Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis

Duration of Induction of Labor for Second-Trimester Medication Abortion and Adverse Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the relationship between duration of labor during second-trimester medication abortion and adverse outcomes.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study including all individuals with a singleton gestation undergoing second-trimester medication abortion without evidence of advanced cervical dilation, rupture of membranes, or preterm labor at four centers. The primary exposure was duration of labor (ie, hours spent from receiving misoprostol to fetal expulsion). The primary outcome was composite morbidity , defined as uterine rupture, need for blood transfusion, clinical chorioamnionitis, intensive care unit admission, or need for readmission. We performed bivariate and multivariate negative binomial analyses. A post hoc subgroup analysis was performed to assess for the risk of the primary outcome by gestational age. We performed tests of homogeneity based on history of uterine scarring and parity.

RESULTS

Six hundred eighty-one individuals were included. The median duration of labor was 11 hours (interquartile range 8-17 hours). One hundred thirty-one (19.2%) experienced the primary outcome. When duration of labor was evaluated continuously, a longer duration of labor was associated with an increased frequency of morbidity (adjusted β=0.68, 95% CI, 0.32-1.04). When duration of labor was evaluated categorically, those experiencing the highest quartile of duration (ie, 17 hours or more) had a statistically higher risk for experiencing morbidity compared with individuals in all other quartiles (adjusted relative risk 1.99, 95% CI, 1.34-2.96). When we focused on components of the composite outcome, clinical chorioamnionitis was significantly different between those experiencing a longer duration and those experiencing a shorter duration of labor (26.2% vs 10.6%, P <.001). On subgroup analysis, gestational age was not associated with the risk of composite morbidity. Tests of homogeneity demonstrated no significant difference in the risk for morbidity among individuals with a history of uterine scarring or based on parity.

CONCLUSION

Duration of labor was independently associated with risks for adverse maternal outcomes during second-trimester medication abortion, specifically clinical chorioamnionitis.

Obesity at term: What to consider? How to deliver?

Obesity presents significant challenges during pregnancy, increasing the risk of complications and adverse outcomes for both mother and baby. With the rising prevalence of obesity among pregnant women, questions arise regarding optimal management, including timing of delivery and choice of delivery mode. Labour induction in obese women may require a combination of mechanical and pharmacological methods due to increased risk of failed induction. Caesarean section in obese women presents unique challenges, requiring comprehensive perioperative planning and specialized care to optimize outcomes. However, specific guidelines tailored to obese patients undergoing caesarean sections are lacking. Postpartum care should include vigilant monitoring for complications. Addressing obesity in pregnancy necessitates a multidisciplinary approach and specialized care to ensure the best outcomes.

Single-balloon catheter with concomitant vaginal misoprostol is the most effective strategy for labor induction: a meta-review with network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Several systematic reviews and meta-analyses have been conducted to summarize the evidence for the efficacy of various labor induction agents. However, the most effective agents or strategies have not been conclusively determined. We aimed to perform a meta-review and network meta-analysis of published systematic reviews to determine the efficacy and safety of currently employed pharmacologic, mechanical, and combined methods of labor induction.

DATA SOURCES

With the assistance of an experienced medical librarian, we performed a systematic search of the literature using PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Control Trials. We systematically searched electronic databases from inception to May 31, 2021.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We considered systematic reviews and meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials comparing different agents or methods for inpatient labor induction.

METHODS

We conducted a frequentist random-effects network meta-analysis employing data from randomized controlled trials of published systematic reviews. We performed direct pairwise meta-analyses to compare the efficacy of the various labor induction agents and placebo or no treatment. We performed ranking to determine the best treatment using the surface under the cumulative ranking curve. The main outcomes assessed were cesarean delivery, vaginal delivery within 24 hours, operative vaginal delivery, hyperstimulation, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, and Apgar scores of <7 at 5 minutes of birth.

