Buccal vs vaginal misoprostol combined with Foley catheter for cervical ripening at term (the BEGIN trial): a randomized controlled trial

Buccal versus Vaginal Misoprostol Combined with a Foley Catheter among Individuals with Obesity Undergoing Induction

OBJECTIVE

 Combining pharmacologic agents with mechanical ripening achieves the shortest labor duration, yet there is no clear evidence on route of drug administration in obese individuals. The use of buccal misoprostol has shown greater patient acceptance but remains understudied. Our objective was to evaluate the difference in time to delivery of buccal compared with vaginal misoprostol in combination with a Foley catheter (FC) for induction of labor (IOL) in the obese population.

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial comparing identical dosages (25 μg) of buccal and vaginal misoprostol in combination with a FC. The parent trial was an institutional review board-approved, randomized clinical trial conducted from June 2019 through January 2020. Labor management was standardized among participants. Women undergoing IOL at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and cervical dilation ≤2 cm were included. Body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) was stratified. The primary outcome was time to delivery.

RESULTS

 A total of 215 participants were included. Demographic characteristics were similar between the three groups. Vaginal drug administration achieved a faster median time to delivery than the buccal route among patients with a body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 (vaginal misoprostol-FC: 21.3 hours vs. buccal misoprostol-FC: 25.2 hours, p = 0.006). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups. Furthermore, patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2 receiving vaginal misoprostol delivered 1.2 times faster than women who received buccal misoprostol after censoring for cesarean delivery and adjusting for parity (hazard ratio: 1.2, 95% confidence interval: 1.1-1.7). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

 We found that vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal misoprostol when combined with a FC among individuals with a BMI greater than or equal to 30 kg/m2. Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of drug administration for term IOL in this population.

KEY POINTS

· Vaginal misoprostol was superior to buccal route among patients with obesity.. · There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the two groups.. · Vaginal misoprostol should be the preferred route of administration among patients with obesity..

Implementation and Clinical Impact of a Guideline for Standardized, Evidence-Based Induction of Labor

OBJECTIVE

 This study aimed to assess the impact of implementation of an induction of labor (IOL) guideline on IOL length and utilization of evidence-based practices.

STUDY DESIGN

 We conducted a quality improvement project to increase utilization of three evidence-based IOL practices: combined agent ripening, vaginal misoprostol, and early amniotomy. Singletons with intact membranes and cervical dilation ≤2 cm admitted for IOL were included. Primary outcome was IOL length. Secondary outcomes included cesarean delivery and practice utilization. We compared preimplementation (PRE; November 1, 2021 through January 31, 2022) to postimplementation (POST; March 1, 2022 through April 30, 2022) with sensitivity analyses by self-reported race and ethnicity. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression were used to test the association between period and outcomes.

RESULTS

 Among 495 birthing people (PRE, n = 293; POST, n = 202), IOL length was shorter POST (22.0 vs. 18.3 h, p = 0.003), with faster time to delivery (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.38, 95% CI 1.15-1.66), more birthing people delivered within 24 hours (57 vs. 68.8%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.90 [95% CI 1.25-2.89]), and no difference in cesarean. Utilization of combined agent ripening (31.1 vs. 42.6%, p = 0.009), vaginal misoprostol (34.5 vs. 68.3%, p < 0.001), and early amniotomy (19.1 vs. 31.7%, p = 0.001) increased POST.

CONCLUSION

 Implementation of an evidence-based IOL guideline is associated with shorter induction time. Additional implementation efforts to increase adoption of practices are needed to optimize outcomes after IOL.

KEY POINTS

· Implementation of an IOL guideline is associated with faster time to delivery.. · Evidence-based induction practices were used more often after guideline implementation.. · Adoption of evidence-based induction practices is variable even with a guideline..

Prognostic factors for successful induction of labor in intrauterine growth restriction after 36 weeks of gestation

OBJECTIVE

In comparison to eutrophic fetuses, intra uterine growth restriction fetuses (IUGR) have a higher risk of perinatal morbi-mortality. There are no guidelines on the labor induction of labor (IOL) method to be performed in IUGR. The main objective was to determine fetal and maternal predictive factors of successful induction in IUGR fetuses from 36 weeks. Study design We conducted a retrospective cohort single-center study including 320 women with a cephalic fetal presentation. Labour was induced after 36 weeks for suspected IUGR between January 2013 and December 2019.

