Factors associated with improved toxicity and tolerability of intraperitoneal chemotherapy in advanced-stage epithelial ovarian cancers

A Modified Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Regimen for Ovarian Cancer: Technique and Treatment Outcomes

Simple Summary

To overcome the limitations of intraperitoneal chemotherapy (IP), which include a low completion rate and port-related toxicities, we modified three institutional procedures concerning IP chemotherapy in patients with ovarian cancer: (i) insertion of an IP port in a neutral abdominal position, (ii) daily irrigation of the peritoneal cavity with warmed dextrose fluid (5%) for IP port patency and to prevent adhesion, and (iii) intravenous infusion of cisplatin on Day 2 after left colonic surgery. Among patients who underwent left colonic surgery, including low anterior resection, 27 were investigated to identify the rate of completion of six planned cycles and the feasibility of IP chemotherapy. With modifications in IP chemotherapy, the completion rate improved even after patients underwent left colonic surgery during cytoreduction with enhanced feasibility.

Abstract

This study aimed to investigate treatment outcomes concerning three institutional modifications to intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy for patients with ovarian cancer. The medical records of 27 patients treated with IP chemotherapy were retrospectively reviewed. All patients had three IP chemotherapy institutional modifications; modified Gynecologic Oncology Group 172 regimen was used for the chemotherapy regimen. With institutional modifications, 63.0% (17/27) completed all six cycles of IP chemotherapy. Of the 17 and 10 patients with primary and recurrent ovarian cancer, respectively, 55.6% (15/27) underwent left colonic surgery, including low anterior resection. In patients with primary ovarian cancer, the IP chemotherapy completion rate was 76.5% (13/17). In patients with and without left colonic surgery, the IP chemotherapy completion rates were 53.3% (8/15) and 75.0% (9/12), respectively. No complications related to left colonic surgery during IP chemotherapy were identified. The most frequent grade 3–4 toxicities were gastrointestinal toxicities (33.3%) and neutropenia (29.6%). The median progression-free survival was 19.5 months in all patients and 25.2 months in patients with primary ovarian cancer. Three institutional modifications to IP chemotherapy increased the completion rate for planned IP chemotherapy, even after left colonic surgery. Further studies involving a larger study cohort are required to confirm survival outcomes using these modifications.

Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Should we look closer at the microenvironment?

The age of cancer as an isolated single-cell concept is now behind us. It is now established that epithelial ovarian cancer, like other cancers, interacts with the healthy bystander cells to influence them and takes advantage of their nutritional, immunological, disseminating and other capacities. This interaction has become a therapeutic target, as shown by the numerous studies on this subject. Intraperitoneal chemo-hyperthermia has been part of the therapeutic armamentarium for some time yet its efficiency in ovarian cancer has only been recently proven in a randomized controlled trial. However, its therapeutic performance is not revolutionary and epithelial ovarian cancer maintains a high mortality. In this review, we studied the impact of HIPEC on the microenvironment and vice versa to determine whether it could be the key to this lukewarm efficacy. We began by exploring the modalities of HIPEC and establishing the reasons that make this treatment topical. Then, we examined its impact on each element of the tumor environment to obtain a global view of the resistance mechanisms at work in HIPEC.

Nanotechnology-Based Cisplatin Intracellular Delivery to Enhance Chemo-Sensitivity of Ovarian Cancer

Background

Platinum resistance is a major challenge in the management of ovarian cancer. Even low levels of acquired resistance at the cellular level lead to impaired response to cisplatin. In ovarian cancer intraperitoneal therapy, nanoparticle formulation can improve the cisplatin’s pharmacokinetics and safety profile.

Purpose

This work aimed to investigate the chemo-sensitivity of ovarian cancer SKOV3 cells upon short-term (72h) single treatment of cisplatin and cisplatin-loaded biodegradable nanoparticles (Cis-NP). The aim was then to determine the therapeutic properties of Cis-NP in vivo using a SKOV3-luc cells’ xenograft model in mice.