RESULTS

We included 11 systematic reviews and extracted data from 207 randomized controlled trials with a total of 40,854 participants. When assessing the efficacy of all agents and methods, the combination of a single-balloon catheter with misoprostol was the most effective in reducing the odds of cesarean delivery and vaginal birth >24 hours (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9 for each). Among the pharmacologic agents, low-dose vaginal misoprostol was the most effective in reducing the odds of cesarean delivery, whereas high-dose vaginal misoprostol was the most effective in achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9 for each). Single-balloon catheter (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.8) and double-balloon catheter (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9) were the most effective in reducing the odds of operative vaginal delivery and hyperstimulation. Buccal or sublingual misoprostol (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9) and the combination of single-balloon catheter and misoprostol (surface under the cumulative ranking curve of 0.9) most effectively reduced the odds of abnormal Apgar scores and neonatal intensive care unit admissions.

CONCLUSION

The combination of a single-balloon catheter with misoprostol was the most effective method in reducing the odds for cesarean delivery and prolonged time to vaginal delivery. This method was associated with a reduction in admissions to the neonatal intensive care unit.

Methods for the induction of labor: efficacy and safety

This review assessed the efficacy and safety of pharmacologic agents (prostaglandins, oxytocin, mifepristone, hyaluronidase, and nitric oxide donors) and mechanical methods (single- and double-balloon catheters, laminaria, membrane stripping, and amniotomy) and those generally considered under the rubric of complementary medicine (castor oil, nipple stimulation, sexual intercourse, herbal medicine, and acupuncture). A substantial body of published reports, including 2 large network meta-analyses, support the safety and efficacy of misoprostol (PGE1) when used for cervical ripening and labor induction. Misoprostol administered vaginally at doses of 50 μg has the highest probability of achieving vaginal delivery within 24 hours. Regardless of dosing, route, and schedule of administration, when used for cervical ripening and labor induction, prostaglandin E2 seems to have similar efficacy in decreasing cesarean delivery rates. Globally, although oxytocin represents the most widely used pharmacologic agent for labor induction, its effectiveness is highly dependent on parity and cervical status. Oxytocin is more effective than expectant management in inducing labor, and the efficacy of oxytocin is enhanced when combined with amniotomy. However, prostaglandins administered vaginally or intracervically are more effective in inducing labor than oxytocin. A single 200-mg oral tablet of mifepristone seems to represent the lowest effective dose for cervical ripening. The bulk of the literature assessing relaxin suggests this agent has limited benefit when used for this indication. Although intracervical injection of hyaluronidase may cause cervical ripening, the need for intracervical administration has limited the use of this agent. Concerning the vaginal administration of nitric oxide donors, including isosorbide mononitrate, isosorbide, nitroglycerin, and sodium nitroprusside, the higher incidence of side effects with these agents has limited their use. A synthetic hygroscopic cervical dilator has been found to be effective for preinduction cervical ripening. Although a pharmacologic agent may be administered after the use of the synthetic hygroscopic dilator, in an attempt to reduce the interval to vaginal delivery, concomitant use of mechanical and pharmacologic methods is being explored. Combining the use of a single-balloon catheter with dinoprostone, misoprostol, or oxytocin enhances the efficacy of these pharmacologic agents in cervical ripening and labor induction. The efficacy of single- and double-balloon catheters in cervical ripening and labor induction seems similar. To date, the combination of misoprostol with an intracervical catheter seems to be the best approach when balancing delivery times with safety. Although complementary methods are occasionally used by patients, given the lack of data documenting their efficacy and safety, these methods are rarely used in hospital settings.

The use of adjunctive mechanical dilation at the time of induction termination and adverse health outcomes: a systematic review

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to assess if the use of mechanical dilation at the time of induction termination is associated with changes in the time from initiation of labor to expulsion of the fetus (induction-to-expulsion interval) and with the frequency of health complications when compared with medication management alone.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, CINAHAL, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried from January 2000 to May 2023.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

We included randomized controlled trials of individuals who were assigned to undergo mechanical dilation (ie, laminaria, Dilapan-S, and intracervical Foley balloon catheter) in combination with the use of medication and compared it with the outcomes of medication use (eg, prostaglandins, antiprogestins, oxytocin) alone.

METHODS

The primary outcome was the induction-to-expulsion interval. The secondary outcomes were the incidence of clinical chorioamnionitis, sepsis, hemorrhage, the need for blood transfusion and uterotonics, cervical laceration, the need for adjunctive procedures (eg, dilation and curettage), failed induction termination, uterine rupture, intensive care unit admission, or death. Assessment of bias was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. A subgroup analysis was performed among studies deemed to be at low risk of bias.