RESULTS

Among the 320 patients, 246 were delivered vaginally (76.9 %) and 74 had a cesarean (23.1 %). Prognostic factors for successful IUGR induction were nonscarring uterus (OR 8.41; 95 %CI [2.92-24.21]), absence of preeclampsia (OR 7.14; 95 %CI [2.42-21.03]), multiparity (OR 4.32; 95 %CI [1.83-10.18]), normal fetal heart rate before IOL (OR 2.99; 95 %CI [1.24-7.22]) and BMI < 30 (OR 3.54; 95 %CI [1.62-7.72]). Doppler abnormalities, method and number of line of IOL, cervical evaluation were not significant in our study.

CONCLUSION

The prognostic factors for successful IUGR induction are essentially maternal. Thus, a low BMI, multiparity, nonscarring uterus, absence of preeclampsia, and a normal FHR are good prognostic factors in IUGR induction.

Early vs expectant artificial rupture of membranes following Foley catheter ripening: a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Early amniotomy shortens the duration of spontaneous labor, yet there is no clear evidence on the optimal timing of amniotomy following cervical ripening. There are limited high-quality studies on the use of early amniotomy intervention following labor induction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion reduces the duration of labor among individuals undergoing combined misoprostol and Foley catheter labor induction at term.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a randomized clinical trial conducted from November 2020 to May 2021 comparing amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion (early artificial rupture of membranes) with expectant management. Randomization was stratified by parity. Labor management was standardized among participants. Individuals undergoing induction at ≥37 weeks with a singleton gestation and needing cervical ripening were eligible. Our primary outcome was time to delivery. Wilcoxon rank sum, Pearson chi-square, and Cox survival analyses with intent-to-treat principles were performed adjusting for age, body mass index, parity, mode of delivery, Bishop score, and the interaction between randomization group and parity. A sample size of 160 was planned to detect a 4-hour reduction in delivery time.

RESULTS

A total of 160 patients (79 early artificial rupture of membranes, 81 expectant management) were randomized. Early artificial rupture of membranes achieved a faster median time to delivery than expectant management (early artificial rupture of membranes: 11.1 hours; interquartile range, 6.25-17.1 vs expectant management: 19.8 hours; interquartile range, 13.2-26.2; P<.001). A greater percentage of individuals in the early artificial rupture of membranes group delivered within 24 hours (86% vs 70%; P=.03). There was no difference in the cesarean delivery rate between the 2 groups (22% vs 31%; P=.25). Individuals delivered 2.3 times faster following early artificial rupture of membranes (hazard ratio, 2.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.5-3.4; P<.001). There were no significant differences in maternal and neonatal outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Amniotomy within 1 hour of Foley catheter expulsion resulted in 2.3 times faster delivery than expectant management. Therefore, early artificial rupture of membranes should be considered in individuals undergoing mechanical cervical ripening at term.

Application of Sol–Gels for Treatment of Gynaecological Conditions—Physiological Perspectives and Emerging Concepts in Intravaginal Drug Delivery

Approaches for effective and sustained drug delivery to the female reproductive tract (FRT) for treating a range of gynaecological conditions remain limited. The development of versatile delivery platforms, such as soluble gels (sol–gels) coupled with applicators/devices, holds considerable therapeutic potential for gynaecological conditions. Sol–gel systems, which undergo solution-to-gel transition, triggered by physiological conditions such as changes in temperature, pH, or ion composition, offer advantages of both solution- and gel-based drug formulations. Furthermore, they have potential to be used as a suitable drug delivery vehicle for other novel drug formulations, including micro- and nano-particulate systems, enabling the delivery of drug molecules of diverse physicochemical character. We provide an anatomical and physiological perspective of the significant challenges and opportunities in attaining optimal drug delivery to the upper and lower FRT. Discussion then focuses on attributes of sol–gels that can vastly improve the treatment of gynaecological conditions. The review concludes by showcasing recent advances in vaginal formulation design, and proposes novel formulation strategies enabling the infusion of a wide range of therapeutics into sol–gels, paving the way for patient-friendly treatment regimens for acute and chronic FRT-related conditions such as bacterial/viral infection control (e.g., STDs), contraception, hormone replacement therapy (HRT), infertility, and cancer.

Geburtseinleitung mittels Foley-Katheter: vaginales Misoprostol im Vorteil

Misoprostol kann im Rahmen der Geburtseinleitung auf verschiedene Weise appliziert werden: Bukkal, oral, sublingual, vaginal oder rektal. Die Kombination mit einer mechanischen Zervixreifung verkürzt die Zeit bis zur Wehentätigkeit. Unklar ist allerdings, welche Misoprostol-Applikationsart diesbezüglich optimalerweise gewählt werden sollte. Ein US-Forscherteam beschäftigte sich mit dieser Thematik.