Methods

Cell cytotoxicity was assessed after the exposure of the cell culture to cisplatin or Cis-NP. The effect of treatments on EMT and CSC-like phenotype was studied by analyzing a panel of markers by flow cytometry. Intracellular platinum concentration was determined by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICS-MS), and gene expression was evaluated by RNAseq analysis. The efficacy of intraperitoneal chemotherapy was evaluated in a SKOV3-luc cells’ xenograft model in mice, through a combination of bioluminescence imaging, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses.

Results

We observed in vitro that short-term treatment of cisplatin has a critical role in determining the potential induction of chemoresistance, and a nanotechnology-based drug delivery system can modulate it. The RNAseq analysis underlines a protective effect of nanoparticle system according to their ability to down-regulate several genes involved in chemoresistance, cell proliferation, and apoptosis. The highest intracellular platinum concentration obtained with Cis-NP treatment significantly improved the efficacy. Consistent with in vitro results, we found that Cis-NP treatment in vivo can significantly reduce tumor burden and aggressiveness compared to the free drug.

Conclusion

Nanoparticle-mediated cisplatin delivery may serve as an intracellular depot impacting the cisplatin pharmacodynamic performance at cellular levels. These features may contribute to improving the drawbacks of conventional intraperitoneal therapy, and therefore will require further investigations in vivo.

[Malignant epithelial ovarian cancer: Role of intra peritoneal chemotherapy and hyperthermic intra peritoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC): Article drafted from the French Guidelines in oncology entitled "Initial management of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer" developed by FRANCOGYN, CNGOF, SFOG, GINECO-ARCAGY under the aegis of CNGOF and endorsed by INCa]

Intraperitoneal drug delivery in first-line treatment of advanced ovarian cancer have been widely studied. After a complete primary surgery or with residual disease<1cm, intraperitoneal chemotherapy significantly improves disease-free and overall survival (NP1), but with more local and systemic toxicities. Whenever this therapeutic option is under consideration, the ratio efficacy/toxicity must be carefully discussed. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy has to be considered after complete or optimal primary surgery in ovarian, tubal or primitive peritoneal carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC. This treatment must be performed by trained teams and after an assessment of the ratio efficacy/toxicity. In one randomized study, hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) using cisplatinum at interval surgery demonstrated an improvement in recurrence free and overall survival compared to surgery alone, in patients initially not resectable and with residual tumor less than 1cm (complete or optimal surgery) (NP1). HIPEC has to be considered after a complete or optimal interval surgery (residu<10mm) in patients with ovarian, tubal or primitive carcinomatosis FIGO IIIC, initially not resectable (Grade B).

Imaging and therapy of ovarian cancer: clinical application of nanoparticles and future perspectives

Despite significant advances in cancer diagnostics and treatment, ovarian cancers (OC) continue to kill more than 150,000 women every year worldwide. Due to the relatively asymptomatic nature and the advanced stage of the disease at the time of diagnosis, OC is the most lethal gynecologic malignancy. The current treatment for advanced OC relies on the synergistic effect of combining surgical cytoreduction and chemotherapy; however, beside the fact that chemotherapy resistance is a major challenge in OC management, new imaging strategies are needed to target microscopic lesions and improve both cytoreductive surgery and patient outcomes. In this context, nanostructured probes are emerging as a new class of medical tool that can simultaneously provide imaging contrast, target tumor cells, and carry a wide range of medicines resulting in better diagnosis and therapeutic precision. Herein we summarize several exemplary efforts in nanomedicine for addressing unmet clinical needs.

Investigating the Impact of Body Mass Index on Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy Outcomes in Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Cancer

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on completion, complications, and clinical outcomes of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy in patients with advanced-stage ovarian cancer.

METHODS

Patients with optimally cytoreduced International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage IIIC ovarian cancer treated with IP chemotherapy were retrospectively identified using an institutional review board-approved database. Clinical data were abstracted from the longitudinal medical record. Survival estimates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Ninety-two patients (35.5%) completed at least one cycle of IP chemotherapy. For these patients, there was no difference in histology, surgical complexity, or degree of cytoreduction based on BMI. Sixty-five percent of normal weight, 70% of overweight, and 59.1% of obese women completed 6 cycles (P = 0.697). There was also no significant difference in IP chemotherapy complications (P = 0.303). Body mass index had no impact on disease-free survival (P = 0.44) or overall survival, with a median overall survival of 68.5 months for normal weight, 65.9 months for overweight, and 61.7 months for obese women (P = 0.25). However, on multivariate analysis, obesity had an odds ratio of 2.92 (P = 0.02) for mortality. There was a trend toward treatment with intravenous chemotherapy (84.2%) over IP (15.8%) in patients with class II obesity (P = 0.06).