RESULTS

Of 864 abstracts identified, 11 met the inclusion criteria. Five studies demonstrated a shorter induction-to-expulsion interval among those randomized to mechanical dilation, whereas 6 studies demonstrated a similar or longer induction-to-expulsion interval. There were no significant differences reported in the frequency of any adverse outcomes between the trial arms. In addition, most studies (8/11) exhibited moderate to high levels of bias. In an analysis of the 3 studies deemed to have a low risk of bias, 1 (n=60) demonstrated a longer induction-to-expulsion interval with adjunctive laminaria, 1 (n=60) demonstrated a shorter induction-to-expulsion interval with adjunctive intracervical Foley balloon catheter use, and 1 demonstrated no difference in the induction-to-expulsion interval with adjunctive Dilapan-S use (n=180).

CONCLUSION

Only a small number of studies, most of which were of low quality, assessed mechanical dilation for induction termination. The results of these studies were inconsistent in terms of the induction-to-expulsion interval of adjunctive mechanical methods in comparison with medication management alone. Studies did not reveal significant differences between the groups in adverse outcomes. Further research should investigate the use of mechanical dilation at the time of induction termination using high-quality methods.

Misoprostol with balloon vs oxytocin with balloon in high-risk pregnancy induction: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Pregnancies at high risk for maternal, fetal, or placental complications often necessitate induction of labor in the late preterm or early term period for delivery. Limited data exist on the safest method of induction to use in this specific patient population.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the combination of oxytocin plus a Cook balloon vs misoprostol plus a Cook balloon for induction of labor in high-risk pregnancies.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted an open-label, randomized controlled trial at a single institution from July 2020 to May 2022. The study was approved by the institutional review board and registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04492072). Individuals with a high-risk pregnancy, at least ≥22 weeks' gestation, with a singleton in cephalic presentation, Bishop score ≤6, and intact membranes were offered enrollment. A high-risk pregnancy was defined as a pregnancy with any of the following complications: hypertensive disease of pregnancy, fetal growth restriction, oligohydramnios, suspected placental abruption requiring delivery, uncontrolled pregestational diabetes, or abnormal biophysical profile or nonstress test requiring delivery. The primary outcome was the rate of cesarean delivery. Secondary maternal outcomes included induction to delivery interval, number of vaginal deliveries within 24 hours, rates of uterine tachysystole, intraamniotic infection, operative vaginal delivery, and postpartum hemorrhage. Secondary fetal outcomes included fetal heart rate abnormalities, stillbirth, Apgar scores <7 at 5 minutes, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit, arterial umbilical blood pH <7.1, sepsis, and neonatal death. A subgroup analysis was planned for the primary outcome to assess the different indications for cesarean delivery. An intent-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

During the 22 months of the trial, a total of 150 patients were randomized, and 73 (49%) of those were induced with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and 77 (51%) were induced with misoprostol and a Cook balloon. There was no significant difference in the overall rate of cesarean delivery between the study groups, (21.9% vs 31.1%; relative risk, 0.70; 95% confidence interval, 0.41-1.21), nor among those for which the cesarean delivery was performed for a specific indication. There were no differences in the secondary maternal and fetal or neonatal adverse outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In high-risk pregnancies, the rate of cesarean delivery and adverse maternal and fetal outcomes were similar for induction of labor with oxytocin and a Cook balloon and for induction with misoprostol and a Cook balloon.

Foley catheter plus misoprostol versus misoprostol alone for labor induction

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyze the effects of Foley catheter combined with misoprostol in the labor induction process.

METHODS

This is a nonblinded, block randomized, controlled trial that compared the association between transcervical Foley catheter/vaginal misoprostol 25 μg combination and vaginal misoprostol 25 μg alone in normal-risk and healthy pregnant women undergoing labor induction in the south of Brazil.

