Cancer of the uterus and treatment of stress incontinence: a pilot study

Pelvic floor dysfunction survivorship needs and referrals in the gynecologic oncology population: a narrative review

The population of survivors of gynecologic malignancies continues to grow. The population of gynecologic oncology survivors has a high prevalence of pelvic floor disorders. Gynecologic oncology patients identify several survivorship needs, including a need for more focused pelvic floor disorder sequelae care. The increasing focus on patient needs following cancer treatment has led to the development of survivorship care plans and other strategies for addressing post-treatment transitions and sequelae. Common themes in patient survivorship care are patient needs for flexible and integrated care, and it is unclear if survivorship care plans in their current state improve patient outcomes. Patient referrals, specifically to urogynecologists, may help address the gaps in survivorship care of pelvic floor dysfunction.The objective of this review is to discuss the burden of pelvic floor disorders in the gynecologic population and to contextualize these needs within broader survivorship needs. The review will then discuss current strategies of survivorship care, including a discussion of whether these methods meet survivorship pelvic floor disorder needs. This review addresses several gaps in the literature by contextualizing pelvic floor disorder needs within other survivorship needs and providing a critical discussion of current survivorship care strategies with a focus on pelvic floor disorders.

Functional Changes of the Genitourinary and Gastrointestinal Systems before and after the Treatment of Endometrial Cancer-A Systematic Review

Simple Summary

Endometrial cancer is currently one of the most common gynecological cancer and accounts for around 5% of all female cancers. The treatment strategy most often includes surgery and adjuvant radiation therapy. Thanks to the high effectiveness of used treatment methods, the patients can live longer lives. Unfortunately their quality of life can be negatively affected by side effects resulting from weakening pelvic floor such as urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and fecal incontinence. In our paper we analyzed the studies published between 2010 and 2020 that touch upon the prevalence and management of pelvic floor dysfunction in endometrial cancer patients. Our results show increase in the incidence of pelvic floor disorders after various forms of endometrial cancer treatment and the need for more good quality research in the subject to be able to provide patients with holistic care focused on minimizing treatment side effects and prioritizing their quality of life.

Abstract

The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC), which coexists with such civilization diseases as diabetes, obesity or hypertension, is constantly increasing. Treatment includes surgery as well as brachytherapy, teletherapy, rarely chemotherapy or hormone therapy. Due to the good results of the treatment, the occurrence of side effects of therapy becomes a problem for the patients. One of the large groups of side effects includes the pelvic organ prolapse, urinary and fecal incontinence. The aim of this study was to present current knowledge on the occurrence of pelvic floor dysfunction in women treated for EC. A literature review was conducted in the PubMED and WoS databases, including articles on pelvic floor dysfunction in women with EC. PRISMA principles were followed in the research methodology. A total of 1361 publications were retrieved. Based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria, 24 papers were eligible for the review. Mostly retrospective studies based on different questionnaires were evaluated. No prospective studies were found in which, in addition to subjective assessment, clinical examination and objective assessment of urinary incontinence were used. Studies show a significant increase in the incidence of pelvic floor disorders, including urinary incontinence, after various forms of EC treatment. We believe that assessment of complications after endometrial cancer treatment is clinically relevant. The review emphasizes the importance of programming prospective studies to prevent and address these disorders at each stage of oncologic treatment.

Mesh Complication Rates Following Pelvic Radiation Therapy in Women With History of Synthetic Midurethral Sling Implantation

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the risk of mesh complications in women with and without subsequent pelvic and abdominal radiation therapy (RT).

METHODS

We identified women within a large health care organization who underwent mesh-augmented surgery for pelvic floor disorders between 2008 and 2014 and subsequently received RT prior to 2018. We compared them to a randomly selected group of women who underwent similar mesh-augmented pelvic reconstructive surgery without RT in a 1:4 ratio. Mesh complications were identified through chart review corroborated with the ninth and tenth revisions of the International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes for mesh complications. Mesh complications between groups were compared using survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

We identified 36 women with RT and compared them with 144 women without RT. Indications for mesh implantation and concomitant vaginal procedures were similar between the groups. The majority of mesh implants (94.4%) were midurethral slings. Twelve mesh complications (6.7%) were identified, with similar rates in the RT (8.3%) and no-RT (6.2%) groups (P = 0.65). The risk of mesh complications did not differ between groups when compared using the Cox proportional hazards model, controlling for age, body mass index, diabetes, menopausal status, and smoking (hazard ratio, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, 0.802-1.787).

CONCLUSIONS

There was no difference in the occurrence of mesh-related complications between women with and without RT. Abdominopelvic RT may not substantially increase the risk of mesh complications following placement of a synthetic sling for stress urinary incontinence. The need for future RT may only be a minor factor in counseling patients on the risks of mesh implants for pelvic floor disorders.

Concomitant Repair of Pelvic Floor Disorders in Women Undergoing Surgery for Gynecologic Malignancies

OBJECTIVE

The aims of this study were to determine the rate and describe 30-day postoperative complications of concomitant pelvic organ prolapse and/or urinary incontinence (POPUI) procedures in women undergoing surgery for a gynecologic malignancy.

METHODS

Women who underwent surgical intervention for a gynecologic malignancy between 2010 and 2014 were identified using postoperative International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision codes 179.0 to 184.9 in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women who underwent POPUI procedures were identified using Current Procedural Terminology codes between 51840 and 58294. Infectious, pulmonary, cardiac, and venous thromboembolism complication rates were calculated. Patient demographics and postoperative complication rates were analyzed using Student t, χ, and Fisher exact tests and compared between women with a gynecologic malignancy who did and did not undergo concomitant POPUI procedures.

RESULTS

We identified 23,501 women with a diagnosis of a gynecologic malignancy. The most common included uterine (63%), ovarian (25%), and cervical cancer (8%). Only a small proportion of the women undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery (n = 556 [2.4%]) had concomitant POPUI procedures. The most commonly performed POPUI procedures included anterior and/or posterior colporrhaphy (n = 205 [32%]), laparoscopic colpopexy (n = 181 [28.2%]), and midurethral sling (n = 70 [10.9%]). There were no differences in 30-day reoperation; infectious, pulmonary, and cardiac complications; or venous thromboembolic events between women who did and did not have concomitant POPUI surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a large national surgical database, only 2.4% of women undergoing gynecologic cancer surgery had a concomitant POPUI procedure. Our data suggest that postoperative complications may not increase when concomitant surgery for POPUI is done at the time of gynecologic cancer surgery.