DISCUSSION

There was no difference in completion of IP chemotherapy or complications with respect to BMI; however, there was a trend away from treatment with IP therapy in extreme obesity. These data suggest that IP chemotherapy is feasible in obese patients without incurring increased morbidity.

Discovery of candidate tumor biomarkers for treatment with intraperitoneal chemotherapy for ovarian cancer

Tumor mRNA expression was used to discover genes associated with worse survival or no survival benefit after intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy. Data for high grade serous ovarian cancer patients treated with IP (n = 90) or IV-only (n =  398) chemotherapy was obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared between IP and IV groups using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox regression. Validations were performed by analyses of microarray and RNA-Seq mRNA expression data. PFS and OS were compared between IP and IV groups by permutation testing stratified by gene expression. P-values are two-tailed. IP chemotherapy increased PFS (26.7 vs 16.0 months, HR 0.43 (0.28-0.66), p = 0.0001) and OS (49.6 vs 38.2 months, HR 0.46 (0.25-0.83), p = 0.01). Increased expression of NCAM2 and TSHR and decreased expression of GCNT1 was associated with decreased PFS and OS after IV chemotherapy (p < 0.05). High tumor expression of LMAN2, FZD4, FZD5, or STT3A was associated with no significant PFS increase after IP compared to IV chemotherapy. Low expression of APC2 and high expression of FUT9 was associated with 5.5 and 7.2 months, respectively, decreased OS after IP compared to IV chemotherapy (p ≤ 0.007).

Prognostic significance of the number of postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy cycles for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Phase 3 trials have demonstrated a survival advantage for patients with optimally debulked epithelial ovarian cancer who received intravenous (IV) and intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy compared with IV therapy alone. This was despite a significant proportion of patients in the IV/IP arms not completing all 6 planned cycles. Our objective was to evaluate the prognostic significance of the number of IV/IP cycles administered.

METHODS/MATERIALS

Data were analyzed for all patients with stage III to IV epithelial ovarian cancer who underwent optimal primary cytoreduction followed by 1 or more cycles of IV/IP chemotherapy from January 2005 to July 2011 at our institution. A landmark analysis was performed to associate progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with the number of IV/IP cycles given.

RESULTS

We identified 201 patients; 26 (13%) received 1 to 2 cycles of IV/IP chemotherapy, 41 (20%) received 3 to 4 cycles, and 134 (67%) received 5 to 6 cycles. The 5-year PFS for patients who received 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6 cycles was 18%, 29%, and 17%, respectively. The 5-year OS for patients who received 1 to 2, 3 to 4, and 5 to 6 cycles was 44%, 54%, and 57%, respectively. There was no significant difference in PFS (P = 0.31) or OS (P = 0.14) between the 3 groups. The most common reason for discontinuing IV/IP therapy was treatment-related toxicity (77%). Postoperative complications were the most common reason for not initiating IV/IP therapy (42%) in patients who subsequently transitioned to it.

CONCLUSIONS

We did not detect a significant survival difference between patients who received 1 to 2, 3 to 4, or 5 to 6 IV/IP chemotherapy cycles. Women may still derive a survival benefit if they receive fewer than 6 IV/IP cycles.

A comparison of primary intraperitoneal chemotherapy to consolidation intraperitoneal chemotherapy in optimally resected advanced ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

To compare survival outcomes for patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) who received primary intravenous/intraperitoneal (IV/IP) chemotherapy to those who received IV followed by consolidation (treatment given to patients in remission) IP chemotherapy.