RESULTS

A total of 230 patients with indications for labor induction were evaluated and classified into the "combined" group (Foley catheter plus misoprostol), consisting of 107 patients, and the "misoprostol" group (misoprostol only), consisting of 123 patients. The "combined" group was observed to have a shorter labor induction time (p=0.008). In addition, there was a lower need for misoprostol use for overall cervical ripening (p<0.001) and a lower relative risk of needing a second, third, or fourth misoprostol tablet in the "combined" group (risk ratio [RR] 0.80, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.71-0.91; RR 0.41; 95%CI 0.31-0.56; and RR 0.29, 95%CI 0.17-0.52, respectively) (p<0.001). No statistically significant difference was found in induction failure rate, cesarean section rate, or perinatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A combination of methods leads to shorter labor induction, lower need for misoprostol doses, and lower risk of cesarean section, with no increase in the rate of perinatal complications. REBEC number is RBR-7xcjz3z.

GRADE Use in Evidence Syntheses Published in High-Impact-Factor Gynecology and Obstetrics Journals: A Methodological Survey

Objective: To identify and describe the certainty of evidence of gynecology and obstetrics systematic reviews (SRs) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Method: Database searches of SRs using GRADE, published between 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020, in the 10 "gynecology and obstetrics" journals with the highest impact factor, according to the Journal Citation Report 2019. Selected studies included those SRs using the GRADE approach, used to determine the certainty of evidence. Results: Out of 952 SRs, ninety-six SRs of randomized control trials (RCTs) and/or nonrandomized studies (NRSs) used GRADE. Sixty-seven SRs (7.04%) rated the certainty of evidence for specific outcomes. In total, we identified 946 certainty of evidence outcome ratings (n = 614 RCT ratings), ranging from very-low (42.28%) to low (28.44%), moderate (17.65%), and high (11.63%). High and very low certainty of evidence ratings accounted for 2.16% and 71.60% in the SRs of NRSs, respectively, compared with 16.78% and 26.55% in the SRs of RCTs. In the SRs of RCTs and NRSs, certainty of evidence was mainly downgraded due to imprecision and bias risks. Conclusions: More attention needs to be paid to strengthening GRADE acceptance and building knowledge of GRADE methods in gynecology and obstetrics evidence synthesis.

Guideline No. 432b: Cervical Ripening

OBJECTIVE

This guideline presents evidence and recommendations for cervical ripening and induction of labour. It aims to provide information to birth attendants and pregnant individuals on optimal perinatal care while avoiding unnecessary obstetrical intervention.

TARGET POPULATION

All pregnant patients.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Consistent interprofessional use of the guideline, appropriate equipment, and trained professional staff enhance safe intrapartum care. Pregnant individuals and their support person(s) should be informed of the benefits and risks of induction of labour.

EVIDENCE

Literature published to March 2022 was reviewed. PubMed, CINAHL, and the Cochrane Library were used to search for systematic reviews, randomized controlled trials, and observational studies on cervical ripening and induction of labour. Grey (unpublished) literature was identified by searching the websites of health technology assessment and health technology related agencies, clinical practice guideline collections, clinical trial registries, and national and international medical specialty societies.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

All providers of obstetrical care.

RECOMMANDATIONS

Directive clinique no 432b : Maturation cervicale

OBJECTIF

Présenter des données probantes et des recommandations sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. Fournir de l'information aux professionnels accoucheurs et aux personnes enceintes sur les soins périnataux optimaux et la prévention des interventions obstétricales inutiles.

POPULATION CIBLE

Toutes les patientes enceintes. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: La mise en application interprofessionnelle et cohérente de la présente directive, l'équipement adéquat et le personnel compétent améliorent la sécurité des soins per partum. Les personnes enceintes et leurs personnes de soutien doivent être informées des risques et bénéfices du déclenchement artificiel du travail. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée jusqu'en mars 2022 a été passée en revue. Une recherche a été effectuée dans les bases de données PubMed, CINAHL et Cochrane Library pour répertorier des revues systématiques, des essais cliniques randomisés et des études observationnelles sur la maturation cervicale et le déclenchement artificiel du travail. La littérature grise (non publiée) a été obtenue à l'aide de recherches menées dans des sites Web d'organismes s'intéressant à l'évaluation des technologies dans le domaine de la santé et d'organismes connexes, dans des collections de directives cliniques, des registres d'essais cliniques et des sites Web de sociétés de spécialité médicale nationales et internationales. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Tous les fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux.

RECOMMANDATIONS

Balloon catheters versus vaginal prostaglandins for labour induction (CPI Collaborative): an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Induction of labour is one of the most common obstetric interventions globally. Balloon catheters and vaginal prostaglandins are widely used to ripen the cervix in labour induction. We aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety profiles of these two induction methods.

