the canines and second premolars were measured using panoramic radiographs.

RESULTS

The overbite and interincisal angle increased significantly in the Invisalign group compared with in the conventional fixed appliance group (P <0.05). The maxillary central incisors showed increased lingual tipping in the Invisalign group (P <0.05), whereas there was no statistically significant difference in the angular change of the mandibular incisors between groups (P >0.05). The maxillary first and second molars showed mesial tipping in the Invisalign group (P <0.05). The maxillary second premolars, first and second molars, and the mandibular second molars showed mesial movement in the Invisalign group (P <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The Invisalign group showed more statistically significant lingual tipping of the maxillary central incisors, distal tipping of the maxillary canines, and mesial tipping of the maxillary first and second molars after maximum retraction of the anterior teeth compared with the fixed appliance group.

Comparative assessment of orthodontic clear aligner versus fixed appliance for anterior retraction: a finite element study

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to conduct a comparative evaluation of different designs of clear aligners and examine the disparities between clear aligners and fixed appliances.

METHODS

3D digital models were created, consisting of a maxillary dentition without first premolars, maxilla, periodontal ligaments, attachments, micro-implant, 3D printed lingual retractor, brackets, archwire and clear aligner. The study involved the creation of five design models for clear aligner maxillary anterior internal retraction and one design model for fixed appliance maxillary anterior internal retraction, which were subsequently subjected to finite element analysis. These design models included: (1) Model C0 Control, (2) Model C1 Posterior Micro-implant, (3) Model C2 Anterior Micro-implant, (4) Model C3 Palatal Plate, (5) Model C4 Lingual Retractor, and (6) Model F0 Fixed Appliance.

RESULTS

In the clear aligner models, a consistent pattern of tooth movement was observed. Notably, among all tested models, the modified clear aligner Model C3 exhibited the smallest differences in sagittal displacement of the crown-root of the central incisor, vertical displacement of the central incisor, sagittal displacement of the second premolar and second molar, as well as vertical displacement of posterior teeth. However, distinct variations in tooth movement trends were observed between the clear aligner models and the fixed appliance model. Furthermore, compared to the fixed appliance model, significant increases in tooth displacement were achieved with the use of clear aligner models.

CONCLUSIONS

In the clear aligner models, the movement trend of the teeth remained consistent, but there were variations in the amount of tooth displacement. Overall, the Model C3 exhibited better torque control and provided greater protection for posterior anchorage teeth compared to the other four clear aligner models. On the other hand, the fixed appliance model provides superior anterior torque control and better protection of the posterior anchorage teeth compared to clear aligner models. The clear aligner approach and the fixed appliance approach still exhibit a disparity; nevertheless, this study offers a developmental direction and establishes a theoretical foundation for future non-invasive, aesthetically pleasing, comfortable, and efficient modalities of clear aligner treatment.