METHODS

Data were analyzed and compared for all patients with stage III-IV EOC who underwent optimal primary cytoreduction (residual disease ≤ 1 cm) followed by cisplatin-based consolidation IP chemotherapy (1/2001-12/2005) or primary IV/IP chemotherapy (1/2005-7/2011).

RESULTS

We identified 224 patients; 62 (28%) received IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy and 162 (72%) received primary IV/IP chemotherapy. The primary IP group had significantly more patients with serous tumors. The consolidation IP group had a significantly greater median preoperative platelet count, CA-125, and amount of ascites. There were no differences in residual disease at the end of cytoreduction between both groups. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was greater for the primary IP group; however, this did not reach statistical significance (23.7 months vs 19.7 months; HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.57-1.06; p=0.11). The median overall survival (OS) was significantly greater for the primary IP group (78.8 months vs 57.5 months; HR 0.56; 95% CI, 0.38-0.83; p=0.004). On multivariate analysis, after adjusting for confounders, the difference in PFS was not significant (HR 0.78; 95% CI, 0.56-1.11; p=0.17), while the difference in OS remained significant (HR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.39-0.89; p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

In our study, primary IV/IP chemotherapy was associated with improved OS compared to IV followed by consolidation IP chemotherapy in patients with optimally cytoreduced advanced EOC.

First in-mouse development and application of a surgically relevant xenograft model of ovarian carcinoma

Purpose

Preclinical models of epithelial ovarian cancer have not been exploited to evaluate the clinical standard combination therapy of surgical debulking with follow-up chemotherapy. As surgery is critical to patient survival, here we establish a combined surgical/chemotherapy xenograft model of epithelial ovarian cancer and demonstrate its translational relevance.

Experimental Design

SKOV-3^luc+ ovary cancer cells were injected topically into the ovaries of immunodeficient mice. Disease development and effect of clinical standard treatment including hysterectomy, bilateral salpingoophorectomy and removal of metastasis with follow up chemotherapy (carboplatin 12 mg/kg + paclitaxel 15 mg/kg) was evaluated by clinical parameters. Tumor burden was quantified by bioluminescence imaging (BLI).

Results

The xenograft ovarian tumors developed were poorly differentiated and multicystic and the disease disseminated into the peritoneal cavity. When compared to the controls with a mean survival time of 4.9 weeks, mice treated with surgery and chemotherapy, surgery or chemotherapy demonstrated significantly improved mean survival of 16.1 weeks (p = 0.0008), 12.7 weeks (p = 0.0008), or 10.4 weeks (p = 0.008), respectively.

Conclusion

Combined surgical intervention and adjuvant chemotherapy was demonstrated for the first time in an orthotopic xenograft model of ovarian cancer. Similar to observation in human studies the combined approach resulted in the longest medial survival time, advocating application of this strategy in future preclinical therapeutic development for this disease.

Safety and outcome of patients treated with a modified outpatient intraperitoneal regimen for epithelial ovarian, primary peritoneal or fallopian tube cancer

BACKGROUND

Despite the survival benefit of intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy observed in GOG172, significant toxicity and poor treatment completion rates have prevented the widespread acceptance of this regimen. Here, we report our experience with a modified outpatient GOG172 regimen.

METHODS

Eligible patients had stage III, optimally debulked epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer that underwent IP port placement for administration of a modified GOG172 regimen consisting of: (i) intravenous paclitaxel 135 mg/m² on day 1 over 3 h; (ii) intraperitoneal cisplatin 75 mg/m² on day 2, and (iii) intraperitoneal paclitaxel 60 mg/m² on day 8. Day 8 IP paclitaxel was omitted until tolerance of the first cycle of IP cisplatin had been established.

RESULTS

Four or more cycles of IP chemotherapy were completed by 72.5% (29) of 40 eligible patients; 20% of patients exhibited catheter-related complications requiring port removal and discontinuation of IP chemotherapy. Grade 3-4 hematologic, metabolic and gastrointestinal toxicities occurred in 36, 8 and 21% of the patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 47.7 months, progression-free and overall survival was comparable to GOG172.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified outpatient GOG172 regimen is associated with less toxicity and improved completion rates compared to the original GOG172 regimen.