METHODS

We did an individual participant data meta-analysis comparing balloon catheters and vaginal prostaglandins for cervical ripening before labour induction. We systematically identified published and unpublished randomised controlled trials that completed data collection between March 19, 2019, and May 1, 2021, by searching the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and PubMed. Further trials done before March 19, 2019, were identified through a recent Cochrane review. Data relating to the combined use of the two methods were not included, only data from women with a viable, singleton pregnancy were analysed, and no exclusion was made based on parity or membrane status. We contacted authors of individuals trials and participant-level data were harmonised and recoded according to predefined definitions of variables. Risk of bias was assessed with the ROB2 tool. The primary outcomes were caesarean delivery, indication for caesarean delivery, a composite adverse perinatal outcome, and a composite adverse maternal outcome. We followed the intention-to-treat principle for the main analysis. The primary meta-analysis used two-stage random-effects models and the sensitivity analysis used one-stage mixed models. All models were adjusted for maternal age and parity. This meta-analysis is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020179924).

FINDINGS

Individual participant data were available from 12 studies with a total of 5460 participants. Balloon catheters, compared with vaginal prostaglandins, did not lead to a significantly different rate of caesarean delivery (12 trials, 5414 women; crude incidence 27·0%; adjusted OR [aOR] 1·09, 95% CI 0·95-1·24; I²=0%), caesarean delivery for failure to progress (11 trials, 4601 women; aOR 1·20, 95% CI 0·91-1·58; I²=39%), or caesarean delivery for fetal distress (10 trials, 4441 women; aOR 0·86, 95% CI 0·71-1·04; I²=0%). The composite adverse perinatal outcome was lower in women who were allocated to balloon catheters than in those allocated to vaginal prostaglandins (ten trials, 4452 neonates, crude incidence 13·6%; aOR 0·80, 95% CI 0·70-0·92; I²=0%). There was no significant difference in the composite adverse maternal outcome (ten trials, 4326 women, crude incidence 22·7%; aOR 1·02, 95% CI 0·89-1·18; I²=0%).

INTERPRETATION

In induction of labour, balloon catheters and vaginal prostaglandins have comparable caesarean delivery rates and maternal safety profiles, but balloon catheters lead to fewer adverse perinatal events.

FUNDING

Australian National Health and Medical Research Council and Monash Health Emerging Researcher Fellowship.

Failed induction of labor and associated factors among women delivered in Jigjiga University Sheik Hassan Yabare Referral Hospital: a cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

This study was aimed to assess the magnitude of failed induction of labor and associated factors among mothers delivered in Eastern Ethiopia.

METHODS

An institutional-based cross-sectional study was carried out among 364 women who had induction of labor at Jigjiga University, Sheik Hassan Yabare Referral Hospital from 2018 to 2021. A checklist was used to collect the data from the women's chart. To isolate independent predictors related to failed induction of labor, multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.

RESULT

The magnitude of failed induction of labor was 36.8% (95% CI: 31.8, 42.0). Age (AOR = 3.2; CI: 1.78, 5.75), rural residency (AOR = 2.28; CI:1.29, 4.01), para (AOR = 2.76; CI: 1.55, 4.91), gestational age (AOR = 2.65; CI: 1.44, 4.89), multiple pregnancy (AOR = 2.36; CI: 1.01, 5.55), premature rapture of membrane (AOR = 4.88; CI: 2.33, 10.21), pregnancy-induced hypertension (AOR = 5.11; CI: 2.67, 9.79), and bishop score (AOR = 1.95; CI: 1.15, 3.32) were significantly associated with failed induction of labor.

CONCLUSION

The magnitude of failed induction of labor was relatively high in the study setting. Failed induction of labor was significantly associated with age, rural residency, primipara, gestational age, multiple pregnancy, premature rapture of membrane, PIH, and bishop score less than six. Prior to initiating the induction of labor, proper pelvis assessment and cervical ripening for bishop score might be considered. Beside to this, adherence to locally available induction protocols and guidelines might also be needed.

Outpatient Cervical Ripening with Balloon Catheters: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate whether outpatient cervical ripening with a balloon catheter results in a shorter amount of time in the labor and delivery unit when compared with use in the inpatient setting.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from their inception until December 2020. No restrictions for language or geographic location were applied.

METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION

Using a predefined protocol and search strategy, 1,152 titles were identified and screened. Randomized controlled trials that compared outpatient and inpatient cervical ripening with balloon catheters were included.

TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessments were performed by two reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed to produce mean difference for continuous data and risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous data, both with a 95% CI. The primary outcome was the amount of time from admission to the labor ward until delivery. Additional secondary maternal and neonatal outcomes were evaluated. Eight trials (740 patients) were included; six studies (571 patients) reported on our primary outcome. Compared with the inpatient group, outpatient balloon cervical ripening was associated with significantly less time in the labor and delivery unit (outpatient 16.3±9.7 hours vs inpatient 23.8±14.0 hours; mean difference -7.24 hours, 95% CI -11.03 to -3.34). There were no differences in total induction time or total hospital admission. The outpatient group was significantly less likely than the inpatient group to undergo cesarean delivery (21% vs 27%), RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.59-0.98). There were no differences in other maternal or neonatal outcomes. There were no deliveries outside of the hospital and no stillbirths.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient balloon cervical ripening in low-risk patients is associated with a decreased amount of time from admission to labor and delivery until delivery. Outpatient balloon cervical ripening is a safe alternative for low-risk patients and has the potential for significant benefits to patients, and labor and delivery units.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO, CRD42019140503.

Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone versus foley catheter labor induction in nulliparas: a randomized trial

PURPOSE

To evaluate Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert compared to foley catheter alone on induction to delivery interval and maternal satisfaction.

METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in a university hospital in Malaysia from December 2018 to May 2019. Term nulliparas with unfavorable cervix (Bishop score ≤ 5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone insert simultaneously or Foley catheter alone. Primary outcomes were induction to delivery interval (hours) and maternal satisfaction on birth experience (assessed by 11-point Visual Numerical Rating Scale VNRS 0-10, higher score more satisfied).

RESULTS

Induction to vaginal delivery intervals was mean ± standard deviation 22.5 ± 10.4 vs. 35.1 ± 14.9 h, P =  < 0.001 but maternal satisfaction on birth experience was not significantly different median[interquartile range] VNRS 8[7-9] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.12 for Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms, respectively. Cesarean delivery rates were 35/102(34.3%) vs. 50/101(49.5%), P = 0.02 RR 0.7 95% CI 0.5-0.9 NNTb 6.3 95% CI 3.5-39.4, pain score at 6 h after catheter insertion 5[2-8] vs. 1[1-3], P < 0.001, Bishop score at trial devices removal 9[9-10] vs. 8[7-9], P = 0.001, requirement for oxytocin induction or augmentation 39/102(38.2%) vs. 76/101(75.2%) NNTb 3 95% CI 2.0-4.1, P < 0.001 and amniotomy rates 73/99(73.7%) vs. 81/95(85.3%), P = 0.052 RR 0.9 85% CI 0.8-1.0 in Foley catheter-controlled-release dinoprostone and Foley catheter alone arms respectively.

CONCLUSION

In nulliparas with unripe cervixes at term, combined Foley catheter and controlled release dinoprostone vaginal insert compared to Foley catheter alone reduces the induction to vaginal delivery interval and cesarean delivery rate but satisfaction was not significantly increased.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN2282883, 03/12/2018, "prospectively registered" ( https://doi.org/10.1186/ISRCTN12282883 ).

Induction of labour in patients with prior caesarean births or uterine surgery

The current evidence favours trial of labour after one caesarean in the absence of any other contraindications, recognizing that risks with both trial of labour after caesarean (TOLAC) and elective repeat caesarean section (ERCS) birth are relatively uncommon. When the need for induction of labour (IOL) following a previous caesarean arises, shared decision-making should be based on the current available evidence. This approach, however, needs to be tailored, taking into account the individual's history, initial examination and response to the ongoing process of induction to optimize the maternal and foetal outcomes. This paper aims to review the evidence and provide guidance on decision making surrounding labour induction in a pregnancy following a prior caesarean or uterine surgery.

Towards an evidence-based approach to optimize the success of labour induction

Induction of labour is a two-step process involving cervical ripening and the initiation of uterine contractions, with the goal of achieving vaginal birth. To optimize the chance of a safe and timely vaginal birth, the process of induction of labour should be evidence based and individualized to the given person and situation. In this study, we lay out a framework for how this should be done, emphasizing on careful clinical assessment and planning, flexibility in the strategy of induction, patience during the ripening and latent phases of labour, and thoughtful consideration regarding changing the strategy if active labour is not initially achieved. The goal of this review is to present the current evidence on this topic in the form of a user-friendly protocol that can be easily adapted to institutional practice.

Outpatient vs inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas with unripe cervixes: A randomized trial

INTRODUCTION

Multiparous labor inductions are typically successful, and the process can be rapid, starting from a ripened cervix with a predictable response to amniotomy and oxytocin infusion. Outpatient Foley catheter labor induction in multiparas with unripe cervixes is a feasible option as the mechanical process of ripening is usually without significant uterine contractions and well tolerated. Labor contractions can be initiated by amniotomy and titrated oxytocin infusion in the hospital for well-timed births during working hours as night birth are associated with adverse events. We sought to evaluate outpatient compared with inpatient Foley catheter induction of labor in multiparas for births during working hours and maternal satisfaction.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A randomized trial was conducted in the University of Malaya Medical Center. A total of 163 term multiparas (no dropouts) with unripe cervixes (Bishop score ≤5) scheduled for labor induction were randomized to outpatient or inpatient Foley catheter. Primary outcomes were delivery during "working hours" 08:00-18:00 h and maternal satisfaction on allocated care (assessed by 11-point visual numerical rating score 0-10, with higher score indicating more satisfied).

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

ISRCTN13534944.

RESULTS

Comparing outpatient and inpatient arms, delivery during working hours were 54/82 (65.9%) vs. 48/81 (59.3%) (relative risk 1.1, 95% CI 0.9-1.4, p = 0.421) and median maternal satisfaction visual numerical rating score was 9 (interquartile range 9-9) vs. 9 (interquartile range 8-9, p = 0.134), repectively. Duration of hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shorter in the outpatient arm: 35.8 ± 20.2 vs. 45.2 ± 16.2 h (p = 0.001) and 4.1 ± 2.9 vs. 5.3 ± 3.6 h (p = 0.020), respectively. Other maternal and neonatal secondary outcomes were not significantly different.

CONCLUSIONS

The trial failed to demonstrate the anticipated increase in births during working hours with outpatient compared with inpatient induction of labor with Foley catheter in parous women with an unripe cervix. Hospital stay and membrane rupture to delivery interval were significantly shortened in the outpatient group. The rate of maternal satisfaction was high in both groups and no significant differences were found.

Intracervical Foley catheter with and without oxytocin for labor induction with Bishop score ≤3: a secondary analysis

BACKGROUND

The combination method for cervical ripening with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin administration has been shown to reduce the total time from induction to delivery when compared with a Foley catheter only in patients with an unfavorable cervix (Bishop score of <6). It is unclear if this is still effective for patients with a less favorable cervix as indicated by a Bishop score of ≤3.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if inducing labor with a Foley catheter and concurrent oxytocin administration reduced the total time from induction to delivery in subjects with a Bishop score of ≤3 compared with those who only received a Foley catheter without oxytocin for cervical ripening.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a secondary analysis of a randomized, multicenter trial of patients with a live singleton pregnancy at ≥24 weeks' gestation undergoing labor induction with a Foley catheter and a Bishop score of <6. This analysis included patients with a Bishop score of ≤3. Exclusions included >1 cesarean delivery, unexplained bleeding, nonreassuring fetal tracing, major fetal anomalies, or other contraindications for vaginal delivery. The subjects were randomized to receive an intracervical Foley catheter only or with concurrent oxytocin infusion. The primary outcome for this analysis was the time from induction to delivery. Secondary outcomes included delivery at ≤12 hours, time to delivery ≤24 hours, cesarean delivery, total time of oxytocin infusion, need for additional ripening agents, postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

RESULTS

A total of 322 patients were enrolled in the primary trial; 151 subjects had an initial Bishop score of ≤3 and were included in the secondary analysis (n=77 for Foley catheter with oxytocin and n=74 for the Foley catheter only). The demographics were similar in both groups. Those with a Bishop score of ≤3 who received a Foley catheter with concurrent oxytocin administration had a shorter time from induction to delivery than those patients who received a Foley catheter only for cervical ripening (21.3 vs 27 hours; P=.005). The group with a Foley catheter and oxytocin administered concurrently also had a shorter time from induction to delivery after adjusting for body mass index, parity status, and first Bishop score (21.5 vs 26.7 hours; P=.007). They also were more likely to deliver within 24 hours (74% vs 46%; P=.001) and not to require additional ripening agents (4% vs 15%; P=.04). Patients with the Foley catheter only method were more likely to receive additional ripening agents, but had fewer hours of oxytocin infusion (19.1 vs 12.4 hours; P<.001). There was no difference in the rate of delivery at ≤12 hours, cesarean delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, chorioamnionitis, and neonatal intensive care unit admission.

CONCLUSION

Concurrent Foley catheter and oxytocin infusion significantly reduced the time from induction to delivery in patients with a Bishop score of ≤3 when compared with a Foley catheter only, particularly in multiparous patients.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, March 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of men's experiences of pregnancy loss and commentaries on reviews focused on the effects of perineal massage on perineal trauma and air pollution and heat exposure on birth outcomes.

Misoprostol-augmented induction of labour for third trimester fetal demise in a patient with prior hysterotomies

A 31-year-old G3P2002 with history of two prior caesarean sections presented with influenza-like illness, requiring intubation secondary to acute respiratory distress syndrome. Investigations revealed intrauterine fetal demise at 30-week gestation.She soon deteriorated with sepsis and multiple organs impacted. Risks of the gravid uterus impairing cardiopulmonary function appeared greater than risks of delivery, including that of uterine rupture. Vaginal birth after caesarean was achieved with misoprostol and critical care status rapidly improved.Current guidelines for management of fetal demise in patients with prior hysterotomies are mixed: although the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists recommends standard obstetric protocols rather than misoprostol administration for labour augmentation, there is limited published data citing severe maternal morbidity associated with misoprostol use. This case report argues misoprostol-augmented induction of labour can be a reasonable option in a medically complex patient with fetal demise and prior hysterotomies.

Obstetric protocols in the setting of a pandemic

The purpose of this article is to review key areas that should be considered and modified in our obstetric protocols, specifically: 1) Patient triage, 2) Labor and delivery unit policies, 3) Special considerations for personal protective equipment (PPE) needs in obstetrics, 4) Intrapartum management, and 5) Postpartum care.

Is Unfavourable Cervix prior to Labor Induction Risk for Adverse Obstetrical Outcome in Time of Universal Ripening Agents Usage? Single Center Retrospective Observational Study

Cervical assessment on the Bishop scale prior to induction of labor (IOL) is one of the strongest prognostic criteria in relation to the success of the procedure. The commonly used preinduction methods are mainly aimed at reducing the percentage of cesarean sections. Our study has analyzed obstetric results of patients who had unripe cervix (Bishop score <7) before IOL and used preinduction (Foley catheter or misoprostol vaginal insert releasing 7 mcg of misoprostol per hour for 24 hours) with obstetric results of patients in whom, due to favourable cervix, only a low-dose infusion of oxytocin was used. We reviewed the medical records of 1010 single pregnancies in whom IOL was performed. We divided the patients into two groups: group A (where preinduction was used) and group B (Bishop score ≥7 points) where preinduction was not used. Patients in group A were more likely to complete the delivery by caesarean section (OR = 4.58, 95% CI 3.22-6.51), and more likely to have events that were indications for operative delivery: unreassuring fetal heart rate trace (OR = 3.29, 95% CI 2.07-5.23) and arrested labor or failed induction (OR = 3.4, 95% CI 2.06-5.62). The groups did not differ in the percentage of vacuum extraction, postpartum haemorrhage, and meconium stained amniotic fluid. In group B, more infants were born with umbilical cord blood pH <7.1 (1.38% vs. 0%), both groups included no deliveries of newborns with Apgar score ≤3 points, the groups did not differ in terms of the percentage of newborns with Apgar score between 4 and 7 at birth (OR = 0.66, 95% CI 0.29-1.49). The immature cervix and the need to use labor preinduction is a risk factor for caesarean section. The necessity of preinduction does not impair neonatological results.